政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/60027
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51789263      線上人數 : 710
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60027


    題名: 重覆閱讀與非重覆閱讀對國小學童口語閱讀流暢度之效益研究
    The effect of repeated reading and non-repeated reading on EFL elementary school students` oral reading fluency
    作者: 林虹伶
    Lin, Hung Ling
    貢獻者: 葉潔宇
    Yeh, Chieh Yue
    林虹伶
    Lin, Hung Ling
    關鍵詞: 重覆閱讀
    口語閱讀流暢度
    repeated reading
    oral reading fluency
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2013-09-04 14:55:47 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在了解並比較重覆閱讀及非重覆閱讀對於國小四年級學童的口語閱讀流暢度的影響。本研究以台灣北部某國小四年級中的兩個班級為研究對象，共為59人。此閱讀能力相近的兩個班級經隨機分派指定為重覆閱讀組及非重覆閱讀組。在為期16週，每週一節的實驗教學中，重覆閱讀組以重覆閱讀法每週閱讀同一本英文讀本，而非重覆閱讀組以非重覆閱讀法每週閱讀兩本讀本。兩組皆於教學前及教學後接受口語閱讀測驗，以了解接受不同教學法的學童在口語閱讀速度及正確性是否有差異。測驗所得的資料以成對樣本t檢定及獨立樣本t檢定分析進行統計分析。
    研究結果顯示重覆閱讀與非重覆閱讀皆能顯著提升研究對象的口語閱讀速度及正確性。此外，非重覆閱讀與重覆閱讀對於受試學童的口語閱讀流暢度顯示相似的成效。此研究結果盼能提供教學者彈性的運用此兩種閱讀教學法並更加重視口語閱讀流暢性的重要。
    The study aims to examine and compare the effect of assisted repeated reading (RR) and non-repeated reading (Non-RR) approaches on EFL young learners` oral reading rate and accuracy rate. Two classes with homogenous reading level consisting of 59 fourth graders were selected from one elementary school in northern Taiwan and were randomly assigned to two groups, the RR and Non-RR group. During the 16-week instruction, one period of class per week, the RR group practiced reading aloud on one reader with assisted repeated reading approach, whereas the Non-RR group practiced reading aloud on two readers with assisted non-repeated reading approach each class. The data collected from the pretest and posttest assessing the participants’ oral reading rate and accuracy rate were analyzed by paired samples t-tests and independent samples t-tests.
    The results revealed that the RR and Non-RR groups performed equivalent growth on their reading rate and accuracy rate with significant improvement. It is hoped that the findings provide a deeper understanding on the effect of assisted repeated reading and non-repeated reading on EFL young learners’ oral reading fluency and are applied in classrooms.
     
    參考文獻: Amarel, M. (1978). Educational Testing Service reading study. Institute for Research in Teaching: Notes and News, 5, 2-3.
    Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009a). Increasing Elementary-aged Students` Reading Fluency with Small-group Interventions: A Comparison of Repeated Reading, Listening Passage Preview, and Listening Only Strategies. Behavioral Education, 18, 211-228.
    Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009b). Increasing Elementary-aged Students’ Reading Fluency with Small-group Interventions: A Comparison of Repeated Reading, Listening Passage Preview, and Listening Only Strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 211-228. doi: 10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9
    Caldwell, J. S. (2007). Reading Assessment (Second ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
    Carbo, M. (1978). Teaching reading with talking books. The Reading Teacher, 32, 267-273.
    Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Chomsky, C. (1978). When you still can`t read in third grade. After decoding, what? Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of Repeated Reading on Second-Grade Transitional Readers` Fluency and Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 389-406.
    Educational Bureau of Taipei County (2010). Trial implementation of activation curriculums 臺北縣 99 學年度「活化課程實驗方案」實施計畫 https://esa.ntpc.edu.tw/central/019999/uploadfile/c_announce/20153/%E6%B4%BB%E5%8C%96%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B.rar
    Eldrege, J. L. (1990). An experiment using a group assisted repeated reading strategy with poor readers. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, Department of Elementary Education, College of Education.
    Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
    Goodman, Y. (1996). Revaluing readers while readers revalue themselves: Restrospetive miscue analysis The Reading Teacher, 49, 600-609
    Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2008). Repeated reading for developing reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of EFL learners in Vietnam. System, 36(2), 253-278.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
    Grabe, W. (2010). Fluency in reading—Thirty-five years later. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 1.
    Hoffman, J. V. (1987). Rethinking the role of oral reading in basal instruction. Elementary School Journal, 87, 367-373.
    Homa, S., Klesius, P., & Hite, S. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetive strategies on students` fluency and comprehesion. Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94-99.
    Hyatt, A. V. (1943). The place of oral reading in the school program: Its history and development from 1880-1941. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.
    Jeon, E. (2009). Effects of repeated reading on L2 reading fluency and comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Arizona University.
    Kuhn, M. (2004). Helping students become accurate, expressive readers: Flueney instruetion for small groups. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 338-344.
    Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
    LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
    Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123-146.
    Melanie, R. K., Paula, J. S., Robin, D. M., Lesley Mandel, M., & et al. (2006). Teaching Children to Become Fluent and Automatic Readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357.
    Moyer, S. B. (1982). Repeated reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 619-623.
    Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Barkley, E. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 12-23.
    Nichols, W. D., Rupley, W., & Rasinski, T. (2009). Fluency in Learning to Read for Meaning: Going Beyond Repeated Readings. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(1), 1-13.
    O`Connor, R. E., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated Reading Versus Continuous Reading: Influences on Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31-46.
    O`Shea, J., L., Sindelar, T., P., & O`Shea, D. (1987). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103-109.
    National Reading Panel. (2000). Reports of the subgroups: National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Development.
    Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461-469.
    Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading Fluency: More Than Automaticity? More Than a Concern for the Primary Grades? . Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350-361.
    Rasinski, T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147-150.
    Rasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, J. V. (2003). Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 510-522.
    Rupley, W. H., Willson, V. L., & Nichols, W. D. (1998). Exploration of the developmental components contributing to elementary school children`s reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 143-158.
    Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 50(5), 376-381.
    Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 107.
    Singer, H. (Ed.). (1981). Instruction in reading acquistion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391-1466.
    Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal ofLearning Disabilities, 27, 91-103.
    Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-460.
    Taguchi, E. (1997). The effects of repeated readings on the development of lower identification skills of FL readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(97-119).
    Taguchi, E. (2002). Transfer effects of repeated EFL reading on reading new passages: A preliminary investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 43.
    Taguchi, E. (2004). Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(2), 70.
    Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading: A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252-261.
    Therrien, W. J., & Jr., R. M. K. (2007). The Importance of Context in Repeated Reading. Reading Improvement, 44(4).
    Topping, K. (1989). Peer Tutoring and Paired Reading: Combining Two Powerful Techniques. The Reading Teacher, 42(7), 488.
    Villaume, S. K., & Brabham, E. G. (2003). Phonics instruction: Beyond the debate. The Reading Teacher, 56, 478-482.
    Welsch, R. G. (2006). 20 ways to increase oral reading fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 180-183.
    Yurick, A. L., Robinson, P. D., Cartledge, G., Lo, Y., & Evans, T. L. (2006). Using peer-mediated repeated readings as a fluency-building activity for urban learners. Educational and Treatment of Children, 29, 469-506.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英語教學碩士在職專班
    97951004
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097951004
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    100401.pdf1260KbAdobe PDF2439檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋