English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51735580      Online Users : 608
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/60370
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60370


    Title: 媒體如何框架氣候談判爭議:哥本哈根峰會之跨國新聞分析
    News framing of controversy in climate negotiations: a cross-national analysis of copenhagen climate talk
    Authors: 謝孟哲
    Contributors: 徐美苓
    謝孟哲
    Keywords: 全球暖化
    氣候變遷
    哥本哈根峰會
    新聞框架分析
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-05 14:32:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   人類社會造成全球暖化問題的科學事實已逐漸受到科學界肯定,而國際社會自1992年《聯合國氣候變化綱要公約》簽署以來即開始著手因應全球暖化問題,至今已邁入第17年。其中在2009年舉辦的哥本哈根峰會,由於背負著產出延續《京都議定書》的新氣候協議之重責大任,是全球氣候談判最受矚目的一年;知名經濟學家Nicholas Stern更稱之為「二次戰後最重要的一次會議」。然而哥本哈根峰會最終仍因不同國家間巨大的利益分歧,未能達到當初期待的目標。

      新聞媒體是公眾理解全球暖化議題最重要的管道;若從建構論角度觀之,媒體更是各類政治行為者論述競爭的場域,反映了社會上某種文化價值或意識型態。因此不同國家媒體框架哥本哈根峰會的方式,很可能反映了一個國家及其社會、乃至於公眾理解氣候變遷議題的觀點,進而左右其對氣候政策的支持態度。本研究主要之研究目的,即為透過跨國新聞框架分析,了解新聞媒體在特定國家情境的影響下,有關哥本哈根峰會報導的論述特色,進而思考媒體在再現全球暖化這個全球性議題上的角色。

      本研究以哥本哈根峰會最受矚目的美國和中國,以及台灣本土報紙作為研究對象,採取van Gorp的新聞框架分析取徑,針對《紐約時報》、《人民日報》及《聯合報》自2009年10月至2010年2月共五個月份的相關報導進行歸納及演繹兩階段的新聞框架分析。首先在歸納階段,研究者在大量反覆閱讀、推敲新聞文本後,共找出環境保護、經濟發展、政治賽局,以及國族主義四個新聞框架,以及與每個框架相對應的框架化裝置及推理裝置,作為建構框架的要素。在演繹階段,本研究則採用內容分析法,逐一測定四個新聞框架在三報所有文本中的分布狀況,以及新聞性質和新聞消息來源與框架之間的關聯。最後則整併上述結果,並納入不同國家的氣候談判立場及社會文化脈絡,以論述的方式探討不同國家框架哥本哈根峰會的相同和相異之處。

      研究發現,三國媒體框架哥本哈根峰會的方式與其國家氣候談判立場及國情大致相符:《紐約時報》大多將哥本哈根峰會框架為各類政治行為者之間的政治角力,反映國內政治化的氣候懷疑論述,同時模糊了美國的國家角色及應承擔的氣候責任。《人民日報》多將峰會框架為經濟發展問題,或是刻意強調國家立場、讚揚國家表現的國族主義論述;此論述特色符合國家以開發中國家自居、強調經濟發展權利的立場堅持。《聯合報》同樣主要將峰會框架為與台灣無關之國家間的政治角力,否則即為以順應時勢或掌握外交機會為題旨的國族主義論述;此若即若離的論述特色反映了台灣弱勢的國際地位,以及國家深怕遭到國際制裁或孤立的特性。

      以上研究發現也促使研究者思考不同媒體在報導氣候談判及全球暖化議題時扮演的角色。《紐約時報》的政治賽局論述雖與美國社會中的質疑聲浪有關,然而媒體強調平衡報導的新聞產製規範亦是導致爭議爭議被放大的關鍵。《人民日報》向來是為中國政府喉舌的傳聲筒,此體制特色造成該報新聞論述大幅偏袒國家立場,顯示中國公眾對氣候變遷議題的理解很可能也有所偏向。《聯合報》的新聞論述則出現斷裂的現象,其中台灣角色和哥本哈根峰會之間僅存在提升外交地位一項連結,恐怕難使公眾重視此議題;此外,媒體的哥本哈根峰會新聞和國內全球暖化論述也並無緊密關聯,因此顯得片斷、無脈絡可言。

      研究者最後提出國內新聞實務的改善空間,認為在當今媒體主流論述以強調個人層面之節能減碳為主的狀況下,媒體對氣候談判的關切應可作為將全球暖化新聞提升至國家及國際政策層次的機會,如此方能促進國內公眾更加關注全球暖化議題。
    Reference: 中文部分
    于宏源(2009)。〈中國積極應對全球氣候變化挑戰〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》,32(9): 81-85。
    王石番(1989)。《傳播內容分析法─理論與實證》。台北:幼獅。
    王京明(2009)。〈哥本哈根氣候談判與台灣應有的對策〉。取自行政院環境保護署台灣氣候變遷調適資訊平台 http://climate.cier.edu.tw/AdjustmentNewsSubject.asp?ID=184&TID=25&OPENID=23
    呂嘉容(2009)。〈中國溫室氣體排放趨勢與管理政策〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》,32(9): 74-80。
    宋燕輝(2002)。〈美國與京都議定書:小布希政府氣候變化政策急轉彎?〉。《理論與政策》,16(2): 27-45。
    李河清(2001)。〈環境外交與氣候談判-以京都議定書為例〉。《國政研究報告》。取自財團法人國家政策研究基金會網頁http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SD/090/SD-R-090-040.htm
    李河清(2004)。〈知識社群與全球氣候談判〉。《問題與研究》,43(6): 73-102。
    李河清、羅永青(2004)。〈全球暖化與全球正義〉。《應用倫理研究通訊》,32: 3-11。
    李金銓(2007)。〈建制內的多元主義:美國精英媒介對華政策的描述〉。《二十一世紀》,67。取自http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ics/21c/supplem/essay/0112036.htm
    李美華(2005)。《從國際新聞流通理論探討台灣報紙國際新聞報導內容之轉變(1988~1990年)》。《新聞學研究》,85: 111-139。

    周翼虎(2009)。〈抗爭與入籠:中國新聞業的市場化悖論〉。《新聞學研究》,100: 101-136。
    林子倫(2008)。〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉。《公共行政學報》,28: 153-175。
    林子倫(2009)。〈後京都氣候談判的五大難題〉。《能源報導》,10: 9-13。
    林麗雲(2008)。〈變遷與挑戰:解禁後的台灣報業〉。《新聞學研究》,95: 183-212。
    邱碧婷(2007)。《全球暖化下新興的媒介議題內容分析與意見領袖傳播行為之研究-以「京都議定書」為例》,世新大學廣播電視電影研究所碩士論文。
    施奕任(2009)。〈全球暖化與美國的氣候政治〉。《國家與社會》,7: 187-241。
    洪貞玲、廖雅琴、林舫如(2008)。〈國際新聞的國內化與小報化:以我國報紙報導WTO香港會議為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》,14: 77-114。
    徐美苓、楊意菁(2011年7月)。〈科技風險與全球暖化報導品質分析〉,「中華傳播學會研討會」。新竹:交通大學。
    徐美苓、熊培伶、吳姿嫻、施馨堯、賴若涵(2010)。〈台灣人口「問題」的建構:以少子化新聞框架為例〉。《新聞學研究》,103: 43-82。
    張楊乾(2009年12月20日)。〈哥本哈根協議,爭議中產出〉。取自低碳生活部落格網頁 http://lowestc.blogspot.com/2009/12/blog-post_20.html
    梁慧玲(2004)。《兩岸三地國際新聞報導之比較—以美伊戰爭期間的《人民日報》、《蘋果日報》、《聯合報》為例》,政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    莊朝榮(2009)。〈中國溫室氣體減排之因應政策〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》,32(9): 86-90。
    莊蕙嘉(2009年12月4日)。〈幫地球降溫 98國領袖聚哥本哈根〉,《聯合報》,專題。
    陳澤義(1994)。〈全球溫暖化問題──國際反應及台灣努力方向〉。《經濟前瞻》,34: 57-61。
    陳靜茹、蔡美瑛(2009)。〈全球暖化與京都議定書議題框架之研究──以2001-2007年紐約時報新聞為例〉。《新聞學研究》,100: 253-295。
    陳鴻達(2004a)。〈非附件一國家對氣候變化綱要公約的立場分析〉。《能源季刊》,34(1): 19-27。
    陳鴻達(2004b)。〈京都議定書之挑戰與未來發展趨勢〉,《能源季刊》,34(4): 21-33。
    陳韜文、李金銓、潘忠黨、蘇鑰機(2002)。〈國際新聞的「馴化」:香港回歸報導比較研究〉。《新聞學研究》,73: 1-27。
    曾鏡濤(2007)。〈溫室效應、全球暖化與國際政治〉。《二十一世紀》,102: 4-14。
    游維倫(2004)。〈新時代,新難題──展望治理全球環境難題之專屬倫理〉。《應用倫理研究通訊》,32: 21-31。
    楊任徵(2000)。〈主要集團因應氣候公約策略現況〉。《能源季刊》,30(3): 19-31。
    楊智凱(2009年1月28日)。〈哥本哈根會議看國際氣候變遷趨勢〉。《國際經濟情勢雙週報》,1967: 5-13。
    葉保強(2004)。〈全球暖化的政治倫理──為氣候政治建立目的王國〉。《應用倫理研究通訊》,32: 11-20。
    詹中原(2008)。〈全球化理論與公共治理發展:峇里島路徑圖之檢視〉。《國政研究報告》。取自財團法人國家政策研究基金會網頁 http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/3818
    趙家緯(2009年12月20日)。〈哥本哈根的許諾與失落〉。取自低碳生活部落格網頁 http://e-info.org.tw/node/50373
    趙家緯、謝雯凱(2007)。〈台灣氣候變遷政策的回顧與展望〉。《全球變遷通訊雜誌》,56: 16-23。
    潘忠黨(2006)。〈架構分析:一個亟需理論澄清的領域〉。《傳播與社會期刊》,1: 17-46。
    賴麗瑩(1998)。〈京都議定書之分析及未來發展趨勢〉。《能源季刊》,28(3): 2-16。
    賴麗瑩(2000)。〈聯合國氣候變化綱要公約第三次締約國大會之後續發展分析〉。《能源季刊》,30(3): 2-18。
    羅文輝(1997)。《精確新聞報導》。台北:正中書局。



    英文部分
    Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338-352.
    Arrhenius, S. (1986). On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41, 237-276.
    Berglez, P., Höijer, B., & Olausson, U. (2009). Individualisation and nationalisation of the climate issue. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 213-223). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Boston, J. (2008). Global climate change policies: From Bali to Copenhagen and beyond. Policy Quarterly, 4(1), 50-61.
    Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. (2004). Balancing as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
    Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204.
    Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2009). Media communications and public understanding of climate change. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 43-58). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Corbett J. B., & Durfee, J.L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129-151.
    Carvalho, A. (2005). Representing the politics of green house effects: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourses Studies, 2(1), 1-29.
    Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223-243.
    Chang, T. K., Chen, C. H., & Zhang, G. Q. (1993). Rethinking the mass propaganda model: evidence from the Chinese regional press. International Communication Gazette, 52(3), 173-195.
    Christoff, P. (2010, July). Climate science as political challenge. Paper presented at the Democratizing Climate Governance Conference on Democracy and Climate Change, Canberra, Austeralia.
    D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: a response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
    Desser , E. A., & Parson, A. E. (2006) The science and politics of global climate change: A guide to the debate. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Dirikx, A., & Celders, D. (2009). Global warming through the same lens: an explorative framing study in Dutch and French newspapers. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 80-91). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Durfee, J. (2006). “Social change” and “status quo” framing effect on risk perception: An exploratory experiment. Science Communication, 27(4), 456-495.
    Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
    Freedom House. (2010). Freedom of the press 2010: Broad setbacks to global media freedom. Retrieved from the Freedom House Website: http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/pfs/371.pdf
    Freestone, D. (2009). The international climate change legal and institutional framework: An overview. University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2009, working paper 39.

    Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
    Goffman, E. (1974). Framing analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
    Good, J. E. (2008). The framing of climate change in Canadian, American, and international newspapers: A media propaganda model analysis. Canadian Journal of Communication, 33(2), 233-255.
    Harris, P. G., & Yu, H., (2005). Environmental change and the Asia pacific: China responses to global warming. Global Change, Peace and Security, 17(1), 45-58.
    Harrison, K. (2007). The road not taken: Climate change policy in Canada and the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 93-117。
    Howard-Willams, R. (2009) Ideological construction of climate change in Australian and New Zealand newspapers. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 80-91). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    International Energy Association. (2009a). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights. Retrieved from International Energy Association Website http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/CO2highlights.pdf
    International Energy Association. (2009b). World energy outlook 2009. Retrieved from International Energy Association Website http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2009/WEO2009_es_chinese.pdf
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical sciences basis—Summary for policy makers. Retrieved from IPCC Website http://www.pnud.cl/recientes/IPCC-Report.pdf
    Kim, T. (2005, May). Corporate media and global warming: Can corporate media function as an agent of progressive social change? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY.
    Kim, T. (2009, May). Corporate newspapers, global warming, and editorial vigor hypothesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
    Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 239-260.
    Lahsen, M. (2005). Seductive simulations: Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 895-922.
    Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2010, July). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust (SSRN-id1633932). Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. New Haven, CT. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1633932
    McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499-522.
    McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348-373.
    Morris, J. (2000). Defining the precautionary principle. In J. Morris (Ed.), Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle. Oxford, UK: Butterworth & Heinemann.
    Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In P. D’Angelo & A. J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 43-83). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Pan, Z. (2001). Orchestrating the family-nation chorus: Chinese media and nationalism in the Hong Kong handover. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 331-348.
    Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
    Peng, Z. (2008). Framing the anti-war protests in the global village: A comparative study of newspaper coverage in three countries. International Communication Gazette,70(5), 361-377.
    Ravindranath, N. H. (2010). IPCC: Accomplishments, controversies and challenges. Current Science, 99 (1), 26-35.
    Reese, D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154.
    Schenck, L. (2008). Climate change “crisis”—Struggling for worldwide collective action. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 19(3), 319-379.
    Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications 29, 401-428.
    Shanahan, M. (2009). Time to adapt? Media coverage of climate change in nonindustrialised countries. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 145-157). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Shanahan, J., & Good, J. (2000). Heat and hot air: Influence of local temperature on journalists’ coverage of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 285-295.
    Stamm, K. R., Clark, F., & Eblacas, P. R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 219-237.
    Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, A. D. (2009). News framing theory and research. In Bryant, J. & Oliver, B. M. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Tolan, S. (2007). Coverage of climate change in the Chinese media. Human Development Office Occasional Paper 38. Retrieved from United Nations Development Program http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008/papers/tolan_sandy.pdf
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from UNFCCC Website http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from UNFCCC Website http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2001). An introduction to the Kyoto Protocol compliance mechanism. Retrieved from UNFCCC Website http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/compliance/items/3024.php
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2007). Bali Action Plan. Retrieved from UNFCCC Website http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf#page=3
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2009). Copenhagen Accord. Retrieved from UNFCCC Website http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf
    Trumbo, C., & Shanahan, J. (2000). Social research on climate change: where we have been, where we are, and where we might go. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 199-204.
    Van Gorp, B. (2007a). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78.
    Van Gorp, B. (2007b, May). Challenging the frame: The influence of attitude on the interpretation of news about asylum. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
    Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & A. J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 84-109). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Whalley, J., & Walsh, S. (2009). Bring the Copenhagen climate change negotiation to conclusion. CSEifo Economic Studies, 55(2), 255-285.
    Yang, J. (2003). Framing the NATO air strikes on Kovoso across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. International Communication Gazette, 65(3), 231-249.
    Yao, Q. (2007). China’s official framing of religion and its influence on young Chinese students: A partial testing of the process model of framing in a special media environment. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 416-432.
    Zehr, S. (2000). Public representation of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 85-103.
    Zehr, S. (2009). An environmentalist/economic hybrid frame in US press coverage of climate change, 2000-2008. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 80-91). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science Online. Retrieved from SAGE database http://www.sagepublications.com
    Zusman, E., & Turner, J. (2005). Beyond the bureaucracy: Changing China’s policy making environment. In A. D. Kristen (Ed.), China’s Environment and the Challenge of Sustainable Development (pp. 121-149). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    97451008
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100801.pdf1914KbAdobe PDF2831View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback