Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60269
|
Title: | 從公司治理觀點剖析力霸集團弊案 |
Authors: | 鄒美琪 |
Contributors: | 許崇源 林宛瑩 鄒美琪 |
Keywords: | 集團企業 公司治理 內部控制 股權結構 Business group Corporate governance Internal control Ownership structure |
Date: | 2008 |
Issue Date: | 2013-09-05 13:55:39 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究以力霸集團為個案研究對象,從決策及資源分配掌控者觀點定義該集團企業之最終控制者,首先分析力霸集團企業之董監結構及股權結構,並針對該集團之公司治理機制說明對內部控制議題及財務舞弊之影響。 研究結果顯示,力霸集團企業之最終控制者王又曾家族係透過交叉持股及掌握董事會席次控制權等控制途徑掌控集團企業,其集團內七家公開發行以上公司的平均直接持股率、股份控制權、盈餘分配權分別為7.72%、28.92%、6.81%,但平均席次控制權則高達95.33%,股份控制權(席次控制權)與盈餘分配權偏離差之平均值則達22.11%(88.52%)。力霸集團企業席次控制權與盈餘分配權嚴重偏離之個案研究發現,符合經營者之經營誘因不足,而財富侵佔動機較強之學術假設。此外,該集團企業亦嚴重違反內部控制制度中控制環境、風險評估、控制作業、資訊與溝通,以及監督機制等主要原則,造成投資人權益的重大損失。最後,本研究針對內部控制制度之有效性、公司治理機制、會計師責任,以及金融監理功能四層面,提出討論及建議。 Using the Rebar Business Group as the case of this study, the present research first analyzes the ownership structures of the member firms from an ultimate controller perspective. Internal control related issues are then identified, followed by a discussion on the effect of corporate governance on internal control weakness and fraudulent reporting. The analysis indicates that cross-holding, pyramid structure and seat control over the board members are venues utilized by the Wang Family to actively control Rebar Business Group. An analysis on the measurement of voting right, cash flow right and board seat-control shows that direct shareholding, voting rights, cash flow rights are on average 7.72%, 28.92%, 6.81%, while the board seat-control ratio is 95.33%. The deviation between voting right (board seat-control) and cash flow rights is 22.11% (88.52%). To the extent that ownership and control is highly deviated, a weaker disciplinary effect and a stronger entrenchment effect can be expected. In addition, this research also finds that all principles buttressed in building a sound internal control system are violated. Finally, suggestions for improvements on internal control system and policies are provided. |
Reference: | 林宛瑩、許崇源,2008,台灣集團企業之控股型態及公司治理指標衡量之研究與建議,Chiao Da Management Review, 28 (1):267-311。 許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003a,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上),貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第42期:15-31。 許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003b,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(下),貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第43期:11-26。 許崇源、林宛瑩、郭學平、林尚志,2003c,複雜交叉持股典範-力霸東森集團,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第44期:36-59。 許崇源、林宛瑩、李宛臻、鄭雯馨,2004c,複雜交叉控股型態(II)-遠東集團,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第47期:11-43。 銀行法第32條、第33-3條,票券金融管理法第30條,票券金融公司保證背書限額第3點。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會, ,內部控制之考量,審計準則公報第32號公報。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會, ,財務報表查核報告,審計準則公報第33號公報。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會, ,財務資訊協議程序之執行,審計準則公報第34號公報。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會, ,財務報表之核閱,審計準則公報第36號公報。 臺灣臺北地方法院檢察署檢察官,2007年,偵緝字第575號中國力霸股份有限公司起訴書。 Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, 2000, “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 81-112. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang, 2002, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings,” Journal of Finance, 57 (6): 2741-2771. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 1999, “Corporate Ownership around the World,” Journal of Finance, 54: 471-517. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, 2002, “Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation,” Journal of Finance, 57: 1147-1170. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, 1997, “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, 52: 737-783. Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan,” International Review of Finance, 2: 21-48. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 90932311 97 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090932311 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
231101.pdf | 986Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 3164 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|