政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70752
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51818129      Online Users : 527
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70752


    Title: 不同來源外資企業在中國大陸生產效率之比較--以工業部門為例
    Other Titles: A Comparison of Technical Efficiency of Production among Different Sources of Foreign-Funded Enterprises-A Case of China`s Manufacturing Sector
    Authors: 黃智聰;林昇誼;潘俊男
    Huang, Jr-Tsung;Lin, Sheng-Yi;Pan, Chun-Nan
    Contributors: 財政系
    Keywords: 中國大陸;外資企業;技術效率;製造業
    China;Foreign-Funded Enterprises;Manufacturing Sector;Technical Efficiency
    Date: 2003.01
    Issue Date: 2014-10-23 18:00:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在確認臺港澳企業與其他外資企業，在中國大陸製造業生產績效的差異。利用Battese and Coelli (1995)所提出的實證模型以及1993、1994與1997年《中國統計年鑑》、《中國工業經濟統計年鑑》中的官方統計資料，估計隨機邊界生產函數(stochastic frontier production function)。由研究發現，在控制了其他因素之後，1993與1997兩年臺港澳與其他外資企業的生產績效並無顯著的差異。但1994年臺港澳企業的生產績效，卻較其他外資企業低落。其隱含了文化因素並沒有使臺港澳資企業的生產效率明顯地高於其他外資企業，此與2001年陳永生的研究結論並不相符。
    This study aims to investigate the difference between the technical efficiency of Taiwan, Hong-Kong and Macao enterprises (THM, hereafter) and that of foreign enterprises from other countries (FOR, hereafter) in China`s manufacturing sector. This study utilizes the empirical methodology model proposed by Battese and Coelli(1995) and the industrial-based panel data from 1993-1994 and from 1997 provided by various years of China Statistical Year Book and China Industrial Economy Statistical Year Book to estimate the stochastic frontier production function. The primary finding of this study is that, after controlling other explanatory variables, there is no difference in technical efficiency between THM and FOR in 1993 and 1997. However, the technical efficiency of FOR was better than that of THM in 1994. This result also implies that the cultural factor didn`t help the technical efficiency of THM to be better than that of FOR. This result is quite different with the conclusion of Cheng (2001).
    Relation: 遠景基金會季刊, 4(1), 93-123
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93123.pdf585KbAdobe PDF21142View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback