政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67566
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51769620      線上人數 : 545
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67566


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67566


    題名: 團隊認知需求及團隊合作性目標與交融記憶系統形成─資訊精緻化的中介效果
    Need For Cognition , Team Cooperative Goal and the formation of Transactive Memory System: The Mediating Effects of Information Elaboration
    作者: 葉讚名
    貢獻者: 黃家齊
    葉讚名
    關鍵詞: 認知需求
    團隊合作性目標
    資訊精緻化
    團隊交融記憶系統
    日期: 2013
    上傳時間: 2014-07-21 15:33:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著時代不斷演進，現代企業裡的工作團隊大多面臨複雜、變動快速且競爭激烈的環境，因此，如何有效提升團隊績效已成為企業重視的一大課題。過去許多研究指出，團隊交融記憶系統(transactive memory system，簡稱TMS)能有效幫助團隊提升績效並提升團隊決策速度與品質，然而，一個團隊欲建立團隊交融記憶系統，必須先瞭解團隊交融記憶系統的形成前因為何。本研究以資訊處理動機模型為理論基礎，並以企業中之實務工作團隊為研究對象，探討團隊內成員之認知需求(知識動機)與團隊合作性目標(社會動機)如何促成團隊交融記憶系統的形成，並且在研究中加入團隊資訊精緻化作為中介變數，以探討團隊資訊精緻化在認知需求、團隊合作性目標與團隊交融記憶系統間之中介效果。另外，研究中亦將進一步探討團隊合作性目標對於認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化關係的調節效果。

    本研究以70個實際工作團隊(包含研發團隊與行銷團隊)作為研究樣本，並以層級迴歸分析及Sobel test進行假設驗證。經由實證分析結果，本研究發現團隊合作性目標與團隊資訊精緻化具有顯著的正向關係，而團隊資訊精緻化在團隊合作性目標與團隊交融記憶系統之關係間具有中介效果。此外，團隊合作性目標亦會調節團隊認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化間的正向關係。也就是說當團隊合作性目標高時，團隊認知需求與團隊資訊精緻化間的正向關係將高於團隊合作性目標低時。
    參考文獻: Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Alper, S., Tjosvold, D.,&Law, S. A. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52.

    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182

    Bentler, P. M. (1988). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations
    program. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.

    De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Cooperative outcome independence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628-638.

    De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Kinppenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.

    Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of Theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 802-835.

    Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict
    Management, 1, 237-263.

    Donnellan, M. Brent., Oswald, Frederick L., Baird, Brendan M., & Lucas, Richard E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203.

    Fornell, Claes & David F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobervables and Measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50

    Gladstein, D. L., (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.

    Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis（5th ed.）,Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall, 1998.

    Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.

    Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationship. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 257-267.

    Hollingshead, A.B., & Brandon, D.P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607–615.

    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

    Jackson, M., & Moreland, R.L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40, 508–534.

    James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal
    of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.

    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
    Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-141.

    Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581-598.
    Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum Press.

    Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604.

    Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16, 581–598.

    Liang, D.W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393.

    MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of the methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.

    Moreland, R. L. (1999). Tranisactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Moreland, R.L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133.

    Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Altine, J. V., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D.
    (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
    Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.

    Pearsall, M., & Ellis, A. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness onteam performance and satisfaction. Journal of Management, 32, 575–594.

    Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences, Academy of Management Annuals, 5, 189-229.

    Ren, Y., Carley, K.M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52, 671–682.

    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Stewart, D. D. & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.

    Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group and Organization Management, 29, 540-559.
    Van Ginkel, W. P., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 82-97.

    Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 185-208). New York: Springer.

    Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.

    Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.

    Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in closerelationships. In W J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp.253-276). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systemsand collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187.

    Zhang, Z., Hempel, P.S., Han, Y., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory systemlinks work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1722–1730.
     
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355059
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355059
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋