Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59265
|
| Title: | 平衡計分卡長期實施困難及績效之比較研究-以兩公司個案為例
Long-term Implementation Difficulties and Performance Research for Balanced Scorecard - A Comparative Study of Two Firms |
| Authors: | 陳志冠
Chen, Chih Kuan |
| Contributors: | 吳安妮
Wu, Anne
陳志冠
Chen, Chih Kuan |
| Keywords: | 平衡計分卡實施困難
平衡計分卡長期績效
Balanced Scorecard
Implementation Difficulties
Performace
Comparative Study |
| Date: | 2012 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-09-02 15:29:34 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 1992年平衡計分卡首次被Kaplan與Norton兩大管理界的權威所提出，該文提及在過去的工業社會中，績效的衡量指標永遠是財務上的數字，但隨著科技的進步，這套衡量模式已經顯著地不再適用，而平衡計分卡則是因涵蓋了財務及非財務項目而成為較好的衡量方式。時序進入2012年，在21世紀快速發展的資訊科技下，許多公司像是Google、雅虎、Facebook等已經漸漸地取代傳統製造業成為主流市場；另外，生物科技業的蓬勃發展亦是這個世代的重要發展方向。因此，經過了20年的推廣，平衡計分卡已經成為企業界實施管理時的一個思考方向。由於平衡計分卡對企業而言是一個長期的帶狀經營模組，而非短期零散的經營模式，平衡計分卡的導入，除了針對企業短期的財務績效以外，更針對企業因其他的非財務項目所產生的長期效益。因此，如何評估這些績效所產生之效益以及如何解決長期導入之中的困難就變成一個非常值得探究的議題。
因此，本文即就平衡計分卡做為最主要的研究對象，透過過去在台灣成功導入平衡計分卡的兩個個案，K公司及L公司，徹底了解在實施平衡計分卡時，在不同產業下可能遭遇的困難，及兩公司如何解決這樣的困難。並探究平衡計分卡在這兩家公司績效成長的背後所扮演的角色及產生實務差異的因素，以作長期性的績效分析與比較，最後，利用這兩家公司長期的發展經驗，提供其他中小企業在實施平衡計分卡時之指引。
In 1992, Balanced Scorecard was first introduced by two professors of management, Kaplan and Norton. Their research mentioned in the past that business performance was always measured in terms of financial results only. As technology advanced, this metrics became less and less useful. Balanced Scorecard is a better measurement tool for measuring financial and non-financial outcomes. In the 21st century due to the rapid growth of information technology many companies, such as Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, have already replaced traditional manufacturing industries and have become the biggest players in business. On the other hand, biological technology industry has recently become another major player in the marketplace. Therefore, after twenty years of development, Balanced Scorecard has become a key tool of corporate management. Because Balanced Scorecard is a long-term operating model rather than short-term operational strategy, implementing Balanced Scorecard is not only useful for improving short-term financial performance but also long-term non-financial performance as well. Hence, how to evaluate the non-financial performance and overcome the difficulties in implementing the balanced scorecard have become issues.
So, the thesis will evaluate two companies that used Balanced Scorecard in order to understand the difficulties that could be encountered by different industries as they use Balanced Scorecard, and to discuss how they overcome those difficulties. Then the thesis will analyze and compare their long-term performances thoroughly analyzing the factors that lead to differences in practice and performance improvement while implementing Balanced Scorecard. Finally, using the experiences of the companies, we should offer a simple guideline for medium and small businesses for implementing Balanced Scorecard. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
方慶榮，2004，平衡計分卡管理制度之設計及應用以陽光社會福利基金會為案例，國立政治大學經營管理碩士論文。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局，2012，企業人力資源作業實務手冊留才篇，TTQS訓練品質系統實施計畫。
行政院經濟部統計處，2013，中華民國2012年工業生產統計年報，經濟部出版品。
吳安妮，2003，平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合（上），會計研究月刊，第211期：45-54。
吳安妮，2003，平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合（下），會計研究月刊第212期：78-93。
吳安妮，2004，平衡計分卡之重點發展方向，會計研究月刊，第224期：99-108。
吳明璁，2012，平衡計分卡管理制度之演進過程－以個案公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
林進南，2012，被動電子元件製造業基本資料，臺灣經濟研究院專題研究報告。
林進南，2012，被動電子元件製造業景氣動態報告，臺灣經濟研究院專題研究報告。
周齊武、吳安妮、K. Haddad、施能錠，2001，探索平衡計分卡可能遭遇的問題，會計研究月刊，第183期：63-74。
黃膺旭，2012，平衡計分卡與策略性獎酬之結合－以特用化學公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
英文
Atkinson, A., J. Waterhouse, and R. Wells. 1997. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review: 25-37.
Brown, T., P. Bush, and L. Norberg. 2001. Building executive alignment, buy-in, and focus with the balanced scorecard SWOT. Balanced Scorecard Report (May-June): 3-5.
Cannella, A., and M. Lubatkin. 1993. Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. The Academy of Management Journal 36 (August, 1993) : 763-793.
Child, J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6 :1-22.
Cobbold, I., and G. Lawrie. 2002. The development of the balanced scorecard as a strategic management tool.
Dissertation, 2GC Active Management Ltd., Maidenhead, UK.
Crook, T., D. Ketchen Jr., J. Combs, and S. Todd. 2008. Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal 29: 1141-1154.
Eisenheardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532-550.
Elenkov, D., W. Judge, and P. Wright. 2005. Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: An international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal 26 (2005): 665-682.
Hoehn, W. 2003. Managing organizational performance: Linking the balanced scorecard to a process improvement technique. Ph. D dissertation, Raytheon Systems Company, Tucson, Arizona.
Hoque, Z., and W. James. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12: 1-17.
Ittner, C., and D. Lacker. 1998. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205-238.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (1) (Jan. –Feb.): 71-79.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1993. Putting the balanced scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review 71 (5): 134-147.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 74 (1): 74-86.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 2001. The Strategy Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 2004. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 2005. Creating value from organizational alignment. Balanced Scorecard Report 7(6) (Nov. –Dec.): 1-8.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 2006. Alignment：Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. New York, NY: Harvard Business Press.
Niven, P. 2002. Balanced Scorecard Step-by-step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Norreklit, H. 2000. The balance on the balanced scorecard: A critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research 11:65-88.
Olve, N., J. Roy, and M. Wetter. 1999. A Practice Guide to Using Balanced Scorecard. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Richards, P., T. Devinney, G. Yip, and G. Johnson. 1996. Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management 35(3): 718-804.
Rock, D., and R. Donde. 2007. Driving change with internal coaching programs. Dissertation, Coaching System Result.
Schiuma, G., and D. Carlucci. 2007. The knowledge-based foundations of organisational performance improvements: An action research approach. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (3): 333-344.
Senge, P. 1997. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. London, UK: Random House Business.
Wagner III, J., J. Stimpert, and E. Fubara. 1998. Board composition and organizational performance: Two studies of insider/outsider effects. Journal of Management Studies 35 (5) (Sept., 1998): 655-677.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171-180. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
100353039
101 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1003530391 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
