English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719022      Online Users : 638
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59633


    Title: 專利侵權訴訟損害賠償分析之探索性研究-以智慧財產法院之實證判決資料為基礎
    An Exploratory Research on Patent Infringement Damages: An Empirical Analysis of Cases in the Taiwan IP Court
    Authors: 桂祥豪
    Kuei, Hsiang Hao
    Contributors: 蘇瓜藤
    Robert Su.
    桂祥豪
    Kuei, Hsiang Hao
    Keywords: 專利
    專利侵權
    智慧財產法院
    專利侵權損害賠償
    Patent
    patent infringement
    Taiwan Intellectual Property Court
    patent-damage calculation theories
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-09-03
    Abstract: 本研究探討損害賠償計算方法理論對請求金額與判賠金額間差距幅度之影響。本研究以請求金額與判賠金額的差距幅度作為應變數,以三大損害賠償計算方法作為解釋變數,並設定三大群組變數作為控制變數。本研究之樣本為智財法院所審理之專利侵權求償判決,樣本期間為2008年9月至2010年9月。
    本研究所建立之回歸模型解釋該差距幅度的變異量達45.1%。實證結果顯示,我國專利侵權損害賠償訴訟之差距幅度,顯著地受到總利益說及總銷售額說之兩種損害賠償計算方法的影響,但受合理權利金說之影響並不顯著。該等實證結果指出,總利益說的採用對於縮短請求差距幅度的影響能力,優於總銷售額說,代表著專利權人於訴訟中應詳盡地提出損害賠償相關事證,以獲得較高的賠償救濟。
    This research explores the association of the patent-damage calculation theories with the Variance between the amount of damage claimed and that awarded. Specifically, it tests the relationship between the Variance and three explanatory variables, namely, patent-damage calculation theories based on the profit, sales, and reasonable royalty, along with control variables including the case specifics, patents-at-issue, and litigants information. Its sample includes 186 patent infringement cases decided in Taiwan Intellectual Property Court from 2008/9 to 2010/9.
    The empirical regression model explains 45.1% of the variation in the Variance. The results show significance associations of the Variance with the profit approach and the sales approach, but not with the reasonable royalty approach. Such findings point out that the profit approach is more successful at reducing the Variance, implying that the patentee should present more detailed evidence during litigation to get more awards.
    Reference: 中文部分

    專書
    王澤鑑,2009,債法原理(一)基本理論債之發生,著者發行。
    王澤鑑,2009,不當得利,增訂新版,著者發行。
    王澤鑑,2009,侵權行為法,初版,著者發行。
    王澤鑑,2006,特殊侵權行為,初版,著者發行。
    馮震宇,2012,智慧財產法律與管理案例評析(八),元照出版公司。
    馮震宇,2003,智慧財產權發展趨勢與重要問題研究,元照出版公司。
    蔡明誠,1998,發明專利之研究,臺灣大學法學院圖書部。
    熊誦梅,2011,當公法遇上私法—台灣智慧財產訴訟制度之今昔,元照出版公司。
    謝銘洋,2012,智慧財產權法,元照出版公司。
    劉孔中,2007,智慧財產權法制的關鍵革新,元照出版公司。
    劉江彬、張孟元,2005,無形資產評估鑑價之理論與實務,政大科技政策與法律研究中心。
    劉江彬、黃俊英,2004,智慧財產管理總論,政大科技政策與法律研究中心。
    蕭富山,2007,專利訴訟實務,經濟部智慧財產局。

    期刊、會議論文
    李治安,2011,解構著作權法的損害賠償方程式-以著作財產權之侵害為中心,政大法學評論,第124期。
    李素華,2010,專利權侵害之損害賠償計算—以合理權利金為例,全國律師,第14 卷第6 期。
    李柏靜,2010,專利法修正草案對損害賠償計算修訂之思考與評析,法令月刊,第61 卷第11 期。
    沈宗倫,2011,智慧財產權侵權問題—損害賠償計算問題之個案研究,100 年第4 期智慧財產專業理論與實務課程巡迴講座。
    沈宗倫,2011,專利侵害責任範圍因果關係的合理詮釋與再建構,科技法學評論,第8 卷第1 期。
    林洲富,2010,智慧財產侵權之財產上損害額計算,萬國法律,第173期。
    許忠信,2007,從德國法之觀點看我國專利權侵害之損害賠償責任,台北大學法學論叢,第61 期。
    熊誦梅,2012,分久必合,合久必分—台灣智慧財產訴訟新制之檢討與展望,月旦民商法雜誌,第38期。
    劉孔中、謝銘洋、馮震宇,2012,著作權判決實證研究-從智財法院成立後三年相關判決出發,月旦法學雜誌,第203期。
    蘇瓜藤、張書瑋,2006,無形資產之評價(上),會計研究月刊,第252期。

    學位論文
    李柏靜,2009,論專利侵害之損害賠償計算-從美國、中國大陸與台灣之專利修法談起,國立政治大學法律與科際整合研究所碩士論文。
    吳靜怡,2011,台灣及美國專利侵害損害賠償與立法效力之探討,國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    周漢威,2005,論專利侵權損害賠償之範圍及計算—專利權人所失利益之界定,銘傳大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    施志遠,2009,自美國專利改革趨勢論我國專利侵權損害賠償之認定,清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    陳怡妃,2006,台灣及美國專利侵害損害賠償與立法效力之探討,交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    楊晉佳,2009,專利侵權損害賠償額之研究,政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
    鄭巧筠,2009,論專利權之懲罰性賠償,台灣大學法律學院法律學研究所碩士論文。
    譚百年,2009,專利侵權懲罰性賠償金立法政策之分析─以臺灣法與美國法為中心,政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
    簡秀如,2003,論專利侵權損害賠償範圍之確定,政治大學法律研究所碩士論文。

    網路資料
    台灣證券交易所網站,2007,上市公司29類產業別-7月2日上線宣導手冊,http://www.twse.com.tw/ch/announcement/official_document.php,最後瀏覽日:2013/06/21。
    台灣證券交易所,2007,新舊產業類別對照表,http://www.tse.com.tw/ch/announcement/official_document.php,最後瀏覽日:2013/06/21。
    司法院,2009,98年智慧財產法律座談會提案及研討結果民事訴訟類第8 號研討結果年,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/publish/paperd/9808/pdf/9808%E3%80%80_30_%2098%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E6%B3%95%E5%BE%8B%E5%BA%A7%E8%AB%87%E6%9C%83%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88%E5%8F%8A%E7%A0%94%E8%A8%8E%E7%B5%90%E6%9E%9C.pdf,最後瀏覽日:2013/7/3。
    司法院網站,常見問答集,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/qa.htm,最後瀏覽日:2013/7/3。
    法源法律網,http://db.lawbank.com.tw/FLAW/FLAWDAT10.aspx?lsid=FL011249,最後瀏覽日:2013/7/3。
    經濟部智慧財產局,專利法,http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=285885&ctNode=6677&mp=1,最後瀏覽日:2013/7/3。
    經濟部智慧財產局,歷年專利相關法規,http://www.tipo.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=6678&CtUnit=3205&BaseDSD=7&mp=1,最後瀏覽日:2013/7/3。

    英文部分
    Allison, J. R., M. A. Lemley, and J. H. Walker. 2009. Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents. 158 U. Penn. L. Rev. 1.
    Bebchuk, L. 1984. Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information. Rand Journal of Economics, 15.
    Federal Trade Commission. 2012. The Evolving Marketplace: Aligning Patent and Remedies Competition. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2011/03/110307patentreport.
    Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2001. Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129-151.
    Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004a. Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics, XLVII (1), 45-74.
    Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004b. Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. Economic Journal, 114, 441-465.
    Lemley, M. A. 2009. Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1133173.
    Lemley, M. A., and Carl Shapiro. 2007. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1991.
    Mazzeo, Michael J., Jonathan Hillel, and Samantha Zyontzd. 2013. Explaining the “Unpredictable”: An Empirical Analysis of U.S. Patent Infringement Awards. International Review of Law and Economics, 35.
    Linck, Nancy J., 1993. “Patent Damages: The Basics.” Available at: http://ipmall.org/hosted_resources/IDEA/34_IDEA/341_IDEA_13_Linck.pdf.
    Opderbeck, D. W. 2009. Patent Damages Reform and the Shape of Patent Law. 89 B. U. L. Rev. 127.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2007. 2007 Patent and Trademark Damages Study. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/patent-litigation-study.jhtml.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2008. 2008 Patent Litigation Study: Damages awards, success rates and time-to-trial. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/en_us/us/forensic-services/assets/2008_patent_litigation_study.pdf.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2009. 2009 Patent Litigation Study: Patent litigation trends and the increasing impact of nonpracticing entities. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/assets/2009-patent-litigation-study.pdf.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2010. 2010 Patent Litigation Study: Patent litigation trends and the impact of recent court decisions on damages. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/assets/2010-patent-litigation-study.pdf.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2011. 2011 Patent Litigation Study: Patent litigation trends as the “America Invents Act” becomes law. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/assets/2011-patent-litigation-study.pdf.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2012. 2012 Patent Litigation Study: Litigation continues to rise amid growing awareness of patent value. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/assets/2011-patent-litigation-study.pdf.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    智慧財產研究所
    99361015
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099361015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101501.pdf3407KbAdobe PDF21072View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback