 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51789181
Online Users : 629
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55974
|
| Title: | 中國大陸的社經變遷與法制發展-子計畫一：走向規範憲法：中國違憲審查制度開展之研究 (II) |
| Other Titles: | Toward a Normative Constitution: the Study of China$S Judicial Review System |
| Authors: | 董保城;劉定基;陳淳文 |
| Contributors: | 國立政治大學法律學系
行政院國家科學委員會 |
| Keywords: | 違憲審查;憲法監督;全國人大;中國大陸;憲法 |
| Date: | 2012 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-11-26 09:39:21 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 中國大陸雖於1954 年即通過公布第一部憲法，但憲法作為國家根本大法的規範性格，並未同時確立。直至改革開放初期1982 年重新制訂的憲法，首次在序言宣示：「本憲法…是國家的根本法，具有最高的法律效力，全國各族人民、一切國家機關…都必須以憲法為根本的活動準則…」，一舉把憲法推到前所未有的規範高度。改革開放近三十年後的2004 年修憲，更明定「徵收補償」制度，並宣示「國家尊重和保障人權」。至此，中國憲法成為追求社會穩定發展基礎的地位應告確立，「如何」落實憲法的規範性則成為新一階段的熱門課題。然而，自中共第十六屆四中全會宣示「建構和諧社會」的目標，並歷經「零八憲章」、「三博士上書」等事件後，有關憲法司法化或違憲審查的議題卻急速冷卻。即便如此，在中國市場經濟迅速發展的情形下，人民對司法的期待，恐怕難以侷限於傳統行政法與民商法的範圍。如何進一步使國家的法律與政策也納入憲法規範架構之下，由司法加以審查，使其具有一定的可預見性，毋寧是中國經濟持續發展所需要面對的問題。但是，在中國大陸現行憲法的架構下，是否仍有司法違憲審查制度的存在空間？如有，又應採取何種設計，在程序上應該如何實施？凡此，均值得加以研究。
China promulgated its first Constitution in 1954. However, as the basic law of the land, the normative characteristic of the 1954 Constitution was wanting. It was the 1982 Constitution—promulgated after the “reform and opening-up policy”—that first declared in its preamble that “the Constitution … is the basic and supreme law of the land, … and all people and agencies should act in accordance with the Constitution.” In 2004, thirty years after the opening-up policy, China amended its Constitution again to include the idea of “taking and just compensation,” and declare that the fundamental rights of people should be respected. There was no doubt at that time that China’s Constitution would provide a firm basis for China’s social development. It is how to implement the relevant constitutional mandates that becomes the hot topic of China’s constitutional research. However, after the 16th Communist Party Convention, which announced the national goal of pursuing a peaceful society, the discussion of the judicialization of the Constitution and constitutional review has died down. Nevertheless, as China’s economy continues to grow, it is quite normal that people will have high expectation of the judiciary, and such expectation will not be met by simply reforming the more traditional field of laws, such as commercial law, civil law, and administrative law. Thus, how to establish an effective judicial review system, which considers the constitutionality of laws and policies, is the key issue faced by the Chinese government, and is surely worth studying. |
| Relation: | 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:10101~ 10112
研究經費:623仟元
行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC100-2420-H004-023-MY2 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [法律學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100-2420-H004-023-MY2.pdf | | 2825Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1828 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
