English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51621000      Online Users : 538
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68147


    Title: 兩岸關係中的兩種論述風格之分析
    Authors: 石之瑜
    Shih, Chih-Yu
    Contributors: 政大政治系
    Keywords: 兩岸關係;論述;大陸政策;對台政策;知識論;中國研究
    cross-Taiwan Strait relations;discursive analysis;China policy;Taiwan policy;epistemology;China studies
    Date: 1999-12
    Issue Date: 2014-08-05 10:39:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 兩岸在關於彼此關係的論述上，可以分成三塊：一、在關係論述中統與獨的衝突；二、在現實論述中能力、價值等方面的衝突；三、論述風格差異引起的衝突。過去認為兩岸在認知上有衝突，指的是同一類論述風格之內的衝突。本文則認為，因為論述風格不同所引起在認知上的衝突，其在情感上所造成的不安，未必亞於統與獨之間的衝突。台北的優勢是可以熟練地轉移論述的風格，在這短期內有助於分散因為關係論述中的尖銳對立所引起的衝突，但長期下來因而累積了在北京方面的極度不安。此時台北的優勢就可能轉變成負債，因為在台灣，人們不理解為什麼大陸的人不能在論述風格上像台北一樣有彈性，這種不理解，使北京更難釋懷，為什麼台北可以週期地放下在應然或態度問題上的討論，突然變成一個分析家對大陸指指點點？
    There have been two discursive styles existing in the cross-Taiwan Strait relationship: relational and realistic. The former is concerned with attitude, norm, and policy promotion and is spacio-temporally specific, while the latter is related to analysis, theory and behavioral prediction and is universal. Washington typically displays a realistic style in its statements and Beijing, a relational style. Taipei adopts both, using them alternatively. This paper argues that differences in discursive style may cause more anxiety than disputes within the same style.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 42(12), 1-16
    Source URI: http://iiro.nccu.edu.tw/attachments/journal/add/2/10132716-199912-42-12-1-16-a.zip
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-16.pdf1235KbAdobe PDF2634View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback