Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58321
|
| Title: | 韓國之中國認知的變化
South Korea`s changed perception on China |
| Authors: | 朴成林 |
| Contributors: | 何思因
Ho, Szu yin
朴成林 |
| Keywords: | 韓中關係
韓中建交
北韓核武器
六方會談
韓國對外政策
認知 |
| Date: | 2012 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-06-03 17:39:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文之研究動機是如此而已：在今日的韓國之中國認知如何？筆者在2012年寫這論文時，韓中關係處於比較緊張的局面，而美國之亞洲重返的情形加以緊張的程度。在北韓核武器危機與美國之重返亞洲之下，韓國與中國之間的分歧與認知上的變化取得世人的矚目。筆者認為，國家之間安全保護因素決定對外政策的方向，為曾明這假設與韓國之中國認知及其變化，我採取北韓核武器危機上的韓國之中國認知變化，因北韓因素與北韓核武器是韓國之安全保護上的關鍵的因素。筆者採取古典現實主義與建構主義、分析韓國之中國認知的變化。所謂‘認知’具有結果包括的認知與心理上存在的認知，而筆者以古典現實主義測量韓國之中國方面的政策變化及其結果、分析韓國之中國認知上的變化及，同時筆者對韓國的政治領袖與一般民眾之中國認知以心理存在的認知測量和文件調查的結果、分析它們的中國認知及其變化。為指出北韓核武器因素對韓國之中國認知（政策、理解）之變化，我比較北韓核武器危機前後，先探索1992年韓中建交及其背景、發現當時韓國之中國認知更為積極、主要目的在於以中國之影響力、改變北韓。但北韓核武器危機之中，中國謹慎小心介入這問題，而中國在六方會談中、雖然不斷努力協調，但中國與六方會談成員國束手無策目睹北韓的第一次核武器實驗（2006年）、顯示中國之北韓方面影響力之限制，因北韓社會非常封閉、難以接受國外的影響力，同時北韓負擔中國東北地區的保護之角色，故中國對北韓方面的協調毫無使得任何結果。這失敗引起韓國國內之北韓政策與對外政策，而2007年總統選舉中，李明博指出北韓政策與對外政策的變化。他從2008年至2010年與美國強化同盟、推進強硬的北韓政策、遭遇天安船事件與延坪島炮擊戰，中國對此毫無表示態度、卻支持中立的立場、遇到韓國之中國認知的變化，而韓國之中國認知由北韓核武器危機協調失敗導致的結果。除了國家安全領域之外，韓國之商業界對中國投足不斷增加，同時政治領袖的中國方面認知也處於好感，但國家安全領域上的危機導致國內輿論，這使得總統選舉的結果、產出韓國之對外政策方向的變化。
The main motive of thesis is that. : In today, how does South Korea perceive on China? The author written in the thesis in 2012, South Korea – China’s relation was in tension and U.S’s pivot to Asia added the level of tension. Under the circumstance of North Korea’s nuclear crisis and U.S’s pivot to Asia, South Korea and China’s tension and the perception has raised the attention from the world.
I reckon, national security decides the direction of foreign policy and for proving my idea and solving the question of South Korea’s perception on China, I took the case that South Korea’s perception on China in the crisis of North Korea’s nuclear weapon as experiment, because North Korea factor and the nuclear crisis is the key factor in South Korea’s national security. In the thesis, I use two of theory in IRs: Classical Realism and Constructivism. I use it to analyze South Korea’s perception on China and the change. Perception includes two of perspectives: Psychological factor and its outcome and I took Classical Realism to analyze South Korea’s perception on China and the change in foreign policy, economic performance that are all classified as outcome of perception and
To prove North Korea factor in changed South Korea’s perception on China, I compared the situation by North Korea nuclear crisis that has been from 1993 and searched for the perception of South Korea in the establishment of South Korea – China’s diplomatic ties and South Korea’s perception on China was in positive in 1992. The North Korea factor in the diplomatic ties between South Korea and China was key factor and South Korea made efforts to build ties with China that was aimed to change North Korea by China’s influence. However, in the crisis of North Korea’s nuclear weapon, China approached the issue with very careful attitude and China made efforts to solve the crisis in the system of Six Party Talks. But, China and the member countries of Six Party only watched North Korea’s first nuclear test without any implication in 2006 that shown China’s influence to North Korea is limited that North Korea is extremely closed society and oversea countries’ influence is not worked and North Korea, in reality, has charged as guardian for Eastern-North provinces of China. Therefore, China’s efforts on North Korea have not brought any visible outcome. The failure brought an change of South Korea’s public opinion on North Korea policy and foreign policy that Lee Myung-bak offered the changed policy on North Korea, foreign affairs in the presidential election in 2007 that has been high attention from the public. He strengthen alliance with U.S and offered changed policy against North Korea that confronted Cheonan Naval sinking in 2009 and bomb shelling in Yeonpyung Island in 2010. China has not offered visible attitude on the followed crisis and just urged calm attitude for them and it marked South Korea’s changed perception on China that was began from the first nuclear test of North Korea in 2006. Except the factor of National Security, South Korea’s economic investment and trade on China has been increased and political figure’s perception on China was in positive. But, the crisis of national security turned a direction on public opinion to negative and brought changed outcome of presidential election in 2007, so the crisis of national security, in reality, turned a direction of South Korea’s perception on China. |
| Reference: | 1.英文
Alastair Iain Johnston, Robert S.Ross(Edited), Engaging China : The management of an emerging power, Routledge, London, New York, 1999
Bagby, Johnson M. Johnson. (1994) the use and abuse of Thucydides in international relations, International Organization, Vol. 48.1
Bain, William. (2000) Decoupling Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered, Review of International Studies, Vol. 26
Baylis ,John.; Smith,Steve (eds), The globalization of world politics : an introduction to international relations, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001
Bennet, Bruce W. Uncertainties in the North Korean Nuclear threat, Santa Monica, The Rand Cooperation, 2010
Bruce W.Bennet, Uncertainties in the North Korean nuclear threat, RAND National defense research institute, 201
Bush, George, Scowcroft, Brent (1998) A world transformed, New York : Alfred A. Knopf Joel S.Wit,
Capling, Ann；Nossa, Kim Richard Blowback: Investor State Dispute Mechanisms in International trade agreements, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, Vol. 19, No.2, April 2006
Carr, Edward.Hallett, the Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the study of International Relations, London: St Martin’s Press, 1946
Carl von Clausewitz, On War: translated from the German by O. J. Matthijs Jolles, New York: The modern library, 1943
Chen, Jie, Ideology in U.S. Foreign policy : Case Studies in U.S. China policy, Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1992
Cheng, Dean, Sea Power and the Chinese State: China’s Maritime Ambitions, The Heritage Foundation, 2012
Choi, Won-mog, the present and future of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement paradigm，Journal of International economic law 10(3), July.2007
Chung, Jae-ho, Between Ally and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States, New York: Columbia University Press, 2006
Christensen, Thomas J.(1996) Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, And Sino-American Conflict 1947 – 1958, Princeton, Princeton University Press
Chinoy, Mike，Meltdown : The inside story of the North Korea nuclear crisis, ST. Martin’s press, New York, 2008;
Clinton，Hillary ‘America’s pacific century’, <Foreign Policy>, Nov, 10, 2011; ‘Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense’,
David Shambaugh, China and the Korean Peninsula : Playing for the long term, The Washington Quartely, Spring 2003,
Ford , Christopher, Challenges of North Korea nuclear negotiation, presented to the Aspen Institute
Germany’s U.S – DPRK “Track II” Dialogues Schloss Risstissen, Germany, 2011
Christopher Ford, Challenges of North Korea nuclear negotiation Hudson Institute, 2011
Daniel B.Poneman, Robert L.Gallucci, Going Critical : The first north Korean nuclear crisis, The Brookings Institutions, Washington, 2004
Friedberg, Aaron L. A contest for supremacy: China, America, And the Struggle for mastery in Asia ， W.W.Norton&Company, 2011
Hamashita Takeshi, Tribute and Emigration : Japan and the Chinese administration of foreign affairs, Senri Ethnological studies 25, 1989
Hecker，Siegfried S, A Return Trip to North Korea’s Yongbyon Nuclear Complex
Center for International Security and Cooperation, The lecture in Stanford University，November 20, 2010
Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976
Joel S.Wit, Daniel B.Poneman, Robert L.Gallucci, Going Critical: The first North Korean nuclear crisis, Washington, The Brookings Institution, 2004
Joseph P.H. Fan, Randall Morck, Lixin Colin Xu, Bernard Yeung, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: China versus the rest of the world, World Development, Vol. xx, No x, 2009
Kagan, Richard C. A nuclear North Korea? Why? How? What to do? : A lecture manuscript, University of Minnesota, 1996
Lee Chae-jin, China and Korea: Dynamic Relations, Hoover Press, 1996
Lebow, Richard Ned, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003
, Why Nations Fight: The Past and Future of War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
Lieberthal, Kenneth ‘The American Pivot to Asia’, <Foreign Policy>, Dec ,21, 2011,
Levy, Jack S, Thompson, William R, Causes of War, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010
Loren Brandt, Thomas G. Rawski (eds), China’s Great Economic Transformation, London: Cambridge University Press, 2010
Morgenthau, Hans Joachim Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, New York: Knopf, 1954
, Scientific man vs. power politics, Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 1946
Odierno, Raymond, The U.S Army in a time of Transition, Foreign Affairs, May/June, 2012
Onuf Nicholas, A Constructivist Manifesto" in Burch & Denemark, Constituting Political Economy, Lynne Rienner, 1997
, Constructivism: A User`s Manual" in Kubálková, International Relations in a Constructed World, M.E. Sharpe, 1998
Ross, Robert S ，Zhu Feng , China’s Ascent: Power, Security and the future of International Politics， edited by Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 2008
Rubins, Noah；Kinsella, N.Stephen International investment, political risk and dispute resolution:
A practitioner’s guide: New York, 2005
Ruggie, John, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization ， London, New York: Routledge, 1998
, Contingencies, Constraints and Collective Security: Perspectives on UN Involvement in International Disputes, International Organization, No 28, 1974
, International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order, International Organization, No.36, 1982
Sigal, Leon V. Disarming strangers: Nuclear diplomacy with North Korea, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1998
Shen Dingli, North Korea’s strategic significance to China, China Security, Autumn 2006
Sutter, Robert G, the China quandary: Domestic determinants of U.S. China policy: 1972-1982 ， Boulder: Praeger Publishers, 1983
Siegfried S. Hecker, Can the North Korea nuclear crisis be resolved?,,the lecture in the Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, http://cisac.stanford.edu/publications/23661
Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War: A new translation by Martin Hammond, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009
Wellesley Classic Studies, http://www.wellesley.edu/ClassicalStudies/CLCV102/
Whiting, Allen S. China crosses the Yalu : The decision to enter the Korean War, New York: The Rand Cooperation, 1960
Witold J. Henisz, The Institutional environment for Multinational Investment, The Journal of Law ， Economics &Organization, Vol.16, No.2
Wendt, Alexander, Social theory of international politics ， New York : Cambridge University Press , 1999
, “The agent-structure problem in international relations theory", International Organization ， vol. 41, no. 3, 1987
, "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics" ， International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992
Zheng Bijian, China’s “Peaceful Rise” to Great-Power Status, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84, No.5, 2005
Zoellick, Robert B (2006), Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?, The DISAM Journal,
2.中文
錢其琛， 外交十記， 香港，三聯書店（香港）有限公司，2005年
拜根興 著，七世紀中葉唐與新羅關係研究，中國和會科學出版社，2003年
陳威志、石之瑜，從亞洲認識中國：濱下武志研究『朝貢體系』的啟示，政治科學論叢，第三十九期，民國98年3月
黃剛，中華民國與各國互駐代表機構之建制年表疑考（1949~2006）， 台北, 2007年
3.韓文
金景錄,朝鮮時代國際秩序與韓中關係之展開情勢, 中國學報（韓國），第六十輯，2009年
金景一，洪冕基 譯，中國之韓國戰爭參戰起源，論衡，漢城，2005年
金宇祥，大韓民國願意這樣總統：外交方面為例，月刊NEXT,2007年 11月，碼 59-66
金大中，金大中自傳（1, 2）， 三仁出版社，漢城， 2010年
Kim You-en，中國之北韓核武器問題的六方會談上的戰略考驗，中蘇研究，28號，2006年
金大中 和平中心(Kim Dae Jung Peace Center) ， http://www.kdjpeace.com
金三雄， 金大中評傳（I ，II）， 漢城，時代之窗，2010年
金聖翰，李明博政府之實用外交之展望及其課題，新亞細亞研究所 2008年春節研討會，2008年 2月 14日。
金泰孝，北韓核武器問題展望與韓日合作方案，未發表文章
KDB韓國產業銀行，北韓產業現況與南北韓產業合作方向，2012年
東亞細亞研究院與Chicago Councils on Global Affairs(CCFR)，<東亞太七國對外認知調查：韓國人看的世界>，2006年
BBC World Service，Globe Scan，東亞西亞研究院，每日經濟新聞，27個國家之國際議題3次報導：世界人之主要國家認知)，2007年
東亞細亞研究院，韓國日報，<政治安全保護意識調查：北韓核武器危機與變遷中的北韓認識>，2007年
東亞西亞研究院，每日經濟新聞，緊急政治：安全保護意識形態調查，2009年
東亞西亞研究院，Korea Research，強溫雙面之共存 ， 韓國之北韓認知變化及其關鍵字 ， 2010年
，韓國戰爭發生60周年：變遷中的韓國人之北韓與統一問題之認知，2010年
柳時敏，這是命運， 漢城，Dolbaegye publishing ，2010年
朴勝俊，韓國與中國一百年 ：動盪不息的外交秘錄，首爾，Gipalang Publishing，2010年
樸炳光，中國的北韓核武器問題之現況與政策，東亞期刊(韓文), 46號，2004年
，胡錦濤時代中國的北韓政策方向與北韓認知：第1,2次核武器實驗之前與之後的變化為案例，<統一政策研究>，第19券 1號，2010年
朴弘緖，中國的朝鮮半島核武器危機上的同盟管理之困境：其理論和現實，國際政治論叢，46號，2006年
申尚真，中國的北韓認知變化研究：北韓專家深入面談調查，<統一政策研究>，第17券 1號，2008年
鄭在浩，中國崛起和朝鮮半島之未來，漢城國立大學校出版文化園， 漢城，2011年
Jun Byung-kon，中國之北韓核武器問題的認識及其中北關係之變化，中國學研究，35號，2006年
仁川發展研究院，韓中建交20周年特輯II：對中國交流的新方式、公共外交，仁川，2012年
Won Dong-wook, Kim Jae-kwan(2010) ,中國與北韓關係及其同盟之困境：以韓國天安艦為例，現代中國 研究，12號
韓國大統領秘書室，金大中大統領演說文集(第1卷)，漢城，1999年
盧武鉉大統領演說文集(第1卷)，漢城，2004年
李明博大統領演說文集(第1卷)，漢城，2010年
韓國外交通商部 自由貿易協定入門網站，http://www.fta.go.kr
韓國進出口銀行 海外經濟研究所，我國之中國投資20年之明暗與將來之應對，2012年
韓國貿易投資振振興公司，在中國的韓國企業看中國，2012年
韓國貿易協會 國際貿易研究院，韓中建交二十周年 對中國出口之碩果與課題，2012年
韓國計劃經濟部，韓中建交20周年經濟合作之成果及關注點， 2012年
Han Suk-hee, 六方會談與中國外交的困境，國際政治論叢，45號,2005年
秋明燁，“高麗時代之韓中關係史的諸論爭及其分析”，韓中日學術界之韓中關係史研究與爭論，東北亞歷史財團（編輯），2011年
4.新聞媒體
BBC
Pressian（韓文）
京鄉新聞(Kyunghyang Xinmoon)(韓文)
聯合新聞(Yeonhap news)（韓文）
韓國日報(Hangook Ilbo)（韓文）
Hangyurae Sinmoon(한겨례 신문)（韓文）
5.政府公式文件
6.15 南北韓共同宣言（韓文）
計劃經濟部(Ministry of Strategy and Finance) ， 韓中建交20周年經濟合作之成果及關注點 ， 2012年
Yang Woon-chul, 北中礦物資源交易增加及其引發的北韓經濟之中國附屬可能性，世宗研究所，2011年 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
政治研究所
99252025
101 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099252025 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 448 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
