English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51781966      Online Users : 572
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/60362
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60362


    Title: 董事會智慧資本、薪酬與公司績效之關連性研究
    Board capital, board compensation and performance
    Authors: 謝素芳
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    謝素芳
    Keywords: 董事會智慧資本
    董監事薪酬
    公司績效
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-05 14:29:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文採用實證研究,以2001年至2004年高科技產業的上市公司為研究對像,結合代理理論與資源依賴理論,探討董事會智慧資本對於董監事薪酬與公司績效的影響。不同於過去研究僅偏重董事會單一功能,例如,以代理理論強調董事會內部的監督控制功能,或是資源依賴理論強調董事會外部的提供資源服務功能,本研究嘗試以內部治理與外在經營環境為出發點,整合代理理論與資源依賴理論,視董事會同時具有監督控制與提供資源服務功能,瞭解董事會成員的智慧資本(人力資本與關係資本)對落實董事會功能的影響,主要在探討董監事個人智慧資本對於董監事個人薪酬的影響,以及董事會智慧資本對於公司績效的影響,據以彌補以董事會為主的研究文獻缺口。
    關於董監事個人智慧資本與董監事現金基礎薪酬的關連性(個人層級),本論文發現任職於學術界的關連董監事,該董監事獲得的現金基礎薪酬較少;兼職工作於同產業的本公司關連董監事,該關連董監事的現金基礎薪酬較高;關連董監事獲得的現金基礎薪酬較多,以及獨立董監事的現金基礎薪酬水準較低,以上結果皆支持代理理論與資源依賴理論的觀點。
    此外,有關董事會智慧資本與公司績效的關連性(公司層級),本論文發現公司關連董監事佔董事會規模的比重愈高,公司的當期市場績效表現愈差,研究結果支持代理理論,推翻資源依賴理論的觀點。公司關連董監事在外兼職的平均數與公司績效無關,未能支持代理理論與資源依賴理論的看法。公司獨立董監事比重愈高,公司在下期會計績效表現較差,未能支持代理理論與資源依賴理論的看法。來自學術界的董監事佔董事會成員比重愈高,公司下期會計績效愈好,支持資源依賴理論的觀點。最後,在外兼職工作為同產業的企業的關連董監事佔董事會成員的比重愈高,公司下期會計績效皆愈好,支持資源依賴理論,且符合台灣高科技產業的公司以垂直分工的合作方式,相互支援所需資源與進行共同研發,以提升企業因應競爭快速變動的經營環境,改善經營績效。然而,由本論文的二個研究主軸的實證結果發現,來自學術界的關連董監事公司未來(下一期)的會計績效有顯著貢獻,但領取的董監事薪酬卻較少,表示來自學術界的關連董監事所負責的權利與責任的關係不對稱,企業未能給予學術界的關連董監事合理的報酬。
    Reference: 吳安妮,2002,剖析智慧資本,會計研究月刊,第204期:57-66。
    廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華,2006,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響,東吳經濟商學學報,第54期:117-60。
    韓志翔、陳怡靜,2006,人力資本的概念與衡量,智慧資本管理。
    Adams, R. B., & D. Ferreira. 2008. Do directors perform for pay? Working paper.
    Agrawal, A., & C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31(3):377-97.
    Ang, S., S. Slaughter, & K. Y. Ng. 2002. Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Science 48(11):1427-45.
    Bantel, K. A., & S. E. Jackson. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference. Strategic Management Journal 10:107-24.
    Barney, J. 1995. Looking inside for competitive advanatage. Academy of Management Executive 9(4):49-61.
    Bart, C., & N. Bontis. 2003. Distinguishing between the board and management in company mission: implications for corporate governance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(3):361-81.
    Baysinger, B., & R. E. Hoskisson. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review 15(1):72-87.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71(4):443-65.
    Becker, B., & B. Gerhart. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal 39(4):779-801.
    Bhagat, S., & B. Black. 1999. The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer 54(3):921-63.
    Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Boyd, B. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: a test of resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal 11(6):419-30.
    Boyd, B. K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15(5):335-44.
    Brick, I. E., O. Palmon, & J. K. Wald. 2006. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3):403-23.
    Bukh, P. N., H. T. Larsen, & J. Mouritsen. 2001. Construcing intellectual capital statements. Scandinavian Journal of Management 17(1):77-87.
    Carter, D. A., B. J. Simkins, & W. G. Simpson. 2003. Corporate Governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review 38(1):33-53.
    Carpenter, M. A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(3):275-84.
    Carpenter, M. A., & J. D. Westphal. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44(4):639-60.
    Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review 28(3):432-46.
    Chowdhury, S. 2005. Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important? Journal of Business Venturing 20(6): 727-46.
    Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95-S120.
    Coles, J. W., V. B. McWilliams, & N. Sen. 2001. An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management 27(1):23-50.
    Cotter, J. F., A. Shivadasani, & M. Zenner. 1997. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics 43(2):195-218.
    Daily, C. M., D. R. Dalton, & A. A. Cannella Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review 28(3):371-82.
    Daily, C. M., & C. Schwenk. 1996. Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: congruent or countervailing forces? Journal of Management 22(2):185-208.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, S. T. Certo, & R. Roengpitya. 2003. Mega-analyses of financial performance and equity: fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal 46(1):13-26.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, & J. L. Johnson. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19(3):269-90.
    Dalton, D. R. C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, & A. E. Ellstrand. 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42(6):674-86.
    Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, & L. Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22(1):20-47.
    Delaney, J. T., & M. A. Huselid. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal 39(4):949-69.
    Donaldson, L., & J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1):49-65.
    Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction. International Management Accounting Study 78:32-6.
    Edvinsson, L., & M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower, New York: Harper Business.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review 14(1):57-74.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & C. B. Schoonhoven. 1990. Organizational growth:linking founding team, strategy , environment, and growth among United-States semiconductor ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(3):504-29.
    Erhardt, N. L., J. D. Werbel, & C. B. Shrader. 2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: an International Review 11(2):102-11.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88(2):288-307.
    Fich, E. M., & A. Shivdasani. 2005. The impact of stock-option compensation for outside directors on firm value. Journal of Business 78(6):2229-54.
    Finegold, D., G. S. Benson, & D. Hecht. 2007. Corporate boards and company performance: review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: an International Review 15(5):865-78.
    Finkelstein, S., & D. C. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic leadership, St. Paul: West.
    Forbes, D. P., & F. J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review 24(3):489-505.
    Geletkanycz, M. A., K. B. Boyd, & S. Finkelstein. 2001. The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 22(9):889-98.
    Gerhart, B., & G. T. Milkovich. 1990. Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal 33(4):663-91.
    Gneezy, U., & A. Rustichini. 2000. Pay enough or don’t pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):791-810.
    Goulder, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25(2):161-78.
    Hambrick, D. C., T. S. Cho, & M. J. Chen. 1996. The influence of top management heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(4):659-84.
    Hempel, P., & C. Fay. 1994. Outside director compensation and firm performance. Human Resource Management 33(1):111-33.
    Hillman, A. J., A. A. Cannella, & I. C. Harris. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ? Journal of Management 28(6):747-63.
    Hillman, A. J., A. A. Cannella, & R. L. Paetzold. 2000. The resource dependence role of corporate directors: strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies 37(2):235-55.
    Hillman, A. J., & T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28(3):383-96.
    Hillman, A. J., M. C. Withers, & B. J. Collins. 2009. Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management 35(6):1404-27.
    Hitt, M. A., L. Bierman, K. Shimizu, & R. Kochhar. 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44(1):13-28.
    Hitt, M. A., & R. D. Ireland. 2002. The essence of strategic leadership: managing human and social capital. The Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 9(1):3-14.
    Hoffman, L. R., & N. R. F. Maier. 1961. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62(2):401-7.
    Huang, H. H., P. Hsu, H. A. Khan, & Y. L. Yu. 2008. Does the appointment of an outside director increases firm value? Evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 44(3):66-80.
    Jackling, B., & S. Johl. 2009. Board structure and firm performance: evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: an international review 17(4):492-509.
    Jensen, M. C., & W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305-60.
    Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily, & A. E. Ellstrand. 1996. Boards of directors: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 22(3):409-38.
    Johnson, R. A., & D. W. Greening. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 42(5):564-76.
    Joia, L. A., & R. Malheiros. 2009. Strategic alliances and the intellectual capital of firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital 10(4):539-58.
    Kim, Y. M., & A. A. Cannella. 2008. Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: an International Review 16(4):282-93.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3):375-400.
    Knight, D., C. L. Pearce, K. G. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims, K. A. Smith, & P. Flood. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal 20(5):445-65.
    Knight, D. J. 1999. Performance measures for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy & Leadership 27(12):22-7.
    Koka, B. R., & J. E. Prescott. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23(9):795-816.
    Kor, Y. Y., & C. Sundaramurthy. 2009. Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management 35(4):981-1006.
    Kor, Y. Y., & V. F. Misangyi. 2008. Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal 29(12):1345-55.
    Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal 33(1):129-50.
    Kruz, A. H., & D. Pfaff. 2002. Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(3):275-95.
    Lambert, R. A. 2001. Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32(1-3):3-87.
    Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science 8(1):1-22.
    Lepak & Snell. The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review 24(1):31-48.
    Lester, R. H., A. Hillman, A. Zardkoohi, & A. A. CAnnella. 2008. Former government officials as outside directors: the role of human and social capital. Academy of Management Journal 51(5):999-1013.
    Linn, S. C., & D. Park. 2005. Outside director compensation policy and the investment opportunity set. Journal of Corporate Finance 11(4):680-715.
    Miller, T., & M. D. Triana. 2009. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46(5):755-86.
    Milliken, F. J., & L. L. Martins 1996. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21(2): 402-33.
    Minichilli, A., A. Zattoni, & F. Zona. 2009. Making boards effectives: an empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management 20(1):55-74.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, & R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20(1-2):293-315.
    Muth, M. M., & L. Donaldson. 1998. Stewardship theory and board structure: a contingency approach. Corporate Governance: an international review 6(1):5-28.
    Nahapiet, J., & S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2):242-66.
    Nicholson, G. J., & G. C. Kiel. 2007. Can director impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: an International Review 15(4):585-608.
    Papadakis, V. M., S. Lioukas, & D. Chambers, 1998. Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context. Strategic Management Journal 19(2):115-47.
    Payne, G. T., G. S. Benson, & D. L. Finegold. 2009. Corporate board attributes, team effectivemess amd financial performance. Journal of Management Studies 46(4):704-31.
    Pearce, J. A., & S. A. Zahra. 1992. Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies 29(4):411-38.
    Pelled, L. H. 1996. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science 7(6):615-31.
    Pelled, L. H., K. M. Eisenhardt, & K. R. Xin. 1999. Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1):1-28.
    Penning, J. M., K. M. Lee, & A. van Witteloostuijn. 1998. Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal 41(4):425-40.
    Pettigrew. A. M. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal 13(special issue):163-82.
    Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive advantage through people: unleashing the power of the workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Pfeffer, J., & G. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organization: a resource-dependence perspective. New Yori: Harper & Row.
    Rechner, P. L., & D. R. Dalton. 1991. CEO duality and organizational performance: a longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal 12(2):155-60.
    Roberts, J., T. McNulty, & P. Stiles. 2005. Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management 16:S5-S26.
    Rosenstein, S., & J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26(2):175-91.
    Royal, C., & L. O’Donnell. 2008. Differentiation in financial markets: the human capital approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital 9(4):668-83.
    Ryan, H. E., & R. A. Wiggins. 2004. Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics 73(3):497-524.
    Siciliano, J. I. 1996. The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics 15(12):1313-20.
    Simons, T., L. H. Pelled, & K. A. Smith. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 42(6):662-73.
    Smith, K.G., K. A. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims, P. Obannon, & J. A. Scully. 1994. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(3):412-38.
    Songini, L. 2006. The professionalization of family firms: theory and practice, in Poutziouris, P. Z., K. X. Smyrnios, & S. B. Klein (eds.), Handbook of Research on Family Business: Northampton, MA: 269-97.
    Stearns, L. B., & M. S. Mizruchi. 1993. Board composition and corporate financing: the impact of financial institution representation on borrowing. Academy of Management Journal 36(3):603-18.
    Stewart, T. 1997. Intellectual Capital. New York: Doubleday-Currency.
    Stout, L. 2003. On the proper motives of corporate directors (or, why don’t want to invite homo economicus to join your board. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 28:1-25.
    Valenti, A. 2008. The Sarbanex-Oxley Act of 2002: has it brought about changes in the boards of large US corporations? Journal of Business Ethics 81(2):401-12.
    Webber, S. S., & L. M. Donahue. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management 27(2):141-62.
    Yermack, D. 2004. Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. Journal of Finance 59(5):2281-08.
    Yermack, D. 2006. Board members and Company Value. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 20(1):33-47.
    Young, C-S. 2005. Top management teams’ social capital in Taiwan: the impact on firm value in an emerging economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2):177-90.
    Zahra, S. A., & J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15(2):291-334.
    Zald, M. N. 1969. Power and functions of boards of directors: theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology 75(1):97-111.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    92353502
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923535021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    502101.pdf942KbAdobe PDF2290View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback