政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/73232
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113873/144892 (79%)
造访人次 : 51903070      在线人数 : 608
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/73232


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73232


    题名: 公司治理及企業社會責任關聯性之研究
    The Association between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility
    作者: 吳筱婷
    Wu, Hsiao Ting
    贡献者: 汪泱若
    Wang, Yang Jong
    吳筱婷
    Wu, Hsiao Ting
    关键词: 公司治理
    企業社會責任
    股權結構
    董監結構
    經營層風險
    corporate governance
    corporate social responsibility
    ownership structure
    board structure
    risk characteristic of management
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2015-02-03 10:17:04 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 過去文獻的結果顯示，公司治理與公司價值或績效間存在正向關聯性；企業社會責任與公司價值或績效間亦有關聯性。本文從多個面向去分類負面的企業社會責任事件，並以金融業與非金融業公司為樣本，探討股權結構、董監結構及經營層風險等公司治理特性對企業社會責任的影響。在控制公司財務特性變數下，實證結果顯示：(1)公司治理與企業社會責任依然存在關聯性；(2)公司治理與企業社會責任之關係，在不同的企業社會責任面向上有不同之關聯性；(3)公司治理與企業社會責任之關係，在不同產業間存在不同之關聯性。
    The previous studies show that there is a positive association between corporate govemence and companys’value or performance. Some studies also show that there is an association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and companys’value or performance. This study investigates the effect of corporate governance attributes, including ownership structure, board structure and risk characteristics of management, on assessmet of corporates’CSR measured in terms of several kinds of negative CSR events as a proxy for negative CSR score. The samples are divided into the financial industry and non-financial industry. After controlling for firm-specific factors, we find that: (1) There is a association between corporate governance and CSR; (2) the relationship between corporate governance and CSR differs from several kinds of negative CSR events; (3) the relationship between corporate governance and CSR differs from different industries.
    參考文獻: 一、參考網頁：
    2011天下企業公民評選辦法，網址：http://issue.cw.com.tw/issue/2011csr/analysis.jsp。
    OECD.2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. 網址：http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/31557724.pdf。
    TVBS網路新聞，2011.07.30，六輕3天2火 台塑總經理、董座請辭，網址：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110730/8/2vzwj.html。
    Yam蕃薯藤網路新聞，2011.05.30，趙曉慧，南亞台塑停工 日損3440萬(財經焦點)，網址：http://n.yam.com/cnabc/fn/201105/20110530519877.html。
    中時電子報，2011.06.21，王莫昀，六輕大火 停工衝擊 台塑營收至少減1500億，網址：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110621/4/2to24.html。
    中時電子報，2011.09.07，張朝欣、周麗蘭、王莫昀、陳宥臻，六輕1年8燒 檢修漏油也起火(社會新聞)，網址：http://news.chinatimes.com/society/11050301/112011090700174.html。
    中國時報，2010.06.12，曾昭明，一個被冷落的世界議題，網址：http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/22274。
    中廣新聞網，2011.07.30，劉怡伶，六輕暗夜再火 業者：槽體破裂氣體外洩著火，網址：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110730/1/2vzjf.html。
    今日新聞網財經新聞，2011.08.04，曹逸雯，台塑要求2500名外勞？ 施顏祥：還是以本國勞工優先，網址：http://www.nownews.com/2011/08/04/320-2732834.htm#ixzz1U9BbLuA1。
    台灣企業社會責任協會，網址：http://www.csrtaiwan.org/index.php。
    台灣新生報，2011.05.31，台塑、南亞廠 明起停工，網址：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110531/128/2sgeh.html。
    台灣經濟新報公司治理資料庫說明網頁，網址：http://www.tej.com.tw/twsite/Default.aspx?TabId=169。
    自由時報電子報，2011.05.13，陳燦坤、黃淑莉、林國賢、高嘉和，六輕氣爆冒火 居民驚：以為末日真來臨(生活新聞)，網址：http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/13/today-life7.htm。
    自由時報電子報，2011.05.19，廖淑玲、黃淑莉、高嘉和、林毅璋，六輕火再燒 雲縣促全面停工安檢(財經焦點)，網址：http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/19/today-e1.htm。
    自由時報電子報，2011.05.19，廖千瑩，王如玄﹕台塑工安管理有問題(財經焦點)，網址：http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/19/today-e2.htm。
    82
    社團法人中華公司治理協會說明網頁，網址：http://www.cga.org.tw/main/f_1_01_company_govern.aspx。
    社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會http://www.bcsd.org.tw。
    華視影音新聞，2011.07.26，李若慈、廖學賢，雲林六輕又燒！ 氫氣外洩冒大火，網址：http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/general/201107/201107260786901.html。
    經濟日報，2003.01.12，李禮仲，告別「小蝦米對抗大鯨魚」─迎接「公司治理」時代來臨(17版)，網址：http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/FM/092/FM-C-092-009.htm。
    經濟日報，2010.07.26，邱展光、王瑞堂，六輕爆炸 損失恐達百億元(A2版)。
    經濟部台灣企業社會責任網站，網址：http://csr.moea.gov.tw/main.aspx。
    遠見雜誌2012企業社會責任獎徵選辦法，網址：http://www.gvm.com.tw/CSR2012/select.html。
    聯合晚報，2010.10.03，陳雲上，再重創形象 南亞大火 台塑集團總動員(A2版)。
    聯合新聞網，2011.08.10，仁武廠停電 台塑恐一天虧1億(財經焦點)，網址：http://udn.com/NEWS/FINANCE/FIN1/6517082.shtml#ixzz1Uaj2oTHR。
    臺灣證券交易所，網址：http://www.twse.com.tw。
    謝清麟教授研究團隊，有母數分析方法 vs. 無母數分析方法，基礎統計名詞介紹網頁，網址：http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~clhsieh/biostatistic/10/10-1.htm，最後更新2010年11月。
    證券櫃檯買賣中心，網址：http://www.otc.org.tw。
    蘋果日報電子要聞，2011.08.04，石明啟、吳詠平、陳建彰，實習生控宏達電 只給半薪 私放無薪假 不給資遣費「很惡劣」，網址：http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/33574860/IssueID/20110804。
    二、中文文獻：
    王光華與李勁興，2011，公司治理機制與價值創造之關聯性─論企業社會績效之中介效果，2011會計理論與實務研討會。
    王傳輝，2005，新編商法教程 理論‧規則‧案例，中國：清華大學出版社。
    江逸之，2010，負面新聞不斷 該怎麼辦？，天下雜誌，第450期(6月30日)：282-283。
    沈中華與張元，2008，企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎？─以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例，中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文，第36期(3月)：339-385。
    林宛瑩、戚務君及韓建婷，2009，公司治理與銀行融資利率，研討會。
    林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君及陳宜伶，2009，公司治理與信用風險，臺大管理論叢，第19卷第2.2期，71-98頁。
    胡美蓉，2005，銀行對中小企業授信評等模型，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
    83
    張元，2009，企業社會責任與財務績效─臺灣的實證研究，社會科學論叢，第三卷，第1期(4月)：57-120。
    陳厚儒，2008，台灣社會責任型企業相對股票市場之報酬與風險之比較分析，逢甲大學合作經濟學系碩士論文。
    黃庭輝，2009，企業社會責任的發展，三聯技術月刊，第74期(12月)：30-32。
    黃靖萱，2010，企業必須面對的環境風險，天下雜誌，第454期(8月25日)：136-137。
    黃瓊瑤，2009，公司治理與企業社會責任績效關聯性─整合核心代理問題與社會鑲嵌觀點，國立中興大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    劉昱菁，台灣企業社會責任得獎公司之財務績效探討(2009)，國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士在職專班論文。
    鄭桂蕙、林宛瑩與許崇源，2006，董監事持股高低對庫藏股買回誘因之影響，東吳經濟商學學報，第54期：1-26。
    學生報告，2007，企業社會責任指標建構之研究─以超商產業為例，碩專班整合行銷報告，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學系。(網址：http://cc.shu.edu.tw/~porc/2.pdf)
    蕭富元，2010，八成民眾願多付錢買環保商品，天下雜誌，第450期(6月30日)：166-170。
    三、英文文獻：
    Aguilera, R. V., C. A. Williams, J. M. Conley, and D. E. Rupp. 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (3): 147-158.
    Aigner, D. J. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and the bottom line. Working Paper, Paul Merage School of Business, University of California.
    Alexander, G. J. and R. A. Bucholtz. 1978. Corporate social performance and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal 21 (3): 479-486.
    Alkhafaji, A. F. 1989. A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a dynamic environment. New York: Quorum Books.
    Anderson, J. and G. Smith. 2006. A great company can be a great investment. Financial Analysts Journal 62 (4): 86-93.
    Anginer, D., K. L. Fisher, and M. Statman. 2008. Stocks of admired companies and despised ones. Unpublished Manuscript.
    Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. W. Collins, and R. LaFond. 2006. The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(1-2): 203-243.
    Aupperle, K., A. Carroll, and J. Hatfield. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of
    84
    Management Journal 28 (2):446-463.
    Bacon, J. 1973. Corporate directorship practices: Membership and committees of the board, Paper Presented at the Conference Board and American Society of Corporate Secretaries, New York.
    Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, and I. Hasan. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value: An event study analysis. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    Bernadette, M. R., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney, and K. Paul. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2): 143-156.
    Bhattacharya, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78(3): 641-678.
    Botosan, C., M. Plumlee, and Y. Xie. 2004. The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (2): 233-259.
    Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 435-455.
    Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin. 2006. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management 35(3): 97-116.
    . 2009. The stock performance of America’s 100 best corporate citizens. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49 (3): 1065-1080.
    Business Week. 1993. Now, a big job at kodak means you’ll buy a big stake. February 1: 26.
    Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 12(7): 471-491.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57(6): 2741-2772.
    Clinebell, S. K. and J. M. Clinebell. 1994. The effect of advanced notice of plant closings on firm value. Journal of Management 20 (3): 553-564.
    Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (1): 42-56.
    Coffey, B.S. and G. E. Fryxell. 1991. Inatitutional ownership of stock and dimensiona of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (6): 437-444.
    Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all?
    85
    Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329-356.
    Cornell, B. and A. C. Shapiro. 1987. Corporate stakeholder and corporate finance. Financial Management 16 (1): 5-14.
    Cyert, R. M., S. H. Kang, and P. Kumar. 2002. Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Science 48(4): 453-470.
    Dam, L. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in a general equilibrium stock market model: Solving the financial performance puzzle. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Groningen.
    Dierkes, M. and R. Coppock. 1978. Europe tries the corporate social report. Business and Society Review 16 (Spring): 21-24.
    Eric, H. and S. Michael. 2005. Who’s monitoring the monitor? Do outside directors protect shareholders’ interest? The Financial Review 40 (2): 155-172.
    Fombrun, C. J. and M. Shanley. 1990 What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233-258.
    Fombrun, C. J., N. A. Gardberg, and M. L. Barnett. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105 (1): 85-106.
    Francis, J., R., P. LaFond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 967-1010.
    . 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(2): 295-327.
    Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13 Sep.: 32-33.
    Fuerst, O., and S. H. Kang. 2000. Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing. Working Paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven.
    Gautschi, F., and T. Jones. 1987. Illegal corporate behavior and corporate board structure. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 9: 93-106.
    Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 107-155.
    Graves, S.B. and S. A. Waddock. 1992. Reaponses of institutional investors to corporate social performance measures. Best Paper Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, 338-342.
    Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 36 (1): 5-31.
    Grinstein, Y., and P. Hribar. 2004. CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from
    86
    M&A bonuses. Journal of Financial Economics 73(1): 119-143.
    Guenster, N., J. Derwall, R. Bauer, and K. Koedijk. 2005. The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Working Paper, Academy of Management Conference.
    Guerard, J. B., Jr. 1997a. Is there a cost to being socially responsible? Journal of Investing 6 (2): 11-18.
    . 1997b. Additional evidence on the cost of being socially responsible in investing. Journal of Investing 6 (4): 31-35.
    Hamilton, S., H. Jo, and M. Statman. 1993. Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal 49 (6): 62-66.
    Hannon, J. and G. Milkovich. 1996. The effect of human resource reputation signals on share prices: An event study. Human Resource Management 35 (3): 405-424.
    Hansen, G. S., and C. W. L. Hill. 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management Journal 12 (1): 1-16.
    Huson, M. R., P. Robert, and T. S. Laura. 2001. Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. Journal of Finance 56 (6): 2265-2297.
    Imhoff, E. A. 2003. Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance. Accounting Horizons 17(Supplement): 117-128.
    Jeffrey, L. C., D. D. Naveen, and N. Lalitha. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329-356.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48(3): 831-880.
    Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (2): 225-264.
    Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11(1/4): 5-50.
    Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 564-576.
    Kesner, I. F. 1987. Directors stock ownership and organization performance: An investigation of fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management 13(3): 499-508.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3): 375-400.
    McGuire, J., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854-872.
    Moore, G. 2001. Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the
    87
    UK supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3/4): 299-315.
    Moskowitz, M. R. 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1 (1): 71-75.
    Moussavi, F. and D. Evans. 1986. An attributional approach to measuring corporate social performance. Working Paper, Academy of Management Meetings in San Diego.
    Nabil, A. I., and P. A. John. 1995. The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 405-410.
    Nelling, E. and E. Webb. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The ‘virtuous circle’ revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, forthcoming.
    Newgren, K., A. Rasher, M. LaRoe, and M. Szabo. 1985. Environmental assessment and corporate performance: A longitudinal analysis using market-deter-mined performance measures. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 7: 153-164.
    Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3): 403-441.
    Pava, M. L. and J. Krausz. 1996. The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3): 321-357.
    Pearce, J. A., and S. A. Zahra. 1992. Boards composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Study 29 (4): 411-438.
    Peloza, J. 2006. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review 48 (2): 52-72.
    Porter, M. and M. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12): 78-92.
    Posner, B. Z. and W. H. Schmidt. 1992. Values and the American manager: An update. California Management Review 34 (3): 80-94.
    Posnikoff, J. F. 1997. Disinvestment from South Africa: They did well by doing good. Contemporary Economic Policy 15 (1): 76-86.
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20(1): 237-265.
    . 1992. Beyond takeovers: Politics comes to corporate control. Harvard Business Review 70(2): 83-93.
    Preston, L. E. and P. O’Bannon. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and Society 36 (4): 419-429.
    88
    Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73(4): 459-474.
    Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52(2): 737-783.
    Stanwick, P. A. and S. D. Stanwick. 1998. The relationship between CSP and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2): 195-204.
    Stephen, P. F., M. L. Robert, and K. M. Anil. 2001. Derivative lawsuits as a corporate governance mechanism: Empirical evidence on board changes surrounding filings. Working Paper, University of Missouri - Columbia, Contracting and Organizations Research Institute.
    Szewczyk, S. H., G. P. Tsetsekos, and R. Varma. 1992. Institutional ownership and the liquidity of common stock offerings. The Financial Review 27(2): 211-225.
    Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and C. P. Wazzan. 1999. The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: Evidence from the South African boycott. Journal of Business 72 (1): 35-89.
    Trotman, K. T. and G. W. Bradley. 1981. Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6 (4): 355-362.
    Tsoutsoura, M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Working Paper, University of California.
    Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658-672.
    Vance, S. 1975. Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review 64 (8): 18-24.
    Waddock, S. and S. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18 (4): 303-319.
    Wang, J., and H. D. Dewhirst. 1992. Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2): 115-123.
    Worrell, D., W. N. Davidson, and V. N. Sharma. 1991. Layoff announcements and stockholder wealth. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 662-678.
    Wright, P. and S. Ferris. 1997. Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal 18 (1): 77-83.
    Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model. Journal of Management 15 (2): 291-334.
    Zahra, S. A., B. M. Oviatt, and K. Minyard. 1993. Effects of corporate ownership and
    89
    board structure on corporate social responsibility and financial performance. In 1993 Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management: 336-340.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    97353030
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353030
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    303001.pdf1576KbAdobe PDF2991检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈