Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70338
|
| Title: | 新產品發展專案之權力結構與新產品發展績效之關聯研究：以外部控制觀點探討
The Effect of Power Structure in the New Product Development Teams on New Product Development Performance: The External Control Perspective |
| Authors: | 張家揚 |
| Contributors: | 別蓮蒂
樓永堅
Bei, Lien Ti
Lou, Yung Chien
張家揚 |
| Keywords: | 新產品發展
權力結構
環境不確定性
新產品發展流程正式化
new product development
power structure
environmental uncertainty
NPD formalization |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-10-01 13:45:32 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 過去探討新產品發展專案中行銷與研發權力結構之配置與績效之間關係的研究結果並不一致；而這些不一致的結果很可能是因為各研究抽樣的產業分布不盡相同，亦反映出各個新產品發展專案面對不一樣的環境不確定性。因此，本研究的主要研究目的為探討是否身處不同外部環境不確定性的新產品專案，其行銷與研發功能的權力結構與新產品發展績效之間有著不同的線性關係，並試圖以外部控制觀點解釋過去研究在新產品發展專案之權力結構與新產品發展績效關係的不一致，進一步導入新產品發展流程正式化對新產品發展專案權力結構與新產品發展績效關係之調節效果。
本研究採用兩階段的問卷調查法，第一階段先取得廠商同意以及新產品發展專案之名稱。第二階段會有二到三位填答者填寫主要變數之問卷，分別是新產品發展專案經理、該新產品發展專案之行銷負責人與該新產品發展專案之研發負責人。若專案經理兼任行銷或研發負責人，則填寫兩份問卷。本研究共發放238個新產品發展專案，共123個新產品發展專案為有效樣本。
根據外部控制觀點探討新產品發展專案中的行銷與研發的權力分配和新產品發展績效之關聯，本研究比過去的研究更周延地納入行銷與研發的權力在權力結構中，填補過去的研究僅著重討論單一功能對新產品發展流程的決策權力和新產品發展績效之間的關係。
除此之外，藉由檢視在不同市場與技術不確定性情境之下的新產品發展專案在行銷與研發功能權力與新產品發展績效之關係，本研究解釋了過去研究探討新產品發展專案在行銷與研發功能權力與新產品發展績效關係不一致的現象。研究結果顯示在市場不確定性低但技術不確定性高的情境下，新產品發展專案之權力結構應偏向研發功能，新產品發展績效會有較佳之表現，例如電子製造業中的IC設計專案，新產品發展專案權力結構偏向研發功能，新產品發展績效會較好。
最後，過去未曾發現新產品發展流程正式化的調節效果有其適用條件，在市場不確定性高但技術不確定性低的情境下，新產品發展流程正式化會強化新產品發展專案之權力結構偏向行銷與新產品發展績效之正向關係，例如：食品製造業中的冰品或是紡織製造業中的運動休閒布料專案，明定新產品發展流程有助於行銷功能主導的新產品發展專案獲得較好的績效。
Past studies showed inconsistency in the relationship between the power structure of marketing and R&D in conjunction with new product development (NPD) performance. The reason of the inconsistency might be that the focal industries of each study were not the same which implies every NPD project faced different uncertainties dues to various industrial environments. According to the perspective of external control, the research objective is to show under different environmental uncertainties, different linear relationships between the marketing/R&D power structure and NPD could occur. Further, this research also introduced the moderating effect of the NPD formalization.
This research adapted a two-stage questionnaire approach. The first stage is acquiring agreement and titles of NPD projects from firms. The second stage is having project managers, marketing personnel, as well as R&D personnel in NPD projects answer the questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent to 238 NPD projects, among them 123 had returned.
The evidences showed a positive relationship between NPD performance and R&D power structure under low market uncertainty and high technological uncertainty. For example, NPD projects performed better when the balance of power structure swung to the side of R&D function in the High-tech industry, IC Designs. In situations of high market uncertainty and low technological uncertainty, NPD formalization strengthened the relationship between marketing and NPD performance. For example, the NPD formalization strengthened the relationship between power structure in the NPD project and performance in both food and textile industries.
These findings, rather focusing on single functions such as marketing or R&D, helped advance the understanding of the relationship between the power structure of marketing and R&D with NPD performance. Furthermore, examining the variables under different environment uncertainty situations in this study explained the inconsistency of the relationship between the power structure of marketing/RD and NPD performance in the past studies. Finally, this research conditionally supported the moderating effect of NPD formalization on the relationship between the power structure of marketing/R&D and NPD performance, and this discovery has never been noted in previous studies. |
| Reference: | Acur, N., Kandemir, D., De Weerd‐Nederhof, P. C., & Song, M. (2010). Exploring the impact of technological competence development on speed and NPD program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 915-929.
Ansoff, I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Armstrong, S. T. & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
Astley, W. G. & Zajac, E. J. (1991). Intraorganizational power and organizational design: reconciling rational and coalitional models of organization. Organization Science, 2(4), 399-411.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Wei, Y. (2010). The vital role of problem-solving competence in new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 81-98.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & De Luca, L. M. (2008). Marketing`s lateral influence strategies and new product team comprehension in high-tech companies: A cross-national investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(6), 664-676.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Li, H. (2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 583-597.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Evangelista, F. (2000). Cross-functional influence in new product development: An exploratory study of marketing and R&D perspective. Management Science, 46(10), 1269-1284.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-96.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Blindenbach-Driessen, F., Dalen, J., & Ende, J. (2010). Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 572-592.
Brettel, M., Heinemann, F., Engelen, A., & Neubauer, S. (2011). Cross‐functional integration of R&D, Marketing, and manufacturing in radical and incremental product innovations and its effects on project effectiveness and efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 251-269.
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
Calantone, R. & Rubera, G. (2012). When should RD&E and marketing collaborate? The moderating role of exploration–exploitation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 144-157.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Massachusetts: MIT press.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
Clark, K. B. & Wheelwright, S. C. (1993). Managing new product and process development: Text and cases. New York: Free Press.
Cooper, R. & Kleinchmidt, E.J. (1987). New product: what separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management 4(3): 169-184.
Cooper, R. G. (1979). The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 93-103.
Cooper, R. G. (1983). Process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 30(1), 2-11.
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, Elko J. (1986). An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(2), 71-85.
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215.
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
Dewar, R. D., Whetten, D. A., & Boje, D. (1980). An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization, and task routineness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 120-128.
Dill, W. (1958). Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(), 409-443.
Dougherty, D. (1990). Understanding new markets for new products. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 59-78.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
Dougherty, D. & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.
Dougherty, D. & Heller, T. (1992). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200-218.
Downey, H. K., Hellriegel, D., & Slocum Jr, J. W. (1975). Environmental uncertainty: The construct and its application. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 613-629.
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543-576.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Bourgeois III, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737-770.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41.
Engelen, A. S. & Brettel, M. (2012). A coalitional perspective on the role of the R&D department within the organization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 489-505.
Enz, C. A. (1988). The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 284-304.
Enz, C. A. (1989). The measurement of perceived intraorganizational power: A multi-respondent perspective. Organization Studies, 10(2), 241-251.
Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80-92.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gatignon, H. & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1): 77-90.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 399-423.
Griffin, A. & Page, A. L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 291-308.
Griffin, A. & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191-215.
Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. (1985). The R&D-marketing interface in high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(1), 12-24.
Gupta, Ashok K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, David (1986). A model for studying R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process. Journal of Marketing, 50(1), 7-17.
Hambrick, D. C. (1981). Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 253-275.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis 3rd, Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Henard, D. H. & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375.
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 216-229.
Hinings, C. R., Hickson, D. J., Pennings, J. M., & Schneck, R. E. (1974). Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 22-44.
Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture`s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.
Homburg, C., Workman Jr, J. P., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing`s influence within the firm. The Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 1-17.
Hsien, M. H., Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. R. (2008). The moderating effects of market orientation and launch proficiency on the product advantage-performance relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), 580-592.
Im, S. & Nakata, C. (2008). Crafting an environment to foster integration in new product teams,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25 (3), 164-172.
Im, S. Montoya, M. M., & Workman Jr, J. P. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 170-185.
Ingenbleek, P.T.M., Frambach, R.T., & Verhallen, T.M.M. (2010). The role of value-informed pricing in market-oriented product innovation management. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(7):1032-1046.
Jaworski, B. J. & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
Jhang, J. H., Grant, S. J., & Campbell, M. C. (2012). Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing new product acceptance by facilitating resolution of extreme incongruity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 247-259.
Kim, N. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(4):519-536.
Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
Langerak, F. Hultink, E.J., & Griffin, A. (2008). Exploring mediating and moderating influences on the links among cycle time, proficiency in entry timing, and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation and Management 25(4): 370-385.
Langerak, F., Griffin, A., & Hultink, E. J. (2010). Balancing development costs and sales to optimize the development Time of product line additions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 336-348.
Langerak, F., Hultink, E.J., & Robben, H.S.J. (2004). The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation and Management 21(2): 79-94.
Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment, managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University.
Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Wierenga, B. (2002). The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(4), 305-317.
Li, C. R., Chu, C. P., & Lin, C. J. (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1186-1197.
Li, H. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (1999). Marketing’s influence and new product performance in Chinese firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7(1), 34-56.
Li, H. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). The impact of R&D and marketing interaction on new product performance: An empirical analysis of Chinese high technology firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 21(1/2): 61-75.
Li, H., Bingham, J. B., & Umphress, E. E. (2007). Fairness from the top: perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organization Science, 18(2), 200-216.
Li, T. & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13-29.
Low, G. S. & Mohr, J. J. (2001). Factors affecting the use of information in the evaluation of marketing communications productivity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 70-88.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Massey, G.R. & Dawes, P.L. (2007). The Antecedents and consequence of functional and dysfunctional conflict between marketing managers and sales managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(8), 1118-1129.
McCarthy, I. P., Lawrence, T. B., Wixted, B., & Gordon, B. R. (2010). A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 604-626.
McNally, R. C., Cavusgil, E., & Calantone, R. J. (2010). Product innovativeness dimensions and their relationships with advantage, product financial performance, and project protocol. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 991-1006.
Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 133-143.
Milliken, F. J. (1990). Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators` interpretation of changing demographics. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 42-63.
Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power in and around organizations. New Jerseys: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management. New York: Free Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New Jerseys: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M. & Calantone, R. J. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397-417.
Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 318-335.
Nakata, C. & Im, S. (2010). Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: A group effectiveness perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 554-571.
Narver, J. C. & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
Nord, W. R. (1978). Dreams of humanization and the realities of power. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 674-679.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organization. New York: Harper &Row.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
Poskela, J. & Martinsuo, M. (2009). Management Control and Strategic Renewal in the Front End of Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 671-684.
Rijsdijk, S.A., Langerak, F., & Hultink, E.J. (2011). Understanding a Two-Sided Coin: Antecedents and Consequences of a Decomposed Product Advantage. Journal of Product Innovation and Management 28(1): 33-47.
Ruekert, R. W. & Walker Jr., O. C. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 1-19.
Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
Song, M. X. & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124-135.
Song, M. X. & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001) The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.
Song, M. X. & Parry M. E. (1993). R&D-marketing integration in Japanese high-technology firms: Hypotheses and empirical evidence. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (2), 125-133.
Song, M. X. & Parry, M. E. (1997). The determinants of Japanese new product success. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 64-76.
Song, M. X. & Parry, M. E. (1999). Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan. Journal of Operations Management, 17(6), 665-688.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tsai, K. H., Chou, C., & Kuo, J. H. (2008). The curvilinear relationships between responsive and proactive market orientations and new product performance: A contingent link. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(8), 884-894.
Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
Verhoef, P. C. & Leeflang, P. S. (2009). Understanding the marketing department`s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14-37.
Workman Jr., J. P. (1993). Marketing limited role in new product development in one computer systems firm. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 405-421. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
96355507
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0963555071 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 507101.pdf | 1231Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 141 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
