政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/60375

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/60375

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51761044 線上人數 : 592

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/60375

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60375

題名:	有影無隱？影音傳播隱私管理測量研究：以影音社交網站YouTube為例 Tug of War, to Vlog or Not to Vlog? An Exploratory Measure Study of Communication Privacy Management Theory in Video Disclosure and Privacy: Take Online Social Networking Site YouTube for Instance
作者:	鍾佩君 Chung, Pei Chun
貢獻者:	許瓊文 Hsu, Chiung Wen 鍾佩君 Chung, Pei Chun
關鍵詞:	YouTube 影音部落格傳播隱私管理理論自我揭露匿名 YouTube Vlog Communication Privacy Management theory self disclosure anonymity
日期:	2010
上傳時間:	2013-09-05 14:33:01 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究應用Petronio的傳播隱私管理理論(CPM)，探討在影音社交網站YouTube的情境中，使用者在資訊揭露與隱私之間的緊張關係，試圖了解使用者在影音社交網站YouTube情境中的隱私管理是如何，並從使用者的性別、使用動機、網路使用經驗、感知匿名/辨識、及感知風險程度的隱私考量，探討是否會對使用者在影音社交網站YouTube情境的隱私管理有所影響。本研究嘗試從初探性的角度，針對上傳自己影音的使用者，發展出測量YouTube上傳自己影音的隱私測量量表在於了解目前使用者的使用現狀，而什麼樣的影響因素，會影響到這些使用者在上傳影音時的隱私管理行為，以供未來研究做為參考與指教。本文完成有效樣本共有617位使用者，其中包含527位有上傳過自己影音的使用者，90位沒有上傳過自己影音的使用者；研究發現女性使用者會比男性使用者揭露較少，且個人資訊連結較少；而愈沒有消遣娛樂使用動機的使用者，對於個人資訊界線控制會愈多；具有自我表現使用動機的使用者，對於個人資訊揭露程度就會愈多，而不愈具有消遣娛樂使用動機的使用者，個人資訊連結會愈多，具有自我表現使用動機的使用者，個人資訊連結就會愈多。此外在使用者自我感知與各自隱私管理行為之間關係中，發現上傳影音的使用者，不會因為個人內容所感知到的風險程度，而進行自我資訊控制等隱私管理行為；反而會因為從他人的影音內容中辨識出他人，以及因為外在環境感知到的風險程度，而進行自我資訊控制以及自我資訊揭露程度行為的隱私管理。 This study applies Petronio’s Communication Privacy Management theory to explore how YouTubers manage their disclosure in YouTube videos; whether YouTubers’ gender, motivation, internet experience, the degree of perceived identification and perceived risk have any impact on their privacy management behaviors in social networking site, YouTube. In addition, this study uses Child, Pearson & Petronio’s (2008) WPMM scale as reference; attempts to create an explanatory scale to measure YouTubers’ privacy concern and management for future research. There are 617 YouTubers completed an online survey, including 527 YouTubers who have their video available in YouTube and 90 YouTubers who do not have their video available in YouTube. Results show female YouTubers disclose their personal information much less than male and have less linkage behavior. As for YouTubers’ motivation, users who do not regard using YouTube as entertainment will control their information; and users who often present themselves in YouTube will disclose their information. Additionally, users being used to presenting themselves will open more access and linkage to their personal information. What’s more, YouTubers who can identify others from their own videos and perceive threat or risk from internet environment have the tendency to have their information controlled and limited, not to disclose more personal information and disallow others have the access to their video in YouTube. Following the results of the present study, suggestions for future research in the online management of privacy, especially in YouTube context, are also listed and discussed.
參考文獻:	中文部分： Inside社群網站 (2010年4月21日)。〈行動網路之新聞、行銷與有趣技術〉，上網日期：2010年6月2日，取自http://www.inside.com.tw/04/21/facebook-traffic-41percent TWNIC台灣網路資訊中心(2010年3月30日)。〈2010年台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告出爐〉，上網日期：2011年2月18日，取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/ibnews.php 丁菱娟 (2010年8月4日)。〈保護網路隱私權〉，《經濟日報》。王智弘 (2009)。〈探討網路心世界：解析網路的社會特質與心理特質〉，王智弘(編)，《網路諮商、網路成癮與網路心理健康》，頁135-155。台北：學富。方秋三 (2007)。《YouTube使用意願與人格特質差異關係之研究》，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。卡維波 (2000年3月13日)。〈自由社會的人有權利改變社會倫理道德─也談網路真人秀〉，《聯合報民意論壇》。上網日期：2010年7月15日，取自http://intermargins.net/Forum/2001%20July-Dec/privacy/liveshow.htm 左曉棟編譯(2001年3月2日)。〈IT時代，我們還有祕密嗎？〉，《eNet》。上網日期：2010年7月15日，取自http://intermargins.net/Forum/2001%20July-Dec/privacy/net/pn01.htm 沈錦惠 (2007)。〈社群與公眾：從電子連結看資訊時代的群體想像〉，「2007台灣資訊社會研究學會年會暨論文發表會」，台北。沈昱全、歐貞延、曾子豪 (2003)。〈虛擬社群或是網絡社會？〉，《網路社會學通訊期刊》，30。上網日期：2010年7月15日，取自http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/30/30-05.htm 吳文凱(2008)。《維基線上影片協同系統》，國立暨南大學資訊工程學研究所碩士論文。吳奕德 (2007)。《YouTube使用因素與使用者行為之研究》，南台大學資訊傳播學系研究所碩士論文。李美華等譯 (2004)。《社會科學研究方法》，台北：時英。(原書 Babbie, E.〔2001〕. The practice of social research 9th E. U.S.: Wadsworth.) 李廷芳 (2005)。《Web2.0線上影音產業以YouTube為核心之龍捲風暴分析》，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。林佳誼 (2010年7月22日)。〈隱私藏不住當心臉書毀了你的人生不少用戶因個資露餡，造成求職不順、輸掉離婚官司…困擾連連〉，《工商時報》。林庭如 (2008)。《網站著作權問題之研究：以YouTube為例》，國立台灣大學科際整合法律學研究所碩士論文。林婉菁 (2008)。《反思Web2.0併購現象與商品化問題：以Google併購YouTube為例》，淡江大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。柯裕棻 (2008)。〈電視的政治與論述：一九六○年代台灣的電視設置過程〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，69：107-136。星野美克著，黃恆正譯 (1988)。《符號社會的消費》，台北：遠流。徐江敏、李姚軍譯 (2004)。《日常生活中的自我表演》，台北：桂冠。(原書 Goffman E. 〔1959〕. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.) 徐海吟 (2007)。《影音部落格廣告效益之研究》，銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。徐桂尼 (2008)。《以投資併購終結之Web2.0網站特性之研究：以Facebook、無名小站、YouTube為例》，世新大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。高宇成 (2006)。《隱私(權)議題中化約主義與功能主義之探究》。國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。胡文凱 (2008)。《依附型態影響部落格自我揭露之研究》，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。張玉佩 (2005)。〈從媒介影像觀照自己：觀展/表演典範之初探〉，《新聞學研究》，82：43-87。「2004年中華傳播年會學術研討會」，澳門：澳門旅遊學院。張錦梅 (2008)。《影響使用者利用YouTube分享影片因素之研究》。國立交通大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。張卿卿 (2005)。〈網路的功與過：網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討〉，《新聞學研究》，86：45-86。曹衛東等譯 (2002)。《公共領域的結構轉型》，台北：聯經。 (原書 Habermas J. 〔1962 trans 1989〕The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Oxford: Polity Press. 曾淑芬 (2009)。〈網際網路的信任與風險：經驗科技或是社會濡染？〉，《資訊社會研究》，17：127-151。黃厚銘 (2001)。《虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任》。國立台灣大學社會研究所博士論文。黃哲斌 (2003)。〈台灣自拍文化與相簿網站初探：鏡頭反轉下的網路自我〉，「2003年網路時代新聞傳播教育研討會」，台北市文化大學。黃厚銘 (2004)。〈真實的謊言：虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任〉，張維安(編)，《網路與社會》，頁89-139。新竹：國立清華大學出版社。黃克武 (2005)。〈近代中國私領域觀念的崛起與限制〉，江宜樺、黃俊傑(編)，《公私領域新探：東亞與西方觀點之比較》，頁183-201。台北：國立台灣大學出版中心。黃心健 (2006年8月10日)。〈後安迪˙沃荷的世界：安迪˙沃荷的普普人生〉，《破報》。取自http://www.pots.com.tw/node/943 黃信誠 (2007)。《開放編輯模式網路百科全書之信任態度與使用意願之研究-以中文維基百科為例》。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。創世際 (2009)。〈2009年7月線上影音網站到達率前10名〉，上網日期，2010年5月8日，取自網站，http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2009_5_video.htm 童世駿 (2005)。〈公與私：劃界問題的歸屬問題〉，江宜樺、黃俊傑(編)，《公私領域新探：東亞與西方觀點之比較》，頁205-219。台北：國立台灣大學出版中心。資策會 (2007)。〈2007年資訊服務年鑑：資策會MIC經濟部ITIS計畫〉，上網日期，2010年5月8日，取自網站http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/ 廖思逸 (2006)。《公開的秘密：從網路日記看網路上的公開與私密》。國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文。劉博中 (2006)。《YouTube影音分享網站上著作權責任之研究：以美國法為中心》。輔仁大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。劉繼鴻 (2006)。《影音Web2.0平台網路上行銷傳播的社會網絡與資料探勘分析：以YouTube-Mac網絡為例》。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。葉建伸 (2005)。《影音網站服務品質與滿意度之研究：以YouTube及無名小站為例》。中國文化大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。陳彥邦 (1990)。《網路使用者之資訊顧慮探討：採用行為意向模式》。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。陳詩螢 (2008)。《影音分享網站使用行為研究：以YouTube為例》。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。盧育鼎 (2008)。《生活型態、生產性消費與整合型科技接受程度之研究：以台灣參與YouTube網站為例》。淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學研究所碩士論文。蕭美惠譯 (1999)。《透明社會：個人隱私V.S資訊自由》，台北：先覺。(原書 Brin, D.〔1999〕. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? Mass: Perseus Books.) 簡妙如 (2008)。〈全球化的「更真實」狂熱:真人實境節目的心理技術〉，《新聞學研究》，94:1-60 。鄭國威 (2006)。〈部落客對隱私及文責的觀感〉，《龜趣來嘻部落格》。上網日期：2006年8月1日，取自http://www.bigsound.org/portnoy/weblog/001358.html 魏勇剛、龍長權、宋武譯 (2010)。《量表編製理論與應用》，台北：五南。(原書：DeVellis R. F.〔2003〕. Scale development: theory and applications. Sage.) 譚天、吳佳真譯 (1998)。《虛擬化身》，台北：遠流。(原書：Turkle S.〔1995〕. Life on screen: identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.) 羅亦斯 (2001)。《網路環境與網路使用者的身份對個人隱私權動機的影響性研究》。國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。英文部分： Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2006).Privacy and rationality: A survey. In Strandurg, K. & Raicu, S. K. (Eds.), Privacy and technologies of identity: A cross-disciplinary conversation (pp. 15-29). U.S.: Springer. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing and privacy on Facebook. Presentation at the 2006 privacy enhancing technologies (PET) workshop, June 28, 2006, Cambridge, England. Available from: 〈http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/dataprivacy/projects/facebook/facebook2.pdf〉. Retrieved 12, March, 2011. Afifi, T., & Steuber, K. (2010). The revelation risk model (RRM): factors that predict the revelation of secret and strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 144-176. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social presentation: the development of interpersonal relationship. New York; Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Allen, M., W., Coopman, S., J., Hart, J. l., & Walker, K., L. (2007). Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 172-200. Anonymous (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: a theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8(4), 381-407. Andrejevic, M. (2002). The Work of Being Watched: Interactive Media and the Exploration of Self-Disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 231-250. Azechi, S. (2005). Information humidity model: explanation of dual modes of community for social intelligence design. AI & Society, 19(1), 110-122. Baruh, L. (2007). Read at your own risk: Shrinkage of privacy and interactive media. New Media Society, 9, 187-211. Berger, C., R., & Calabrese, R., J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112. Bloustein, E., J. (1964). Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: An answer to Dean Prosser. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.156-202). New York: Cambridge University Press. Bok, S. (1989). Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Vintage Books. Bolt J., Talbert J., Garmon M., & Limperos A. (2007). Blogs in communication research: creating a definition and a content analysis of weblogs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Communication Association. boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N., B. (2008). Social network: sites definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J.(1990). Nonverbal expectancies and evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232-265. Burnard, P., & Morrison, P. (1992). Self-disclosure: A contemporary analysis. UK: Avebury. Burgess, J., & Green, J.(2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Polity Press: Cambridge. Cayanus, J., L., & Martin, M. (2004). An instructor self-disclosure scale. Communication Research Responses, 21(3), 252-263. Catlett, J. (2007). An analysis of female university students’ communicative management of privacy online via Facebook. Paper presented at National Communication Association. Carroll, S. (2008). The practical politics of step-stealing and textual poaching: YouTube, audio-visual media and contemporary swing dancers online. Convergence, 14, 183-204. Cardon, P., W. (2009). Online social networks. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 96-97. Cho, S.(2006). Effects of motivations and gender on adolescents’ self-disclosure in online chatting. Paper presented at International Communication Association. Chen, H., G., Chen, C., C., Lo, L., & Yang, S., C. (2008). Online privacy control via anonymity and pseudonym: cross-cultural implications. Behavior & Information Technology, 27(3), 229-242. Child, J.; Pearson, J., & Petronio, S. (2008). Blogging, communication, and privacy management: development of the weblog privacy management measure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Communication Association. Child, J., & Agyeman-Budu, E. (2009). Blogging privacy management rule development: the impact of self-monitoring skills, concern for appropriateness and blogging frequency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Cho, H., Rivera-Sánchez, M., & Lim, S. (2009). A multinational study on online privacy: global concerns and local responses. New Media Society, 11(3), 395-416. Dominick, J. R. (1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-representation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 646-658. Douglas, K., M., & McGary, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416. Domingo, D., & Heinonen, A. (2008). Weblogs and journalism: A typology to explore the blurring boundaries. Nordicom Review, 29, 3-15. Dinev, T., Xu H., & Smith, H., J. (2009). Information privacy values, beliefs and attitudes: An empirical analysis of Web2.0 privacy. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: IEEE Press. Dutton, W., H., & Shepherd, A. (2006). Trust in the internet as an experience technology. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4), 433-451. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M., F., & Buss, A., H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522-527. Feaster, J. (2008). Interpersonal media use in face threatening situations and the construct of information control. Paper to be presented at International Communication Association conference. Fox, S. (2000). Trust and privacy online: why Americans wants to rewrite the rules. Retreived March 12, 2011 from http;//pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=19 Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 153-160. Fried, C. (1968). Privacy: A moral analysis. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.203-244). New York: Cambridge University Press. Gerstein, R., S. (1970). Privacy and self-incrimination. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.245-264). New York: Cambridge University Press. Gerstein, R., S. (1970). Intimacy and privacy. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.265-271). New York: Cambridge University Press. Gelder, V., & Praag, V.(1999). Expressive & projective techniques. In Merrell K. W. (Eds.), behavioral, social and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (pp.101-121). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gibbs, J., L., Lai, C., H., & Ellison, N., B. (2009). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of communication privacy management strategies and self-disclosure. Paper to be presented at International Communication Association conference, Chicago. Gomez, L. (2003). Effects of visual cues in perceived self-anonymity. Paper to be presented at International Communication Association conference, San Diego. Griffith, M., & Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Looking for you: an analysis of video blogs. First Monday, 15, Number 1-4. Hancock, J., & Merola, N. (2005). Another look at SIDE: identifiability in computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: a uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3). Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: lending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335. Herring, S., C., Scheidt, L., A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. Hollenbaugh, E., E., & Egbert, N. (2009). A test of communication privacy management theory in cross-sex friendships. Ohio Communication Journal, 47, 113-136. Hough, M., G. (2009). Keeping it to ourselves: technology, privacy and the loss of reserve. Technology in Society, 31, 406-413. Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377-386. Hsu, C. W. (2006). Privacy concerns privacy practices and web site categories toward a situational paradigm. Online Information Review, 30(5), 569-586. Hsu, C. W. (2007). Staging on the internet: Research on online photo album users in Taiwan with the spectacle/Performance paradigm. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10, 596-600. Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S., L. (2005). Gender, identity and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), article 1. Joinson, A., N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of social psychology, 31, 177-192. Joinson, A., N., & Paine, C., B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the internet. In Joinson, A. N., Mckenna, K. Y. A., Postmes, T., Reips, U-D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology, Oxford University Press. Jung, Y., Vorderer, P., & Song, H. (2007). Why do people post and read personal messages in public? The motivation of using personal blogs and its effects on users’ loneliness, belonging, and well-being. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Kim, J. (2007). Gender, motivation and self-disclosure online: a study of Korean social networking websites. Paper presented at the National Communication Association annual conference, the Human Communication and Technology Division, Chicago. Kim, J., Klantke, H., A., & Serota, K., B. (2009). Effects of relational motivation and age on online self-disclosure: a content analysis of MySpace profile pages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Kling, R., Lee, Y., Teich, A., Frankel, MS. (1999). Assessing anonymous communication on the internet: policy deliberations. The Information Society. 15, 79-90. Laurenceau, J., P., & Kleinman, B., M. (2006). Intimacy in personal relationship. In A. L.Vangelisti, & D., Perlman.(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp.637-653). New York: Cambridge University Press. Lang, P., G. (2008). Publicly private and privately public: social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 361-380. Lee, D., H., Im, S., & Taylor, C., R.(2008). Voluntary self-disclosure of information on the internet: a multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs. Psychology & Marketing, 25(7), 692-710. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., & Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(1), 79-100. Max G., T. (1999). What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society, 15, 99-112. Mallen, M., J. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversation: an examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy, 40, 155-163. McBride, M., C., & Wahl, S., T. (2005). “To say or not to say:” teachers’ management of privacy boundary in classroom. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 30(1), 8-22. McCullagh, M. (2008). Blogging: self presentation and privacy. Information & Communication Technology Law, 17(1), 3-23. McBride, M., C., & Bergen, K., M. (2008). Communication research: becoming a reluctant confidant: communication privacy management in close friendship. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33(1), 50-61. Metzger, M., J. (2007). Communication privacy management in electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 12, 335-361. Metzger, M., J. & Pure, R. (2009). Privacy management in Facebook. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Communication Association. Mesch, G., S., & Beker, G. (2010). Are norms of disclosure of online & offline personal information associated with the disclosure of personal information online? Human Communication Research, 36, 570-592. Milliken, M., Gibson, K., O’Donnell, S., & Singer, J. (2008). User-generated online video and the Atlantic Canadian public sphere: a YouTube study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Miller, A., E. (2009). Revealing and concealing postmarital dating information: divorced coparents’ privacy rule development and boundary coordination processes. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 135-149. Molyneaux, H., Gibson, K., O’ Donnell, S., & Singer, J. (2008). New visual media and gender: A content, visual and audience analysis of YouTube vlogs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Molyneaux, H., Gibson, K., O’ Donnell, S. (2009). YouTube Vlogs: an analysis of the gender divide. Media Report to Women, 37(2), 6-11. Morio, H., & Buchholz, C. (2009). How anonymous are you online? Examining online social behaviors from a cross-cultural perspective. AI & Society, 23(2), 297-307. Morgan, E., M., Snelson, C., & Elison-Bowers, P. (2010). Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1405-1411. Norberg, P., A., & Horne, D., R. (2007). Privacy attitudes and privacy-related behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(10), 829-847. O’Neil, D. (2001). Analysis of internet users’ level of online privacy concerns. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1):17-31. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80-97. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A., M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175-196. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The self online: the utility of personal home pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 346-368. Parks, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S., A.(2009). Motivations, impression management and self-disclosure in social network sites. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Pauwels, L., & Hellriegel, P. (2009). A critical cultural analysis of ‘YouTube’: Power and control in a Web2.0 interface. Paper to be presented at International Communication Association. Petronio, S., Flores, L., A., & Hecht, M., L. (1997). Locating the voice of logic: disclosure discourse of sexual abuse. Western Journal of Communication, 61(1), 101-113. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. New York: State University of New York Press. Petronio, S. (2004). Road to developing communication privacy management theory: narrative in progress, please stand by. The Journal of Family Communication, 4(3&4), 193-207. Pornsakulvanich, V., & Haridakis, P. (2007). The influence of dispositions and internet-use motivation on online communication satisfaction & relationship closeness. Paper to be presented at National Communication Association. Qian, H., & Scott, C., S. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1428-1451. Rains, S., A., & Young, A. (2003). Perceived anonymity adequacy in performance evaluations of supervisors and coworker. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Rains, S., A., & Scott, C., R. (2007). To identify or not to identify: a theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 17, 61-91. Rains, S., A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: a test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34, 100-125. Rankin, C., & Bustle, J. (2008). Should relational history be discussed? An application and extension of communication privacy management. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Communication Association. Rauhofer, J. (2008). Privacy is dead, get over it! Information privacy and the dream of a risk-free society. Information & Communications Technology Law, 17(3), 185-197. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Schoeman, F., D. (1984). Privacy philosophical dimensions of the literature. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.1-33). New York: Cambridge University Press. Schoeman, F., D. (1992). Privacy and Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press. Schouten, A., Valkenburg, P., Peter, J., & Antheunis, M. (2007). An experimental test of processes underlying self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at International Communication Association. Scott, C., R. (1999). The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members’ multiple identifications during computer-supported decision making. Western Journal of Communicaiton, 63, 456-487. __________ (2008). All we need is a motive: examining the appropriateness of various motivations for anonymous communication in the workplace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Sheer, V., C. (2011). Teenagers’ use of MSN features, discussion topics, and online friendship development: the impact of media richness and communication control. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 82-103. Silverstone, R. (2006). Domesticating domestication: Reflections on the life of a concept. In: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. and Ward, K. J., (Eds.) Domestication of media and technology. (pp.229-248). UK, Maidenhead: Open University Press. Solove, D., J. (2006). Privacy and rationality: A survey. In Strandurg, K. & Raicu, S. K. (Eds.), Privacy and technologies of identity: A cross-disciplinary conversation (pp. 3-13). U.S.: Springer. Strandburg, K., J. (2004). Social norms, self control, and privacy in the online world. In Strandurg, K. & Raicu, S. K. (Eds.), Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation (pp. 31-53). U.S.: Springer. Stutzmann, F. (2005). The freshman Facebook Zeitgeist. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://chimprawk.blogspot.com/2005/10/freshman-facebook-zeitgeist.html Synder, J. (2004). Perceived anonymity and the role of self-disclosure in text-based computer interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Taraszow, T., Aristodemou, E., Shitta, G., Laouris, Y., & Arsoy, A. (2010). Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: An analysis using Facebook profiles as an example. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(1), 81-102. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, facebook and my space: what can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544 – 564. ———— (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 28, 20-36. van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture Society, 31, 41-58. Wang, Z. (2007). Anonymity effects and implications in the social identity model of deindividuation: from crowd to computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Wang, C., C., & Chang, Y., T. (2010). Cyber relationship motives: scale development and validation. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(3), 289-300. Westin, A. (1967). The origins of modern claims to privacy. In Schoeman F. D. (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy：An anthology (pp.56-74). New York: Cambridge University Press. Woo, J. (2006). The right not to be identified: Privacy and anonymity in the interactive media environment. New Media Society, 8, 949-967. Woolley, J., Limperos, A., & Tamul, D.(2009). Cool, revealing, or annoying: measuring the effects of Facebook applications on interpersonal perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Yao, M. (2004). The role of public and private self-awareness in a computer-mediated environment：A self-awareness approach to CMC theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Communication Association. Ye, J. (2007). Attachment style differences in online relationship involvement: An examination of interaction characteristics and relationship satisfaction. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10, 605-607.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學新聞研究所 97451027 99
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451027
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[新聞學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
102701.pdf		157Kb	Adobe PDF2	249	檢視/開啟
102702.pdf		426Kb	Adobe PDF2	320	檢視/開啟
102703.pdf		1493Kb	Adobe PDF2	507	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋