English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51733665      Online Users : 599
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56112


    Title: 後現代陶養與公民美學(I)
    Other Titles: Bildung in Postmodernity and Civil Aesthetics
    Authors: 馮朝霖
    Contributors: 國立政治大學教育學系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 教育;後現代陶養;公民美學
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2012-11-29 11:21:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究計畫目的-闡明「後現代陶養」與「公民美學」之間的關係。第一年工作至目前初步可以提出三個重點: 一、 有關陶養一詞內涵的歷史意義變遷 二、 陶養一詞所具有的教育性與政治性雙重面向內涵 三、 後現代文化脈絡下的陶養多元意涵 哥本哈根大學教授Nordenbo對Bildung概念作了歷史的與語意上的詮釋,透過新人文主義三個人物(von Humblodt、Schiller、Hegel)的介紹,發展Bildung作為教育理念的哲學基礎。Nordenbo指出泛愛主義與盧梭主義在教育上的偏頗,並推崇新人文主義陶養理論兼顧自我與世界和諧關係對現代教育的貢獻。 康德則賦予了陶養一個堅實的人類學取向,陶養不僅只是一個教育理想,它也是一個對於在逐漸浮現的公民社會中之主體角色的回應。換言之,也就是作為一個能反思自身的主體與作為一個有能力自決判斷的主體,在現代脈絡下,陶養也有其政治性脈絡,從而為後現代社會公民美學的意義發展提供了必要的背景脈絡。
    The purpose of this project attempts to illuminate the connection between the postmodern Bildung (self-formation) and the citizen aesthetics. The first year’s research has achieved a draft composed of three main points as the following: 1. The epistemological and historical meaning of the concept of Bildung 2. The double faces of the theory of Bildung, educational and political 3. The diverse contents of Bildung under background of the postmodern culture Professor Nordenbo from Copenhagen points that the German Neo-humanism, in comparison to the philosophy of Philanthropism and Rousseauism, has particularly contributed to the theory of Bildung with the emphasis of the harmony between the individual and the cosmos. Kant gave the Bildung-theory another significant fundament on anthropological approach. For Kant, Bildung is not only the educational ideal, but the necessary response to the role of the subject facing the emergency of the civil society. In summary, the political dimension of Bildung provides the important context for the development of the civil aesthetics in postmodern society.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:9808~ 9907
    研究經費:716仟元
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    98-2410-H-004-004-MY2.pdf953KbAdobe PDF2805View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback