政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68285
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51638348      Online Users : 661
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68285


    Title: 公私協力失靈之政治分析－以阿里山森林鐵路BOT為例
    Authors: 謝崇毅
    Contributors: 湯京平
    謝崇毅
    Keywords: 公私夥伴關係
    協力
    合產
    集體行動
    BOT
    阿里山森林鐵路
    public-private partnership
    collaboration
    coproduction
    collective action
    BOT
    Alishan Forest Railway
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 11:51:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　我國政府近年來積極的推動吸引民間企業投資公共建設，目的是減少財政支出甚至能夠增加財政收入，但是公部門與私部門先天上追求的目標就不同，公部門與私部門間的協力（collaboration）勢必得要解決這種公私協力夥伴關係（public-private partnerships）內在目標上公益與私利間的衝突。本研究選擇阿里山森林鐵路三合一BOT案作為探討的個案，以合產（coproduction）的理論分析此個案從規劃、執行、到契約終止所面臨的各種挑戰與困難，並分析是什麼因素使得看似對公私部門雙贏的計劃最後變成一場災難。公部門代表林務局的行動不只是基於物質性誘因（materialistic incentives）更是基於社群性（solidary）以及目的性（purposive）的誘因，與此相對的宏都阿里山公司則是評估計劃中有獲利的可能，在這樣的情況下一旦發生重大天災或是其他障礙使得物質性誘因的吸引力減弱，計劃就開始搖搖欲墜，另外該計劃所引起劇烈的反彈，反對勢力由當地居民、原住民團體、以及環保團體各自基於不盡相同的理由組合而成，這些來自不同來源的成員成功克服了集體行動（collective action）的困難而進行有組織性的陳情與抗議行動，影響了阿里山森林鐵路三合一BOT案的發展。
    There is a worldwide trend of inviting private sector to provide public infrastructure jointly with the governments. Taiwan has practiced accordingly in the past decade and experienced diverse results that help accumulating valuable lessons regarding the maintenance of accountability in such public-private partnership. This study focuses on the case of privatizing a precious mountain railway system in Taiwan to examine why a theoretically promising policy would eventually turn to a disaster. This research indicates how essential factors in local politics may overwhelm policy arena, more specifically Environmental Impact Assessment, to ruin synergy pursued via cooperation among private capital, agency of central government, and local government.
    Reference: 一、英文資料

    Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571.
    Baiman, S., & Evans, J. H. (1983). Pre-Decision Information and Participative Management Control Systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2): 371-395.
    Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl 1), i21-i40.
    Bradford, C. (1983). Private Sector Initiatives and Public Sector Accountability: A Case Study of Contracting with City Venture Corporation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(3), 326-335.
    Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public administration review, 66(s1): 44-55.
    Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human relations, 38(10): 911-936.
    Gray, B. (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. SanFrancisco: Jossey–Bass.
    Hall, C. M. (1999). Rethinking collaboration and partnership: A public policy perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3-4): 274-289.
    Harding A. (1991). The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK-style?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 9(3):295–317.
    Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public–private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3): 545-558.
    Huxham, C (1996). Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage. In C. Huxham (Eds.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Jamal, T. B., & Getz, D. (1995). Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of tourism research, 22(1): 186-204.
    Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public—private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public money and Management, 23(3), 137-146.
    Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to Terms With the Public-Private Partnership A Grammar of Multiple Meanings. American behavioral scientist, 43(1): 35-51.
    Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 625-648.
    Macneil, I. R. (1985). Relational contract: What we do and do not know. Wis. L. Rev., 483.
    Margerum, R. D. (2001). Organizational commitment to integrated and collaborative management: matching strategies to constraints. Environmental Management, 28(4): 421-431.
    McCaffrey, D. P., Faerman, S. R., & Hart, D. W. (1995). The appeal and difficulties of participative systems. Organization Science, 6(6), 603-627.
    McCubbins, M. D. & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28: 165-179.
    Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4): 739-777.
    Murdock, B. S., Wiessner, C., & Sexton, K. (2005). Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL case studies.Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2): 223-250.
    Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit Is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Plume.
    Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6): 1073-1087.
    Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review: 1-22.
    Pratt, J. W., Zeckhauser, R., & Arrow, K. J. (1985). Principals and agents: The structure of business. Harvard Business Press.
    Putnam, Robert D. (1993). The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 13: 1-11.
    Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of management review,19(1): 90-118.
    Savas, E. S. (1987). Privatization: The Key to Better Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
    Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
    Sellgren, J. (1990). Local economic development partnerships — An assessment of local authority economic development initiatives. Local Government Studies, 16(4): 57-78.
    Singleton, G. (1994). Partnering for the Public Sector: Guest Editor`s Introduction.　Australian Journal of Public Administration,53 (2): 2-5.
    Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1992). Privatization in health and human services: A critique. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 17(2): 233-254.
    Stephenson, M. O. Jr. (1991). Whither the Public-Private Partnership: A Critical Overview. Urban Affairs Quartely, 27(1): 109-127.
    Tendler, J. (1995, May) Social capital and the public sector: The blurred boundaries between private and public. Paper presented at the Conference of the Economic Development Working Group, Social Capital and Public Affairs Project. American Academcy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, MA.
    Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public administration review, 66(s1): 20-32.)
    Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human relations, 36(3): 269-284.
    Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership managers. British Journal of Management, 14(s1): S61-S76.
    Van Ham, H., & Koppenjan, J. (2001). Building Public-Private Partnerships: Assessing and managing risks in port development. Public Management Review, 3(4): 593-616.
    Weingast, B. R. (1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: a principal agent perspective (with applications to the SEC). Public Choice, 44(1): 147-191.
    Weech-Maldonado, R., & Merrill, S. B. (2000). Building partnerships with the community: lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative. Journal of healthcare management/American College of Healthcare Executives, 45(3): 189-205.
    Williamson O. E. (1979). Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233-261.
    Wilson, J. Q. (1974). Political organizations. NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Wood, B. D. (1989). Principal-Agent Models of Political Control of Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 83: 965-978.
    Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2): 139-162.
    Yaffee, S. L., & Wondolleck, J. M. (2003). Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges. Environments: a journal of interdisciplinary studies, 31(2): 58-72.

    二、中文資料

    王瑞堂（2007，6月24日）。陳弘毅搶攻阿里山BOT，勇氣十足。經濟日報，C3版。
    朱鎮明（2005）。公務夥伴的整合之道－論政策網絡的管理。 研考雙月刊， 29（3）： 95-108。
    吳德美。（2009）。英國民間融資方案（PFI）的政治經濟分析。問題與研究，48（1），33-69。
    李光真（2009，8月）。【編者的話】大家的事，需要大家關心。台灣光華雜誌，2009年8月號。取自 http://www.taiwan-panorama.com/
    李彥圻（2013）。高速公路電子收費之政策弔詭－交易成本理論下的公私協力。銘傳大學公共事務研究所碩士論文，台北。
    李柏諭（2005）。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗。 公共行政學報，16：59-106。
    李聯康。（2008）。都市中的保育行動:以富陽公園與巴克禮公園的社區參與為例。政治大學政治研究所學位論文。
    林玉華（2004年5月）。公私夥伴關係的治理﹕理論初探並兼論英國的第三條路。「公共服務改革與民營化的現代課題」研討會發表之論文，東海大學公共行政學系。
    林易萱。（2009）。私有地上的生態保育:以雙連埤的協力治理為例。政治大學公共行政研究所學位論文。
    林宜樟（2009，3月10日）。阿里山小火車，爆司機集體請辭。聯合報，A8版。
    邱崇原、湯京平、黃建勳（2011）。地方治理的制度選擇與轉型政治：台灣水利會制度變革的政治與經濟分析。人文及社會科學集刊， 23（1）：93-126。
    張瓊方（2009，8月）。請神容易送神難？──BOT後的阿里山。台灣光華雜誌，2009年8月號。取自 http://www.taiwan-panorama.com/
    陳玉峰、陳月霞（2002）。火龍119：阿里山1976年大火與遷村事件初探。臺北市：前衛。
    陳明燦、張蔚宏（2005）。我國促參法下 BOT 之法制分析：以公私協力觀點為基礎。公平交易季刊，13（2）：41-75。
    陳敦源，&張世杰。（2010）。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊，2（3），17-71。
    湯京平（2001）。民主治理與環境保護：從中埔慈濟案例檢視我國資源回收的政　　　策體系。台灣政治學刊，5：178-217。
    曾曉瑜（2006）。阿里山森林鐵路民營化再生方案之評估。成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文。
    曾冠球（2011）。為什麼淪為不情願夥伴？：公私夥伴關係失靈個案的制度解釋。臺灣民主季刊，8（4）：83-133。
    楊宗興（2008年6月20日）。七成駕駛無小火車駕照民間團體臥軌抗議阿里山BOT。苦勞網。取自 http://www.coolloud.org.tw/
    廖坤榮。（2004）。台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效。政治科學論叢，22，181-220。
    監察院（2009）。098財正0005案號糾正文。2009年2月17日，監察院網站。取自 http://www.cy.gov.tw/
    謝恩得（2009，6月4日）。劉揆開罵，阿里山鐵路馬上修，修復工程前天發包，災害鑑定昨天出爐，專家批民營化沒配套，遊客都成受害者。聯合報，A8版。
    蘇恩民、鄭智仁（2005，11月18日）。趙建銘扯上關說開發阿里山，護航耐斯，總統女婿促拿出證據。蘋果日報。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/
    寶智華（2008年4月16日）。阿里山小火車頻脫軌疑操作不當。蘋果日報。取自 http://www.appledaily.com.tw/
    民間參與投資經營阿里山森林鐵路及阿里山森林遊樂區－興建暨營運契約（中華民國95年6月19 日）。

    三、判決書

    嘉義地方法院（民國102年6月27日）。塗銷地上權等，101，重訴，8。取自 http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/Index.htm
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    97252007
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097252007
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Political Science] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200701.pdf2474KbAdobe PDF21567View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback