政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67620

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/67620

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67620

Title:	商業性引文資料庫與開放取用引文系統之比較研究—以諾貝爾經濟學獎得主為例 A Comparative Study on Commercial Databases and Open Access Systems—A Case Study of Nobel Laureates in Economics
Authors:	翁竣霖 Weng, Jiun Lin
Contributors:	蔡明月 Tsay, Ming Yueh 翁竣霖 Weng, Jiun Lin
Keywords:	商業性引文資料庫開放取用引文系統比較研究 Commercial Databases Open Access Systems Comparative Study
Date:	2013
Issue Date:	2014-07-21 15:41:09 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究首先利用Nobel Prizes官方網站確認2001年至2012年諾貝爾經濟學獎得主後，再至IDEAS系統確認2001年至2012年諾貝爾獎得主之文獻並建立2001年至2012年諾貝爾經濟學獎得主作品清單，並自Web of Science、Scopus、Google Scholar、Microsoft Academic Search、RePEc、OpenDOAR及OAIster商業引文資料庫及開放取用系統中檢索諾貝爾經濟學得主作品資料後，以Excel 試算表軟體作為主要資料處理工具及SPSS的管理系統交叉運用，互相搭配及支援，以進行資料處理。透過商業資料庫和開放取用引文系統，深入比較此二種學術傳播機制的特色及所涵蓋資源的完整性、重複性與獨特性。期望能提供圖書館選擇引文索引資料庫與未來引文系統發展之參考。此外，藉由對各系統完整性評估結果，提出學術評鑑的指標與工具之建議。 In this study, the use of Nobel Prizes official website confirmed that from 2001 to 2012 Nobel laureate in economics, and then to confirm IDEAS systems literature from 2001 to 2012 and the establishment of the Nobel laureate from 2001 to 2012 Nobel Prize in Economics winner list of works, and since the Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, RePEc, OpenDOAR and OAIster commercial citation databases and open access retrieval system works Nobel laureate data to Excel spreadsheet software as the main data processing tools and SPSS for cross-use management system, with each other and support to carry out data processing. Citation databases and open access system resources through commercial, in-depth comparative characteristics of these two kinds of scholarly communication mechanisms and resources covered by the integrity, repeatability and uniqueness. Expect to provide library Reference Citation Index database system development and future citations. In addition, an assessment of the integrity of the systems by the results, recommendations academic evaluation indicators and instruments.
Reference:	CONCERT(2010)。Web of Science 中文使用手冊，檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://ppt.cc/Px1Z。 Elsevier Taiwan(2013)。Scopus 操作說明書，檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://taiwan.elsevier.com/htmlmailings/Scopus-QRG-2010.pdf。 Elsevier(2014)。SCOPUS資料庫簡介，檢索日期：2014年06月04日，檢自：http://ppt.cc/a~zv。 Google(2013)。Google簡介，檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://www.google.com.tw/about/company/。 IBM SPSS Statistics (2013)。IBM SPSS 產品說明，檢索日期：2013年12月28日，檢自：http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tw/analytics/spss/products/statistics/。 ISI Web of Knowledge(2013)。ISI Web of Knowledge公司網站，檢索日期：2013年12月28日，檢自：http://www.isinet.com/selection/。 Microsoft (2013)。Excel分析新功能，檢索日期：2013年12月14日，檢自：http://office.microsoft.com/zh-tw/excel/。毛慶禎譯(2008)。Open Acccess-開放取用機會及挑戰手冊。Library & Book，German頁5。毛慶禎譯(2012)。布達佩斯公開取用倡議Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI)，在圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典，檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678959/。何琳(2009) 。OpenDOAR和機構知識庫發展現況。圖書館工作與研究，156，30-33。吳孟瑾(2013)。引用文獻索引資料庫-Google Scholar，在認識大學排名系列報導。檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://www.lib.nctu.edu.tw/html/categoryid-34/id-165/ 吳明德(1991)。館藏發展。台北市：漢美。吳惠林(2013)。諾貝爾經濟學家的故事(修訂二版)。台北市：五南文化事業。李治安、林懿萱(2007)。從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版：開放取用出版相關問題初探。圖書館學與資訊科學，33(1)，頁39-52。李治安、林懿萱(2007)。從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版：開放取用出版相關問題初探。圖書館學與資訊科學，33(1)，頁39-52。邱炯友(2006)。學術傳播與其刊出版。遠流出版，台北，頁222~223。財團法人國家實驗研究院(2010)，Web of Science 簡介，檢索日期：2013年10月18日，檢自：http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/fdb/Web of Science/index.html。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心主編(2009)。開放取用的機會與展望。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心，台北，頁3。陳亞寧(民93)。開放式資訊取用之現況發展分析。圖書與資訊學刊，51，89-108。陳薇竹(2007)。引用文獻索引資料庫之比較硏究。政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，未出版碩士論文，台北市。馮玉(2007)。Scopus文摘數據庫及其檢索利用。情報科學，25(3)，401-403, 413。劉琼(2005)。美國25名諾貝爾獎得主致國會公開信支持學術論文的開放訪問。圖書館雜誌，24(6)，頁63-64。魯佑敏(2013)。商業性引文資料庫與開放取用系統之引文索引比較研究。政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，未出版碩士論文，台北市。 ArXive (2013). arXiv introduction. Oct. 18, 2013. Retrieved form: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXiv. Berkeley library (2013). Search engine criteria. Oct. 23, 2013. Retrieved form: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/SrchEngCriteria.pdf. Borgman, C. L. (1990). Editor’s introduction, Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, Sage, p13-16. Bourne, C. P. (1969). Characteristics of coverage by the bibliography of agriculture of the literature relating to agricultural research and development, In Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information(Va.22151). Springfield. Budapest Open Access Initiative(2013). Budapest open Access initiative. Oct. 2, 2013. Retrieved form: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/. Budd, J. M. (2012). The communities of the academic library. In The changing academic library(2nd ed), Unite States: Association of College and Research Libraries(ACRL). Calhoun, K. (2008).Online catalogs: what users and librarians want? An OCLC report. Oct. 23, 2013. Retrieved form: http://ppt.cc/cq4F. Chu, H. (1996). Search engines for the world wide web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. In ASIS 1996 Annual Conference proceedings. Doszkocs, T. (1977). Estimating citation overlap in a milti-file retrieval system, In Information Management in the 1980’s: Proceedings of 40th ASIS Annual Meeting (Chicago, vol.14), White Plains, N. Y. :Knowledge Industry Publications for American Society for Information Science, x. Esmaeil & Mohammad S. & Kiaie, R. M. & Ketab, F. (2011). A comparison between search engines and Meta-Search engines in retrieving information related to physics and the extent of their overlap. Library and Information Studies, 22. 3, p130-140. Getz, M. (2009). Open access scholarship and publishing, In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences(Third Edition). Oct. 18, 2013. Retrieved form: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044492#.UmDK0lBkObY. Google (2013). Google scholar. Oct. 20, 2013. Retrieved form: http://scholar.google.com.tw/. Hood, W. W. & Wilson, S.(1998). The distribution of bibliographic records in databases using different counting methods for duplicate records. Seientometrics, 46(3). 473-486. Dec. 14, 2013. Retrieved form: http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/257/art%253A10.1007%252FBF02459605.pdf?auth66=1387171099_525062b391909a564bcad9b80df0dea3&ext=.pdf. IDEAS (2013). IDEAS-Search. Oct. 20, 2013. Retrieved form: http://ideas.repec.org/search.html. Jacsoó, P. (2005). Google scholar: The pros and cons. Online information review. 29(2): 208-214. Julian, R. L. (1976). Comparison of printed bibliographic descriptions distributed by BIOSIS, CAS, EI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 46-52. LaBorie, T. (1985). Library and information science abstracting and index service: coverage, overlap, and context. Library and Information Science Research, 7(1), 183-195. Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL: A bimonthly report. 226, pp.1-10. Oct. 2, 2013.Retrieved form: http://scholarship.utm.edu/21/1/Lynch,_IRs.pdf. Martyn, J. (1967). Tests on abstracts journals: Coverage overlap and indexing. Journal of Documentation, 23, 45-70. Microsoft academic search. (2013). Microsoft Academic Search Help. Dec. 14, 2013.Retrieved form: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/About/Help.htm Nicholls, P. T. (1989). Bibliometrics of the laserdiscs applications literature. Laserdisk Professional, 2,106-109. Nobelprize(2014). All Prizes in Economic Sciences. May. 28, 2014. Retrieved form: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/. Okerson, A. (1989). Of making many books there is no end: Report on serial prices for the association of research Libraries, In Report of the ARL Serials Prices Project. OAIster(2014). The OAIster® database . Feb. 19, 2014.Retrieved form: http://www.oclc.org/oaister.en.html. OpenDOAR(2014). The directory of open access repositories . Feb. 19, 2014.Retrieved form: http://www.opendoar.org/. Paisley, W. (1989). Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research. Communication Research, 16(5), 701-717. Poyer, P. K. (1984). Journal article overlap among index medicus, Science Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, and Chemical Abstracts. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 72(4), 353-357. Rather, R. A., Lone, F. A. & Shah, G. J. (2008). Overlap in web search tesults: A study of five search engines, library philosophy and practice. Read, E. & Smith, C.(2000). Searching for library and information science literature: a comparison of coverage in three database. Library Computing, 19, 118-126. RePEc (2013). RePEc services. Dec. 14, 2013. Retrieved form: http://repec.org/. RePEc (2014). RePEc services. Jun. 04, 2014. Retrieved form: http://repec.org/. Scopus (2013). Scopus in detail: What does it cover? Oct. 23, 2013. Retrieved form: http://info.scopus.com/detail/what/. Walters, W. H. & Wilder, E. I. (2003). Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 54(14), 1305-1312. Wang, L. & Wang, J. & Michael, L. & Yong, L. & Wang, Y. & Xu, D. (2012 May). Using internet search engines to obtain medical information: A comparative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(3). Wood , J. L. & Flanagan, C. & Kennedy, H. E. (1972). Overlap in the List of Journals monitored by BIOSIS, CAS,Ei. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 36-38. Yerkey, N. & Glogowski, M.(1990). Scatter of library and information science topics among bibliographic data bases. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 245-253.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 101155008 102
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1011550081
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	628	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...