Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67069
|
Title: | 通訊傳播匯流下的頻譜管理框架: 頻譜本質與管理模式之探討 A Spectrum Management Framework in Convergence Era: To Explore the Connection between Spectrum Nature and Management Regimes |
Authors: | 蔡穎 Tsai, Ying |
Contributors: | 彭芸 Peng, Bonnie 蔡穎 Tsai, Ying |
Keywords: | 頻譜管理 財產權 公有論 稀有論 使用效率 spectrum management property rights public spectrum spectrum scarcity spectrum efficiency |
Date: | 2013 |
Issue Date: | 2014-07-01 12:02:28 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本文取徑經濟學的公共財概念,試圖從此一角度出發探討頻譜管理從「稀有論」轉向「公有論」的論述正當性,並釐清管理模式與財貨特性之關連。根據研究結果,頻譜資源的原始狀態雖符合公共財定義,但並非任何人所有,其財貨特性會隨著科技發展和法律制度而變動,因此「頻譜公有」的論述並未獲得專家學者支持。
儘管如此,頻譜資源在運用上需避免使用者相互干擾,因此建立一套合理的使用秩序,方能促使資源發揮效用。針對提供商業服務之頻譜,本文建議主管機關在規劃與指配上應給予使用者更多彈性,以類似出租國有地的方式,視頻譜資源為獨立客體並制訂相關法律;其次為放寬技術與用途限制,並在釋出資源後開放頻譜二次交易,讓分配效率得以提升。
長期而言,無線通訊科技將不斷演化,當干擾問題可獲得妥善解決,為追求資源使用效率,本文建議管理模式應朝開放共享的方向邁進。簡言之,「頻譜管理」任務本身就是一種公共服務,政府責無旁貸,唯有充分掌握頻譜資源的供給與需求變化,施政方針才能充分反應使用者需求。 This research argues that the scarcity rationale could be replaced by public spectrum rationale. The research results show that although the nature of spectrum resource is public good by economic definition, it doesn’t mean the resources are owned by the public. Therefore, the ownership of resources should be clearly defined under the law to prevent users from interfering with each other.
For spectrum used in private sector, the allocative efficiency is important for some valuable blocks of spectrum such as 800MHz, 900MHz, 1800MHz, 2600MHz. To improve allocative efficiency, the research result suggest that the government could legislate specific laws on spectrum management, while allowing users to decide how they want to make use of the resources.
In the long run, wireless communication technology will keep developing. As long as signal interference can be controlled under specific conditions, spectrum sharing including common regime and license-exempt use should be adopted. A government plays the key role which not only provides management service but should also have a systematic plan for improving spectrum efficiency. |
Reference: | 1.丁奇、陽楨(2013)。《大話行動通訊》。台北市:佳魁資訊。 2.日商野村總合研究所(2011)。〈我國中、長期無線電頻譜最佳化規劃〉,日商野村總合研究所股份有限公司。 3.石世豪(2011)。〈電波監理與言論自由事前限制問題:大法官釋字第678號解釋評析〉,《法令月刊》,(62)3:25-49。 4.石世豪、蔡志宏、莊春發與程宗明(2001)。《數位化時代無線電視之定位與發展》。臺北市:行政院研考會。 5.王文科(1994)。《教育研究法》。臺北市:五南。 6.王修曉譯(2007)。《研究方法概論》。臺北市:五南。(原書Ruane, J.M. [2005]. Essentials of Research Methods:A Guide to Social Science Research. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.) 7.行政院(2010)。《數位匯流發展方案》。 8.林淑惠(2013.01.17)。〈數位無線電視台 再釋2執照〉,《工商時報》。 上網日期:2013年01月20日,取自:http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/11050106/122013011700124.html 9.林承宇(2007)。〈當「稀有」可能不再「稀有」」:重返廣播電波頻譜「稀有性」的規範立論〉,《傳播與管理研究》,(6)2:65-86。 10.林俊宏(2008)。〈英國電信自由化與無線電頻譜法制變遷之探討〉,《國立中正大學法學集刊》,(24):247-295。 11.周韻采(2004)。〈國際電信政策與產業發展概況〉,劉幼琍(編)《電訊傳播》,頁52-99。臺北市:雙葉書廊。 12.周韻采(2003)。〈頻譜核釋與制度:財產權與公信力的實證研究〉,《政治科學論叢》,19:203-224。 13.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧與吳聰敏(2010)。《經濟學:理論與實際》。臺北市:翰蘆圖書。 14.陳世昌(2013.01.16)。〈NCC規劃6年終定案 第二梯次數位無線電視開放2家〉《EToday 東森新聞雲》。上網日期:2013年01月20日,取自:http://www.ettoday.net/news/20130116/153609.htm 15.陳春生(2010)。〈釋字第678號解釋協同意見書〉。取自: http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=678 16.陳炳宏(2005)。〈無線電頻率指配模式與拍賣制度之研究〉,《新聞學研究》,82:171-210。 17.陳建良譯(2006)。《賽局理論》。臺北市:智勝文化。(原書McCain, R.A. [2004]. Game Theory: A Non-Technical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy. Singapore: Thomson/South-Western.) 18.莊奕琦(2003)。《經濟學原理》。臺北市:智勝文化。 19.羅莊鵬(2004)。《無線電頻譜的配用模式-政府管制、市場機制與共用模式之探討》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 20.通訊傳播法管理草案總說明(2007)。 21.劉鶴群、林秀雲、陳麗欣、胡正申與黃韻如譯(2010)。《社會科學研究方法》。臺北市:新加坡商聖。(原書 Babbie, E. [2010]. The Practice of Social Research, 12e.Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia. 22.邊明道、陳心懿譯(2005)。《傳播政策基本原理:電子媒體管制的原則與過 程》。台北:揚智。原書Napoli, M. P. (2001). Foundations of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press. 23.彭芸(2012)。《NCC與媒介政策-公共利益、規管哲學與實務》。新北市:風雲論壇。 24.彭芸(2011)。《NCC與數位匯流-匯流政策芻議》。新北市: 風雲論壇。 25.彭心儀、王郁琦與周韻采(2007)。《規劃頻率拍賣與回收制度之研究》。(NCC委託研究報告,PG9601-0077)。新竹:國立清華大學。 26.彭心儀(2010)。〈論頻譜「稀有資源」的管制原則〉,《臺北大學法學論叢》,75:211-256。 27.彭心儀(2007)。<天空中的土地?頻譜交易之法律問題初探>,《臺灣法學雜誌》,101:5-26。 28.鄭瑞城主編(1993)。《解構廣電媒體 : 建立廣電新秩序》。台北市 : 澄社。 29.國家通訊傳播委員會(2010)。《頻譜資源之規劃與管理》。台北:通傳會。 30.國家通訊傳播委員會(2013)。【第2梯次數位無線電視釋照規劃草案】。 31.國家通訊傳播委員會(2013)。〈頻譜管理政策〉。上網日期:2013年6月19日,取自http://freqdbo.ncc.gov.tw/Portal/NCCB01D_.aspx 32.〈因應數位匯流 頻譜活化管理開步走〉(2013.04)。《NCC News》4月號:4-5。 33.蔡志宏、周韻采與李淳(2012)。《世界先進國家無線寬頻及新科技發展下之通訊趨勢分析與因應建議委託研究》。(NCC委託研究報告,J101-007)。台北:台灣通訊學會。 34.蔡念中、江亦瑄與劉敦瑞(2010)。《數位媒體匯流》。臺北市:五南。 35.顏春煌(2006)。《行動與無線通訊》。臺北市:金禾資訊。 36.謝穎青主編(2008)。《通訊科技與法律的對話》。臺北市 : 天下遠見。 37.劉幼琍主編(2004)。〈電信、媒體與網路的整合與匯流〉,劉幼琍(編)《電訊傳播》,頁372-412。臺北市:雙葉書廊。 38.劉孔中(2010.09)。〈論頻譜資源管理之革新(上)〉,《NCP Newsletter》,19:29-35。 39.劉孔中(2010.10)。〈論頻譜資源管理之革新(下)〉,《NCP Newsletter》,20:28-35。 40.Bauer, J. M. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Management Regimes. Retrieved August 14, 2013, from http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/toolkit/docs/Document/2299 41.Benjamin, S. M., Lichtman, D. G., Shelanski, H., & Weiser, P. J. . (2006). TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW AND POLICY. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press. 42.Benjamin, S. M. (2003). Spectrum Abundance and the Choice Between Private and Public Control. New York University Law Review, 78, 2007-2102. 43.Benjamin, S. M. (2002). The Logic of Scarcity: Idle Spectrum as a First Amendment Violation. Duke Law Journal, 52(1), 1-111. 44.Berresford, J. (2005). The Scarcity Rationale for Regulating Traditional Broadcasting: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed. Washington, DC: Federal Communication Commission Media Bureau Staff Research Paper. 45.Cambini, C., & Garelli, N. (2011). Evaluation of the opportunity cost of the spectrum: Application to the digital dividend. Telecommunications Policy, 35(7), 633-649. 46.Cave, M., Doyle, C., & Webb, W. (2007). Essentials of Modern Spectrum Management: Cambridge University Press. 47.Cave, M., & Webb, W. (2012). The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum. Telecommunications Policy, 36(4), 293-300. 48.Coase, R. H. (1959). The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1-40. 49.Cooper, M. (2007). Personal Communications and Spectrum Policy For the 21st Century. Telecommunications Policy, 31(10–11), 566-572. 50.Durantini, A., & Martino, M. (2013). The spectrum policy reform paving the way to cognitive radio enabled spectrum sharing. Telecommunications Policy, 37(2–3), 87-95. 51.FCC. (2002). Spectrum Policy Task Force Report. Washington, DC: Federal Communication Commission. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://transition.fcc.gov/sptf/reports.html 52.Falch, M., & Tadayoni, R. (2004). Economic versus technical approaches to frequency management. Telecommunications Policy, 28(2), 197-211. 53.Faulhaber, G. R. (2006). The future of wireless telecommunications: Spectrum as a critical resource. Information Economics and Policy, 18(3), 256-271. 54.Farber, D. J., & Faulhaber, G. R. (2002). Spectrum Management: Property Rights, Markets, and The Commons. No 116, Regulation2point0 Working paper:1-25. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:reg:wpaper:116 55.Fowler, M. S., & Brenner, D. B. (1982). A marketplace approach to broadcast regulation. Texas Law Review, 60, 207-257. 56.Freyens, B. P., & Yerokhin, O. (2011). Allocative vs. technical spectrum efficiency. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 291-300. 57.Freyens, B. P. (2010). Shared or exclusive radio waves? A dilemma gone astray. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 293-304. 58.Freyens, B. (2007). The Economics of Spectrum Management: A Review. Australia: Australian Communication and Media Authority. 59.Goodman, E.P. (2009). Spectrum Policy and the Public Interest. In D. Gerbarg (Ed.), Television goes digital (pp. 173-186). New York: Springer. 60.Hazlett, T. W., & Leo, E. T. (2011). THE CASE FOR LIBERAL SPECTRUM LICENSES: A TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 26(2), 1037-1101. 61.Hazlett, T. W. (1990). The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum. Journal of Law & Economics, 33(1). 62.Hwang, J., & Yoon, H. (2009). A mixed spectrum management framework for the future wireless service based on techno-economic analysis: The Korean spectrum policy study. Telecommunications Policy, 33(8), 407-421. 63.ICC.(2004). Telecoms Liberalization: An international business guide for policy makers. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce. 64.ICT regulation toolkit(2013). Radio Spectrum Management. Retrieved June 8, 2013, from http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/5 65.Iosifidis, P. (2011). Global Media and Communication Policy. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 66.Lundborg, M., Reichl, W., & Ruhle, E-O. (2012). Spectrum allocation and its relevance for competition. Telecommunications Policy, 36(8), 664-675. 67.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research. UK: Sage Publications. 68.Marks, P., & Williamson, B. (2007): Spectrum Allocation, Spectrum Commons and Public Goods: the Role of the Market. Communications & Strategies, 67, 65-84. 69.Napoli, P. (1999), The marketplace of ideas metaphor in communications regulation. Journal of Communication, 49: 151–169. 70.Nuechterlein, J. E., & Weiser, P. J. (2005). Digital crossroads : American telecommunications policy in the internet age. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 71.Ofcom. (2006). Spectrum Usage Rights: Technology and usage neutral access to the radio spectrum. U.K. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/sur/ 72.Peha, J. M. (1998). Spectrum management policy options. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 1(1), 2-8. 73.Saladna, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Oxford University Press:New York. 74.Sedlack, R.G., & Stanley, J. (1992). Social research: theory and methods MA: Allyn and Bacon. 75.Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press. 76.Sterling, C.H., Bernt, P.W., & Weiss, M.B.H. (2006). Shaping American Telecommunications: A History of Technology, Policy, and Economics: Taylor & Francis. 77.Thierer, A. D.(2007). Why Regulate Broadcasting? Toward a Consistent First Amendment Standard for the Information Age. Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 15, 431-482. 78.Yoo, S-H., Kim, J-S., & Kim, T-Y. (2001). Value-focused thinking about strategic management of radio spectrum for mobile communications in Korea. Telecommunications Policy, 25(10–11), 703-718. 79.Werbach, K. D. (2011) The Wasteland: Anticommons, White Spaces, and the Fallacy of Spectrum. Arizona Law Review, 53(1), 2011:214-254. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 新聞研究所 100451012 102 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100451012 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [新聞學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
101201.pdf | 1231Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 880 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|