政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54502
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51763132      在线人数 : 499
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54502


    题名: 字彙圖教學對台灣國中生單字學習之成效
    The effects of instruction using graphic organizers on vocabulary learning of junior high school students in Taiwan
    作者: 黃瀞瑤
    Huang, Ching Yao
    贡献者: 許炳煌
    Sheu, Ping Huang
    黃瀞瑤
    Huang, Ching Yao
    关键词: 單字學習
    字彙圖
    單字學習態度
    字彙教學
    vocabulary learning
    graphic organizers
    vocabulary learning attitudes
    vocabulary instruction
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2012-10-30 11:11:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討字彙圖教學對台灣國中生英文單字學習之成效，以及此教學方式對學生英文單字學習態度的影響。研究對象為六十三位來自中台灣某國中兩班三年級的學生，隨機指派一班為實驗組，而另一班為對照組。實驗組實施字彙圖教學，對照組實施傳統單字教學，每週上課一次，為期八週。兩組均在教學前後接受字彙測驗並施以單字學習態度問卷，實驗組另以問卷詢問對字彙圖教學的看法。研究結果顯示字彙圖教學比傳統單字教學更能顯著提升學生的單字學習，實驗組在字形、字義及用法上的表現均顯著優於對照組。雖然兩組在教學後對單字學習的態度仍未有顯著差異，實驗組在認知方面的學習態度卻在教學後有顯著改變，此外，實驗組普遍認為字彙圖教學有助於記憶新單字，而且表達出繼續使用的意願。本研究結果建議可採用字彙圖做為幫助國中生學習英文單字的教學工具。
    The present study employed an experimental/control group, pretest-posttest design to investigate the effects of vocabulary instruction using graphic organizers on Taiwanese junior high school students’ vocabulary learning.
    The subjects were 63 ninth graders from two classes in a public junior high school in central Taiwan. One was randomly assigned as the experimental group (N=32), and the other as the control group (N=31). The experimental group received graphic organizer instruction, while the control group received traditional vocabulary instruction once a week. Vocabulary pre-and post-tests and a vocabulary learning attitude questionnaire were administered before and after the 8-week treatment to examine students’ knowledge of the target words and their attitudes toward vocabulary learning. In addition, their perceptions of the graphic organizer instruction were also explored.
    The results revealed that graphic organizer instruction could significantly improve students’ vocabulary learning more than traditional vocabulary instruction, and it was effective in improving learners’ knowledge of word form, meaning, and use. Although students in the experimental group did not develop significantly more positive attitudes toward vocabulary learning than their counterparts in the control group, they significantly changed their cognitive attitudes after the treatment. Besides, they generally perceived that graphic organizer instruction could effectively help them remember English words and they were willing to use the word map in their future learning. The findings of this study suggest that the graphic organizer can be used as an alternative instructional tool to facilitate junior high school students’ vocabulary learning.
    參考文獻: Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and the acquisition of word knowledge. Advances in Reading Language Research, 2, 231-256.
    Austermuehle, D., Kautz, T., & Sprenzel, J. (2007). Improving the knowledge and application of vocabulary within content areas. Unpublished master’s thesis, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, Illinois.
    Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Barron, R. F., & Stone, V. F. (1974). Effect of student-constructed graphic post organizers upon learning vocabulary relationships. In P. L. Nacke (Ed.), Interaction: Research and practice for college-adult reading (pp. 172-175). Clemson, SC: Twenty-third Yearbook of the National Reading Conference.
    Baxemdell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative: The 3 C’s of graphic organizers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 46-53.
    Bazeli, M. J., & Olle, R. E. (1995). Using visuals to develop reading vocabulary. Selected readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED391519)
    Blachowicz, C., & Fisher, P. J. (2010). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Person Education.
    Blachowicz, C., Fisher, P., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006).Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524-539.
    Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitis, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic organizers: Visual strategies for active learning. New York: Scholastic.
    Burstall, C. (1975). Factors affecting foreign language learning: A consideration of some relevant research findings. Language Teaching and Linguistic Abstracts, 8, 5-125.
    Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Cheng, M. C. (2006). An investigation into English vocabulary learning strategies used by junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
    Culbert, E., Flood, M., Windler, R., & Work, D. (1998). A qualitative investigation of the use of graphic organizers. Paper presented at the SUNY-Geneseo Annual Reading and Literacy Research Symposium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED418381)
    Dale, E., Razik, T., & Petty, W. (1973). Bibliography of vocabulary studies. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
    DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Cele-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 285-299). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
    Dunston, P. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research & Instruction, 31, 57-65.
    Dye, G. A. (2000). Graphic organizers to the rescue. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3), 72-76.
    Fisher, P., Blachowicz, C., & Fink, L. S. (2007). Teaching how to think about words. Voices From the Middle, 15(1), 6-12.
    Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 98-107.
    Hall, T., & Strangman, N. (2002). Graphic organizers. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved July 7, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_go.html
    Hairrell, A., Rupley, W., & Simmons, D. (2011). The state of vocabulary research. Literacy Research & Instruction, 50(4), 253-271.
    Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261-280.
    Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 109-31.
    Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Huizenga, J. (2005). Totally true: Building vocabulary through reading. Book 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Huizenga, J. (2005). Totally true: Building vocabulary through reading. Book 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Hulstijn, J. & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558.
    Hung, Y. C. (2006). The effects of three different vocabulary glossaries on reading comprehension and noun recognition of EFL vocational high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Irvin, J. L. (1990). Vocabulary knowledge: Guidelines for instruction. What research says to the teacher. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319001)
    Jiang, X. Y., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(1), 33-45.
    Kaelin, A. (1991). The effects of instruction using a mnemonic graphic organizer on vocabulary acquisition among adult English-as-a-second-language students. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Sacramento.
    Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 58, 58-67.
    Lan, C. Y. (2005). The effects of task-induced involvement load on vocabulary learning of senior high EFL students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Lin, M. H. (1999). The effects of memory strategies training on junior high school students’ vocabulary learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Luo, W. C. (2011). An investigation into the effects of graphic organizers on reading comprehension of senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Luppescu, S., & Day, R. R. (1993). Reading, dictionaries and vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 263-287.
    Merkley, D., & Jefferies, D. (2000/2001). Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 350-357.
    Monroe, E. E. (1997). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on fourth grade students. Reading Improvement, 34, 120-132.
    Monroe, E. E. (1998). Using graphic organizers to teach vocabulary: Does available research inform mathematics instruction? Education, 118(4), 538-540.
    Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 11-17.
    Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Phillips, D. C. K, Foote, C. J., & Harper, L. J. (2008). Strategies for effective vocabulary instruction. Reading Improvement, 45(2), 62-68.
    Rice, G. E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology, 15(1), 39-67.
    Robinson, D. H. (1998). Graphic organizers as aids to text learning. Reading Research & Instruction, 37, 85-105.
    Rosenbaum, C. (2001). A word map for middle school: A tool for effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(1), 44-49.
    Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp.1-14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Rupley, W., Logan, J., & Nichols, W. (1999). Vocabulary instruction in a balanced reading program. Reading Teacher, 52(4), 336-46.
    Rupley, W., & Nichols, W. (2005). Vocabulary instruction for the struggling reader. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 239-260.
    Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
    Schwartz, R., & Raphael, T. (1985). Concept of definition: A key to improving students` vocabulary. Reading Teacher, 39(2), 198-205.
    Sibold, C. (2011). Building English language learners academic vocabulary: Strategies & tips. Multicultural Education, 18(2), 24-28.
    Smith, C. B. (2003). Successful techniques of vocabulary. ERIC topical bibliography and commentary. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED480892)
    Smith, J. J. (2002). The use of graphic organizers in vocabulary instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kean University, Union, New Jersey.
    Stahl, S., & Vancil, S. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps works in vocabulary instruction. Reading Teacher, 40(1), 62-67.
    Stamper, J. B. (2006). Vocabulary-building graphic organizers & mini-lessons. New York: Scholastic.
    Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., Thompson, S. L., & Franci, D. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for 7th grade English language learners: Findings from two experimental studies. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 297-324.
    Webb. S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33-52.
    Wen, L. P. (2005). The Effects of English semantically related word instruction on vocabulary retention of junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Works, C. G. (1999). How to build a better vocabulary. Decatur, GA: Dekalb County School System. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED436006)
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英語教學碩士在職專班
    96951012
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096951012
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2644检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈