政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56522
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114205/145239 (79%)
造訪人次 : 52613663      線上人數 : 864
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/56522
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56522


    題名: 濤慕思‧博格論責任、人權與貧窮
    Thomas Pogge on Responsibility, Human Rights and Poverty
    作者: 林宸安
    Lin, Chern An
    貢獻者: 鄭光明
    林宸安
    Lin, Chern An
    關鍵詞: 消極責任
    積極義務
    人權
    傷害
    制度
    參與
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2013-01-02 13:25:32 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文共分三個部分。本文第一部分試圖就博格(Thomas Pogge)對世界貧窮的關懷,所提出的理論做出說明與釐清。博格的理論試圖指出並說明,因為諸富裕國家之國民透過當今不正義的制度,而造成世界貧窮此一傷害,所以應為這樣的行為承擔責任。本文將在第一部分對其理論中「不正義的制度」做出釐清,並做討「制度是否能作為一個主動能動者」此一問題前的釐清與說明。
    本文第二部分則是承接第一部分的分析,指出「制度」並非主動能動者,「制度傷人」亦須透過行為者的行為才能傷人。本文第二部分作為全文核心,將說明博格的理論為何需要對制度及行為者做出區分,而行為者又如何造成傷害。並將指出在博格的理論中,缺乏這部分的說明,導致其理論可能會得到博格本人所不願接受的結論。
    本文第三部分則是試圖指出博格的理論會失敗,是由於他試圖以消極責任的概念來做人權的請求,而這將導致他的理論中,勢必談論到行為者的面向,而在此面相,尚有待經驗研究方能確定。而在本文第三部分將就博格的理論與漢娜鄂蘭(Hannah Arendt)所論及有關「罪與責任」的理論做比較,並用和博格進路不同的楊(Iris Young)的觀點,來指出無法採取博格的理論進路,來得到他所希望的結論。
    參考文獻: Arendt, H. (2003). Collective responsibility. Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books. 147-158.

    Arendt, H. (2005). Organized guilt and universal responsibility. Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. 121-132.

    Cohen, J. (2010). Philosophy, Social Science, Global Poverty. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 18-45.

    Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing & deserving; essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Jaggar, A. M. (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Patten, A. (2005). Should We Stop Thinking about Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 19-28.

    Pogge, T. (2005). Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 55-84.

    Pogge, T. W. M., & Kosch, M. (2007a). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Pogge, T. W. (2007b). Severe Poverty as a Human Rights Violation. Freedom from Poverty As a Human Right : Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, 11-53.

    Pogge, T. W. M. (2008). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.

    Pogge, T. W. M. (2010a). Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity.
    Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York u.a: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Rawls, J. (2003). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.

    Risse, M. (2005). Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 9-18.

    Salomon, M. E. (2007). Global responsibility for human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Tan, K.-C. (2010). Rights, Harm, and Institutions. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 46-65.

    Young, I. M. (2007). Global challenges: War, self determination and responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity.

    Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    博格著,劉莘譯(2010b)。〈評價社會制度的契約後果論視野的三個問題〉。《康德、羅爾斯與全球正義》,251-279頁。上海:上海譯文出版社。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    99154006
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099154006
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[哲學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    400601.pdf1165KbAdobe PDF21559檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋