政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/63742
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51666164      在线人数 : 515
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63742


    题名: 我國建立受控外國公司稅制對上市公司投資中國大陸子公司損益稅負之影響
    The Effects of Implementing Controlled Foreign Corporation Tax Regulation on Taxation of Chinese Subsidary Investment Income of Taiwanese Listed Companies
    作者: 陳富枝
    Chen, Fu Chi
    贡献者: 陳明進
    Chen, Ming Chin
    陳富枝
    Chen, Fu Chi
    关键词: 受控外國公司
    租稅庇護所
    多國籍企業
    Controlled Foreign Corporation
    Tax Haven
    Multinational Enterprise
    日期: 2012
    上传时间: 2014-02-10 15:03:58 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　依現行所得稅法規定，只要受控外國公司盈餘未匯回，即可享有「租稅遞延」的效果，由於近十年臺灣利用受控外國公司，對大陸間接投資金額占全部對外投資總額比重超過五成以上，又因上市公司投資金額較大且具有代表性，因此本論文以國內上市公司利用受控外國公司，間接投資大陸子公司為研究對象，探討國內上市公司是否有透過「受控外國公司」不分配盈餘，藉由稅法「漏洞」以產生遞延課稅之效果，及我國若是建立受控外國公司課稅制度，對我國上市公司投資大陸子公司其損益稅負之影響。
    　　本文研究結果，發現國內上市公司利用受控外國公司投資大陸子公司，普遍存在有盈餘卻不分配且不匯回之現象，我國有建立受控外國公司課稅制度之正當性及必要性；且我國如建立受控外國公司課稅制度，以產業別而言電子產業受影響最大，以研發強度而言，研發強度在5%~7%及9%以上之企業有較大之影響。又雖然實施受控外國公司課稅制度後，對於中等規模(資本額50億至100億)之有效稅率增加幅度最大，但受影響而應繳納稅負之金額仍以大型規模之企業為最高。
    　　因此我國建立受控外國公司課稅制度，能拉近不同特性企業間適用有效稅率的差距，對舉債投資得扣除利息費用，境外投資收益卻能遞延課稅，以及在台灣享有研發投資抵減利益，卻有高額境外所得保留在海外未匯回台灣課稅之公司，有一定衡平作用，則我國建立受控外國公司課稅制度，實已非僅財政收入之考量而已，相對而言，改善租稅公平才是具有更大的意涵，因此有其正當性及必要性。文末提出幾點建議，期能作為政府研擬受控外國公司課稅制度之參考。
    關鍵詞：受控外國公司、租稅庇護所、多國籍企業
    　　According to the current provisions of the Income Tax Act, Taiwanese companies will benefit from the "tax deferral" by not unremitting overseas earnings of their controlled foreign corporations (CFCs). Since the last decade in Taiwan, many companies have been increasing investments in Mainland China via their controlled foreign corporations, the investment in Mainland China have accounted for over half the Taiwanese total foreign investments. Therefore, this study focuses on the Taiwanese listed companies which invest indirectly in Mainland China. Furthermore, the controlled foreign corporations have become a tax loophole; this study examines whether those listed companies leverage the tax loophole to gain the tax benefit through the "tax deferral of Chinese subsidiary earnings." Besides, this study estimates the potential impacts on the profit and tax costs of the mainland subsidiaries of Taiwanese listed companies, if the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) tax system will be established in the future.
    　　The results of this study show that the majority of Taiwanese listed companies do not fully distribute and remit the Chinese subsidiary earnings back to Taiwan. Hence, it is necessary for Taiwan to establish the controlled foreign company tax system to close the tax loophole. As to the impacts on industries, the electronics industries will be most affected by the CFC tax system, if established. In addition, companies whose R&D intensity range from 5% to 7% and over 9% will also be significantly influenced. Although the effective tax rates of medium-sized companies will have the highest increase in effective tax rates, but large companies will have the highest increase in the amount of CFC tax.
    　　Therefore, the establishment of CFC tax system will contribute to narrowing down the gaps in effective tax rates between different firm characteristics of companies. Moreover, the new tax system can help prevent companies from shirking their fair shares of tax payments. The establishment of CFC tax system is not just for fiscal revenues, but also for the improvement of tax fairness—the latter being more important. Finally, this study concludes with suggestions that may be the useful references for the government to design CFC tax system in the future.
    Key words：Controlled Foreign Corporation, Tax Haven, Multinational Enterprise
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分:
    王建煊、吳嘉勳(2012)，租稅法34版，台北：華泰文化事業公司。
    王瓊荻(2007)，受控外國公司所得稅反避稅課稅制度之研究，逢甲大學財稅研究所碩士論文。
    楊偕易(2005)，影響台灣跨國業企業運用租稅天堂之特性分析，政治大學財政學系碩士班論文。
    曾嘉文、吳蓮英(1999)，「受控外國公司所得課稅制度之研究」，財稅研究，第31卷，頁97-156。
    金世朋、羅能清(2002)，「綜合所得稅改採屬人兼屬地主義之研究」，台北：行政院財政改革委員會。
    李顯峰(2009)，所得稅反避稅制度之研究，行政院賦稅改革委員會研究報告。
    李顯峰、葛克昌、林世銘(2006)，海外所得課稅相關配套措施之研究，財政部賦稅署95年委託研究計畫。
    蘇建榮、賴育邦(2006)，受控外國公司所得課稅制度之研究，財政部95年委託研究計畫。
    林妙雀(1992)，「防杜國外控股公司避稅之立法研究」，財稅研究，第24卷第2期，頁45-71。
    胡仕賢(2009)，企業運用租稅天堂型態與受控外國公司課稅制度之研究，東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
    吳宗吉(1994)，租稅天堂衍生租稅問題之研究，國立政治大學財政學研究所碩士論文。
    徐婉琳(2000)，多國籍企業跨國節稅之實證研究-以我國上市上櫃電子業為例，大葉大學工業關係研究所碩士論文。
    陳信宏、孫克難(2002)，免稅天堂投資法令之誘因分析及對投資之影響，台北：經濟部研發會。
    張永維(2003)，國際租稅規避與查核之研究，逢甲大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部分:
    Tanzi, V.(2000), “Globalization, Technological Developments, and the Work of Fis
    cal Termites,” IMF Working Paper, WP/00/81.
    Altshuler, R. and H. Grubert (1996), “Balance Sheets, Multinational Financial Policy, and the Cost of Capital at Home and Abroad,” NBER Working Paper No. 5810.
    Boskin, M. and W. G. Gale (1987), “New Results on the Effects of Tax Policy on the International Location of Investment,” in Martin Feldstein (ed.), The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation, 201-219, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bretschger, L., and F. Hettich (2002), “Globalization, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries,” European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 695-716.
    Chown, J., M. Edwards-ker (1974), “Tax Havens and offshore Investment Center.” The Banker.
    Edger, T. (2003), “Corporate Income Coordination as a Response to International Tax Competition and International Tax Arbitrage,” Canadian Tax Journal, 51(3),1079-1158.
    European Federation of Accountants (2002), “Controlled Foreign Company Legislations in the EU,” FEE Position Paper.
    Greenleaf, L.（2004）, “National Report Australia,” in M. Lang, et al. (eds.), CFC Legislation：Domestic Provisions, Tax Treaties and EC Law, Vienna：Lime Tree Press.
    Glautier M. W. E. & Bassinger, F. W. (1987), A Reference Guide to International Taxation, Massachusetts：Lexington.
    Grubert, H. (1998), “Taxes and Division of Foreign Operating Income among Royalties, Interest, Dividends and Retained Earnings,” Journal of Public Economics, 68, 269-290.
    Grubert, H. and J. Mutti (1991), “Taxes, Tariffs and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 285-293.
    Hartman, D. (1984), “Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States,” National Tax Journal, 37, 475-487.
    Hartman, D. (1985), “Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of Public Economics, 26, 107-121.
    Hines, J. and E. Rice (1994), “Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 149-182.
    Hines, J. and R. G. Hubbard (1990), “Coming Home to America： Dividend Repatriation by U.S. Multinationals,” in A. Razin and J. Slemrod (eds.), Taxation in the Global Economy, 161-200, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Mutti, J. (1981), “Tax Incentives and Repatriation Decisions of U.S. Multinational Corporations,” National Tax Journal, 34, 241-248.
    Miller, R. B. (1988), Tax Haven Investing, Probus Pulishing. Chicago.
    Rodrik, D. (1997), “Trade, Social Insurance, and the Limits of Globalization,” NBER working paper 5905.
    UNCTAD (2006), World Investment Report 2006, FDI from Developing and Transition Economies：Implications for Development Overview, New York: United Nations.
    Wildasin, D. (1988), “Nash Equilibrium in Models of Fiscal Competition,” Journal of Public Economics, 35, 229-240.
    Wildasin, D. (1989), “Inter-jurisdictional Capital Mobility: Fiscal Externality and a Corrective Subsidy,” Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 193-212.
    Wilson, D. (1986), “A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition,” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 296-315.
    Wilson, D. (1999), “Theories of Tax Competition,” National Tax Journal, 52, 269-304.
    Wilson, D. and D. Wildasin (2004), “Capital Tax Competition: Bane or Boon,” Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1065-1091.
    Young, Kan H. (1988), “The Effects of Taxes and Rates of Return on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States,” National Tax Journal, 41, 109-121.
    Zodrow, G. and P. Mieszkowski (1986), “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Under-provision of Local Public Goods,” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    100921211
    101
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100921211
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2242检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈