| Reference: | 余致力（1998）。方案評估在政府預算決策過程中的角色與功能。財稅研究，30（3），23-30。
施能傑（2010）。建立行政機關團體績效評比機制之研究。臺北：考試院。
胡龍騰（2011a）。真實還是虛假？前進或是停滯？從績效資訊角度反思政府績效管理之理論與實務。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告（編號：NSC 98-2410-H-128-009-MY2）。台北市：國家科學委員會。
胡龍騰（2011b）。我國施政績效資訊運用實務與問題分析。研考雙月刊，35（3），10-22。
胡龍騰、張國偉（2010）。美國績效管理改革做法。研考雙月刊，34（3），24-36。
孫本初（2013）。新公共管理（五版）。臺北：新保成。
徐仁輝、蔡馨芳（2011）。結果導向的學習：績效管理與組織學習。行政：澳門公共行政雜誌，24（94），923-933。
國家發展委員會（2009）。機關施政績效評估，2014年6月24日，取自：http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0027444。
國家發展委員會（2012）。計畫評核，2014年6月24日，取自：http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0027438。
張四明、施能傑、胡龍騰（2013）。我國政府績效管理制度檢討與創新之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-RES-101-003）。台北市：研究發展考核委員會。
莊文忠（2008）。績效衡量與指標設計：方法論上的討論。公共行政學報，29，61-91。
郭昱瑩、謝雨豆（2012）。施政績效評估制度之前瞻與未來。研考雙月刊，36（3），29-42。
審計部（2013）。審計機關查核市縣政府施政績效評核作業執行情形，2014年6月24日，取自：http://www.audit.gov.tw/m/405-1000-540,c116.php。
Askim, J. ( 2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 453-472.
Askim, J. (2009). The demand side of performance measurement: Explaining councillors` utilization of performance information in policymaking. International Public Management Journal, 12(1), 24-47.
Bartos, S. (1995). Current developments in performance information. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 386-392.
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
Boyne, G., J. Gould-Williams, J. Law, & R. Walker (2002). Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of Best Value. Public Administration, 80(4), 691-710.
de Lancer Julnes, P. (2011). Performance measurement beyond instrumental use. In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (p. 64). Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
de Lancer Julnes, P., & M. Holzer (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61, 693-708.
Deloitte (2013). Market assessment of public sector information. Retrieved July 11, 2014, form https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-sector-information-market-assessment
Demaj, L., & L. Summermatter (2012). What should we know about politicians’ performance information need and use? International Public Management Review. 13(2), 85-111.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2001). Managing for results: Federal managers views on key management issues vary widely across agencies. Washington, DC: GAO-01-592.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2003). Results-oriented government: Using GPRA to address 21st century challenges. Washington, DC: GAO-03-1166T.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2004). Results-oriented government: GPRA has established a solid foundation for achieving greater results. Washington, DC: GAO-04-38.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2005). Managing for results: Enhancing agency use of performance for management decision making. Washington, DC: GAO-05-927.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2008). Government performance: Lessons learned for the next administration on using performance information to improve results. Washington, DC: GAO-08-1026T.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2009). Results-oriented management: Strengthening key practices at FEMA and interior could promote greater use of performance information. Washington, DC: GAO-09-676.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2013). Managing for results: Executive branch should more fully implement the GPRA Modernization Act to address pressing governance challenges. Washington, DC: GAO-13-518.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2014). Managing for results: Agencies` trends in the use of performance information to make decisions. Washington, DC: GAO-14-747.
Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle, & V. Stimac (2013). Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: Results from an international survey. Public Money and Management, 33(4), 261-268.
Hatry, H. P. (2002). Performance measurement: Fashion and fallacies. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(4), 352-258.
Hyndmana N. S., & R. Anderson (1998). Performance information, accountability and executive agencies. Public Money & Management, 18(3), 23-30.
James, O. (2011). Information effect on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399-418.
James, O., & P. John (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567-580.
Koppell, J. GS. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of“Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94-108.
Kroll, A. (2014). Why performance information use varies among public managers: Testing manager-related explanations. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 174-201.
Leviton, L. C., & E. F. X. Hughes (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5(4), 525-548.
Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203-216.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Moynihan, D. P., & P. W. Ingraham (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance-information use. Administration & Society, 36(4), 427-453.
Moynihan, D. P., & S. K. Pandey (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849-866.
Moynihan, D. P., & S. Lavertu (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592-602.
Newcomer, K. E. (2007) How does program performance assessment affect program management in the federal government? Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 332-350.
OECD. (2008). Sequencing and pacing of performance budgeting reforms. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/governance/budgeting/42188165.pdf
OECD. (2011). 7th meeting of the senior budget official network on performance and results. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/governance/budgeting/49198044.pdf
Peck L. R., & L. M. Gorzalski (2009). An evaluation use framework and empirical assessment. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(12), 139-156.
Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management Review, 2(2), 181-199.
Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy: The missing link? Evaluation, 12(1), 38-55.
Swiss, J. E. (2005). A framework for assessing incentives in results-based management. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 592-602.
Tabachnick, B. G., & L. S. Fidell (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Eds.). Boston: Pearson.
Taylor, J. (2011). Factors influencing the use of performance information for decision-making in Australian state agencies. Public Administration, 89(4), 1316-1334.
Ter Bogt, H. J. (2004). Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen`s use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 221-252.
Van de Walle, S., & W. Van Dooren (2010). How is information used to improve performance in the public sector? Exploring the Dynamics of Performance Information. In W. Kieran, H. Gill, & J. Pauline (Eds.), Connecting knowledge and performance in public services (pp. 33-54). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dooren, W. (2008). Nothing new under the sun? Change and continuity in twentieth century performance movements. In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector: How it is used (pp. 11-23). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
Van Dooren, W., & S. Van de Walle (2008).Performance information in the public sector: How it is used. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert, & J. Halligan (2010). The use of Performance Information. In W. Van Dooren, G. Bouckaert, & J. Halligan (Eds.), Performance management in the public sector (pp. 96-115). Oxon: Routledge.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have We Learned Anything New About the Use of Evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21-33. |
