 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51722050
Online Users : 544
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71409
|
| Title: | 橘子與香蕉如何比？從SSCI看臺灣高等教育學術評鑑之迷思 |
| Authors: | 周祝瑛 |
| Contributors: | 教育系 |
| Keywords: | 學術評鑑;SSCI;人文社會領域
academic evaluation;Taiwan`s higher education;evaluation indicators;SSCI |
| Date: | 2011-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-11-13 17:15:33 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著台灣高等教育數量大幅擴張的結果，如何維持高教的品質，已成為各大學關注的焦點。自民國94 年起教育部為提高我國高等教育國際競爭力與能見度，接連提出「追求卓越計畫」、「頂尖大學」及建立大學評鑑等政策。其強調評鑑指標之份量與經費配置結合之做法，促成國內高等教育以SCI/SSCI、A&HCI 等國際期刊的刊載篇數與被引用次數，作為評鑑標準的發展方向，過程中出現不少爭議，尤其評鑑指標過於「單一量化」的問題始終未獲解決，以致評鑑效度備受質疑。本文擬針對目前臺灣在學術評鑑上過度倚賴SSCI 等資料庫發表之的問題進行探討，進而引用國際案例說明人文社會領域在專書等發表形式所占之重要地位。最後提出人文社會領域學術評鑑可能之參考指標與方向。
With the expansion of Taiwan`s higher education system in recent years, the maintenance of quality has become a key concern. In 2005, the Ministry of Education initiated both the Program for Promoting Academic Excellence in Universities (PPAE) and the Aiming for the Top University and Elite Research Center Development Plan (ATU Plan), and also established a formal university evaluation policy, with a view to improving the competitiveness and international visibility of Taiwan`s universities. In so doing, the MOE established a clear link between the results of evaluations and the allocation of funds. Research performance is assessed in terms of the number of articles published in SCI, SSCI and A&HCI indexed journals, as well as citation rates and associated impact factors. Evaluation has thus taken on a highly quantitative dimension. Despite the efforts of all concerned to encourage academic excellence, the above-mentioned quantitative evaluation indicators have resulted in bitterness and complaints from humanities and social sciences whose research accomplishment were de-valued and ignored under current quantitative indicators. It is necessary to investigate other approaches to evaluation that are beneficial to both researchers and funding agencies, and find ways to properly tap into teachers` academic productive capacity. The authors will first examine the academic evaluation issues in Taiwan, then introduce the ways of evaluation is conducted in some developed countries (Australia, Italy, UK, and US, per se) as references to Taiwan. Finally, the author will concrete solutions to policy-makings in the make of a fair and effective evaluation system for humanities and social sciences in Taiwan`s higher education. |
| Relation: | 教育研究月刊, 98, 212, 40-51 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 40-51.pdf | | 403Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 718 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
