政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/67460
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51706889      線上人數 : 480
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67460


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67460


    題名: 生技產業IPO風險因子、策略聯盟與折價之關聯性研究
    The Association between the Risk Factor Disclosures in IPO Prospectus, Strategic Alliances and Underpricing of Biotech Firms
    作者: 洪上琄
    貢獻者: 諶家蘭
    洪上琄
    關鍵詞: 首次公開發行
    生技產業
    首次公開發行折價
    公開說明書
    風險因子
    策略聯盟
    Initial public offerings
    Biotech industry
    Underpricing
    Prospectus
    Risk factor
    Strategic alliance
    日期: 2013
    上傳時間: 2014-07-14 11:27:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要探討生技產業公開說明書之風險因子揭露以及首次公開發行(IPO, initial public offering)前之策略聯盟關係對首次公開發行折價所產生之影響。本研究以美國生技產業首次公開發行公司為研究對象，樣本期間為1997年至2012年。
    許多文獻指出當初級市場認購人間資訊不對稱程度越大時，IPO價值之事前不確定性(ex ante uncertainty)越高，因此以事前不確定性的概念來衡量資訊不對稱程度，並透過公開說明書中資訊之揭露作為事前不確定性的代理變數以探討其與IPO折價現象之關聯。本研究即利用公開說明書之風險因子揭露作為事前不確定性的代理變數，並預期揭露的數量多寡與內容描述將影響IPO折價。另外，由於文獻指出策略聯盟所傳達的正面訊號，可能有助於生技公司減少因產業特性所造成的不確定性，因此本研究預期生技公司於IPO前擁有策略聯盟關係將影響IPO折價。
    本研究參考過去文獻，建立資訊揭露的四級指標加上風險因子所揭露的項目多寡，系統性地衡量生技公司公開說明書之風險因子，並以多元迴歸分析檢測假說。實證結果顯示：風險因子的內容描述越具量化或越具體，IPO折價越大，並且發現大公司之風險因子揭露數量與IPO折價具正向關係，而生技公司於IPO前擁有策略聯盟關係對IPO折價幅度具有顯著負向關係。研究結果顯示公開說明書之風險因子揭露及策略聯盟與事前不確定性所產生之IPO折價現象之關聯性。
    This study investigates whether disclosure of risk factors in the prospectus and the effect of strategic alliances before IPO date will influence underpricing of the biotech firms. Data is collected for biotech companies of U.S IPOs issued from 1997 to 2012 as the research sample.
    Much literature indicates that the greater is the information asymmetry between different investors, the higher is the ex ante uncertainty about an initial public offering’s value. Hence, the ex ante uncertainty is measured as the degree of asymmetric information. And there are a number of studies that use different measurement as a proxy for ex-ante uncertainty including disclosures in the prospectus to examine its relation to underpricing. This study uses risk factors in the prospectus as a proxy for ex-ante uncertainty and expects that the quantity of risk factors and the content or description of risk factors will influence underpricing. Furthermore, since previous studies consider that strategy alliances convey a positive signal to investors which would reduce the uncertainty from the industrial characteristics of the biotech industry and would mitigate investors’ concern, this study expects that a biotech IPO with strategic alliances before IPO date will affect underpricing.
    Referring to past literature, this study builds four-class index for disclosure score and uses the number of risk factors to systematically measure risk factors in the prospectus. The empirical results show that a biotech IPO with more quantitative information or some specific information of risk factors will experience higher underpricing. In addition, in larger firms the greater are risk factors disclosed no matter the quantity or the content and its description, the higher is underpricing. And there is a significantly negative relation between strategic alliances before IPO date and underpricing. In conclusion, disclosure of risk factors in the prospectus and the effect of strategic alliances are related to underpricing as expected.
    參考文獻: References
    陳韻涵，2012，我國生醫產業初次上市櫃公開說明書之資訊揭露程度對初級市場承銷定價效率暨次級市場投資人信念異質性之影響，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    廖偉盛，2011，IPO市場中風險資訊揭露之角色，國立台北大學經濟學系碩士論文。
    Arnold, T., R.P.H. Fishe, and D. North. 2010. The Effects of Ambiguous Information on Initial and Subsequent IPO Returns. Financial Management 39 (4): 1497-1519.
    Arthurs, J. D., R. E. Hoskisson, L. W. Busenitz, and R. A. Johnson. 2008. Managerial agents watching other agents: multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal 51(2): 277-294.
    Atiase, R.K. 1980. Predisclosure information asymmetries, firm capitalization, earnings reports and security price behavior. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
    Atiase, R. K. 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 23(1): 21-36.
    Barry, C. B., C. J. Muscarella, J.W. Peavy, and M. R. Vetsuypens. 1990. The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies. Journal of Financial Economics 27(2):447-471.
    Beatty, R.P., and J.R. Ritter. 1986. Investment banking, reputation and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 15 (1-2): 213-232.
    Beatty, R. P., and E. J. Zajac. 1994. Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2):313-335.
    Beatty, R.P., and I. Welch. 1996. Issuer expenses and legal liability in initial public offerings. Journal of Law and Economics 39 (2): 545-602.
    Benveniste, L.M., and P. A. Spindt. 1989. How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues?” Journal of Financial Economics 24(2): 343-361.
    Carter, R. B., F. H. Dark, and A. K. Singh. 1998. Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-Run Performance of IPO Stocks. The Journal of Finance 53(1):285-311.
    Cerbioni, F., and A. Parbonetti. 2007. Exploring the Effects of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital Disclosure: An Analysis of European Biotechnology Companies. European Accounting Review 16(4): 791-826.
    Certo, S. T., J.G. Covin, C. M. Daily, and D. R. Dalton. 2001. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22(6‐7): 641-658.
    Cyr, L. A., D. E. Johnson, and T. M. Welbourne. 2000. Human Resources in Initial Public Offering Firms: Do Venture Capitalists Make a Difference? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 25(1): 77-92.
    Darrell, W., and B. N. Schwartz. 1997. Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(2): 125-154.
    Feltham, G.A., J. S. Hughes, and D. A. Simunic. 1991. Empirical assessment of the impact of auditor quality on the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14(4): 375-399.
    Freedman, M. and A. J. Stagliano. 1992. European unification, accounting harmonization, and social disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting 27(2): 112-122.
    Galant, D. 1992. Going Public. Institutional Investor 26(4):127-129.
    Givoly, D., and C. Shi. 2008. Accounting for Software Development Costs and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from IPO Underpricing in the Software Industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 23(2):271-303.
    Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20 (5): 397–420.
    Gulati, R., and M.C. Higgins. 2003. Which ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2): 127-144.
    Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2004. Competitive Costs of Disclosure by Biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (2): 319-355.
    Guo, R.J., B. Lev, and N. Zhou. 2005. The Valuation of Biotech IPOs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 20(4): 423-459.
    Guthrie, J.P., and L. D. Parker. 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. In Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3:159-175.
    Hail, L. 2002. The impact of voluntary corporate disclosures on the ex-ante cost of capital for Swiss firms. European Accounting Review 11(4): 741-773.
    Hand, J. R. M. 2005. The Value Relevance of Financial Statements in the Venture Capital Market. The Accounting Review 80(2): 613-648.
    Hanley, K.W. 1993. The Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings and the Partial Adjustment Phenomenon. Journal of Financial Economics 34(2): 231-250.
    Hanley, K.W., and G. Hoberg. 2010. The Information Content of IPO Prospectuses. The Review of Financial Studies 23 (7): 2821-2864.
    Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
    Hughes, S. B., A. Andersonb, and S. Golden. 2001. Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20(3): 217-240.
    Ibbotson, R. G. 1975. Price Performance of Common Stock New Issues. Journal of Financial Economics 2 (3): 235-272.
    Ibbotson, R. G., J. L. Sindelar, and J. R. Ritter. 1988. Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 1(2): 37-45.
    Ibbotson, R. G., and J. R. Ritter. 1995. Initial public offerings. Handbooks in operations research and management science edited by R. A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. T. Ziemba, North-Holland 9: 993-1016.
    Jensen, M. 2004. Who gets Wall Street’s attention? How alliance announcements and alliance density affect analyst coverage. Strategic Organization 2 (3): 293–312.
    Krippendorf, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publications. Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. London: Oxford University Press. Marketing 25(6): 47-51.
    Leone, A.J., S. Rock, and M. Willenborg. 2007. Disclosure of Intended Use of Proceeds and Underpricing in Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (1): 111-153.
    Li, X., and R. W. Masulis .2006. Venture Capital Investment by IPO Underwriters: Certification, Alignment of Interest, or Moral Hazard? Working paper.
    Ljungqvist, A., and W. J. Wilhelm. 2003. IPO Pricing in the Dot‐com Bubble. The Journal of Finance 58(2): 723-752.
    Logue, D. E. 1973. On the Pricing of Unseasoned Equity Issues: 1965-1969. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8 (1): 91-103.
    Loughran, T., and J. Ritter. 2004. Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed over Time? Financial Management 33(3): 5-37.
    Megginson, W. L., and K. A. Weiss. 1991. Venture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance 46(3): 879-903.
    Muscarella, C., and M. Vetsuypens. 1989. Initial public offerings and information asymmetry. Working paper, Southern Methodist University.
    Nam, D., J.D. Arthurs, M.L. Nielsen, F. Mousa, and K. Liu. 2008. Information Disclosure and IPO Valuation: What Kinds of Information Matter and is More Information Always Better?. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 28.
    Pisano, G.P. 1991. The governance of innovation: vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 20 (3): 237–249.
    Reilly, F. K. 1973. Further Evidence on Short-run Results for New Issue Investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8 (1): 83-90.
    Ritter, J. R. 1984. The `Hot Issue` Market of 1980. The Journal of Business 57: 215-239.
    Rock, K. 1986. Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics 15 (1-2): 187-212.
    Stoll, H. R. and A. J. Curley. 1970. Small Business and the New Issues Market for Equities. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 5 (3): 309-322.
    Stuart, T. E., H. Hoang, and R. C. Hybels. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2):315-349.
    Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Edited by Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
    Welbourne, T. M., and A. O. Andrews. 1996. Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: should human resource management be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal 39(4): 891-919.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    101353050
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101353050
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    305001.pdf4854KbAdobe PDF2153檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋