政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56904

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56904

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51782658 線上人數 : 598

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 公共行政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/56904

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56904

題名:	兩岸協議治理研究:以兩岸經濟合作架構協議(ECFA)為例 The study of Cross-Strait agreements governance: Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA)
作者:	夏道維
貢獻者:	蕭武桐夏道維
關鍵詞:	兩岸關係兩岸協議協議治理國際建制論治理成效
日期:	2011
上傳時間:	2013-02-01 16:56:46 (UTC+8)
摘要:	二十餘年來，兩岸之間經貿、社會與文教交流頻繁，雙方關係已呈現密不可分的趨勢。然而，由於兩岸的特殊情勢，導致政治與經濟、社會發展方向背道而馳，而在某種程度上呈現「制度缺失」的現象，無法將雙方交流互動所產生的合作或問題，以制度化方式予以規範及解決。2008年6月兩會重啟協商，迄今已簽署18項協議，所涉事務範圍廣泛，涵蓋經貿、金融、農漁業、社會、食品安全、核能安全等領域，均與台灣民眾之權益及福祉息息相關。然而，簽署協議並不意謂所規範之事項或欲解決之問題即能完善運作，重要的是，必須由治理層面看待協議內容，方能確實達成協議創立之目的。然而，迄今探討18項協議之多著重於協議內容之簡述及分析為主，較少由治理層面予以系統性分析。有鑒於此，本文將透過以制度主義探討國際關係之首要理論：國際建制論（International regime）作為理論基礎，探討兩岸協議治理議題。在研究案例上，則選擇18項協議中，涵蓋層面最廣，影響最為深遠的兩岸經濟合作架構協議（Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement），希望在建制治理的相關概念與理論的基礎上，透過深度訪談及過程追蹤等研究方法，探討ECFA的治理成效。為達成此一目的，本研究建立一研究架構，就各項可能變數進行描述與分析，論述ECFA制度性治理內容，及建立評估治理成效指標等，以利對兩岸協議治理研究有初步貢獻，並可作為評估協議成效之實務參考。 Since June, 2008, Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and PRC’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) have reactivated the cross-strait negotiation. To date, they have held eight Chiang-Chen Talks, signed 18 agreements, and reached two consensuses. These agreements have established important framework and blueprint for cross-strait exchanges and aimed at the well-being of the people on both sides. However, those agreements signed do not guarantee the smooth implementation of policy born out of the talks. It is imperative that we should make a detailed analysis of the content of those agreements from the perspective of governance to help realize the goal of the agreements. Yet most research papers fail to develop a systematic analysis from the perspective of governance by merely emphasizing on the literal description and analysis of articles of individual agreement. Therefore, this research will employ international regime theory, which argues that international institutions or regimes affect the behavior of states and act as the main theoretical underpinning for investigating the issues concerning the governance aspect of those agreements. This research chooses ECFA (Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement) as the object of research, because it is the most important, comprehensive and influential agreement among the 18 agreements. In order to assess the effectiveness of governance element in ECFA, this research establishes a research framework which is capable of describing and analyzing relevant variables and set up evaluation indicators. Information was obtained through in-depth interview and process-tracing to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of above-mentioned research framework, and through study and analysis it has proven that this research framework can act as a reference for evaluating effectiveness of governance in agreements when put in practice.
參考文獻:	王明國（2003）。國際機制對國家行為的影響機制有效性的一種新的分析視角，世界經濟與政治，4月號 -----------（2006）。權力、合法性、國內政治與國際制度的有效性，世界經濟與政治，8月號 (2011)。國際制度的有效性：現狀研究、路徑方法與理論批評，歐洲研究，4月號遵約與國際制度的有效性:情投意合還是一廂情願當代亞太 2011 年第2 期,第6- 28 頁。王重陽（2009）。「從比較法觀點看海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」，展望與探索第七卷第六期，6月。艾明江、張永汀、葉迎（2008）。「兩岸關係的新路徑選擇：和平發展中的兩岸多軌治理探究」，世界經濟與政治論壇，第5期李秘（2010）。兩岸治理：兩岸和平發展的新動力機制，台灣研究，第1期李俊緯（2010）。陸客來臺消費分析與建議，財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論李英明（2001）。全球治理、認同多元與兩岸關係的新定位，國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告，4月29日。周志懷（2006）。大陸對台政策合兩岸關係的發展，台灣研究季刊，第1期林享能（2011）。兩岸農產品及食品安全合作之檢討與建議，財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論，6月11日邱亞文、黃靜宜（2010）。「海峽兩岸食品安全協議之成效評估」，戰略安全研析，第59期，3月。門洪華（2000）。對西方國際機制理論主要流派的批評，國際政治研究，第1期。 -----------（2002）。合法性、有效性與局限性：評估國際機制作用的理論框架，香港社會科學學報吳玉山（1995）。兩岸關係對台灣經濟成長模式的影響，問題與研究月刊，第 34卷2期 -----------（1998）。三黨大陸政策的趨同：選民偏好的常態分配與選舉極大化策略，理論與政策，第47卷 -----------（2001）。兩岸關係中的中國意識與台灣意識，中國事務，4期，頁71-89 --------（2003）。跨國關系與國內政治——比較政治與國際政治經濟學視野下的國際關系研究，美國研究，4月號 --------（2009）。全球公共問題與國際合作：一種制度的分析。上海：上海人民出版社（2011）。從政策思維探討兩岸經濟合作架構協議的議題，海峽評論第237期頁37-42 于宏源（2007）。國際制度與政府決策轉型，國際政治科學，第1期，31-54頁。中華經濟研究院。「兩岸經濟合作架構協議之影響評估」摘要說明，98年7月29日曲博（2006）。國內政治、國際關係與國際政治經濟學研究，國際政治研究，4月號 ---------（2010）。因果機制與過程追蹤法，世界經濟與政治，第4期江憶恩。簡論國際機制對國家行為的影響，世界經濟與政治，2002年12月號吳秀光、石冀忻（2009）。「兩岸談判的雙層賽局分析」，羅明德等着，重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論，頁239-274，臺北：五南出版社吳芝儀、李奉儒（譯）（2008）。質的評鑑與研究（M.Q Patton原著），臺北：濤石文化事業股份有限公司。沈燦宏、袁鶴齡（2010）。國際合作框架的一種演化：整合制度結構和認知轉化的過程，問題與研究月刊，第49卷第1期周海濤、李永賢, 張蘅（譯）（2010）。案例研究:設計與方法（Robert K. Yin原著）。重慶大學出版社。林祖嘉、譚瑾瑜（2010）。ECFA早期收穫清單及後ECFA時代之研析，貿易調查叢刊第12期，頁1-34 信強（2008）。權力政治、制度建構與未來兩岸關係：一種制度主義的分析邏輯，全球政治評論，第21期，45-60。姜鵬、董素華（譯）（2003）。《國際化和國內政治：導論》，國際化與國內政治（Robert Keohane、Helen Milner 編）。北京大學出版社。胡少華、王紅纓（譯）（1992）。國際政治理論（Kenneth Waltz原著）。北京：中國人民公安大學出版社。范世平（2009）。開放大陸觀光客來台對當前兩岸關係發展之研究，展望與探索，第7卷第1期，1月唐永勝、徐棄郁（2004）。尋求複雜的平衡－國際安全建制與主權國家的參與，北京：世界知識出版社。孫本初（2005）。公共管理，台北：智勝出版社秦亞青（2005）。權力•制度•文化——國際政治學的三種體系理論，載秦亞青：權力、制度、文化：國際關係理論與方法研究文集。北京：北京大學出版社。秦亞青（譯）（2000）。國際政治的社會理論（Alexander Wendt原著），上海人民出版社袁正清（譯）（2001）。國際社會中的國家利益（Martha Finnemore原著），浙江人民出版社。袁易（2003）。中國遵循國際導彈建制的解析：一個社會建構論的觀點。台北市：五南圖書有限公司出版。康仙鵬（2010）。兩岸治理：兩岸關係思維的檢視與突破，台灣研究集刊，第4期張亞中（2003）。論兩岸治理，問題與研究，第42卷，第6期郭承天（1996）。國際組織與國際建制。台北：時英出版社陳向明（2002）。質的研究方法與社會科學研究，北京：教育科学出版社。陳陸輝耿曙涂萍蘭黃冠博（2009）。理性自利或感性認同？影響台灣民眾兩岸經貿立場因素的分析，東吳政治學報，第27卷第2期，頁 87-125 楊志誠（2011）。兩岸關係和平發展的契機—兩岸互信機制的建構，研習論壇第2期，頁23-40 賈烈英（2006）。國際制度的有效性：以聯合國為例，國際政治科學，第1 期廖坤榮（2009）。書評：Multi-level Governance〔多層次治理〕edited by Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders，台灣民主季刊，第 6 卷第 2 期，p.251-255。齊皓（2009）。國際環境機制的差異性原因，國際政治科學，第2期劉國深（2009）。試論和平發展背景下的兩岸共同治理，台灣研究季刊，第4期蔡宏明（2009）。兩岸經濟合作架構協議重點研析，貿易政策論叢，第11期鄭端耀（1997）。國際關係『新自由制度主義』理論之評析，問題與研究，第 36 卷 12 期，頁 1-23 蕭武桐、葉張繼、張力（2009）。中國建設海峽兩岸經濟區對金門馬祖經濟發展之影響。策略評論，第1期, 頁59-72. 蕭瑞麟（2008）。不用數字的研究，台北：培生教育出版。隨新民（2004）。國際制度的合法性與有效性：新現實主義、新自由制度主義和建構主義三種範式比較，學術探索，第6期薄燕（2006）。全球環境治理的有效性，外交評論，第6期羅德明、包宗和、吳玉山（2009）。重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論，臺北市：五南圖書蘇長和（2003）。跨國關係與國內政治：導讀。載於羅伯特 •基歐漢、海倫 •米爾納編：《國際化與國內政治》(姜鵬、董素華譯 )，北京大學出版社。 Andresen, Steinar and Wettestad, Jørgen. (1995) International Problem-Solving Effectiveness: The Oslo Project Story so Far. International Environmental Affairs;7/2,127-49. --------------------(2001).Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,International Organiz ation, Vol 55, No 3, Summer, ------------(2007). Compliance Theory：Compliance, Effectivenes s, and Behavior Chan ge in International Environmental Law in Jutta Brunee et al, eds, Oxford H andbook of International Environmental Law , Oxford University Press -------------(2008). Evaluating the Performance of Environmental Institutions: What to Evaluate and How to Evaluate It?”In Oran R.Young, Leslie A. King, & Heike Schroeder (Eds.),Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers(pp.79-114),Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Abbott, Kenneth W., R.O. Keohane, A. Moravcsik, A-M Slaughter & D. Snidal（2000）. The Concept of Legalization, International Organization 54 (3), 401-419. Abram Chayes and Antonia H andler Chayes（1995）. The New Sovereignty :Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Harvard University Press Agni Kalfagianni & Philipp Pattberg（2011）. The Effectiveness of Transnational Rule：Setting Organisations in Global Sustainability Politics—An Analytical Framework, Global Governance Working Paper No43 Alexander George and Andrew Bennett（2001）.Case Studies and Theory Development in the S ocial Science Andresen,S. & J. Wettestad（2004）.Case Studies of the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. In A. Underdal & O. Young (Eds.),Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies（pp.49-69）. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Andrew Cortell and James Davis(1996). How Do International Institutions Matter:The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms. International Studies Quarterly, Vol.40, 451—478 Andrew Hasen,Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger,（1997）Theories of International Regimes, London:Cambridge University Press Andrew,Bennett（2002）.Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages, in Detlef F. Sprinz & Yael Wolinsky (Eds),Cases, Numbers, Models:International Relations Research Methods (pp.27-64). University of Michigan Press. Ausubel, J.H. & D.G. Victor.（1992）.Verification of International Environmental Agreements, Annual Review of Energy and Environment ,17: 1-43. Berkman, P.A. and Young, O.R. (2009). Governance and Environmental Change in the Arctic Ocean. Science and Government, vol. 324, April 2009, 339-340. Bernauer, Thomas (1995) The effect of international environmental institutions: how we might learn more. International Organization 49, 351-77 Bernd Siebenhüner(2003). International Organisations as Learning Agents in the Emerging System of Global Governance. A Conceptual Framework. Global Governance Working Paper No 8 Brady, Henry E.(2010). Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. In Henry E. Brady and David Collier(Eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards(pp.267-271), 2nd Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Breitmeier, H.,Young, O.R.,and Zurn, M.(2007). Analyzing International Environmental Regimes: From Case Study to Database.Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, England Collier, David（2011）, Understanding Process Tracing, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 44, No. 4, 823-830, October, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856702 Creswell, John W.(2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Dai Xinyuan（2006）.The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 50（No.5）, October ,690-713 Daniel W. Drezner(2003). Locating the Proper Authorities Michigan.University of Michigan Press De Vos, M., Janssen, P., Frantzi, S., Pattberg, P, Petersen, A, Biermann, F, Kok, M. （2010）.Formalizing knowledge on international environmental regimes for integrated assessment modelling. In D. A. Swayne, W. Yang, A. A. Voinov, A. Rizzoli & T. Filatova (Eds.), Proceedings of the iEMSs Firth Biennial Meeting: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs 2010). International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Ottawa, Canada, July 2010. Ostrom, E.(1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dimitrov, R.（2003）.Knowledge, Power, and Interests in Environmental Regime Formation.International Studies Quarterly, 47 (1), 123-150. Downs, George W. (2000). Constructing Effective Environmental Regimes, Annual Review of Political Science, 3 (1), 25-42. Downs, George W David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom (1996). Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization, 50 (3): 379-406 Easton , David.(1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: John Wiley. Edith Brown Weiss（2004）.Rethinking Compliance with International Law. In Eyal Ben venisti & MosheHrsh（Eds.）,The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation : Theoretical Perspectives (pp.134-165),Cambridge U nivers ity Press Eisenhardt, K.M.（1989）. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14,532-550. Eleni Dellas ,Philipp Pattberg, Jesper Berséus ,Marcel Kok, Sofia Frantzi,Martine de Vos,Peter Janssen, Frank Biermann(2011).Modelling Governance and Institutions for Global Sustainability Politics (ModelGIGS) ：Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Framework Report W11/005 Fariborz Zelli(2008).Regime Conflicts in Global Environmental Governance：A Framework for Analysis. Global Governance Working Paper No 36，July Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, & Fariborz Zelli (2007). Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures：The Case of Climate Policy. Global Governance Working Paper No 34 Frantzi, S., N.T. Carter & J.C. Lovett（2009）. Exploring discourses on international environmental regime effectiveness with Q methodology: A case study of the Mediterranean Action Plan,Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (1), 177-186. Gehring, T., & Oberthu¨r, S. (2004). Exploring regime interaction: A framework of analysis.In A. Underdal & O. R. Young (Eds.), Regime consequences: Methodological challenges and research strategies (pp.247–269). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Gehring, T., & Oberthu¨r, S. (2006). Comparative empirical analysis and ideal types of institutional interaction. In S. Oberthu¨ r & T. Gehring (Eds.), Institutional interaction in global environmental governance. Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies (pp. 307–371). Cambridge: MITPress. Gehring, T., & Oberthu¨r, S. (2008). Interplay: Exploring institutional interaction. In O. R. Young, L. A.King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications,and research frontiers (pp. 187–223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gehring, T., & Oberthu¨r, S. (2009). The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions.European Journal of International Relations,15, 125–156. George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett（2005）.Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA and London, England: MIT Press. Gerring, John and Rose McDermott.（2007）. An Experimental Tem-plate for Case-Study Research. American Journal of Political Science 51:3 (July), 688–701 Gerring,John（2007a）.Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haas, Peter M.(1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization,Vol.43:3, 377-403. Haas, Peter M., Robert O. Keohane, & Marc A. Levy, eds., (1993). Institutions for the Earth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger (1997). Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hovi, Jon (2004). Causal Mechanisms and the Study of Regime Effectiveness. In Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young (Eds.), Regime Consequences:Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies(pp.71-87).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hovi, Jon, Detlef F. Sprinz, & Arild Underdal (2003). The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness: Critique, Response, and the Road Ahead. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 74-96. Hurrell, Andrew（2002）.International Society and the Study of Regimes: A Reflective Approach, in Regime Theory and International Relation, eds. Volker Rittberger and Peter Mayer, New York: Oxford University Press Jackson,Wendy L.(2011). Integrating ecological impacts into evaluations of the effectiveness of environmental regimes: the example of CITES Jacobson, Harold K. and Edith Brown Weiss.(1995). Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords: Preliminary Observations from a Collaborative Project. Global Governance, Vol 1, 119-148. Jeffrey Checkel(1999). Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe International Studies Quarterly, Vol.4 3, 83—114 Kal Raustiala and Anne Marie Slaughter（2002）.International Law, International Relations and Compliance,In Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth Simmons, (Eds). Handbook of International Relations(pp.538-558), S AGE Publications Ltd Kal Raustiala(1997).Domestic institutions and International Regulatory Cooperation Comparative Responses to the Convention on Biological Diversity, World Politics 49.4 , 482-509 Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane, and Stephen Krasner (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52 (4): 645-685. Kenneth W. Abbott and Duncan Snidal(2003). Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations, in Paul F. Diehl, The Politics of Global Governance: International Organizations in an Interdependent World Boulder, London: Lynne R ienner Publishers Kenneth W.Abbott and Duncan Snidal（2000）,Hard and Soft Law in International Governance, International Organization, Vol,54, No.3, Summer Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Keohane, Robert O., Peter M. Haas, and Marc A. Levy (1993). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions. In Peter M. Haas, Robert. O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, eds., Institutions for the Earth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney(1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba.（1994）. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal (2001). The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization, 55 (4): 761-799. Krasner, Stephen D. (1982a). Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, 36 (2): 185-205. Krasner, Stephen D. (1982b). Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables. International Organization, 36 (2): 497-510. Krasner, Stephen D. (1983). Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. In International Regimes, edited by Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Kütting, Gabriela.(2000). Environment, Society and International Relations: Towards More Effective International Environmental Agreements. London, UK: Routledge. Levy, Marc A., Oran R. Young and Michael Zurn.(1994). The Study of International Regimes. Working Paper WP-94-113. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Lindemann, Stefan(2005). Explaining success and failure in international river basin management – Lessons from Southern Africa. The 6th Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community Lisa Martin（2009）. Against Compliance, http: //userspoliscwiscedu/irc/ Martinpdf Lisa Martin, Beth Simmons（1998）Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, Autumn M.L. Honkanen, K. von Moltke, M. Hisschemöller and others（1999）.Report of the Concerted Action on the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements,Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken/Institute for Environmental Studies March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press. ---------------(1995). Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press. Martha Finnemore（1996）.National Interests in International Society, Ithaca N.Y.:Cornell University Press Miles, Edward L., Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, Jorgen Wettestad, Jon Birger Skjaerseth, & Elaine M. Carlin(Eds). Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory With Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mireia Tarradell(2007).The Influence of International Bureaucracies in Global Environmental Politics: Results from an Expert Survey. Global Governance Working Paper No 26. Mitchell, Ronald B. (2003). The Relative Effects of Environmental Regimes: A Qualitative Comparison of Four Acid Rain Protocols. Paper presented at the 2003 International Studies Association Conference, Portland, Oregon. ------------(2003).International Environmental Agreements: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Volume 28,429-461. --------------(2004). A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes. In Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young (Eds.), Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies(pp.121-149). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. -------------(2004).Methodological Challenges in Evaluating the Effects of Wildlife Management Regimes. Paper presented at the Christopher H. Browne Center for International Politics, University of Pennsylvania. 4 March 2004. Ostrom, Elinor.(1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Peter Gourevitch（1978）,The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics, International Organization, vol. 32, no. 4,881-912 Peter Katzenstein（1976）.International Relations and Domestic Structures：Foreign Economics Policies of Advanced Industrial States, International Organizations, Vol.30, No.1, Winter,1-45 Przeworksi, Adam (2004). Institutions Matter? Government and Opposition,39 (4), 527-540. Ragin, Charles C. (1987). The Comparative Method. Berkely/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press. Raustiala, Kal and David G. Victor (1998). Conclusions. In David G. Victor; Kal Raustialaand Eugene B. Skolnikoff(Eds.),The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments(659-709). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Regine Andersen（2006）. Governing Agrobiodiversity: A Framework for Analysis of Aggregate Effects of International Regimes, Paper prepared for the IDGEC Synthesis Conference, Bali, 6–9 December Richard Perkins and Eric Neumayer（2007）.Implementing Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Analysis of EU Directives ,Global Environmental Politics,7:3, August,13-41 Ringquist, Evan J. and Tatiana Kostadinova (2005). Assessing the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements: The Case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol. American Journal of Political Science, 49 (1), 86-102. Rittberger V. & M. Zürn.（1991）.Regime Theory: findings from the study of "East-West regimes. Cooperation and Conflict ,26, 165-183. Robert Putnam（1988）,Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization, vol. 42, issue 3, 427-60 Rosendal, G. Kristin (2001). Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity. Global Governance, 7 (1), 95-117. Ruggie, John G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36 (2): 379-415. Schelling, Thomas C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Seawright, Jason and John Gerring（2008）.Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options, Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294–308. Sevasti-Eleni Vezirgiannidou（2009）.The Climate Change Regime Post-Kyoto:Why Compliance is Important and How to Achieve it,Global Environmental Politics 9:4, November, 41-63 Siegfried, Tobias and Thomas Bernauer (2006). Estimating the Performance of International Regulatory Regimes. Zürich: ETH/Universität Zürich, CIS: CIS Working Paper, 16/2006. Simmons, Beth A. (2000). International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review, 99 (4), 819-835. Skjærseth, J. B.（2006）.Protecting the Northeast Atlantic: One Problem, Three Institutions. In S. Oberthür & T. Gehring (Eds.), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies（pp103-125）. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Snidal, D.（1994）.The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity, and Institutions, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (4), 449–472 Sprinz, Detlef F. and Carsten Helm (1999). The Effect of Global Environmental Regimes: A Measurement Concept.International Political Science Review,Vol.20 (4), 359-369. Sprinz, Detlef F. and Carsten Helm.(1999). The Effect of Global Environmental Regimes: A Measurement Concept.International Political Science Review,Vol.20, 359-369. Steinar Andresen a, Shardul Agrawala(2002). Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime. Global Environmental Change,Vol.12,41-51 Steinar Andresen and Jørgen Wettestad(2001). Case studies of the effectiveness of international environmental regimes:Balancing textbook ideals and feasibility concerns FNI Report 19 Stokke, O. S. (Ed.). (2001a). Governing high seas fisheries: The interplay of global and regional regimes.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stokke, Olav S. (forthcoming). International Governance and Fisheries Management: Determining and Explaining the Effectiveness of International Regimes. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute. Stokke, Olav S. and D. Vidas (Eds.)(1996). Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System , Cambridge University Press. Stokke, Olav S., ed., (2001). Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stokke, Olav Schram and Clare Coffey (2003).Institutional Interaction in High Seas Fisheries Management, in Sebastian Oberthür(Ed.), Institutional Interaction – How to Prevent Conflicts and Enhance Synergies Between International and European Environmental Institutions, Project Report, Ecologic, shortly also available at www.ecologic.de/interaction. Thomas Risse-Kappen（1991）. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies, World Politics, Vol.43, No.4, July,479-512 Tora Skodvin and Steinar Andresen（2006）.Negotiating International Environmental Regimes Leadership Revisited ,International Organization,Vol.61,Fall, 821–40 Underdal, Arild (1992). The Concept of Regime Effectiveness. Cooperation and Conflict, 27 (3), 227-240. ------------ (1994). Progress in the Absence of Substantive Joint Decisions? Notes on the Dynamics of Regime Formation Processes. In Ted Hanisch(Ed.),Climate Change and the Agenda for Research(pp.113-131). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. -------------(2004). Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness. In Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young,(Eds.).Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies(pp.27-48). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers Underdal, Arild & Oran R. Young,(Eds.).(2004). Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Victor, David G. & Eugene B. Skolnikoff. (1999) Translating intent into action: Implementing environmental commitments. Environment,Vol.21:2,16-20, 39-43. Victor, David G.、Kal Raustiala, & Eugene B. Skolnikoff,(Eds.).(1998).The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wendt, Alexander (2001). Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization, 55 (4),1019-1049. Wettestad, Jørgen (2002). The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). In Edward L. Miles et al., Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Wettestad, Jørgen.(2001). Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Conditional Keys, Global Governance, Vol 7,317-341. Xinyuan Dai and Duncan Snida（2010）. International Cooperation Theory ,International Cooperation Encyclopedia Young, Oran R.(1991).Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization,Vol 45:3, 281-308. ------------ (1996).Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance, 2 (1): 1-24. ------------（1999）. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes:Causal Connections and Behavioural Mechanisms. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press ----------- (2001). Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics,Vol. 1:1, 99-121. -------------(2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. -----------(2002a). Evaluating the success of international environmental regimes: where are we now? Global Environmental Change, Vol.12, 73-77. ------------(2003).Determining Regime Effectiveness: A Commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam Solution. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (3), 97-104. Young, Oran R. and Marc A. Levy (1999). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. In Oran R. Young,(Ed.),The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms(pp.1-32). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Young, Oran R. et al. (2005). Science Plan – Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (revised edition). Bonn: IHDP, IHDP Report No 16..
描述:	博士國立政治大學公共行政研究所 92256503 100
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922565031
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[公共行政學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
503101.pdf	2709Kb	Adobe PDF2	544	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋