English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719318      Online Users : 616
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/74857
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74857


    Title: 地理標示與商標的利益衝突與協調—評析現行商標法第30條第1項第8款相關司法實務發展
    Authors: 沈宗倫
    Shen, Chung-Lun
    Contributors: 法律系
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2015-04-27 16:05:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,「地理標示」的保護觀念逐漸成熟,雖然該標示後享有的既存價值,不若商標明確,但由於地理標示得以連結特定「地理區域」與該區域的自然或人文屬性所產出的商品或服務,在相當程度內,似形成另一既存價值。不可否認的,「地理標示」的既存價值富含商業、社會與文化的概念。我國商標法第三十條第一項第八款似為解決「地理標示」與「商標」間權利衝突的法源,向來亦伴隨有豐富的相關司法實務。為確保「地理標示」與「商標」於商標法正確的利益衡量,令商標法第三十條第一項第八款的解釋適用,能具有正當化的基礎,並切合商標法的立法意旨,本文擬由國際公約、比較法與我國司法實務三方面,重新檢視與思考商標法第三十條第一項第八款關於「地理標示」的解釋適用,望能建立「地理標示」與「商標」間利益保護的均衡點,有益於未來司法實務對於相關議題的開展。
    The protection of geographical indication has been becoming mature gradually. Distinguished from trademark, the values of eographical indication are reflected in the link between a specific geographical area and the products or services with the characteristics contributed ssentially from such an area. Under some occasions, the value of trademarks seems inevitable to collide with that of geographical ndications. As a consequence, it is worth further clarifying whether the registration of trademark should be revoked, provided that the applicant of trademark has taken advantage of geographical indications to function as trademark content. If the answer is affirmative, hat extent of protection for geographical indication is required to justify the revocation of trademark registration? The eighth ubparagraph, the first paragraph of Article 30, current Taiwan Trademark Act is the authority to resolve the conflicting interests etween trademark and geographical indication. To start from the reviews from international treaties, this article would like to seek an ptimal interpretation of this provision to achieve the interest balance oftrademark and geographical indication.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 139, 65-109
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    65-109.pdf832KbAdobe PDF2946View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback