English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51691975      Online Users : 528
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55232


    Title: 殖民地與母國的界限---日本殖民時代文化出版法規的初探
    Other Titles: The Boundary between the Colony and the Mother-Land---An Initial Study of the Publication Laws of Taiwan during Japanese Colonization.
    Authors: 李衣雲
    Contributors: 國立政治大學台灣史研究所
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 文化控制;出版法規;日本殖民時代;國民的定義
    Cultural control;the Publication Laws;Japanese Colonization;the Definition of Citizen
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2012-11-06 16:30:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在於以作為文化控制之一環的出版法規為研究對象,探究日本殖民時代,台灣在日本帝國內的地位。文化作為一個社會精神與主體性的展現方式,同時,亦作為社會乃至行動者表現自我的象徵符碼,而經常成為支配者所要掌握、再製造的對象。透過對文化的控制,支配者也控制了被支配者用來思考的體系與工具。是以,透過支配者對文化的統治方式或限制,應能進一步理解殖民者的統治體制。換言之,當日本帝國宣稱對台灣採取「內地延長主義」乃至「皇民化政策」的同時,其是否真的把台灣視作日本帝國的一部分、或是有限制地將台灣納入帝國體制中?而這限制又是如何去表現的?本研究試圖透過日本殖民政府對台灣的文化控制,來釐清這一部分。而文化所指涉的範疇相當廣泛,是以本研究不得不在研究對象上作一些限定。由於本研究是以文化控制作為探究殖民地支配的一個表徵,或謂理解的管道,因此,本研究選擇限制在明文公布的文化相關律令,再將研究對象明確限定為符碼表徵的文字出版品的相關法規,以期能更確切地掌握研究對象,從而彰顯本研究所期能達到的研究目的。
    This Research plans to explore how Taiwan was defined in the Japan Empire during the Japanese Colonization by studying the publication laws. Culture, being the representation of social spirit and the symbolic system through which the society and the agent express themselves, is always the target the sovereign holds in great account. While the sovereign controls and re-produces the culture, the sovereign controls the tools of thinking. Thus, to understand how the Japanese governor controlled the culture would help us to understand the ruling system during the Japan Colonization. In other words, when the Japan Empire claimed that Taiwan is a part of the empire and the Taiwanese is the citizen of Japan, did she really follow what she claimed? And how could we prove it? Studying her laws about culture control may help us to clear up this issue. However, the cultural field is very wide. Thus, we have to narrow down the object of study. First, this research selects the laws about the culture as the object, because that they were declared and had to be obeyed. Then, we narrow the object down to the Publication Laws which control the symbolic system. By narrowing down the object, we could handle the theme and access the purpose of this research much more surely.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    學術補助
    9708~ 9807
    研究經費: 529仟元
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣史研究所] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    97-2410-H-004-053.pdf8303KbAdobe PDF2802View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback