English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51729640      Online Users : 677
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54542
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54542


    Title: 財務報表審慎性比較:中國大陸會計準則vs.國際財務報導準則
    The Comparison between Conservatism of Financial Statements under PRC GAAP versus IFRS
    Authors: 王中任
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    Kuo, Horng Ching
    王中任
    Keywords: 中國大陸會計準則
    國際財務報導準則
    審慎性
    事務所規模
    PRC GAAP
    IFRS
    conservatism
    audit firm size
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:19:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的為透過中國大陸A股、B股公司財務報表之比較,探討相對於中國大陸會計準則(PRC GAAP),國際財務報導準則(IFRS)是否更具審慎性。研究方法採Khan and Watts在2009年發展之C_Score來衡量財務報表審慎性。研究期間為2001年初至2006年底,研究標的為在上海或深圳證券交易所同時掛牌上市A、B股之公司(意即同時按PRC GAAP及IFRS編製兩套財務報表之公司)。實證結果如下:
    1.A股市場之C_Score小於B股市場之C_Score,顯示相對於依照PRC GAAP編製之財務報表,依照IFRS編製之財務報表其審慎性較高。
    2.無論是針對個別產業進行A股、B股之比較,或是針對A股或B股市場進行跨產業比較,均證實產業因素會對財務報表之審慎性造成影響。
    3.無論是針對A股或B股市場進行事務所規模之比較,均顯示在中國大陸,四大事務所查核之財務報表,其審慎性不但不如非四大事務所,而且在A股市場甚至不具審慎性。
    Using C_Score developed by Khan Watts(2009) to test the financial statements of Chinese companies which have both the A-Share and B-Share listed on the stock exchange marke of Shanghai and Shenzhen during 2001 to 2006, this study aims to examime whether International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS) are more conservative than People’s Republic of China’s generally accepted accounting principles(PRC GAAP). The empirical results are as follows:
    1.The average C_Score of A-Share companies is smaller than B-Share Companies, which means that, as compared to PRC GAAP-based financial statements, IFRS-based financial statements are more conservative.
    2.Regardless of whether the comparison is between A-Share and B-Share companies in a specific industry, or between industries in a specific stock market, the results show some industry effect on the conservatism of financial statements.
    3.Regardless of whether the stock is traded on the A-Share or B-Share market, the results show that in China, financial statements audited by Big 4 are not more conservative than non Big 4. In fact, for stocks traded on the A-Share stock market, financial statements audited by Big 4 are not conservative at all.
    Reference: 吳常慈,2010,IFRS之接軌與直接採用對會計品質之影響:來自中國大陸之證據,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
    李木蘭,2008,審計人員與會計穩健關係之研究:理論與實務,國立成功大學
    會計學系碩博士班碩士論文。
    唐心怡,2010,金融商品採用公平價值會計準則對財務報表可靠性之影響,國
    立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    徐雪峰,2008,中國會計準則國際協調與趨同對會計信息質量影響的研究,復
    旦大學管理學院碩士論文。
    張兆國、劉永麗與談多嬌,2011,管理者背景特徵與會計穩健性-來自中國上
    市公司的經驗證據,會計研究,第7期:11-18。
    陳玉梅,1998,大陸會計概念架構之分析-兼論大陸、台灣及國際財務報告準
    則之比較,中原大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    陳建瑋,2009,IFRS與會計品質之關係:以中國上市公司為研究對象,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    陳姵潔,2008,會計穩健性與財務報表價值攸關性,輔仁大學會計學系碩士班
    碩士論文。
    陳晏誠,2007,不同會計準則之盈餘管理程度比較:中國大陸會計準則vs.國際財務報告準則,輔仁大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    陳彩稚、李書行與蔡壁徽,2006,會計準則、資訊不對稱對中國大陸證券市場
    盈餘宣告之市場反應的影響,會計評論,第43期:1-25。
    黃陶源,2005,國際財務報告準則與大陸會計準則資訊有用性之分析及比較,
    銘傳大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    葉玫佩,2007,盈餘之不對稱時效性、市值淨值比、保守性與資訊不對稱,輔
    仁大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    葛怡芬,2002,國際會計準則與中國大陸會計準則資訊內涵之比較,國立中正
    大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    趙子文,2006,大陸跨市場上市公司之會計品質研究,銘傳大學會計學系碩士
    班碩士論文。
    潘琰、陳凌云與林麗花,2003,會計準則的信息含量:中國會計準則與IFRS
    之比較,會計研究,第7期:7-15。
    簡美琪,2009,財務報表價值攸關性比較:中國大陸會計準則vs.國際財務報告準則,輔仁大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    魏子涵,2010,國際會計準則暨資訊不對稱、公司治理對會計資訊品質的影響:中國大陸資本市場A、B股之實證研究,逢甲大學會計所碩士論文。
    Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(December): 3-37.
    Chen, C., F. A. Gul and X. Su. 1999. A comparison of reported earnings under Chinese GAAP vs. IAS: evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Accounting Horizons 13(June): 91-111.
    Chen. J. J., and H. Zhang. 2009. The impact of regulatory enforcement and audit upon IFRS compliance: evidence from China. European Accounting Review 19(July): 665-692.
    Choi, J-H., F. Kim, J-B. Kim, and Y. Zang. 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1): 73-97.
    Eccher, E., and P. M. Healy. 2000. The role of International Accounting Standards in transitional economies: A Study of the People’s Republic of China. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of management, Cambridge, MA.
    Gao. Y., K. Jamal, Q. Liu, and L. Luo. 2011. Does reputation discipline Big 4 audit firms? CAAA Annual Conference Paper.
    Hu, D. 2002. The usefulness of financial statements under Chinese GAAP vs. IAS: evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange in PRC. Working paper, Kobe University, Japan.
    Khan, M., and R. L. Watts. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics
    48(December): 132-150.
    Lafond, R., and R. L. Watts. 2007. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 83(March): 447-478.
    Li. C., F. M. Song, and S. M. L. Wong. 2008. A continuous relation between audit firm size and audit opinions: evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing 12(July): 111-127.
    Louis, H. 2004. Acquirers’ abnormal returns, audit firm size, and the small auditor clientele effect. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
    Ohlson, J. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 661-687.
    Vuong, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57: 307-333.
    Watts, R. L. 1993. A proposal for research on conservatism. Working paper, University of Rochester.
    Watts, R. L. 2002. Conservatism in accounting. Working paper, University of Rochester.
    Watts, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17(September): 207-221.
    Watts, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting part II: evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17(September): 287-301.
    Wu, S. H., M. Koo, and T-c. Kao. 2005. Comparing the value-relevance of accounting information in China: standards and factors effects. AAA Annual Meeting.
    Yang. Z., K. Rohrbach., and S. Chen. 2005. The impact of standard setting on relevance and reliability of accounting information: lower of cost or market accounting reforms in China. Journal of International Financial Management
    & Accounting 16(October): 194-228.
    Zhan. J., and M. Magnan. 2008. Auditor incentive and audit size: evidence from Chinese audit market. CAAA Annual Conference Paper.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    99353036
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099353036
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    303601.pdf757KbAdobe PDF22093View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback