Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60621
|
| Title: | 知識密集服務業之知識管理與服務創新之關聯性研究
The relationships among knowledge management and service innovation in knowledge-intensive business service firms |
| Authors: | 洪鳳儀
Hung, Feng Yi |
| Contributors: | 吳豐祥
洪鳳儀
Hung, Feng Yi |
| Keywords: | 知識密集服務業
知識管理促動因子
知識管理
服務創新
Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS)
Knowledge Management Enablers
Knowledge Management
Service Innovation |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-09-09 11:23:35 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 全球的經濟發展階段已進入知識經濟與服務經濟時代，在知識經濟與服務經濟的交錯發展下，服務業當中依賴專業知識或是特定技術或特定功能領域，並具有高附加價值之知識密集服務業，成為下一波的經濟成長動力。有鑑於知識是知識密集服務業創新的基本要素，知識密集服務業如何透過有效的知識管理提升組織知識的價值，進而不斷的產生創新性的產品或服務，以形成企業的競爭優勢，為企業在經營管理上的重要課題。
本研究將知識密集服務業之知識管理與服務創新模式相結合，探討當企業將知識管理作為策略性工具來實現服務創新的目標時，兩者之關聯性。同時，本研究並深入分析知識密集服務業之知識管理促動因子、知識管理活動以及服務創新的重要影響因素。本研究之研究對象是以一家在國內已推行知識管理多年，且服務創新相當成功的法律事務所作為代表性個案進行研究，並經由學理驗證得出以下研究結論：
在知識管理促動因子與知識管理之關聯性得出以下結論：
1.領導者的態度與明確的知識管理策略是知識管理成功的關鍵因素。
2.企業的團隊合作文化與信任文化越盛行，知識創造與擴散活動越容易進行。
3.資訊科技的選擇性導入，有助於提升組織知識吸收、蓄積與擴散的速度。
4.企業是否提供員工長期性的獎勵措施，會影響員工對知識吸收、創造與擴散活動的參與意願及貢獻程度。
在知識密集服務業之知識管理活動方面得出以下結論：
1.在知識密集服務業的公司，輸入及吸收外部知識是組織能持續進行知識創造的重要方式。
2.基於知識密集服務業之高專業性、高知識密集性的特性，人員的知識與技能是公司知識蓄積的主要載體。
3.知識密集服務業的公司採取以師徒制度為主，教育訓練為輔的人員訓練方式，對知識擴散活動有正面的影響。
在知識密集服務業之服務創新方面得出以下結論：
1.知識密集服務業的公司會根據市場變化與客戶需求來創新服務概念，以提升核心競爭力。
2.知識密集服務業之新客戶介面的重要創新因素，在於能依據實際及潛在客戶的需求特性，建立具有附加價值的服務平台，以提升顧客滿意度。
3.在知識密集服務業的公司，完善的人員教育訓練與人才培育是新服務傳遞系統的重要創新因素。
4.成功創新的知識密集服務業者，於新服務概念、新客戶介面、新服務傳遞系統三構面間的相互配合程度相當良好。
在知識密集服務業之知識管理與服務創新的關聯性得出以下結論：
1.知識密集服務業之知識吸收與創造活動，有助於加速新服務概念的形成。
2.知識密集服務業與客戶間的知識吸收與創造活動，有助於建構符合客戶需求之新客戶介面，並降低創新過程中不確定的風險。
3.知識密集服務業之知識蓄積與擴散活動，對新服務傳遞系統的進行有顯著的正面影響。
4.知識密集服務業將知識管理作為創新服務的策略性工具時，有助於加速實現服務創新的目標。
In the 21st century, the world economy has two highly important developments: the rise of the service sectors and the growing role of knowledge. Especially, the service sectors have increased dramatically in recent years and they occupy a large share of the economy of advanced industrial societies. Among the service sectors, knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) is strong momentum of the economic growth. As “knowledge” is a basic element of KIBS’s innovation, how to implement knowledge management effectively to enhance the value of organizational knowledge and make KIBS continually produce innovative products or services as well as create a competitive advantage is an important issue on business management for enterprises.
This research aims to combine knowledge management with service innovation and to analyze when KIBS firms adopt knowledge management as a strategy to achieve the objective of service innovation, the relationships between knowledge management and service innovation. This research also describes the issues of knowledge management enablers, knowledge management activities and service innovation implemented in KIBS firms. Additionally, this research, through a case study conducted on a successful law firm in Taiwan, further explored the relationships between knowledge management and service innovation. The conclusion of this research may include in four aspects:
1.The findings of the research regarding relationships between knowledge management enablers and knowledge management in KIBS are as follows:
(1)Leadership and clear knowledge management strategy are critical success factors in knowledge management.
(2)The more teamwork culture and trust culture existed in KIBS firms, the easier knowledge creation and diffusion activities implemented.
(3)Application of appropriate information technology in KIBS firms can enhance the speed of organizational knowledge absorption, accumulation and diffusion.
(4)Whether enterprises can offer long-tem incentives to employees will affect employees’ participation willingness and contribution degree for knowledge absorption, creation and diffusion activities thereof.
2.The findings of the research regarding knowledge management activities in KIBS are as follows:
(1)In KIBS firms, input and absorb knowledge from external sources is an important manner of continually facilitating knowledge creation.
(2)Based on KIBS’s characteristics of high professional and high knowledge-intensive, personnel’s knowledge and skills are main carriers of knowledge accumulation in KIBS firms.
(3)In KIBS firms, adoption of “mentoring-based, education and training-supplemented” as staff training methods will make positive impact on knowledge diffusion activities.
3.The findings of the research regarding service innovation in KIBS are as follows:
(1)To enhance the core competitiveness, KIBS firms will create “new service concept” in accordance with market changes and customers’ needs.
(2)In KIBS firms, a critical innovation factor of “new client interface” is whether they can build a value-added service platform in accordance with actual and potential customers’ needs so as to enhance customer satisfaction.
(3)Successful education and training on employees is a critical innovation factor of “new services delivery system” in KIBS firms.
(4)In successful KIBS firms, organizational interaction and coordination between “new service concept”, “new customer interface” and “new service delivery system” would be excellent.
4.The findings of the research regarding relationships between knowledge management and service innovation in KIBS are as follows:
(1)In KIBS firms, through knowledge absorption and creation activities, it can speed up the formation of “new service concept”.
(2)Through Knowledge absorption and creation activities between KIBS firms and their clients, it can assist KIBS firms in building “new client interface” and reducing potential risk in the innovation process.
(3)In KIBS firms, knowledge accumulation and diffusion activities may make a significant positive impact on “new service delivery system”.
(4)When KIBS firms adopt knowledge management as a strategy to innovate services, it can speed up to achieve the objective of service innovation. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
1.Alan Webber等，林宜瑄等譯(1993)，知識優勢：杜拉克、梭羅等大師共譜未來市場新貌，遠流出版。
2.Bill Gates，樂為良譯(1999)，數位神經系統－與思想等快的明日世界，商周出版。
3.Debra M. Amidon，金周英等譯(2001)，知識經濟的創新策略，知書房出版。
4.Dorothy Leonard-Barton，王美音譯(1998)，知識創新之泉：智價企業的經營，遠流出版。
5.James B. Quinn, Jordon J. Baruch, Karen Anne Zien，洪明洲譯(2000)，知識管理與創新，商周出版。
6.Thomas H. Davenport & Laurence Prusak，胡瑋珊譯(1999)，知識管理，中國生產力中心出版。
7.尤克強(2001)，知識管理與創新，天下遠見出版。
8.申靜(2006)，知識型服務業的服務創新，北京圖書館出版社出版。
9.吳怡銘(2004)，理律法律事務所—以關懷、信賴為原動力的知識管理。能力雜誌，583，78-83。
10.吳思華(1996)，策略九說：策略思考的本質，麥田出版社。
11.吳思華(1998)，知識流通對產業創新的影響，第七屆產業管理研討會。
12.吳思華(2001)，知識經濟、知識資本與知識管理，台灣產業研究，第四期，遠流出版。
13.吳豐祥、謝慶龍(2002)，技術知識特質對知識管理作為的影響之實證研究，2002知識經濟與科技創造力培育國際研討會。
14.吳豐祥(2003)，我國高科技中小企業之創新行為之實證研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
15.林孝禹(2004)，知識密集服務業創新行為之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
16.林國勝(2007)，業務部門的知識管理活動與其知識管理促動因子之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
17.林英峰(2000)，知識經濟與知識管理，知識管理研討會論文集，1~45，台北：國立政治大學商學院北區中小企業研訓中心。
18.野中郁次郎&竹內弘高，胡瑋珊譯(2004)，企業創新的螺旋：全球競爭下的知識創新架構，中國生產力中心出版。
19.野中郁次郎&竹內弘高，楊子江、王美音譯(1997)，創新求勝：智價企業論，遠流出版。
20.黃家齊、王思峰(2008)，團隊知識轉換能力組合與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效—知識螺旋理論的新觀點驗證，組織與管理，1(1)，39-72。
21.勤業管理顧問公司，劉京偉譯(2000)，知識管理的第一本書，商周出版。
22.勤業管理顧問公司，許史金譯（2001），知識管理推行實務，商周出版。
23.廖瑋伶(2003)，知識管理在服務創新之應用，國立成功大學碩士論文。
24.劉詩平(2004)，知識密集服務業的創新研究—以工研院全溫層物流技術的創新服務系統發展為例，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
25.賴威龍（1997），組織知識流通之研究：以台灣資訊硬體業為例，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
26.譚大純、汪昭芬(2001)，知識管理之策略觀點：文獻回顧、分類與命題， 科技管理學刊，6(1)，35-54。
27.譚大純、劉廷揚、蔡明洲(1999)，知識管理文獻之回顧與分類，中華民國科技管理研討會論文集，1，623-636。
英文文獻
1.Aaker, D.A. (1998). Strategic Management, 5th. John Wiley& Son, Inc., New York.
2.Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C., & Schiuma, G. (1999). “Knowledge Transfer and Inter-Firm Relationships in Industrial Districts: The Role of the Leader Firm”, Technovation, 19(1), 53-63.
3.Arthur Andersen and the American Productivity and Quality Center (1996). “The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version”, Winter.
4.Badaracco, Jr. (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.Cohen, Wesley M. & Daniel A. Levinthal (1990). “A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35;128-152.
6.Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
7.Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.Gallouj, Faiz (1998), “Innovation in Reserves Services and the Reverse Product Cycle”, Topical Paper, STEP Group.
9.Gates, B. (1999). Business the Speed of Thought: Using A Digital Nervous System. New York: Warner Books, Inc.
10.Gilbert, M & Gordey H.M. (1996). “Understanding The Process of Knowledge Transfer to Achieve Successful Technological Innovation,” Technovation, 16(6), 265-385.
11.Greenwood, W. (1998). “Harnessing Individual Brilliance for Team Creation the Six C’s of the Knowledge Supply Chain”, Paper Presented at the Online Collaboration Conference. Berlin.
12.Sundbo, J. (1997). “Service Development, Internationalization and Competences”, Working Paper, Innovation in Service.
13.Sundbo, J. & Gallouj F. (1998), “Innovation as Loosely Coupled System in Services”, Topical Paper, STEP Group
14.Sundbo, J. (1997). “Management of Innovation in Services”, The Service Industries Journal, 17(3), 432-455
15.Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski B.J. (1990). “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Managerial Implications”, Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1-18.
16.Kotler, P. (2001). Marketing Management- An Asian Perspective. Prentice Hall.
17.Krogh, G. (1998). “Care in Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review, Spring, 40 (3), 133-153.
18.Levitt, T. (1966). “Innovational Imitation”, Harvard Business Review, September - October, 63.
19.Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1995). “Well Spring of Knowledge”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
20.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation”, New York: Oxford University Press.
21.Nonaka, I. (1998). “The Concept of Ba: Building a Foundation of Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54
22.Polanyi, Michael (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York：Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23.Hertog, P den, Bilderbeek, R. (1997a). “Recent Innovation Patterns in Services in the Netherlands. Report Prepared Within the Framework of the SI4S-Project”, TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies, Apeldoorn.
24.Hertog, P. den, Bilderbeek, R. (1998). “Conceptualizing Service Innovation and the Knowledge Flows between KIBS and Their Clients”, Dialogic-SI4S-Report No.8, Apeldoorn/Utrecht.
25.Hertog, P den, Bilderbeek, R., Marklund, G. & Miles, I. (1998). “Services in Innovation: Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Co-Producers of Innovation”, Report of SI4S Project, Step Group.
26.Hertog, P. den, & Bilderbeek, R. (1999). “Conceptualizing Service Innovation and Service Innovation Patterns”, Paper in the Framework of the SIID Project, Dialogic, Utrecht.
27.Miles, I. (Ed.), Services, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Economy (1999), London, Pinter Publishers.
28.Hertog, P. den, & Bilderbeek, R. (1997). The Interactiveness and Innovative Role of Technology Based Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (T-KIBS). TSER-SI4S-Project, TNO-SI4S Report No. 3, TNO Strategy , Technology and Policy, Apeldoorn.
29.Muller, E. & A. Zenker (2001). Business Services as Actors of Knowledge Transformation: the Role of KIBS in Regional and National Innovation Systems, Research Policy, 30, 1501-1516.
30.OECD (1999). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris.
31.Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
32.Sveiby, K.E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth－Managing and Measuring Knowledge – Based Assets, Big Apple Tuttle-Mori Agency, Inc. Co., Ltd.
33.Swan, J., S. Newell, S., H. Scarbrough and D. Hislop (1999). “Knowledge Management and Innovation: Networks and Networking”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 262-275.
34.Szulanski, G. (1996). “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27-43.
35.Sarvary, M. (1999). “Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry”, California Management Review, 41(2), 95-107.
36.Spek, R. & Spijkervet, A. (1997). Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, in Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements, New York: CRC Press, 31-60.
37.Teece, D. J. (1992). “Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation: Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1-25.
38.Teece, D. J. (1996). “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 31,193.
39.Tomlinson, M. (2000). “The Learning Economy and Embodied Knowledge Flow in Great Britain”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 31-451.
40.Wayland, R.E. & P.M. Cole (1997). Customer Connections: New Strategies for Growth, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
41.Quinn, J.B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press.
42.Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Method, California Sage Publication. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
商管專業學院碩士學位學程(AMBA)
96380071
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096380071 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [管理碩士學程/商管專業學院碩士學位學程 AMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 007101.pdf | 1379Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 237 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
