政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59745

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59745

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51680180 線上人數 : 616

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 國際事務學院 > 外交學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/59745

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59745

題名:	現實主義國際關係理論之傳統 Traditions in realist international relations theory
作者:	劉金讓 Liu, Chin Jang
貢獻者:	葉浩劉金讓 Liu, Chin Jang
關鍵詞:	現實主義傳統淺碟化霍布斯修昔底德馬基維利奧古斯丁 Political Realism tradition superficialization Hobbes Thucydides Machiavelli Augustine
日期:	2010
上傳時間:	2013-09-03 13:48:27 (UTC+8)
摘要:	當今現實主義理論學派正面臨著一種淺碟化的危機，伴隨而來的是現實主義深遠的傳統根基遭受簡化以及忽視。本文企圖藉由重新檢驗現實主義傳統的古典文獻，提出在現實主義中的許多被忽略的問題。本文重新定位與評析現實主義之主要理論傳統，包括修昔底德傳統、奧古斯丁傳統、馬基維利傳統、以及霍布斯傳統等四大傳統。此外，本文亦將討論上述四項傳統理論的遺緒。吾人以為，當今現實主義學派的主流理論途徑，存在著嚴重的內在邏輯問題，同時這些問題影響著當代的國關研究。主流學者過度關注於特定版本的霍布斯傳統，因而輕視其它於此理論學派中同等重要的途徑之可能性。同時，透過本文對於現實主義理論傳統多元性與豐富性之展現，本文也指出部分擁簇常識現實主義(commonsense Realism)的學者們，事實上已模糊化現實主義的理論本質。針對上述各種內在的理論問題，作者冀望以本文採一種重新詮釋、重新定位現實主義理論根基的途徑來展現並反省。 Political Realism is suffering from a crisis of superficialization. The profound traditional roots of Political Realism are being simplified or ignored. This thesis attempts to re-examine the classical texts of Political Realism’s traditions and thus raise questions about some problems in this theoretical programme. Four major traditions which are the Thucydidesian, the Augustinian, the Machiavellian, and the Hobbesian tradition will be re-envisioned and re-appreciated, and their legacies to modern Realists will also be expounded. As this thesis would show, serious inherent logical problems exist in the dominant theoretical approach to Political Realism, which has become pertinent to international relations theory study. Mainstream scholars put too much undue attention on a certain version of the Hobbesian tradition and thus overlook other possibilities which are equally important in formatting this vast theoretical school. By showing the richness and diversity of Political Realism’s tradition, this thesis also suggests that the nature of this theoretical programme is being obfuscated by commonsense scholars. All these inherent theoretical problems will be exhibited in this thesis with an approach to re-appreciate and re-envision the traditional roots of Political Realism.
參考文獻:	Amstutz, Mark R. (2008). Reinhold Neibuhr`s Christian Realism and the Bush Doctrine. In Eric Patterson (Ed.), Christianity and Power Politics Today: Christian Realism and Contemporary Political Dilemmas (pp. 117-136). New York: Palgrave Macmilan. Ashley, Richard K. (1982). Realist Dialectics: Toward a Critical Theory of World Politics. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Denver, Colorado. Ashley, Richard K. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225-286. Augustine. (2000). The City of God (Marcus Dods, Trans.). New York: The Modern Library. Baumgold, Deborah. (2009). Hobbes. In David Boucher & Paul Kelly (Eds.), Political Thinkers: From Socrates to the Present (2 ed., pp. 189-206). New York: Oxford University Press. Baylis, John, & Smith, Steve (Eds.). (2001). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boucher, David. (1998). Political Theoires of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boucher, David, & Kelly, Paul. (2009). Part 2: Church and State－ Editors` Introduction. In David Boucher & Paul Kelly (Eds.), Political Thinkers: From Socrates to the Present (pp. 115-117). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brown, Chris. (2002). Sovereignty, Rights, and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bull, Hedley. (2002). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave. Cambridge Dictionaries Online. Retrieved April 26th, 2011, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/solipsism Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, & Simmons, Beth A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Carr, Edward Hallett. (1956). The Twenty Years` Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (Second ed.). London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd. Chen, Hsin-Chih. (2003). The Development of The International Relations. In Yachung Chang (Ed.), International Relations (pp. 1-38). Taipei: Yang-Chih Book Co., Ltd. Cheng, Tuan Y. (2003). Analytical Appraisal of Defensive vs. Offensive Realism. Issues & Studies, 42(2), 1-21. Cohen, Marshall. (1987). Moral Skepticism and International Relations. In Kenneth Kipnis & Diana T. Meyers (Eds.), Political Realism & International Morality: Ethics in the Nuclear Age (pp. 15-34). London: Westview Press. Constantinou, Costas M. (2004). State of Political Discourse: Words, Regimes, Seditions. London: Routledge. Crane, Gregory. (1998). Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press. Digesser, Peter. (1998). Forgiveness and Politics: Dirty Hands and Imperfect Procedure. Political Theory, 26, 700-724. Donnelly, Jack. (2000). Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: The Press Synicate of the University of Cambridge. Dougherty, James E., & Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Robert L. (1981). Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. Dunne, Tim, & Schmidt, Brian C. (2001). Realism. In John Baylis & Steve Smith (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (2nd ed., pp. 141-161). New York: Oxford University Press. Elshtain, Jean Bethke. (2009). St. Augustine. In David Boucher & Paul Kelly (Eds.), Political Thinkers: From Socrates to the Present (pp. 118-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Feng, Ke-Li. (2010). Preface (Ke-Wan Yan, Trans.). In Niccolò B. Machiavelli (Ed.), Il Principe. Taipei: The Commercial Press. Forde, Steven. (1992). Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 372-393. Garrett, Stephen A. (2004). Political Leadership and "Dirty Hands": Winston Churchill and the City Bombing of Germany. In Cathal J. Nolan (Ed.), Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimension of International Affairs (2nd ed., pp. 59-74). Westport: Praeger. Gilpin, Robert G. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(02), 287-304. Gilpin, Robert G. (1996). No One Loves a Political Realist. Security Studies, 5, 3-26. Glaser, Charles L. (1994-1995). Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help. International Security, 19(3), 50-90. Goldstein, Joshua S., & Pevenhouse, Jon C. (2010). International Relations (9th ed.). New York: Longman. Gowens, Christopher. (1987). Moral Dilemmas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gray, John. (1995). Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Gray, John. (2000). Two Faces of Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Griffiths, Martin, & O`Callaghan, Terry. (2002). Internatioanl Relations: The Key Concepts. New York. Gross, Oren. (2003). Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional? The Yale Law Journal, 112(5), 1011-1134. Haslam, Jonathan. (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press. Herz, John H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157-180. Herz, John H. (1951). Political Realism and Political Idealism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hirschman, Albert O. (1970). The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understaning. World Politics, 22(4), 329-343. Hobbes, Thomas. (2006). Leviathan (Dover ed.). New York: Dover Publications (Original work published in 1651 by Andrew Crooke). (Reprinted from: Dover). Hoffmann, Stanley. (1987). Janus and Minerva- Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: Westview Press. Hutchings, Kimberly. (1999). International Political Theory. London: SAGE Publication Inc. Jackson, Robert H. (2004). The Situational Ethics of Statecraft. In Cathal J. Nolan (Ed.), Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimension of International Affairs (2nd ed., pp. 17-34). Westport: Praeger Jervis, Robert. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jones, Charles A. (2008). War Within Reason: A Romantic Epistle to the Christians. In Eric Patterson (Ed.), Christianity and Power Politics Today: Christian Realism and Contemporary Political Dilemmas (pp. 83-98). New York: Palgrave Macmilan. Kaplan, Robert D. (2001). Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Demands a Pagan Ethos. New York: Random House. Lake, David A., & Powell, Robert (Eds.). (1999). Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lebow, Richard Ned. (2003). The Tragic Vision of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Machiavelli, Niccolò. (2003). Discourses on Livy (Julia Conaway Bondanella & Peter Bondanella, Trans.) Oxford World`s Classics (Reissued ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Machiavelli, Niccolò. (2005). The Prince with Related Documents (William J. Connell, Trans.). Boston: Bedford/ ST. Martin`s. Macleod, Colin. (1979). Thucydides on Faction (3.82-83). Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 205(n. s. 25), 52-68. Martin, Thomas F. (2005). Augustine and the Politics of Monasticism. In John Doody, Kevin L. Hughes & Kim Paffenroth (Eds.), Augustine and Politics (pp. 165-186). New York: Lexington Books. Mastanduno, Michael. (1991). Do Relative Gains Matters? American`s Response to Japanese Industrial Policy. International Security, 16, 73-113. McCarraher, Eugene. (2005). The Enchanted City of Man: The State and the Market. In John Doody, Kevin L. Hughes & Kim Paffenroth (Eds.), Augustine and Politcs (pp. 261-296). New York: Lexington Books. McClelland, J. S. (1996). A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge. Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Meinecke, Friedrich. (1984). Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison D`état and Its place in Modern History (Douglas Scott, Trans.). London: Westview Press. Merton, Thomas. (2000). Introduction The City of God (pp. xv-xx). New York: The Modern Library. Mesquita, Bruce Bueno de, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., & Morrow, James D. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Milner, Helen. (1991). The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies, 17, 67-85. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1947). Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1962). Politics in Twentieth Century: The Decline of Democratic Politics (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1978). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (5, Revised ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Murray, Alastair J. H. (1997). Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics. Edinburgh: Keele University Press. Nardin, Terry. (1992). Ethical Traditions in International Affairs. In Terry Nardin & David R. Mapel (Eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (pp. 1-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ni, Shixiong. (2003). International Relations Theory. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc. Niebuhr, Reinhold. (1932). Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons. Nolan, Cathal J. (2004a). "Bodyguard of Lies": Franlin D. Roosevelt and Defensible Deceit in World War II. In Cathal J. Nolan (Ed.), Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimension of International Affairs (2nd ed., pp. 35-57). Westport: Praeger. Nolan, Cathal J. (2004b). Introduction. In Cathal J. Nolan (Ed.), Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimension of International Affairs (2nd ed., pp. 1-14). Westport: Praeger. Nye, Joseph S. (2007). Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History (Vol. 6). New York: Pearson Longman. Oakeshott, Michael. (1975). Hobbes on Civil Association. Berkeley: University of California Press. Orwin, Clifford. (1988). Stasis and Plague: Thucydides on the Dissolution of Society. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 831-847. Patterson, Eric. (2008). Christianity and Power Politics: Themes and Issues. In Eric Patterson (Ed.), Christianity and Power Politics Today: Christian Realism and Contemporary Political Dilemmas (pp. 1-20). New York: Palgrave Macmilan. Rosow, Stephen J. (2009). Paradigm, Tradition, and the Politics of Realism. In Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison & Patrick James (Eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation (pp. 233-252). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (2002). The Social Contract. In Susan Dunn (Ed.), The Social Contract and The First and The Second Discourses. New Haven: Yale University Press. Sherman, Franklin. (1965). Introduction. In Max Weber (Ed.), Politics as a Vocation (pp. iii-v). Philadelphia: Fortress Press. Shimko, Keith L. (2010). International Relations: Perspectives and Controversies (3 ed.). Boston: Wadsworth. Smith, Michael Joseph. (1986). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. Spegele, Roger D. (1996). Political Realism in International Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thompson, Kenneth W. (1994). Fathers of International Thought: The Legacy of Political Theory. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. Thucydides. (1959a). The Peloponnesian War (Thomas Hobbes, Trans. Vol. 2). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Thucydides. (1959b). The Peloponnesian War (Thomas Hobbes, Trans. Vol. 1). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Tuck, Richard. (1996). Hobbes`s moral philosophy. In Tom Sorell (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes (pp. 175-207). New York: Cambridge University Press. Viotti, Paul R., & Kauppi, Mark V. (2010). International Relations Theory (4 ed.). New York: Longman. Walt, Stephen. (1987). The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1990). Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory. Journal of International Affairs, 44, 21-37. Waltz, Kenneth N. (2001). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. Waltz, Kenneth N. (2008). Realism and International Politics. New York: Routledge. Walzer, Michael. (1973). Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2), 160-180. Weber, Max. (1965). Politics as a Vocation (H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, Trans.). Philadelphia: Fortress Press. Wight, Martin. (1992). International Theory: The Three Traditions. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc. Wight, Martin. (2005). Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wilkinson, Paul. (2007). International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wohlforth, William C. (2008). Realism. In Christian Reus-Smit & Duncan Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (pp. 131-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xie, De Feng. (2000). The Translators` Preface Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War (De Feng Xie trans.) (pp. 1-39). Taipei: The Commercial Press.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學外交研究所 96253007 99
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962530073
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[外交學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
007301.pdf	1771Kb	Adobe PDF2	320	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋