English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114898/145937 (79%)
Visitors : 53967633      Online Users : 691
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67478


    Title: 公司長短期避稅行為決定因素──以台灣上市櫃公司為例
    The Determinants of Long-run and Short-run Corporate Tax Avoidance
    Authors: 紀琇芳
    Contributors: 何怡澄
    紀琇芳
    Keywords: 租稅規避行為
    現金有效稅率
    財稅差異
    產業避稅效果
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-14 11:31:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為分析長期與短期公司避稅行為之決定因素以及相關產業效果,本文以實證
    方法檢視租稅規避行為之決定因素,並以現金有效稅率及調整後財稅差異作避稅
    指標,研究對象為 2002 年至 2012 年之台灣上市櫃公司,同時排除性質特殊之金融業以及臺灣存託憑證(TDR)。
    首先,本文採固定效果模型進行短期避稅行為之分析,其實證結果顯示當企
    業知名度較高、研發投資較多、負債資產比較高、投資損失較多及關係企業設立
    在租稅天堂時,企業積極從事避稅行為的可能性較低。另一方面,結果顯示當企
    業持有固定資產較多、投資利益較多、獲利較多及有前期淨營業損失時,企業積
    極從事避稅行為的可能性較高。
    其次,本文採普通最小平方法模型進行長期避稅行為之分析,其實證結果顯
    示當企業長期知名度較高、負債較多、投資損失較多及獲利較多時,企業積極從
    事長期避稅行為的可能性較低。另一方面,結果顯示企業長期固定資產較多、研
    發投資較多及投資利益較多時,企業積極從事長期避稅行為的可能性較高。
    最後,為觀察個別產業之避稅行為,本研究進行平均值差異數 T 檢定、長期
    普通最小平方法回歸結果以及 F 檢定,結果顯示:半導體業、建材營造業等產業
    積極從事避稅行為的可能性較高。另一方面,觀光事業、油電燃氣等產業積極從
    事避稅行為的可能性較低。
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    1. 王建煊與吳嘉勳(2011),租稅法,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    2. 陳明進、蔡麗雯(2006),「財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究」,《管 理學報》,第 23 卷,第 6 期,739-763
    3. 陳明進(2000),「我國公司平均有效稅率決定因素之實證研究:財務報表資料及課稅申報資料之分析比較」,《會計評論》,第 34 期,57-75
    4. 葛克昌(1977),「租稅規避之研究」,《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》,第 6 卷第 2 期 (3 月),167-187。

    二、英文文獻
    1. Badertscher, B., S. P. Katz, and S. O. Rego (2010), “The impact of private equity ownership on portfolio firms’ corporate tax planning.” Working paper, Harvard Business School.
    2. Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin (2010), “Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?” Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1): 41-61.
    3. Cheng, C. S. A., H. H. Huang, Y. Li, and J. Stanfield (2012), “The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance.” The Accounting Review (Forthcoming). 61
    4. Desai, Mihir A., and Dhammika Dharmapala (2006), "Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives," Journal of Financial Economics In Press, Corrected Proof.
    5. Desai, Mihir A., and James R. Hines Jr (2002). "Expectations and expatriations: Tracing the causes and consequences of corporate inversions." National Tax Journal 55(3):409.
    6. Dharmapala, Dhammika and James R. Hines (2009), “Which Countries Become Tax Havens?” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 93, pp. 1058-1068
    7. Engel, Ellen, Merle Erickson and Edward Maydew (1999). "Debt-equity hybrid securities."Journal of Accounting Research 37(2):249.
    8. Erickson, Merle, Austan Goolsbee and Edward Maydew (2003). "How prevalent is tax arbitrage? Evidence from the market for municipal bonds." National Tax Journal 56(1):259.
    9. Graham, John, and Alan L. Tucker (2006). "Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy." Journal of Financial Economics 81(3): 563-594.
    10. Spooner, G.M. (1986). “Effective tax rates from financial statements.” National Tax Journal, 36(1):293–306
    11. Gupta, S., and K. Newberry, (1997), “Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data,” Journal of Accounting and 62 Public Policy, 16(1):1-34
    12. Hanlon, Michelle, Lillian Mills and Joel Slemrod (2005). “An Empirical Examination of Corporate Tax Noncompliance.” working paper presented at the conference on Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century.
    13. Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman(2012).” A review of tax research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(December): 127–178.
    14. Gravelle, Jane G. (2013) “Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion.” CRS Report for Congress.
    15. Joos, P. and G. Plesko (2005) “Valuing loss firms.” The Accounting Review 80 (3): 847-870.
    16. Klein, A. and C. Marquardt (2006) “Fundamentals of accounting losses” The Accounting Review 81 (1): 179-206.
    17. Manzon, Gil B., and George A. Plesko (2002). "The Relation Between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income." Tax Law Review 55(2):175.
    18. Mills, Lillian, Merle M. Erickson and Edward L. Maydew (1998). "Investments in Tax Planning." Journal of the American Taxation Association , 20(1):1.
    19. Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD), Towards Global Tax Competition, 2000
    20. Lisowsky, Petro (2010), “Seeking Shelter: Empirically Modeling Tax Shelters Using 63 Financial Statement Information”, Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 5
    21. Rego, Sonja O. (2003). "Tax-Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations." Contemporary Accounting Research 20(4):805-833.
    22. Seida, Jim A., and William F. Wempe (2004). "Effective Tax Rate Changes and Earnings Stripping Following Corporate Inversion." National Tax Journal ,57(4):805-828.
    23. Slemrod, J., Yitzhaki, S(2002) Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In: Auerbach, A., Feldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    24. Dyreng, Scott, Michelle Hanlon, and Edward L. Maydew (2008), “Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance.” Accounting Review, 83, 61-82
    25. Dyreng, Scott, Michelle Hanlon, and Edward L. Maydew (2005), “Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance.” Working Paper, University of North Carolina.
    26. Wilson, R. (2009) “An examination of corporate tax shelter participants.” The Accounting Review 84 (3): 969-999.
    三、網路資源
    行政院主計總處,中華民國統計資訊網,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    101255012
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101255012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    501201.pdf1353KbAdobe PDF2211View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback