English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51738864      Online Users : 591
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58807


    Title: 金融控股公司之資本配置與績效評估-以國泰金融控股公司為例
    Capital Allocation and Performance Analysis in Financial Holding Company: Empirical Study of Cathay Financial Holdings
    Authors: 黃馨眉
    Contributors: 張士傑
    黃馨眉
    Keywords: 資本配置
    違約價值
    資金成本
    資本報酬
    capital allocation
    default value
    capital cost
    capital return
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-07-11 16:58:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 伴隨著台灣的金融整併,產生資本龐大的金融控股公司,為追求資本的效率,資本配置的重要性隨之提升。此研究將資本配置之方法,應用於國泰金融控股公司,檢視其資本分配的狀態。首先使用Margrabe(1978)提出的交換選擇權計價模型來計算金融控股公司的違約價值,並引用Myers and Read(2001)之方法,利用各子公司邊際違約價值應相等的概念,將金融控股公司的資本分配給各子公司。結果顯示,人壽子公司相較於其他子公司而言,最需要資本來支撐其風險。此外計算各子公司之資金成本與資本報酬做比較,結果顯示銀行資金成本低於資本報酬,為獲利最佳子公司,而人壽資金成本高於資本報酬,反映其面臨風險較多,相較其他子公司而言,需要更多資源作為風險的緩衝。
    Since Taiwan`s financial consolidation, many financial holding companies possess huge capital. For pursuing the capital efficiency, capital allocation becomes much more important than before. The study applys the capital allocation method on the Cathay Financial Holdings to inspects its capital allocation situation. We first use the exchange option pricing model, which was proposed by Margrabe(1978), to compute the default value of the financial holding company. And then we use the Myers and Read(2001) capital allocation method, allocating capital by the concept that all the subsidiaries should have the same marginal default value. The result shows that, comparing with other subsidiaries, the life insurance subsidiary has much more demand for capital. In addition, comparing the capital return and capital cost, we know that the bank subsidiary is the most profitable subsidiary. And the life insurance subsidiary have higher capital cost than capital return, reflecting the fact that it need more capital to be the buffer of the risk it have.
    Reference: 1. Cummins, J. David, 2000, Allocation of Capital in the Insurance Industry, Risk Management and Insurance Review 3(1): 7-27.
    2. Cummins, J. David, and Phillips, Richard D., 2005, Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital for Property-Liability Insurers, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(3): 441-478.
    3. Cummins, J. David, Scott E. Harrington, and Greg Niehaus,1993, An Economic Overview of Risk-Based Capital Requirement in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 11:427-447.
    4. Ehrhardt, M. C. and Y. N. Bhagwat, 1991, A full-information approach for estimating divisional betas, Financial Management 20: 60-69.
    5. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1992, The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 25: 23-49.
    6. Fuller, R. J. and Kerr H. S., 1981, Estimating the divisional cost of capital: An analysus of the pure play technique, Journal of Finance 36: 997-1009.
    7. Lintner, John, 1965, The Valuation of Risk Asset and the Selection of Risky Investment in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1):13-37.
    8. Merton, R., and Perold, A., 1993, Theory of Risk Capital in Financial Firms, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 6:16-32.
    9. Myers, S. C. and Read, J. A., 2001, Capital Allocation for Insurance Company, Journal of Risk and Insurance 68(4): 545-80.
    10. Margrabe, W. 1978, The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another, Journal of Finance 33(1): 177-86
    11. Sharpe, William F., 1964, Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equillibrium under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, 19(3):425-442.
    12. Venter Gary., 2004, Capital Allocation Survey with Commentary, North American Actuarial Journal 8(2): 96-107.
    13. 李儀坤(2003),「金融控股大未來」,大樹林出版社。
    14. 林維義(2004),金融預警制度與金融控股公司之風險管理(下),金融風險管理季刊。
    15. 鄭潔霙(2006),「金融控股公司資本配置之實證研究-以富邦金融控股公司為例」,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文。
    16. 胡涵棻(2007),「金融控股公司之資本配置與績效評估」,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文。
    17. 王美晴(2007),「金控公司下金融業之權益資金成本」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    18. 蔡永順、吳榮振(2007),⌜金融整併與金融不穩定:台灣金融控股公司為例⌟,金融風險管理季刊。
    19. 張孝銓(2008),「台灣產物保險業之資金成本與費率自由化」,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文。
    20. 黃昭元、蔡茂寅、陳忠五、林鈺雄(2011),⌜綜合法典⌟,新學林出版股份有限公司
    21. 劉紹樑(2012),「金融脈動」,金融研訓院。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    風險管理與保險研究所
    100358024
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100358024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    802401.pdf852KbAdobe PDF2139View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback