English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51623995      Online Users : 568
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60133


    Title: 影迷的盛宴:台北金馬影展觀眾的儀式性參與
    The Feast of Cinéphile: The Ritual Participation of Taipei Golden Horse Film Festival Audience
    Authors: 張哲豪
    Chang Che-Hao
    Contributors: 陳儒修
    Chen Ru-Shou
    張哲豪
    Chang Che-Hao
    Keywords: 金馬影展
    影迷
    藝術電影
    儀式
    朝聖
    Golden Horse Film Festival
    Cinephile
    Art Cinema
    Ritual
    Pilgrimage
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2013-09-04 16:15:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 金馬影展對台灣藝術電影影迷而言,就像是場神聖的盛宴,在這場儀式中,透過群體的力量,讓信念的力量益發強大。本研究嘗試依循「朝聖」(pilgrimage)的角度,將金馬影展的觀影者,視為一種信仰著藝術電影教派(cult)的信徒,他們的身份不只是閱聽人或消費者,而是一種參與者(participants)。

    本研究分為三階段進行。第一階段針對金馬影展三十年來(1980~2009)的影片清單進行歷史性檔案研究,歸納出金馬影展播映影片的脈絡。第二階段對影展觀眾進行問卷調查與參與觀察,以期歸納出金馬影迷的外在觀影行為,並透過田野調查實際了解金馬影迷的參與過程。第三階段則是對影迷進行深度訪談與生命史訪談。在影展現場找尋了78位金馬影迷進行訪談,另針對3位具代表性的影迷,分別透過他們參與金馬影展的經歷,來進一步認識歷年金馬影迷參與的過程。

    本研究發現金馬影展的儀式概念(The Cult of Film Festival)主要來自於三者:在時間性而言,因一年一度有如逢年過節的「週期性」而營造了儀式感;在空間性而言,因影片與影迷的「齊聚性」而營造了儀式感;除了這兩者之外,要達到類宗教的景仰標準,勢必還要有「神聖性」的概念,其神聖感則是來自於電影大師的作品,所帶來的崇拜心態。

    至於影迷的朝聖歷程,本研究以三位影迷的生命史作為引述,介紹20、30、40歲各個世代的影迷,究竟是什麼樣的樣貌。而後根據大量深度訪談、田野觀察與問卷調查的結果,搭配儀式結構的模式,描繪出金馬影迷單次旅程與生涯歷程。在單次旅程的部份,可以分作「前影展時期」、「影展時期」與「後影展時期」,三者中尤以前影展時期的套票搶購與排隊劃位最具儀式性特質。在生涯歷程的部份,亦可分作「前影迷階段」、「影迷階段」與「後影迷階段」,此三者之間主要差異,是以對電影的重視、迷戀與可犧牲程度作為劃分標準。
    For art cinema fans of Taiwan, Golden Horse Film Festival just like a sacred Feast, fans gathered together every year, that increasingly the forces of faith in the ritual. This study attempts to follow the "pilgrimage" view, to imagine that Golden Horse Film Festival audience as the cult followers, their identity is not just the audience or consumers, but a participants.

    This study is divided into three stages. First is the archive research of Golden Horse Film Festival for the thirty years (1980~2009). Second is the festival audience questionnaire survey and participant observation, to understand the fans viewing behavior. The third stage is life history interviews.

    The study found that the “ritual” or “cult” concept of Golden Horse Film Festival mainly from the three points: the timing, the result of annual holidays, like the "cyclical" and created a sense of ritual; in the space, for film and fans of the "gather" of the ritual to create a sense; In addition to these two, the religious admiration to achieve the standard class is bound to also have "sacred" concept, its sacred sense is from master`s work in the film, brought the worship mentality.

    For fans of pilgrims journey, the study quoted by three fan’s life history, describes the various generations of 20,30,40 years old. Then according to a large number of interviews, field observations and findings of the survey, with the ritual process model depicts a single journey and the career of the cinephiles. In a single part of the journey, we can divided into "pre-festival period", "Film Festival Period" and "post-festival period". Part in a career of the cinephiles can be divided into "pre-cinephile stage", "cinephile stage" and "post-cinephile stage", the main differences between the three is based on the film`s importance, degree of obsession and expendable as the division of standard.
    Reference: Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences. London: Sage Publications.

    Bazin, A. (1967). The Myth of Total Cinema. In What Is Cinema? Vol. 1. Translated by Hugh Gray, 17–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Becker, K. (1995). Media and the ritual process. Media, Culture & Society. 17(4), 629-646.

    Bell, C. (1992). Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Benjamin, W. (1968). Theses on the philosophy of history (H. Zohn, Trans.). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken Books (orig. pub. 1936).

    Benjamin, W. (1969). Charles Baudelaire or the Lyric Poet of High Capitalism. London: New Left Books.

    Benjamin, W. (1969). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt (ed.) Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken (orig. pub. 1936).(中譯本:許綺玲譯(1998)。《迎向靈光消逝的年代》。台北:台灣攝影工作室。)

    Bourdieu, P (1984) [1979] Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. R Nice. London: Routledge.

    Brooker, W. (2007). Everywhere and Nowhere: Vancouver, Fan Pilgrimage and the Urban Imaginary, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4): 423-44.

    Carey, J. (1975). A Cultural Approach to Communication. Communication. 2(1): 1-22.

    Carey, J. (1992). Communication as Culture. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Collins, R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Corner, J. (1999). Review of Liebes and Curran, Media Ritual and Identity. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2(3): 4. p.16-19.

    Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized Rituals: Beyond Manufacturing Consent. Media Culture & Society 28(3): 411-32.

    Cottle, S. (2008). Mediatized rituals: a reply to Couldry and Rothenbuhler. Media Culture Society, January 1, 2008; 30(1): 135-140.

    Couldry, E. and Rothenbuhler, E.W. (2007). Review essay: Simon Cottle on mediatized rituals: a response. Media, Culture & Society; 29(4), 691-695.

    Couldry, N. (2003). Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.

    Crawford, G. (2003). The career of sport supporter: the case of Manchester Strom. Sociology, 37(2), p.219-237.

    Dayan, D., Katz, E. (1992). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Duncan, C. (1995). Civilising Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums. London: Routledge.(中譯本:王雅各譯(1998)。《文明化的儀式:公共美術館之內》,遠流,1998 年。)

    Durham, F. (2008). Media ritual in catastrophic time: The populist turn in television coverage of Hurricane Katrina. Journalism, February 1, 2008; 9(1): 95 - 116.

    Durkheim, E. [1912] (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by K. Fields. New York: Free Press.(中譯本:芮傳明、趙學元譯(1992)。宗教生活的基本形式。台北市:桂冠出版。)

    Ehrlich, M.C. (1996). Using "Ritual" to Study Journalism, Journal of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 20(2), 3-17.

    Eliade, M. (1957). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religious Myth, Symbolism, and Ritual within Life and Culture. New York: A Harvest/ HBJ Book.(中譯本:楊素娥譯(2001)。聖與俗—宗教的本質。台北市:桂冠出版。)

    Elsaesser, Thomas. (2005). "Cinephilia, or The Uses of Disenchantment." In Cinephilia: Movies, Love And Memory, edited by Marijke De Valck, and Malte Hagener, 27–44. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Erickson, Steve, et al. (2005). "Permanent Ghosts: Cinephilia in the Age of the Internet and Video." Senses of Cinema, essays 1-5. http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/00/4/cine1.html

    Fiske, J. 1989, Reading the Popular. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

    Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: On the value of popular music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1971). Status Passage. London: Routledge.

    Gray, J., Sandvoss, C. and Harrington, C.L. (2007). Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. NY: New York University Press.

    Harbord, J. (2002). Film Cultures. London: Sage.

    Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. Routledge, New York.(中譯本:蔡宜剛譯(2005)。次文化:風格的意義。台北市:巨流出版。)

    Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. London: Routledge(中譯本:朱華瑄譯(2009)。《探究迷文化》。台北:韋伯文化。)

    Holmes, D. (2002). Ritual Views of Communication: Implications for a Sociology of Media. The Australian Sociological Association Conference, Brisbane, July 5-6.

    Holmes, D. (2004). Rituals of Media: Remediation and Community in Recent Sociology of Communication. Revisioning Institutions: Change in the 21st Century: Conference Proceedings of TASA 2004, delivered at Beechworth Campus of Latrobe University: 6-8 December 2004.

    Horkheimer, M.. & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. NY: Herder & Herder.

    Jenkins, Henry (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. Studies in culture and communication. New York: Routledge.

    Jensen, J. (1992). Fandom as pathology: The consequences of characterization. In The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. Lisa A. Lewis, ed. London: Routledge.

    Kozinets, R. (2001), “Utopian enterprise: articulating the meanings of Star Trek`s culture of consumption”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28.

    Kuhn, C., McLellan, M. (1997). Oral history. OAH Magazine of History 11(3): 3–5.

    Liebes, T. and Curran, T. (eds.) (1998). Media, Ritual and Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Marshall, D.A. (2002). Behavior, Belonging, and Belief: A Theory of Ritual Practice. Sociological Theory, Vol. 20(3), 360-380.

    Marvin, C. (2002). Media Rituals: Follow the Bodies. from American Cultural Studies, edited by Catherine A. Warren and Mary Douglas Vavrus (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press), 182-195.

    McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail`s Mass Communication Theory, 4th Edition, / London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Metz, C. (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Translated by Celia Britton et al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Translation of Le Signifiant imaginaire. Psychanalyse et cinéma (1977).

    Michelson, A. (1998). Gnosis and Iconoclasm: A Case Study of Cinephilia. October 83: 3–18.

    Neale, S. (1981). Art Cinema as Institution, Screen. Vol. 22, Iss. 1.

    Petley, J. (1999). Art Cinema in Cook, Pam & Bernink, In Mieke (eds), The Cinema Book: 2nd edition, 106-111. London : British Film Institute.

    Roemer, M.K. (2007). Ritual Participation and Social Support in a Major Japanese Festival. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(2), June 2007, 185-200.

    Rothenbuhler, E.W. (1998). Ritual communication: From everyday conversation to mediated ceremony. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Rothenbuhler, E.W. and Coman, M. (eds) (2005). Media Anthropology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Rubin, A.M. (1984). Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing. Journal of Communication; 34(3): 66-77.

    Russell, C. Cinephilia: The future of cinephilia. Filmreference.com.

    Sandvoss, C. (2005) Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Sella, Z.K. (2007). The Journey of Ritual Communication, Studies in Communication Sciences, 7(1), 117–138.

    Sontag, S. (1966). Against Interpretation, and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.

    Sontag, S. (1996). The Decay of Cinema. New York Times, 25 February 1996.

    Stafford, R. (2007). Understanding Audiences and the Film Industry. British Film Institute.

    Stephenson, W. (1967). The Play Theory of Mass Communication. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Storey, J. (1999) Cultural Consumption and Everyday Life. London: Arnold — Hodder Headline Group.

    Strathern, A. and Stewart, P.J. (2007). Embodiment and communication. Two frames for the analysis of ritual, Social Anthropology, 6(2), 237-251.

    Sterritt, David. (2006). “Festival”, in The Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film, ed. Barry Keith Grant. New York: Schirmer. http://www.filmreference.com/encyclopedia/Criticism-Ideology/Festivals-HISTORY-OF-FILM-FESTIVALS.html

    Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(中譯本:趙玉燕、歐陽敏譯(2006)。象徵之林—恩登布人儀式散論。商務印書館。)

    Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.(中譯本:黃劍波、柳博譯(2006)。儀式過程:結構與反結構。中國人民大學出版社。)

    Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theater: The human seriousness of play. New York: PAJ Publications.

    Willemen, P. (1994). Looks and frictions: essays in cultural studies and film theory. Bloomington and Indianapolis and London: Indiana UP and BFI.

    de Valck, Marijke; Hagener, Malte, eds (2005). Cinephilia: Movies, Love And Memory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    van Gennep, A. (1960). The Rites of Passage. (trans. M.B. Vizedom and G.L. Caffee). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    于君方(1998),〈宗教學研究方法〉,《青松萌芽》第四期18-23。http://www.gaya.org.tw/hkbi/topic/topic1_1.htm。

    王文科、王智弘(2007)。《教育研究法》。台北:五南出版社。

    王耿瑜(2001)。〈關於影展 我知道什麼?〉,《金馬四十專刊》,金馬執委會。另載於http://movie1.cca.gov.tw/Case/Content.asp?ID=57&Year=2001

    王銘銘(2000)。《社會人類學》。台北:五南出版社。

    王霄冰主編(2008)。《儀式與信仰:當代文化人類學新視野》。北京:民族出版社。

    朱峰誼(2006)。《扁迷作為一種道德實踐》。國立政治大學新聞研究所。

    吳凡(2009)。《電影影展》。台北:書林出版。

    吳廷勻(2006)。《藝術電影迷與台灣電影消費階層化現象之研究:以布迪厄(Bourdieu)文化社會學為研究取徑》。淡江大學大眾傳播研究所。

    吳彥明(2006)。《從「大眾商品的迷」到「政治迷」:「政治迷」的論述建構》。輔大大傳所碩士論文。

    吳彥明(2008)。「迷」之迷團-迷研究的過去、現在與未來。《廣告學研究》,30: 127-131。

    李佩真(1998)。《偶像文本的消費意義—迷與偶像關係之探討》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

    李律鋒(2004)。《台灣爵士樂「迷」的研究》,政大廣告所碩士論文。

    李純娟譯(2005)。《永恆的朝聖者》。台北:張老師文化。(原書:Hand, T. [2005] Always a Pilgrim: Walking the Zen Christian Path. Mercy Center Meditation Program.)

    李韶翎(2008)。《我讀,我寫,我迷線上羅曼史討論社群研究》。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所。

    周平(2007)。〈意志、神聖與社會儀式:從叔本華和佛洛伊德的取徑重新詮釋後期涂爾幹之宗教社會觀〉,《宗教與社會的世界圖像》,南華大學教社所。

    林志明(2009)。〈「我來自一個影痴的環境」巴伊尼在台北〉,《電影欣賞》第137期。

    林芳玫(1996)。《女性與媒體再現: 女性主義與社會建構論的觀點》。臺北市:巨流。

    林雨澄(2005)。《影舞者的夢醒時分:小眾影迷習癖與場域之分析》。國立交通大學語言與文化研究所。

    林曉瑜(2005)。《藝術展示與儀式性關聯之初探》。臺南藝術學院音像藝術管理研究所。

    洪淑宜(2008)。《旅遊網誌的幻想世界:認同、參與與遊戲》,世新大學傳播研究所博士論文。

    胡幼慧主編(1996)。《質化研究》。台北:巨流。

    唐慧音(2001)。《影展潮:藝術行銷的觀點》。台北:國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。

    夏春祥(2000)。《媒介記憶與新聞儀式—二二八事件新聞的文本分析(1947-2000)》,台北:國立政治大學新聞系博士論文。

    徐雨村譯(2005)。《文化人類學:文化多樣性的探索》。台北市:麥格羅希爾出版。

    徐國峰(2004)。《媒體儀式中的棒球想像─以中華職棒大聯盟球迷為例》,疆界/將屆:2004年文化研究學生研討會論文。

    徐國峰(2004)。《龍魂不滅—傳播儀式中的社群記憶》,政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

    孫智綺譯(2002)。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課,P. Bonnewitz(著)。臺北市:麥田。

    海德格著,孫興譯(1996)。〈藝術作品的本源〉,孫周興選編《海德格爾選集》上,上海:三聯書店。

    張世倫(2001)。《台灣「新電影」論述形構之歷史分析(1965~2000)》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。

    張俊彥(2005)。〈Re-enchantment!「返魅」21世紀文藝復興的先兆〉。《合唱音樂雙月刊》第11期,13。

    張敏琪(2005)。《尋繹聖像-縷析隱匿的神聖靈光》。高雄師範大學美術系碩士班。

    郭書吟(2007)。《掌中春秋,百年癡迷—霹靂布袋戲迷文化》,政大新聞所碩士論文。

    陳芸芸譯(2006)。《電影學入門》。台北:韋伯文化。(原書:Nelmes, J. [1999]. An Introduction to Film Studies. Routledge.)

    陳振興(1992)。《中國大百科全書-電影卷》。台北:錦鏽出版社。

    陳景威(2006)。《傳神:儀式新聞的產製與內容分析—大甲媽祖遶境進香1988-2004》,國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文

    章伯青(1995)。《電影與觀眾論稿》,北京:華夏出版社。

    黃月純(2003)教育組織變革之研究-以美國學習型社區學院方案為例。教育學刊。第二十一期,256-278。

    曾武清(2003)。《網路媒介與集體記憶:從台灣棒球史中的「龍魂不滅」談起》,國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

    曾武清(2004)。〈虛擬社群的集體記憶與儀式傳播:一個關於「龍魂不滅」的初探性研究〉,《資訊社會研究》,第六卷。

    游上民(2007)。《「上電影院=看好萊塢電影?」:美國化下台灣觀眾的電影想像》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所論文。

    程予誠(1993)。《現代電影學:開啟成功票房的鑰匙》。台北:五南。

    塗翔文(2005)。〈影展在台灣〉,載於台灣電影筆記,http://movie1.cca.gov.tw/Case/Content.asp?Year=2005&ID=317。

    聞天祥(2003)。《影迷的第一堂課》。台北:幼獅。

    劉怡佳、劉宏信譯(2001)。《宗教經驗之種種》。台北:立緒文化。

    劉嘉明(2005)。《影視節目市場展之比較研究》。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

    劉慧雯(2001)。〈電視廣告「效果」再論:語言遊戲的觀點〉。《新聞學研究》,66,97-125。

    蔡筱薇(2004)。《藝術電影觀賞者之消費行為研究》。國立台灣大學商學研究所。

    鄭君仲(2001)。《我迷,故我在—流行音樂樂迷和流行音樂文本互動關係之探索》。台北:世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

    鄭泰丞(1995)。《電影觀賞:現世的宗教意含性心理經驗》。台北:桂冠。

    盧非易(1998)。《台灣電影:政治、經濟、美學(一九四九年至一九九四年)》,台北:遠流出版社。

    賴蕙蘭(2005)。《以生活型態剖析台灣之藝術電影消費行為》。國立台灣大學商學研究所。

    簡妙如(1996)。《過度的閱聽人-「迷」之初探》。中正大學電訊傳播所碩士論文。

    藍祖蔚,2009年10月12日。「專訪李安」一文。自由時報影劇版http://4bluestones.biz/mtblog/2009/10/post-1742.html

    魏大為(2009)。《「國外藝術電影」觀影者使用滿足之研究-以台北市真善美劇院為例》。世新大學廣播電視電影研究所。

    魏玓(1999)。〈好萊塢過台灣:一段電影殖民史的開端〉,《當代》,第139期,頁24-43。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣播電視學研究所
    96453009
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096453009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Radio & Television & Graduate Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300901.pdf2249KbAdobe PDF21348View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback