English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51714337      Online Users : 623
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67025


    Title: Mother or Father: Who Received Custody? The Best Interests of the Child Standard and Judges` Custody Decisions in Taiwan
    Authors: 劉宏恩
    Liu, Hung‐En
    Contributors: 法科所
    Date: 2001.08
    Issue Date: 2014-06-30 17:56:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In 1996, Taiwan adopted the best interests of the child standard to substitute for the presumption of paternal custody. This thesis is an empirical and descriptive study of how Taiwan`s judges explain and apply the new law. The hypothesis is that cultural and social circumstances may significantly influence judges` explanations of what is best for the child. Seventy cases of an urban district court and a rural district court were collected and analysed. The findings attest that Taiwan`s court decisions of child custody cases actually reflect many cultural ideas, such as stereotyped gender roles, a sense of ‘face’, and the tradition of parents` long‐term financial support for their children. Meanwhile, the varying socio‐economic climate of Taiwan across districts and the lack of public welfare programmes also clearly affect judges` custody decisions. Moreover, this study finds that since 1996, custody has been overwhelmingly awarded to mothers, whereas before 1996 fathers were favoured by the courts. This change of court preference was not only caused by the gender‐neutral standard and the influence of the women`s movement, but it was also caused by the influence of traditional ideas and social customs on judges. Judges prefer the ‘all‐or‐none custody’arrangement that imposes a double burden on single mothers. This decision pattern undermines both gender equality and the child`s best interests and further worsens the economic status of post‐divorce single‐mother families. This study argues that judges should stop using economic competence as a necessary factor in determining custody. Both public welfare programmes and private child support from the non‐custodial parent should be implemented to assist the custodial parent if she or he is the more suitable but economically less competent parent. In addition, judges should give visitation orders more often and pay attention to the child`s psychological and emotional needs.
    Relation: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(2), 185-225
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/15.2.185
    DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/15.2.185
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    LiuHung-En2000.pdf51KbAdobe PDF21517View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback