政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59764
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51779735      線上人數 : 536
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/59764


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59764


    題名: 愉悅性嗅覺刺激對產品評價與資訊處理的影響
    The effects of pleasant scent stimulus on product evaluation and information process
    作者: 陳明怡
    貢獻者: 別蓮蒂
    樓永堅
    陳明怡
    關鍵詞: 嗅覺刺激
    資訊處理
    廣告訴求
    論點品質
    涉入程度
    嗅覺刺激診斷性
    推敲可能性模型
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2013-09-03 14:37:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文主要探討愉悅的嗅覺刺激對產品評價與資訊處理的影響。透過兩個子研究分別瞭解產品嗅覺刺激與情境嗅覺刺激各自的影響，以推敲可能性模型做為貫穿全文的主要理論模型，並從多元角色觀點與享樂權宜觀點建構整合模型。產品嗅覺刺激指與產品本身直接有關的氣味，過去在此議題上的研究缺口有二，分別為未考量區辨氣味與產品搭配適合性所需具備之動機，以及不同產品類型之調節效果，例如，氣味對於家用清潔品及保養品的診斷性及攸關性皆較高，但對於筆記型電腦、手機、手錶或隨身碟等產品之診斷價值較低。情境嗅覺刺激指存在於情境中但與被評估之標的產品無關的氣味，過去缺乏探討情境嗅覺刺激影響資訊處理模式之相關研究，但此議題無論對學術或實務都相當重要，因為許多研究人員皆不斷地想探索那些因素會影響人們的資訊處理模式。而且，行銷人員總是希望能藉由產品資訊說服消費者，尤其當不知名品牌的新產品問世時，更仰賴消費者對產品資訊的仔細處理而被說服，進而產生較佳評價。因此，若能進一步瞭解情境嗅覺刺激對資訊處理的影響，對行銷人員在氣味氛圍的營造與操作上，將可提供可參考的方向。
    本論文透過兩個子研究並採用實驗法，分別瞭解產品嗅覺刺激與情境嗅覺刺激的影響。研究一又可分為兩個主題，主題一採3 (產品嗅覺刺激：無vs.適合性vs.不適合) * 2 (嗅覺刺激診斷性：高vs.低) *2 (涉入程度：高vs.低)之12組受測者間實驗設計。主題二為情境嗅覺刺激之前導研究，採3 (情境嗅覺刺激：無vs.適合性vs.不適合)之3組受測者間實驗設計。研究二採2 (情境嗅覺刺激的提供：有vs.無) * 2 (廣告訴求：享樂vs.功利) *2 (產品論點品質：強vs.弱)之8組受測者間實驗設計。
    關於產品嗅覺刺激有三點重要發現，分別為：(1) 對低資訊處理涉入者來說，無論嗅覺刺激是否具診斷性，氣味愉悅性都是主要的影響因素，此時，產品嗅覺刺激乃為情感性角色，因任務結果對低資訊處理涉入者並不攸關且不感興趣，在這種情況下，其易採取週邊說服路徑，視產品嗅覺刺激為週邊線索，只要氣味具愉悅性，雖適合性不高，仍可提升產品評價。(2) 對高資訊處理涉入者來說，嗅覺刺激具診斷性時，產品嗅覺刺激主要扮演認知性角色，因任務結果對高涉入者為攸關且感興趣，在此情況下，其易採取中央說服路徑，視該氣味為攸關判斷的產品論點，所以會仔細推敲該嗅覺刺激與產品的關係，以決定搭配適合性，對於適合的嗅覺刺激評價會比不適合的佳，此時，嗅覺刺激適合性就類似於強弱產品論點的角色。(3) 當嗅覺刺激不具診斷性時，其認知性角色就會消失，此時，高資訊處理涉入者仍然採取中央說服路徑，但氣味已被視為與判斷無關的週邊線索，所以高涉入者並不會再仔細推敲該嗅覺刺激與產品的關係，適合與否也就不會產生差異，甚至高涉入者還會啟動修正機制，排除氣味愉悅性的影響。
    在情境嗅覺刺激部份亦有四點重要發現，分別為：(1) 當愉悅的情境嗅覺刺激存在時，會有助於增加知覺者的正向心情，進而增加消費者對情境標的產品之資訊處理程度並促進其採取中央資訊處理路徑，對於強勢論點品質之產品評價會優於弱勢論點。(2) 愉悅的情境嗅覺刺激也會改變消費者對不同產品資訊類型的偏重，即在資訊處理或編碼階段會對享樂資訊特別關注，因此，在事後對於享樂資訊的提取比率較高，上述效果在享樂廣告訴求下更為明顯。(3) 有愉悅的情境嗅覺刺激存在時，會讓消費者對享樂訴求廣告之產品評價優於功利訴求。(4) 本研究進一步建構情境嗅覺刺激影響產品評價之多元關係，結果發現當產品類型較偏功利性時，則情境嗅覺刺激會先經由引發好心情再增加資訊處理程度，最後才影響產品評價，其中正向心情與資訊處理程度在模式中都是部份中介的角色，當產品類型較偏享樂性時，則情境嗅覺刺激影響產品評價就完全經由心情機制。
    This study adopts a multiple-role view from the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and hedonic contingency model to explore the influences of product scents and ambient scents. The product scents are scents that consumers smell directly from products. In the literature on product scents, there are no research studies considering the moderate role of product types and the motivation to recognize scents appropriately. Ambient scents are scents smelled that are unconnected to products. In the literature on ambient scents, there are no research studies considering how ambient scents can influence information processes. However, many scholars want to explore the factors that can influence information processes. Furthermore, a new product launch by an unknown brand can convince consumers depending on consumers’ careful processing of product information. Thus, this issue is very important to academic study and practice.
    This study adopts two experiments that realize the effects of product scents and ambient scents separately. Study One can be divided into two parts. Part A adopts a 3 (product scents: none, fit, unfit) * 2 (involvement: high vs. low) * 2 (diagnostic of scents: high vs. low) between-subjects design. Part B is a pilot study of ambient scents that adopts a between-subjects design with 3 factors (ambient scents: none, fit, unfit). The Study Two adopts a 2 (ambient scents: yes vs. no) * 2 (advertisement appeal: hedonic vs. utilitarian) * 2 (argument quality: strong vs. weak) between-subjects design.
    The results of Study One have three points: (1) for consumers with low involvement in tasks, whether scents are diagnostic for products or not, pleasant scents have significant effects. Because people who are involved in tasks at a low level and are not concerned or interested in outcomes, they are almost persuaded by peripheral routes and regard product scents as peripheral cues. Even though the scents do not fit with the products, they still can cause positive product evaluation depending on the nature of the pleasure. For people with low involvement in tasks, product scents mainly play an emotional role. (2) For people who are highly involved in tasks and really concerned or interested in outcomes, they are almost persuaded by central routes and regard product scents as arguments, especially when scents are diagnostic for products. For them, product scents not only play an emotional role but also a cognitive role. They will evaluate the similarities or differences between products and scents. A scent that fits with a product will cause a more positive product evaluation than a scent that does not fit a product. (3) For consumers who are highly involved in tasks, as scents are not diagnostic for products, the cognitive role will disappear. The scents are regarded irrelevant to product evaluation, so consumers do not evaluate the similarities or differences between products and scents. Whether a scent fits a product or does not is unimportant for them; furthermore, they will correct for and eliminate the effects of pleasant scents in product evaluation.
    The results of Study Two have four points: (1) when pleasant ambient scents can be provided by marketers, they can cause a positive mood among perceivers and enhance the level of information processing toward the focal product within the context. Furthermore, pleasant ambient scents can encourage consumers to adopt central routes to process information. People will evaluate products with strong argument quality more positively than products with weak argument quality. (2) Pleasant ambient scents also draw people’s attention toward different information types. People will attend more to hedonic product information, especially with hedonic advertisement appeal. (3) A pleasant ambient scent that matches a hedonic advertisement appeal can cause a more positive product evaluation than a pleasant ambient scent that matches a utilitarian advertisement appeal. (4) For a utilitarian product type, the effects of pleasant ambient scents on product evaluation will cause a positive mood and enhance the level of information processing. Mood and cognition play a partial mediation role. For a hedonic product type, the effect of pleasant ambient scents on product evaluation is fully mediated by a positive mood.
    參考文獻: 李昱欣，( 2008)，「罪惡感訴求與產品類型對善因行銷效果的影響」，國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文。
    夏康寧，( 2006)，「消費者心情對產品屬性偏好及產品態度之影響研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    聯合新聞網(2008). 電腦手機真有味開機聞香, http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=156522.
    Aaker, David A. & Norris, Donald (1982). Characteristics of TV Commercials Perceived as Informative. Journal of Advertising Research, 22, 61-70.
    Ackerman, Diane (1990). A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Random House.
    Adaval, Rashmi (2001). Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect-Consistent and Affect-Inconsistent Product Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1-17.
    Aggleton, John P. & Mishkin, Mortimer (1986). The Amygdala: Sensory Gateway to the Emotions. In Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience: Biological Foundations of Emotions, Vol. 3, Robert Plutehik and Henry Kellerman, eds. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 281-299.
    Albers-Miller, Nancy D. & Stafford, Marla R. (1999). An International of Analysis of Emotional and Rational Appeals in Services versus Goods Advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (1), 42-57.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Yair, Mikulincer, Mario, & Zalts, Nir (2003). The Effects of Learned Helplessness on the Processing of a Persuasive Message. Current Psychology, 22 (1), 37-46.
    Anderson, John R. (1983). A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (3), 261-295.
    Andrews, Craig J., Durvasula, Srinivas, & Akhter, Syed H. (1990). A Framework for Conceptualizing and Measuring the Involvement Construct in Advertising Research. Journal of Advertising, 19 (4), 27-40.
    Areni, Chartes S. & Lutz, Richard J. (1988). The Role of Argument Quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 197-203.
    Babin, Barry J., Darden, William R., & Griffin, Mitch (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644-656.
    Baron, Robert A. & Bronfen, Marna I. (1994). A Whiff of Reality: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Effects of Pleasant Fragrances on Work-Related Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24 (13), 1179-1203.
    Baron, Robert A. & Thomley, Jill (1994). A Whiff of Reality: Positive Affect as a Potential Mediator of the Effects of Pleasant Fragrances on Task Performance and Helping. Environment and Behavior, 26 (Nov.), 766-784.
    Baron, Robert A. (1983). Sweet Smell of Success? The Impact of Pleasant Artificial Scents on Evaluations of Job Applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (4), 709-713.
    Baron, Robert A. (1990). Environmentally Induced Positive Affect: Its Impact on Self-Efficacy, Task Performance, Negotiation, and Conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 368-384.
    Batra, Rajeev & Stayman Douglas M. (1990). The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (Sep.), 203-214.
    Benderly, B. L. (1988). Aroma Driven: On the Trail of Our Most Emotional Sense. Health, 20 (December), 62-65.
    Berger, Jonah & Fitzsimons, Granne (2008). Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (1), 1-14.
    Bitner, Mary Jo (1990). Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69-82.
    Bitner, Mary Jo (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surrondings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 57-71.
    Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and Persuasion: A Cognitive Response Analysis. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345.
    Bohner, Gerd, Frank, Elisabeth, & Erb, Hans-Peter (1998). Heuristic Processing of Distinctiveness Information in Minority and Majority Influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28 (5), 855-860.
    Bohner, Gerd, Markus Ruder, & Erb, Hans-Peter (2002). When Expertise Backfires: Contrast and Assimilation Effect in Persuasion. Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 495-519.
    Bohner, Gerd, Moskowitz, Gordon B., & Chaiken, Shelly (1995). The Interplay of Heuristic and Systematic Processing of Social Information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33-68.
    Bone, Paula Fitzgerald & Ellen, Pam Scholder (1999). Scents in The Marketplace: Explaining a Fraction of Olfaction. Journal of Retailing, 75 (2), 243-262.
    Bone, Paula Fitzgerald & Jantrania, Swati (1992). Olfaction as a Cue for Product Quality. Marketing Letters, 3 (3), 289-296.
    Bornstein, R. F. & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128.
    Bornstein, R. F. (1992). Subliminal Mere Exposure Effects. In Bornstein, R. F., & Pittman, T. S. (eds.), Perception Without Awareness: Cognitve, Clinical, and Social Prespectives, 191-210, New York: Guilford.
    Bosmans, Anick & Baumgartner, Hans (2005). Goal-Relevant Emotional Information: When Extraneous Affect Leads to Persuasion and When It Does Not. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (Dec.), 424-434.
    Bosmans, Anick (2006). Scents and Sensibility: When Do (In) Congruent Ambient Scents Influence Product Evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70, 32-43.
    Bower, Gordon H. (1981). Mood and Memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
    Burnkrant, Robert E. (1976). A Motivational Model of Information Processing Intensity. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 21-30.
    Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
    Cacioppo, John T. & Petty, Richard E. (1979). Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Responses, Recall, and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (1), 97-109.
    Cacioppo, John T. & Petty, Richard E. (1989). Effects of Message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10 (1), 3-12.
    Campbell, Margaret C. & Kirmani, Anna (2000). Consumer ‘ Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (June), 69-83.
    Cann, Arnie & Ross, Debra A. (1989). Olfactory Stimuli as Context Cues in Human Memory. Amercan Journal of Psychology, 102 (1), 91-102.
    Celsi, Richard L. & Olson, Jerry C. (1988). The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 210-224.
    Chaiken, Shelly, Liberman, A. & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and Systematic Processing Within and Beyond the Persuasion Context. In Uleman James S. & Bargh John A. (eds.), Unintended Thought, 212-252. New York: Guilford Press.
    Chaiken, Shelly & Maheswaran, Durairaj (1994). Heuristic Processing can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (3), 460-473.
    Chaiken, Shelly (1980). Heuristic versus Systematic Inofrmation Processing and Use the Source versus Message Cue in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
    Chaiken, Shelly (1987). The Heuristic Model of Persuasion. In Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., & Herman, C. P. (eds.), Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, 5, pp. 3-39, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Chen, Serena & Chaiken, Shelly (1999). The Heuristic-Systematic Model in Its Broader Context. In Chaiken, Shelly & Trope, Yaacov (eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, 73-96. New York: Guilford Press.
    Childers, Terry L., Carr, Christopher L., Peck, Joann, & Carson, Stephen (2001). Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77 (4), 511-535.
    Clark, M. S. & Isen, A. M. (1982). Toward Understanding the Relationship between Feeling States and Social Behavior. In A. H. Hastorf & A. M. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive and Social Psychology (pp.73-108). New York: Elsevier.
    Clarke, T. K. & Belk, R. W. (1979). The Effects of Product Involvement and Task Definition on Anticipated Consumer Effort. In W. Wilkie (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (vol. 6, pp. 313-318). Ann Arbor, MI. Association for Consumer Research.
    Clore, Gerald L., Schwarz, Norbert, & Conway, Michael (1994). Affective Causes and Consequences of Social Information Processing. In Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol.1 ed. R. Wyer, T. Srull and A. Isen, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 323-417.
    Cooper, William H. (1981). Ubiquitous Halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90 (2), 218-224.
    Cox, Dena S. & Cox, Anthony D. (1988). What Does Familiarity Breed: Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertisement Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 111-116.
    Cox, Donald F. (1967). The Sorting Rule Model of the Consumer Product Evaluation Process. In Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Boston, MA: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 324-369.
    Crowley, Ayn E. (1993). The Two-Dimensional Impact of Color on Shopping. Marketing Letters, 4, 59-69.
    DeBono, Kenneth G. & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source Expertise, Source Attractiveness, and the Processing of Persuasive Information: An Functional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 279-287.
    Debono, Kenneth G. (1992). Pleasant Scents and Persuasion: An Information Processing Approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (11), 910-919.
    Derbaix, C. & Pham, M. T. (1991). Affective reaction to consumption situation: A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 325-355.
    Dhar, Ravi & Wertenbroch, Klaus (2000). Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (1), 60-71.
    Dick, Alan, Chakravarti, Dipankar, & Biehal, Gabriel (1990). Memory-Based Inferences during Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (1), 82-93.
    Donovan, Robert & Rossiter, John (1982). Store Atmosphere: An Environmental Psychology Approach. Journal of Retailing, 58, 34-57.
    Doty, R. L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., & Settle, R. G. (1985). Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Neuropsychologia, 23 (5), 667-672.
    Doty, R. L. (1981). Olfactory Communication in Humans. Chemical Senses, 6 (4), 351-376.
    Dube, L., Chattopadhyay, A., & Letarte, A. (1996). Should Advertising Appeals Match the basis of Consumers’ Attitude? Journal of Advertising Research, November/December, 82-89.
    Eagly, Alice H. & Chaiken, Shelly (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
    Ehrlichman, Howard & Bastone, Linda (1992). The Use of Odour in the Study of Emotion. In Fragrance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume, S. Van Toller and G. H. Dodd, eds., London: Elsevier Applied Science, 143-159.
    Ehrlichman, Howard & Halpern, Jack N. (1988). Affect and Memory: Effects of Pleasant and Unpleasant Odors on Retrieval of Happy and Unhappy Memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (Nov.), 769-779.
    Ellen, Pam Scholder & Bone, Paula Fitzgerald (1998). Does It Matter If It Smells? Olfactory Stimuli As Advertising Executional Cues. Journal of Advertising, 27 (4), 29-39.
    Engen, Trygg & Ross, Bruce M. (1973). Long-Term-Memory of Odors With and Without Verbal Descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 100 (2), 221-27.
    Engen, Trygg (1982). The Perception of Odors. New York: Academic Press.
    Eroglu, S. A. & Machleit, Karen A. (1990). An Empirical Study of Retailing Crowding: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Retailing, 66 (2), 201-221.
    Fiore, Ann Marie, Yah, Xinlu, & Yoh, Eunah (2000). Effects of a Product Display and Environmental Fragrancing on Approach Responses and Pleasurable Experiences. Psychology and Marketing, 17 (1), 27-54.
    Fiske, Susan T. & Neuberg, Steven L. (1990). A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Infiuences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation," in Advances in Experimental So cial Psychology, 23, ed. Mark P. Zanna. New York; Academic Press, 1-73.
    Fiske, Susan T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd, ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Fiske, Susan T. (1980). Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 889-906.
    Forgas, Joseph P. & Bower, Gordon H. (1987). Mood Effects on Person-Perception Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (1), 53-60.
    Forgas, Joseph P. (1995). Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 39-66.
    Förster, Jens & Strack, Fritz (1996). Influence of Overt Head Movements on Memory for Valenced Words: A Case of Conceptual-Motor Compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (3), 421-430.
    Freedman, D. H. (1993). In the Realm of the Chemical. Discover, (June), 68-76.
    Gibbons, B. (1986). The Intimate Sense of Smell. National Geographic, 170, 324-361.
    Gorn, Gerald J., Goldberg, Marvin E., & Basu, Kunal (1993). Mood, Awareness and Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (3). 237-256.
    Gorn, Gerald J. & Goldberg, Marvin E. (1980). Children`s Responses to Repetitive Television Commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 6 (4), 421-424.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. (1968). Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion and Attitude Change, in Psychological Foundation of Attitudes, eds. Anthony G. Greenwald, Timothy C. Brock, and Thomas M. Ostrom, New York: Academic Press, 147-170.
    Griffin, Robert J., Neuwirth, Kurt, Giese, James, & Dunwoody, Sharon (2002). Linking the Heuristic-Systematic Model and Depth of Processing. Communication Research, 29, 705-732.
    Gulas, Charles S. & Bloch, Peter H. (1995). Right Under Our Noses: Ambient Scent and Consumer Responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10 (1), 87-98.
    Haines, George H. (1974). Process Models of Consumer Decision Making. Buyer/Consumer Information Processing, G. David Hughes and Michael L. Ray ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 89-107.
    Harrell, Gillbert D., Hutt, Michael D., & Anderson, James C. (1980). Path Analysis of Buyer Behavior Under Conditions of Crowding. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 45-51.
    Helweg-Larsen, Marie & Howell, Constance (2000). Effects of Erotophobia on the Persuasiveness of Condom Advertisements Containing Strong or Weak Arguments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22 (2), 111-117.
    Herz, Rachel S. & Engen, Trygg (1996). Odor Memory: Review and Analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3 (Sep.), 300-313.
    Hetsroni, A. (2000). The Relationship between Values and Appeals in Israeli Advertising: A Smallest Space Analysis. Journal of Advertising, 29 (3), 55-68.
    Hirsch, Alan R. (1990). Preliminary Results of Olfaction Nike Study. note dated Nov. 16 distributed by the Smell and Taste Treatment and Research Foundation, Ltd. Chicago, IL.
    Hirsch, Alan R. (1995). Effects of Ambient Odors on Slot-Machine Usage in a Las Vegas Casino. Psychology and Marketing, 12 (7), 585-594.
    Hirschman, Elizabeth C. & Holbrook, Morris B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46 (3), 92-101.
    Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reactions to Communication and Attitude Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 244-252.
    Isbell, Linda M. & Wyer, Jr. Robert S. (1999). Correcting for Mood-Induced Bias in the Evaluation of Political Candidates: The Roles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (2), 237-249.
    Isen, Alice M. & Levin, Paula F. (1972). The Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (3), 384-388.
    Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory Attribution. In Roediger, H. L., & Craik F. I. M. (eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving, 391-422, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Jain, Shailendra Pratap & Maheswaran, Durairaj (2000). Motivated Reasoning: A Depth‐of‐Processing Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 358-371.
    Johar, J. S. & Sirgy, Joseph M. (1991). Value-Expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to use which Appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20 (3), 23-33.
    Johnson, Blair T. & Eagly, Alice H. (1989). Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106 (2), 290-314.
    Johnson, Blair T. & Eagly, Alice H. (1990). Involvement and Persuasion: Types, Traditions, and the Evidenc. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (3), 375-384.
    Kang, Yong‐Soon & Herr, Paul M. (2006). Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 123-130.
    Keller, Punam Anand & Block, Lauren G. (1997). Vividness Effects: A Resource-Matching Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (December), 295-304.
    Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude Formation from Product Trial: Distinct Roles of Cognition and Affect for Hedonic and Functional Product. Psychology and Marketing, 16 (1), 35-50.
    Kirk-Smith, M. D., Van Toiler, C., & Dodd, G. H. (1983). Unconscious Odour Conditioning in Human Subjects. Biological Psychology, 17, 221-231.
    Kirk-Smith, M. D. & Booth, D. A. (1987). Chemoreception in Human Behavior: Experimental Analysis of the Social Effects of Fragrances. Chemical Senses, 12 (1), 159-166.
    Kivetz, Ran & Simonson, Kivetz (2002). Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (2), 155-170.
    Knasko, Susan C., Gilbert, A. N., & Sabini, J. (1990). Emotional Stats, Physical Well-Being, and Performance in the Presence of Feigned Ambient Odor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20 (16), 1345-1357.
    Knasko, Susan C. (1995). Pleasant Odors and Congruency: Effects on Approach Behavior. Chemical Senses, 20 (5), 479-487.
    Koelega, Harry S. (1994). Sex Differences in Olfactory Sensitivity and the Problem of the Generality of Smell Acuity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 78 (1), 203-213.
    Krishna, Aradhna, Lwin, May O. & Morrin, Maureen (2009). Product Scent and Memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (1), 1-11.
    Kruglanski, Arie W. & Freund, Tallie (1983). The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay-Inferences: Effects on Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19 (5), 448-468.
    Krugman, Herbert E. (1965). The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.
    Kuykendall, D. & Keating, J. P. (1990). Mood and persuasion: Evidence for the Differential Influence of Positive and Negative States. Psychology and Marketing, 7, 1-9.
    Laird, Donald A. (1932). How the Consumers Estimate Quality by Subconscious Sensory Impressions: With Special Reference to the Role of Smell. Journal of Applied Psychology, June, 241-246.
    Laird, Donald A. (1935). What Can You Do With Your Nose? The Scientific Monthly, 41, 126-130.
    Larson, A. (1992). Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76-104.
    Lavack, Anne, Thakor, M. V., & Bottausci, Ingrid (2008). Music-Brand Congruency in High and Low Cognition Radio Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 27 (4), 549-568.
    Lawless, Harry T. (1991). A Sequential Contrast Effect in Odor Perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29 (4), 317-319.
    Leippe, M. R. & Elkin, R. A. (1987). When Motives Clash: Issue Involvement and Response Involvement as Determinants of Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
    Lindstrom, Martin (2005). Brand Sense: Build Powerful Brands through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight, Sound. CO: The Free Press of Simon and Schuster Inc.
    Lindstrom, Martin (2008). Buy．Ology: Truth and Lies About Why We Buy. New York : Doubleday.
    Lord, Charles G., Ross, Lee, & Lepper, Mark R. (1979). Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (11), 2098-2109.
    Lord, Kenneth R., Lee, Myung-Soo, & Sauer, Paul L. (1995). The Combined Influence Hypothesis: Central and Peripheral Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad. Journal of Advertising, 24 (1), 73-85.
    Lorig, Tyler & Schwartz, Gary E. (1988). Brain and Odor: Alteration of Human EEG by Odor Administration. Psychobiology, 16 (3), 281-284.
    Luomala, H. & Laaksonen, M. (2000). Contribution from Mood Research. Psychology and Marketing, 17 (3), 195-233.
    Mackie, D. M. & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing Deficits and the Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
    Mackie, Diane M., Asuncion, Arlene G., & Rosselli, Francine (1992). The Impact of Positive Affect on Persuasion Processes. Emotion and Social Behavior. Clark, Margaret S. (Ed). Emotion and social behavior. Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 14. (pp. 247-270). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
    Maheswaran, Durairaj, Mackie, Diane M., & Chaiken, Shelly (1992). Brand Name as a Heuristic Cue: The Effects of Task Importance and Expectancy Confirmation on Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (4), 317-336.
    Maheswaran, Durairaj & Chaiken, Shelly (1991). Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (1), 13-25.
    Martin, Leonard L., Seta, John J., & Crelia, Rick A. (1990). Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People`s Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (1), 27-37.
    Martin, Leonard L. (1986). Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Conception Impression Formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (Sep.), 493-504.
    McGuire, William J. (1969). The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol.3, Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 136-314.
    Meyers-Levy, Joan & Malaviya, Prashant (1999). Consumers’ Processing of Persuasive Advertisements: An Integrative Framework of Persuasion Theories. Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 45-60.
    Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M. (1989). Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 39-54.
    Miller, Norman, Maruyama, Geoffrey, Beaber, Rex, & Valone, Keith (1976). Speed of Speech and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 615-624.
    Milliman, Ronald E. (1982). Using Background Music to Affect the Behavior of Supermarket Shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 46 (2), 86-91.
    Milliman, Ronald E. (1986). The Influence of Background Music on the Behavior of Restaurant Patrons. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 286-289.
    Miniard, Paul W., Bhatla, Sunil, Lord, Kenneth R., & Dickson, Peter R. (1991). Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (June), 92-107.
    Mitchell, Deborah J., Kahn, Barbara E., & Knasko, Susan C. (1995). There’s Something in the Air: Effects of Congruent of Incongruent Ambient Odor on Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 229-238.
    Morrin, Maureen & Ratneshwar, S. (2000). The Impact of Ambient Scent on Evaluation, Attention, and Memory for Familiar and Unfamiliar Brands. Journal of Business Research, 49, 157-165.
    Morrin, Maureen & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Does It Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory? Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 10-25.
    Newman, Joseph P., Wolff, William T, & Hearst, Eliot (1980). The Feature-Positive Effect in Adult Human Subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6 (5), 630-650.
    Nisbett, R. E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Ottati, Victor C. & Isbell, Linda M. (1996). Effects on Mood During Exposure to Target Information on Subsequently Reported Judgments: An On-Line Model of Misattribution and Correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71 (1), 39-53.
    Parasuraman, Raja (1984). The Psychobiology of Sustained Attention. In Sustained Attention in Human Performance, J.S. Warm, ed., Chichester, UK: Wiley, 61-101.
    Peracchio, Laura & Meyers-Levey, Joan (1997). Evaluating Persuasion-Enhancing Techniques from a Resource-Matching Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (September), 178-191.
    Petty, Richard E., & Cacioppo, John T. (1984). The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1), 69-81.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). The Use of Rhetorical Questions in Persuasion: A Cognitive Response Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 432-440.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., & Schumann, David (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (Sep.), 135-146.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (5), 847-855.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., Kasmer, Jeff A., & Haugtvedt, Curt P. (1987). A Reply to Stiff and Boster. Communication Monographs, 54 (3), 257-263.
    Petty, Richard E., Gleicher, Faith, & Baker, Sara M. (1991). Multiple Roles for Affect in Persuasion. Emotion and Social Judgments. Forgas, Joseph P. (Ed). Emotion and Social Judgments. International Series in Experimental Social Psychology, (pp. 181-200). Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.
    Petty, Richard E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (1981). Cognitive Responses in Persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Petty, Richard E., Schumann, David W., Richman, Steven A., & Strathman, Aian J. (1993). Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roies for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (January), 5-20.
    Petty, Richard E., Unnava, Rao, & Strathman, Alan J. (1991). Theories of Attitude Change. Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 4th Ed. Thomas S. Robertson & Harold H. Kassarjian eds. 241-278.
    Petty, Richard E., Wells, Gary L., & Brock, Timothy C. (1976). Distraction can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption versus Effort Justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (5), 874-884.
    Petty, Richard E., Wells, Gary L., & Brock, Timothy C. (1976). Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption versus Effort Justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (5), 874-884.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1979). Issue Involvement can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1984). The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,69-81.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1986a). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Route to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol.19 pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1990). Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
    Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1990). Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (3), 367-374.
    Petty, Richard E. & Wegener, Duane T. (1993). Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context Induced Contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29 (2), 137-165.
    Petty, Richard E. & Wegener, Duane T. (1998). Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables. In Gillbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., & Lindzey, Gardner (eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 323-390. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    Petty, Richard E. & Wegener, Duane T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies. S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, ed. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Guilford Press.
    Petty, Richard E. & Wegener, Duane T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies. in Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, ed. Shelley Chaiken and Yaacov Trope, New York: Guilford. 41-72.
    Petty, Richard. E. & Cacioppo, John T. (1979). Issue-Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (10), 1915-1926.
    Pham. Michel Tuan (1998). Representativeness, Relevance and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September). 144-159.
    Putto, Christopher P. & Wells, William D. (1984). Informational and Transformational Advertising: The Differential Effects of Time. in Advances in Consumer Research, XI, 638-643, Thomas C. Kinnear, ed., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
    Raghunathan, Rajagopal, Pham, Michel Tuan, & Corfman, Kim (2006). Informational Properties of Anxiety and Sadness, and Displaced Coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (March), 596-602.
    Ratneshwar, S. & Chaiken, Shelly (1991). Comprehension`s Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of Source Cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (1), 52-62.
    Richardson, John T. & Zucco, Gesualdo M. (1989). Cognition and Olfaction: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), 352-360.
    Ridgway, Nancy M., Dawson, Scott A., & Bloch, Peter H. (1990). Pleasure and Arousal in the Marketplace: Interpersonal Differences in Approach-Avoidance Responses. Marketing Letters, 1 (2), 139-147.
    Rotton, James, Barry, Timothy, Frey, James, & Soler, Edgardo (1978). Air Pollution and Interpersonal Attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 57-71.
    Schab, Frank R. (1991). Odor Memory: Taking Stock. Psychological Bulletin, 109 (March), 150-162.
    Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J. & Block, Sylia T. (2002). The Signal Function of Thematically (In)congruent Ambient Scents in a Retail Environment. Chemical Senses, 27, 539-549.
    Schmidt, Stephen R. (1991). Can We Have a Distinctive Theory of Memory? Memory and Cognition, 19 (6), 523-542.
    Schwarz, Norbert (1990). Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Vol.2, E. Tory Higgins and Richard M. Sorrentino, eds. New York: Guilford Press, 527-561.
    Schwarz. Norbert & Clore, Gerald L. (1983). Mood. Misattribution, and Judgments of Weil-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (September), 513-523.
    Sedikides, C. (1992). Mood as a Determinant of Attentional Focus. Cognition and Emotion. 6, 129-148.
    Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.
    Sherif, M. & Cantril, H. (1947). The Psychology of Ego Involvements: Social Attitudes and Identifications. New York: Wiley.
    Sherif, M. & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Shiv, Baba & Fedorikhin, Alexander (1999). Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (December), 278-292.
    Simon, Herbert A. (1976). Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press.
    Sinclair, R. C. & Mark, M. (1992). The Influence of Mood State on Judgment and Action: Effects on Persuasion, Categorization, Social Justice, Person Perception, and Judgmental Accuracy. In L. L. Martin & A.Tesser(Eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments (pp. 165-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Singh, Surendra & Hitchon, Jackquline (1989). The Intensifying Effects of Exciting Television Programs on the Reception of Subsequent Commercials. Psychology and Marketing, 6 (Spring), 1-31.
    Skowronski, John J. & Carlston, Donal E. (1989). Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1), 131-142.
    Smith, S. M. & Shaffer, D. (1991). The Effects of Good Moods on Systematic Processing: Willing but not Able or Able but not Willing? Motivation and Emotion, 15, 243-279.
    Snyder, Mark & DeBono, Kenneth G. (1985). Appeals to Image and Claims about Quality: Understanding the Psychology of Advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (3), 586-597.
    Spangenberg, Eric R., Crowley, Ayn E., & Henderson, Pamela W. (1996). Improving the Store Environment: Do Olfactory Cues Affect Evaluations and Behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60, 67-80.
    Stoddart, D. M. (1988). Human Odour Culture: A Zoological Perspective. In S. V. Toiler, & G. H. Dodd (Ed.), Perfumery: The Psychology and Biology of Fragrance (pp. 3-16). London: Chapman and Hall.
    Swasy, John L. & Munch, James M. (1985). Examining the Target of Receiver Elaborations: Rhetorical Question Effects on Source Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (4). 877-886.
    Torii, S., Fukuda, H., Kanemoto, H., Miyanchi, R., Hamuzu, Y., & Kawaski, M. (1988). Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Psychological Effects of Odour. In Perfumery: The Psychology and Biology of Fragrance, S. Van Toller and G.H. Don, eds., New York: Chapman and Hall, 107-120.
    Van Toller, C., Dodd, G. H., & Billing, A. (1985). Aging and the Sense of Smell. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
    Vaughn, Richard (1980). How Advertising Works: A Planning Model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (5), 27-33.
    Voss, Kevin E., Spangenberg, Eric R., & Gorhmann Bianca (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, XL (August), 310-320.
    Watson, David, Clark, Lee A., & Tellegen, Auke (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1070.
    Watson, David (1988). Intraindividual and Interindividual Analyses of Positive and Negative Affect: Their Relation to Health Complaints, Perceived Stress, and Daily Activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020-1030.
    Wegener, Duane T., Petty, Richard E., & Smith, Stephen M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1), 1-15.
    Wegener, Duane T. & Petty, Richard E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (6), 1034-1048.
    Wegener, Duane T. & Petty, Richard E. (1997). The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naïve Theories of Bias in Bias Correction. In M.P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol.29 pp. 141-208). New York: Academic Press.
    Wegener, Duane T. & Petty, Richard E. (2001). Understanding Effects of Mood Through the Elaboration Likelihood and Flexible Correction Models. In Theories of Mood and Cognition, Leonard L. Martin and Gerald L. Clore, eds. Mahwaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 177-210.
    Wells, Gary L. & Petty, Richard E. (1980). The Effects of Overt Head Movement on Persuasion: Compatibility and Incompatibility of Responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1 (3), 219-230.
    Wilson, Timothy D. & Brekke, Nancy (1994). Mental Contamination and Mental Correction: Unwanted Influences on Judgments and Evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 117-142.
    Wood, Wendy & Kallgren, Carl A. (1988). Communicator Attributes and Persuasion: Recipients Access to Attitude-Relevant Information in Memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14 (1), 172-182.
    Worth, L. T. & Mackie, D. M. (1987). Cognitive Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion, Social Cognition, 5, 76-94.
    Wright, Peter L. (1980). Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 151-175.
    Yalch, Richard F. & Spangenberg, Eric (1988). An Environmental Psychological Study of Foreground and Background Music as Retail Atmospheric Factors. In AMA Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Alf W. Walle, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 106-110.
    Yalch, Richard F. & Spangenberg, Eric (1990). Effects of Store Music on Shopping Behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7, 55-63.
    Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
    Zellner, Debra A. & Kautz, Mary A. (1990). Color Affects Perceived Odor Intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 16 (2), 391-397.
    Zenhausern, R. (1978). Imagery, Cerebral Dominance, and Style of Thinking: A Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 381–384.
    Zimbardo, P. G. (1960). Involvement and Communication Discrepancy as Determinants of Opinion Conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86-94.
    Zucco, Gesualdo M. (2003). Anomalies in Cognition: Olfactory Memory. European Psychologist, 8 (2), 77-86.
    Zuckerman, Adam & Chaiken, Shelly (1998). A Heuristic-Systematic Processing Analysis of the Effectiveness of Product Warning Labels. Psychology and Marketing, 15 (7), 621-642.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    94355506
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094355506
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    550601.pdf3786KbAdobe PDF2475檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋