政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/56257
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51826992      Online Users : 546
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56257


    Title: 從歐盟制度設計、問題解決能力及選民能力剖析歐盟公民之被代表性
    Other Titles: The Representedness of EU Citizens Analyzed through the EU`s Institution Design, Problem Solving Capacity, and Voter Competence
    Authors: 盧倩儀
    Contributors: 行政院國家科學委員會
    國立政治大學國際關係研究中心
    Keywords: 歐盟;選民能力;代議制度;問題解決能力;被代表性
    EU;voter competence;representative institutions;problem-solving capacity;representedness
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2012-11-30 15:09:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 從歐盟制度設計、問題解決能力及選民能力剖析歐盟公民之被代表性民主國家的人民透過民主機制使其偏好利益獲得反映乃是天經地義的事情。然而倘使政策的制定不再發生於國家而是發生在超國家的位置﹐則民主國家的人民是否仍舊能在相當程度上被代表﹖根據人類目前所累積的經驗﹐有效的民主最起碼要有兩個條件﹕(1)良好的代議制度﹔(2)決策者解決問題的能力﹔而兩者之有效運作又維繫於責任鏈結構之完整與暢通﹔而選民能力及公領域則是完整責任鏈最基礎的要件。在此前提下﹐本研究試圖回答﹕歐盟反映人民偏好之能力如何﹖歐盟公民的被代表性是否獲得了確保﹖此研究問題純從實證角度出發﹐而不涉及規範性判斷。計劃首先檢視在人類現有經驗範圍內什麼樣的責任鏈才能夠造就成功的民主﹐接著在歐盟層次檢視同樣的責任鏈是否存在並良好運作。為檢視責任鏈是否存有缺口﹐本研究計劃將比較歐洲議會選舉前及會員國國會大選前會員國媒體給予選舉及候選人的關注情形﹐次將就會員國媒體對所謂「民眾較不關心」且「決策權在歐盟」之議題—貿易、工業、外援、農業政策—報導時之語境(「國內」或「歐盟」)進行調查。就研究發現的意義來看﹐若歐盟反映人民偏好能力良好﹐則長年來各界對於歐盟民主赤字之指控即如駁斥民主赤字存在之學者所言﹐是杞人憂天﹔反之﹐如果歐盟在反映人民偏好的能力上存有根本的問題及難以克服的障礙﹐則民主赤字之批評應該被視為歐盟進一步改革之動力。
    Representedness of EU Citizens Analyzed through Institutional Design, Problem-Solving Capacity, and Voter Competence Citizens of democratic countries are used to being represented through democratic mechanisms such as representative institutions. It is, after all, what democracy is all about. When public policies are no longer made within their countries by national or regional governments but at a supranational venue by institutions such as the EU, however, can citizens of the member countries still be appropriately represented? Based on the experiences accumulated so far in human history, democracy can only work in the presence of two pre-conditions: (1) functional representative institutions; (2) good problem-solving capacity on the part of policy makers. The existence of both further depends on the integrity of chains of accountability, which can only flow smoothly when voter competence and public sphere are both present. Based on these assumptions, this research attempts to answer the following questions: How capable is the EU in being responsive to preferences of European citizens? Have the preconditions of being responsive been met? Has the representedness of EU citizens reached a satisfactory level? These questions will be answered on empirical evidence alone with no normative value judgments. The research begins with an examination of the templates of working democratic models with an emphasis on their chains of accountability. It investigates what are the common factors that make democracies—whether presidential, semi-presidential, or parliamentary systems—work. It then examines whether these same factors are present at the EU level to make the chains of accountability work at the supranational level. In order to find out whether there are missing links in the chains of accountability, comparisons will be made between media reports prior to national elections and European elections. In addition, comparisons will be made between the frequencies of media reports of trade, industry, foreign aid, and agricultural issues in national context on one hand and the same type of reports in EU context on the other. The findings of the research will have significant implications for future developments of the EU. If empirical evidence shows that the EU in its current form is failing to represent EU citizens and thus be responsive to voter preferences then further reform with emphasis on voter competence and public sphere would be constructive to the future developments of the EU.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9908~ 10007
    研究經費:1011仟元
    行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-028
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[The Institute of International Relations ] National Sci-Tech Programs

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    99-2410-H004-028.pdf765KbAdobe PDF2398View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback