English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51820149      Online Users : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61123


    Title: 論通勤災害應否視為職業災害
    Authors: 張其恆
    Chu,Gwo-Hwa;Chang,Chun-Chig
    Contributors: 政大勞工所
    Keywords: 通勤災害;職災補償
    Date: 2011-12
    Issue Date: 2013-09-30 17:34:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國有關通勤災害職災補償之特殊法律規範方式，易使法院於某些個案援用日本法例過於傳統的解釋論，否定通勤災害勞工於勞基法第59條之適用，而形成勞雇雙方於通勤災害職災補償上，權利義務處於不確定之狀態。本文自比較勞雇關係與勞動法的觀點，釐清我國與日本勞基法有關通勤災害職災補償規定之不同立法背景與屬性；甚至包括英美日等國在內的世界主要國家職災補償之制度發展納入通勤災害保護的趨勢；論證法院某些判決以上世紀初葉的陳舊過時的勞動法理排除通勤災害於勞基法第59條之適用，並無助於定爭止紛；而對問題的緩和與制度的健全，仍有賴採取某些必要之立法或行政調整作為。
    The way of special legal norms about the commuting accidents in Taiwan, was easy to invoke over-traditional interpretative theory by the court in dealing with some cases, which denied the application of the article 59 of Taiwanese Labor Standards Law about commuting accidents, whatever formed the workers’ compensation of both employers and employees in commuting accidents leading to an uncertain state with the right and obligation of employment relations. First, this article from the point of view with the employment relations and labor law tried to clarify the different legislative background between Taiwanese and Japanese Labor Standards Law on the workers` compensation provisions from commuting accidents. Second, there is a tendency towards commuting accidents protection in the advanced countries, even including USA, UK and Japan gradually. Third, to argue the decision of Court in some cases to exclude commuting accidents in the application of the article 59 of the Labor Standards Law adopted out-of-date labor law theory more than half century ago that is no help to terminate related disputes. Lastly, to mitigate the uncertainty and the integrity of the system still relied on some adjustments of the necessary legislative or administration.
    Relation: 政大勞動學報, 27, 77-99
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[勞工研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    277799.pdf448KbAdobe PDF22996View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback