Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56522
|
| Title: | 濤慕思‧博格論責任、人權與貧窮
Thomas Pogge on Responsibility, Human Rights and Poverty |
| Authors: | 林宸安
Lin, Chern An |
| Contributors: | 鄭光明
林宸安
Lin, Chern An |
| Keywords: | 消極責任
積極義務
人權
傷害
制度
參與 |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-01-02 13:25:32 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文共分三個部分。本文第一部分試圖就博格（Thomas Pogge）對世界貧窮的關懷，所提出的理論做出說明與釐清。博格的理論試圖指出並說明，因為諸富裕國家之國民透過當今不正義的制度，而造成世界貧窮此一傷害，所以應為這樣的行為承擔責任。本文將在第一部分對其理論中「不正義的制度」做出釐清，並做討「制度是否能作為一個主動能動者」此一問題前的釐清與說明。
本文第二部分則是承接第一部分的分析，指出「制度」並非主動能動者，「制度傷人」亦須透過行為者的行為才能傷人。本文第二部分作為全文核心，將說明博格的理論為何需要對制度及行為者做出區分，而行為者又如何造成傷害。並將指出在博格的理論中，缺乏這部分的說明，導致其理論可能會得到博格本人所不願接受的結論。
本文第三部分則是試圖指出博格的理論會失敗，是由於他試圖以消極責任的概念來做人權的請求，而這將導致他的理論中，勢必談論到行為者的面向，而在此面相，尚有待經驗研究方能確定。而在本文第三部分將就博格的理論與漢娜鄂蘭（Hannah Arendt）所論及有關「罪與責任」的理論做比較，並用和博格進路不同的楊（Iris Young）的觀點，來指出無法採取博格的理論進路，來得到他所希望的結論。 |
| Reference: | Arendt, H. (2003). Collective responsibility. Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books. 147-158.
Arendt, H. (2005). Organized guilt and universal responsibility. Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. 121-132.
Cohen, J. (2010). Philosophy, Social Science, Global Poverty. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 18-45.
Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing & deserving; essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Jaggar, A. M. (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity.
Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patten, A. (2005). Should We Stop Thinking about Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 19-28.
Pogge, T. (2005). Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 55-84.
Pogge, T. W. M., & Kosch, M. (2007a). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pogge, T. W. (2007b). Severe Poverty as a Human Rights Violation. Freedom from Poverty As a Human Right : Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, 11-53.
Pogge, T. W. M. (2008). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.
Pogge, T. W. M. (2010a). Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York u.a: Columbia Univ. Press.
Rawls, J. (2003). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
Risse, M. (2005). Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 9-18.
Salomon, M. E. (2007). Global responsibility for human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tan, K.-C. (2010). Rights, Harm, and Institutions. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 46-65.
Young, I. M. (2007). Global challenges: War, self determination and responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity.
Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
博格著，劉莘譯（2010b）。〈評價社會制度的契約後果論視野的三個問題〉。《康德、羅爾斯與全球正義》，251-279頁。上海：上海譯文出版社。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
99154006
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099154006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [哲學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400601.pdf | 1165Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1559 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
