English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51828624      Online Users : 610
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 會議論文 >  Item 140.119/62744


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62744


    Title: 逆想人文社會科學寫作—來自小說敘事研究的啟迪
    Other Titles: Narrative rejuvenating on conventional social science writing
    Authors: 胡紹嘉
    Hu, Shao-Jia
    Contributors: 國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    Keywords: 敘事主體;敘事時間;論文寫作;範式風格
    narrating subject;time of narration;social science writing;paradigmatic style
    Date: 1999
    Issue Date: 2013-12-19 14:28:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去，尤其是在社會科學當中，人們以為自己學科的研究目的在於用抽象、有普遍性意義的理論框架來指導自己的經驗研究，並依此來界說學術研究的宗旨。現在，這種觀點正受到根本性的挑戰。本文便是對此一挑戰的回應。它源於作者對現有學術書寫在描述研究現實之手段上的充分懷疑。本文指出，傳統的論文寫作認為社會真實是獨立於研究者而存在的，因此研究者只要掌握了固定的程序和方法，每一個人所看到與所得到的結論應是一致或至少相近的。因此在研究報告中，比較重視的是研究方法，而不是敘事；因此，誰說的、誰對誰說的？（敘事）並不重要，重要的是怎麼作的、以什麼方式作的？（方法）。凡此，透露的其實是論文寫作中研究者主體的隱沒甚或壓抑。透過對小說研究中的敘事主體與敘事時間這兩種文學批評概念的援引，研究者揭示了新的人文社會科學寫作的可能性途徑。研究者透過對於主體性與時間之敘事意涵的反覆論證，將論文書寫由主/客分裂的「純描述」幻想，恢復為作者自覺意識的「敘事再現」過程。本文最終旨在強調，對於人文社會科學理論的理論反思絕不侷限於對觀念的批評，更重要的乃是針對表述這些觀念的範式風格(paradigmatic style)之有效性的懷疑，而進行更深入的探討。
    In past, literature and science were usually divided to two separate domains. Literature was the repository of rhetoric, subjectivity, and fiction. Science was the repository of "plain" language, objectivity, and fact. The "modernist" vision of science writing as "transparent"－simply reflecting, like a clear pane of glass, an objective "reality"－has dominate social scientific thinking. Only recently has this view been seriously challenge. The purpose of this article is responding to the challenge. All the social sciences have prescribed writing formats－none of them neutral or historically fixed, all of them value-constituting, and all of them narrative choices. By introducing the concepts of narrating subject and time from narratology, we tried answering the question: how should we write in social scientific paper? Finally, we emphases how we are expected to write affects what we can write about.
    Relation: 中華傳播學會年會研討會
    Data Type: conference
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    832_1.pdf399KbAdobe PDF2508View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback