English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51661825      Online Users : 508
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67268


    Title: 操縱學派與西奧•赫曼斯的翻譯觀
    Other Titles: The Manipulation School and Theo Hermans’ Translation Approach
    Authors: 古孟玄
    Ku, Menghsuan
    Contributors: 歐洲語文學系
    Keywords: 操縱學派;西奧˙赫曼斯;翻譯;描述翻譯學派;規範
    the Manipulation School;Theo Hermans;translation;descriptive translation approach;norms
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2014-07-03 14:35:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 西奧˙赫曼斯（Theo Hermans）是描述翻譯學派的主力之一，其最著名的短篇論述為1985年所出版的The Manipulation of Literature, Studies in Literary Translation中，長達9頁的前言：“Translation Studies and New Paradigm”。此篇論述不僅是“操縱學派”（the Manipulation School）命名的由來，也釐清許多傳統觀念的偏差，為翻譯這門學科正名。本文首先介紹操縱學派源起之歷史背景，再佐以赫曼斯的論點詳述一直以來翻譯不受重視，被排除或附屬於其他學科的情形。第二部分討論翻譯與規範的關係：此部份將分別敘述翻譯及規範的定義，再論及兩者之關係，最後討論赫曼斯對於正確的翻譯觀的看法。結論有三，一為翻譯學科的成熟，二為對於“規範”的重新認識，三為結合文本背景與文本本身研究的構想。
    Theo Herman is one of the scholars of the school of descriptive translation approach. "Translation Studies and New Paradigm", the nine-page preface of The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation, published in 1985, is his most well-known article. Not only the Manipulation School was named after this article, but also many traditional deviations of translation were clarified, that has drawn the translation discipline to the right track. The thesis will first introduce the historical background of the Manipulation School and describe in detail how translation was marginalized, excluded from or attached to other disciplines in accordance with Hermans` viewpoint. The second part will discuss the relationship between translation and norms: this part will recount the definitions of translation and norms, explore their relationship, and finally discuss Hermans’ views about the correct translation approach. There are three key points in conclusion: 1. the maturity of the translation discipline; 2. the re-recognition to the "norm" 3. the research approach that integrates the historical background of the text and the text itself.
    Relation: 國立編譯館館刊, 33(2), 48-53
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[歐洲語文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    fb140703142543.pdf458KbAdobe PDF2835View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback