| Reference: | 一、中文部份
米爾斯。1994。《權力菁英》，王逸舟譯，台北：桂冠。
呂郁女。2009。〈發揮巧實力 打通活路外交〉，《中國時報》，6月6日，A19版。
林保純。1999。〈金庸小說版本學〉，《金庸小說國際學術研討會論文集》，台北：遠流，頁401-24。
林婉翎。2008。〈柔性領導 更服眾〉，《經濟日報》，9月22日，A14版。
金庸。1996a。《天龍八部(一)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996b。《天龍八部(二)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996c。《天龍八部(三)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996d。《天龍八部(五)》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996e。《神鵰俠侶》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996f。《笑傲江湖》，台北：遠流。
金庸。1996g。《碧血劍》，台北：遠流。
朗。1994。《權力：它的形式、基礎和作用》，高湘澤、高全余譯，台北：桂冠。
莊錦農、魏中平。1998。〈解釋與批判：論批判實存論的科學解釋觀〉，《政治科學論叢》，9：121-144。
郭秋永。1995。〈解析「本質上可爭議的概念」：三種權力觀的鼎力對峙〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，7(2)：175-206。
郭秋永。2001。〈權力與因果：方法論上的解析〉，《台灣政治學刊》，5(64-131)。
郭秋永。2003。〈科學哲學中的兩種因果解析〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，4：121-177。
郭秋永。2004。〈對峙的權力觀：行為與結構〉，《政治科學論叢》，20：29-78。
郭秋永。2005。〈批判實存主義與價值中立原則〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(3)：565-614。
郭秋永。2006。〈權力概念的解析〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，18(2)：215-267。
陳敦源。2010。〈政務官為何反對考績改革〉，《中國時報》，3月22日，A14版。
楊興安。1998。《金庸小說十談》，台北：遠流。
蕭公權。1982。《中國政治思想史》，台北：聯經。
二、英文部份
Bachrach, Peter and Morton Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barry, Brain. 1975. “The Obscurity of Power: Review of Lukes’ Power: A Radical View” Government and Opposition 10(2): 250-254.
Benton, Ted. 1981. “Objective Interests and the Sociology of Power” Sociology 15(2): 161-84.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1983. “Realism” in “Dictionary of the History of Science” edited by William F. Bynum, Janet Browne and Roy Porter. London: Macmillan, pp.362-3.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. London and New York: Verso. First published in 1975 by Leeds Books. This edition first published in 1978 by The Harvest Press.
Connolly, William. 1985. “Taylor, Foucault, and Otherness” Political Theory 13:365-76.
Connolly, William. 1993. The Terms of Political Discourse. U. K.: Blackwell.
Crenson, Matthew. 1971. The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non- Decisionmaking in the Cities. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Dahl, Robert, 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University.
Dahl, Robert. 1958. “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model” American Political Science Review 52:463-9.
Dahl, Robert. 1994. “The Concept of Power” in Power: Critical Concept edited by John Scott. Vol. I: 288-309. New York: Routledge. Reprinted from Behavioral Science 1957, 2:201-215.
Digeser, Peter. 1992. “The Fourth Face of Power.” The Journal of Politics 54(4): 977-1006.
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. “Power and Strategies” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 edited by Colin Gordon translated by Leo Marshall, John Merpham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. The History of Sexuality translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Random House.
Gallie, Walter. 1955-6. “Essentially Contested Concepts” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press
Gray, John. 1977. “On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts” Political Theory 5(3): 331-348.
Gray, John. 1978. “On Liberty, Liberalism and Essential Contestability.” British Journal of Political Science 8: 385-402.
Hayward, Clarissa. 2000. De-facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Issac, Jeffrey. 1992. “Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A Realist Critique” in Rethinking Power edited by Thomas Wartenberg Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 32-55. Reprinted from Polity, 1987, 20: 4-31.
Issacs, Harold. 1964. India’s Ex-Untouchables. New York: John Day.
Jouvenel, Bertrand de. 1992. “Authority: The Efficient Imperative” in The Nature of Politics edited by Dennis Hale and Marc Landy. New Brunswick, N.J., pp.84-93. Reprinted from Authority. 1959, edited by Carl J. Friedrich. New York: New York University Press.
Lasswell, Harold and Abraham Kaplan. 1952. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. London : Routledge.
Lukes, Steven. 1977. “Power and Structure” in Essay in Social Theory edited by Steven Lukes. London: Macmillan, pp. 3-23.
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Macdonald, K. I. 1976. “Is ’Power” Essentially Contested?” British Journal of Political Science 6: 380-382.
Miller, David. 1983. ”Linguistic Philosophy and Political Theory” in The Nature of Political Theory edited by David Miller and Larry Siedentop. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.35-51.
Morriss, Peter. 2002. Power: A Philosophical Analysis. New York: Manchester University Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1957. “The Distribution of Power in American Society.” World Politics 10: 123-143.
Polsby, Nelson. 1963. Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Popper, Karl. 1976. "The Logic of the Social Sciences," in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby. London: Heinemann, pp. 87-104.
Russell, Bertrand. 2004. Power. New York: Routledge.
Ryle, Gilbert. 2009. The Concept of Mind. New York: Routledge.
Schattschneider, Elmer. 1975. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in American. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Srinivas, Mysore. 1952. Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Srinivas, Mysore. 1962. Caste in Modern India and Other Essays. London: Asia Publishing Hourse..
Wartenberg, Thomas. 1992. “Situated Social Power” in Rethinking Power edited by Thomas Waternberg. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 79-101.
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. Free Press. |
