English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51749360      Online Users : 581
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54283
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54283


    Title: 藥品廣告之法規範與健康素養
    The regulation of pharmaceutical advertising and health literacy
    Authors: 林承宇
    Lin, Cheng-Yu
    Contributors: 蔡明誠
    Ming-Cheng Tsai

    林承宇
    Lin, Cheng-Yu
    Keywords: 媒體識讀
    健康素養
    新素養
    健康權
    傳播法規
    藥品廣告
    media literacy
    health literacy
    new literacy
    the right to health
    communications law
    pharmaceutical advertising
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 10:36:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為國民的健康把關,通常是政府作為實現國民健康權的一種具體作為,有關國民的用藥安全更是政府責無旁貸的責任。本論文著眼於「虛擬藥房」的藥品廣告刺激一般常民用藥的消費過程,政府基於保護國民健康所採取的介入方式是「法規範」對藥品廣告的管理,此種管理方式隨著藥品本身與商業言論的時空變遷會有緊縮或放寬的變革,然而易侷限於專業精英討論的上層層次;後有主管機關意識到常民健康的落實須直達正確的用藥觀念,以健康促進作為彌補上層可能無法下達困境的下層層次。
    本論文以為,此二層次對應的概念仍屬「由上對下」的意識,亦即「政府」下對「常民」的概念。這種由上而下的把關做法,在維護國民「健康權」的國家、社會與個人法益上固然有其必要;惟欲落實整體健康權的實踐,仍須回歸「健康素養」的具體貫徹。亦即,本論文主張政府所主導的法規範或健康促進的作為,必須同時伴隨常民健康素養的賦權,兼顧「由下而上」的作法,不斷促使法規範與社會現實互為主體,則法規範才能真實維護與實踐國民的「健康權」。
    It is the constitutional and legal responsibility of the State to protect people’s health and achieve “the right to health” via, among others, the provision of safe medicines. The vast amounts of advertisings have challenged the State to providing safety access to medicines. This thesis focuses on the advertisings of “virtual pharmacies”, and attempts to investigate how they stimulate consumer behaviors. Legally, the State controls pharmaceutical advertising by means of various different legislative and administrative measures. Nonetheless, this “top-down” process has had only limited effects due to rapid social change and the evolution of the protection of commercial speech. This thesis argues that, to fill the gap, the promotion and development of “health literacy”, i.e. a “bottom-up” way, could be the answer to a meaningful control of pharmaceutical advertisings.
    This thesis conducts empirical analyses and applies them to various theories of political economy regarding pharmaceutical advertising. Moreover, the relationships between “health literacy” and “the right to health” are also elaborated. It is argued that to substantiate the constitutional “right to health”, the best way is to promote and develop the concept of “health literacy”. Only through empowering the consumers with the proper knowledge of “health literacy” can the State, assisted by the implementation of relevant laws, fulfills its responsibility. “Health literacy” is as important as law itself, and the latter cannot satisfactorily operate to arrive at the desired results without the construction of the former.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    丁志音(1986)。〈田野方法與參與觀察在衛生教育上的運用與價值〉,《公共衛生》,13(3): 279-293。
    丁志音(1988a)。〈生活方式與健康-概念、倫理及政策的討論上〉,《公共衛生》,15(1): 16-26。
    丁志音(1988b)。〈生活方式與健康-概念、倫理及政策的討論下〉,《公共衛生》,15(2): 157-173。
    丁志音(2004)。〈健康知能與醫療照護品質〉,行政院衛生署(編),《全民健保醫療品質》,頁57-93。台北:衛生署。
    丁志音、徐美苓(2004)。〈全民健保制度下民眾健康知能之提升〉,行政院衛生署(編),《全民健保醫療資源配置與合理使用》,頁305-356。台北:衛生署。
    丁志音、劉芳助、李袖瑜(2007)。〈以追求身心完美為名:生活機能醫藥對健康照護的危害〉,《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,26(6): 443-451。
    王志弘譯(2011)。《好研究怎麼做-從理論、方法、證據構思研究問題》,台北:群學。(原書Alford, R. R. [1998]. The craft of inquiry: theories, methods, evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.)
    王宜燕(2010)。《閱聽人研究實踐轉向初探》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
    行政院食品藥物管理局(2009)。《藥物食品檢驗局調查研究年報》(編號:2007100003)。台北:作者。
    行政院衛生署(編)(2004)。《全民健保與醫療品質》。台北:衛生署。
    行政院衛生署(編)(2006)。《藥你健康I用藥基本知識》。台北:衛生署。
    行政院衛生署(編)(2006)。《藥你健康II常見疾病用藥》。台北:衛生署。
    行政院衛生署(編)(2006)。《藥你健康III預防保健指引》。台北:衛生署。
    成露茜、羅曉南(主編)(2009)。《批判的媒體識讀》(二版)。台北:正中。
    成露茜(2009)。〈另類媒體實踐〉,成露茜、羅曉南(主編),《批判的媒體識讀》(二版),頁371-387。台北:正中。
    李丁讚(2004)。《公共領域在臺灣》。台北︰桂冠。
    李志宏、施肇榮(2010)。〈醫事人員與代言醫療廣告〉,《台灣醫界》,53(5): 38-42。
    李念祖(2005)。〈菸品標示管制與言論自由之限制-釋字第五七七號解釋之研究〉,《東吳法律學報》,17(1): 1-30。
    李建良(2000)。〈菸品標示「吸菸有害健康」的憲法問題〉,《台灣本土法學雜誌》,9: 97-102。
    李建良(2001)。〈藥物廣告的限制及其合憲性〉,《台灣本土法學雜誌》,28: 75-89。
    李建良(2010)。《人權思維的承與變:憲法理論與實踐(四)》。台北︰新學林。
    李震山(2009)。《人性尊嚴與人權保障》(三版)。台北︰元照。
    李漢庭譯(2011)。《圖解藥理學入門》,台北:世茂。(原書生田哲[2009],勉強したい人のための薬理学のきほん。東京:日本實業)
    何道寬譯(2010)。《科技奴隸》,台北:博雅。(原書Postman, N. [1992]. Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Knopf.)
    余陽洲(2008)。〈媒體「識讀」之辨與辯〉,《媒體識讀教育月刊》,72: 2-6。
    余陽州(2009)。〈媒體公民教育/識讀/素養(Media Literacy)面面觀〉,成露茜、羅曉南(主編),《批判的媒體識讀》(二版),頁17-38。台北:正中。
    吳介民、李丁讚(2005)。〈傳遞共通感受︰林合社區公共領域修辭模式的分析〉,《台灣社會學》,9: 119-161。
    吳全鋒(2009)。〈從健康人權之角度論菸草控制框架公約之發展與國家菸害防制之義務〉,《月旦法學》,169: 32-66。
    吳信華(1997a)。〈菸害防制法的合憲性-基本權利受侵害的合憲性思考上〉,《月旦法學》,30: 79-87。
    吳信華(1997b)。〈菸害防制法的合憲性-基本權利受侵害的合憲性思考下〉,《月旦法學》,31: 93-100。
    吳信華(2010)。〈基本權利案例的精確判斷-大法官釋字第四一四號解釋評析〉,《月旦裁判時報》,4: 5-13。
    吳翠珍、陳世敏(2007)。《媒體素養教育》。台北:巨流。
    林子儀(1987)。〈商業性言論與言論自由〉,《美國月刊》,2(8): 23-33。
    林東泰(2008)。《大眾傳播理論》(三版)。台北:師大書苑。
    林宜平、丁志音(2003)。〈由全民健保西醫門診資料探討台灣民眾的感冒求醫特性〉,《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,22(3): 217-226。
    林明昕(2005)。〈健康權-以「國家之保護義務」為中心〉,《法學講座》,32: 26-36。
    林承宇(2002)。〈廣播電視上規避法律廣告之探討─以菸害防制法之規範為例〉,《新聞學研究》,72: 147-172。
    林承宇(2004)。〈菸品廣告限制與基本權利保護之研究〉,《廣告學研究》,22: 87-115。
    林承宇(2005)。〈菸品廣告規範之國際觀察與趨勢〉,《傳播與管理研究》,4(2): 25-55。
    林承宇(2007)。〈識讀媒介中的菸害訊息-橫跨健康傳播與媒體素養的議題〉,《西南民族大學學報》,28(1): 152-156。
    林承宇(2009)。〈識讀媒體中的健康訊息-從概念到行動〉,成露茜、羅曉南(主編),《批判的媒體識讀》(二版),頁353-369。台北:正中。
    林昱梅(2002)。〈論我國對聯合國兒童權利公約中兒童福利社會權與健康權之立法落實〉,《律師雜誌》,278: 14-33。
    洪漢鼎(主編)(2001)。《理解與解釋:詮釋學經典文選》。北京︰東方。
    高玉泉、施慧玲(主編)(2002)。《兒童及少年權益實用六法》。台北︰內政部兒童局。
    高玉泉、翁曉玲、林承宇(2002)。《菸品廣告管理之法律研究》。(行政院衛生署國民健康局委託研究成果報告,BHP90-Ca Anti-Tobacco 1)。台中︰中興大學財經法律系。
    高玉泉(2010)。《法律的政治經濟學》。台北︰新學林。
    高志陽(2010)。《語言、價值與權力—考掘我國大法官解釋中的「健康利益」》。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
    秦誌佑(2007)。《論我國藥品廣告管制-基本權利限制之觀點》。國立中正大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    徐美苓(2001)。《愛滋病與媒體》。台北︰巨流。
    徐美苓(2004)。〈健康傳播研究的回顧與展望:從國外到台灣〉,翁秀琪(主編),《台灣傳播學的想像(下)》,頁479-542。台北︰巨流。
    徐美苓、丁志音(2004)。〈小病微恙的真實再現-以「感冒」的新聞論述為例〉,《新聞學研究》,79: 197-242。
    翁秀琪(主編)(2004)。《台灣傳播學的想像(上)(下)》。台北︰巨流。
    翁秀琪(2011)。《大眾傳播理論與實證》(三版)。台北︰三民。
    翁曉玲(2003)。〈禁限菸品廣告規範之合憲性〉,《東海大學法學研究》,19: 29-87。
    孫立行(2000)。《商業性言論-從保障言論自由觀點出發》。東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    郭李宗文、梁忠銘、熊同鑫(編)(2003)。《教育行動研究與教學實踐》。台北:心理。
    郭淑珍、丁志音、陳怡君(2005)。〈民眾如何看待健康教育訊息:深度訪談嚼檳榔的計程車司機〉,《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,24(3): 239-253。
    郭淑珍、丁志音(2006)。〈茶行裡的檳榔客:嚼食檳榔的社會脈絡初探〉,《台灣社會研究》,63: 143-208。
    郭淑珍、丁志音(2008)。〈嚼檳榔計程車司機的健康生活型態:社會脈絡觀點的初探〉,《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,27(1): 67-80。
    許德珩譯(1999)。《社會學方法論》,台北:台灣商務。(原書Durkheim, É. [1895]. Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris, FRA: Les Presses Universitaires de France.)
    許宗力(2007)。《法與國家權力(二)》。台北︰元照。
    張永健(2005)。〈論藥品、健康食品、食品之廣告管制〉,《法令月刊》,56(5): 31-56。
    張艾茜譯(2006)。《藥你生病:藥廠製造疾病的現象》,台北:世潮。(原書Moynihan, R. & Cassels, A. [2005]. Selling sickness: how the world`s biggest pharmaceutical companies are turning us all into patients. New York, NY: Nation Books.)
    張君玫譯(1995)。《社會科學的理念》,台北:巨流。(原書Winch, P. [1990]. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London, UK: Routledge.)
    馮建三、程宗明譯(1998)。《傳播政治經濟學-再思考與再更新》,台北:五南。(原書Mosco, V. [1996]. The political economy of communication: rethinking and renewal. London, UK: Sage.)
    陳世敏(2005)。〈媒介的近用與其可能性之探討〉、〈媒介的監督與改造〉,周典芳、陳國明(編),《媒介素養概論》,頁421-482。台北:五南。
    陳坤銘、李華夏譯(1995)。《廠商、市場與法律》,台北:遠流。(原書Coase, R. H. [1988]. The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.)
    陳春生(2007)。《論法治國之權利保護與違憲審查》。台北︰新學林。
    陳秋月(1992)。《論廣告規制之界限─以商業言論自由為中心》。國立政治大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    陳新民(2002)。《憲法基本權利之基本理論(上)(下)》(五版)。台北:元照。
    陳新民(2008)。《憲法學釋論》。台北:三民。
    陳新民(2011)。《釋憲餘思錄(卷一)》。台北:三民。
    陳瑞芸(2009)。《空中藥房-醫療消費文化之場域分析》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
    陳澤榮(2004)。《國家對商業性言論的管制界限-以強制菸品警示說明與禁止廣告為中心》。國立成功大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    黃光國(2001)。《社會科學的理路》。台北:心理。
    黃茂榮(2001)。〈藥物廣告內容之事前審查及其判斷基準〉,《根植雜誌》,17(12): 33-40。
    黃昭泰(1989)。《實用廣告學》。台北︰美國教育。
    黃禎貞、鄭惠美(2005)。〈因應全球化的曼谷健康促進憲章〉,《健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌》,25: 139-148。
    黃德祥(1993)。〈青少年抽煙行為之調查研究〉,《彰化師大學報》,4: 67-109。
    黃銘傑(1998)。〈美國法上的言論自由與商業廣告─兼論司法院大法官會議釋字第四一四號解釋〉,《台大法學論叢》,27(2): 347-393。
    程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯(1994)。《科學革命的結構》,台北:遠流。(原書Kuhn, T. S. [1962]. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.)
    曾育慧譯(2006)。《藥廠黑幕-製藥公司如何掏空你的錢包和健康》,台北:商周。(原書Angell, M. [2004]. The truth about the drug companies: how they deceive us and what to do about it. New York, NY: Random House.)
    溫信學(2005)。〈從社會正義觀點探討外籍與大陸配偶健康權之保障〉,《國立空中大學社會科學系社會科學學報》,13: 95-122。
    傅維康、張慰豐、王慧芳、賈福華、高毓秋、吳鴻洲(編)(2006)。《圖說醫藥史話》。台北:知音。
    甄志亞(主編)(2003)。《中國醫學史》。台北:知音。
    管中祥(2009)。〈閱聽人的傳播權〉,成露茜、羅曉南(主編),《批判的媒體識讀》(二版),頁73-88。台北:正中。
    楊玉隆(2008)。〈從憲法保障商業性言論自由之觀點-看我國藥業廣告場之藥物廣告與事前審查〉,《藥業市場》,154: 24-29。
    楊智明、薛桂文譯(2002)。《健康的騙局》,台北:時報。(原書Apple, R. D. [1996]. Vitamania: vitamins in American culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.)
    楊嘉禎、王桂芸、湯玉英、吳德敏、張乃文、彭萬誠(2005)。〈戒菸措施及其臨床應用結果〉,《台灣醫學》,9(4): 540-547。
    鄒川雄(2003)。〈生活世界與默會知識-詮釋學觀點的質性研究〉,齊力、林本炫(編),《質性研究方法與資料分析》,頁21-56。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
    鄒川雄(2004)。〈經典詮釋與身心狀態:本土化質性研究的另類觀點〉,林本炫、何明修(編),《質性研究方法及其超越》,頁123-156。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
    甄曉蘭(2003)。《課程行動研究:實例與方法解析》。台北:師大書苑。
    鄭金生(2005)。《藥林外史》。台北:東大。
    鄭自隆、黃深勳、郭良文、陳尚永(2001)。《廣告管理》。台北:國立空中大學。
    鄭慧文、陳慧佳、余萬能、林銅祿(2010)。〈論處方藥直效行銷廣告與憲法言論自由及大法官釋字第414號解釋之關聯初探〉,《醫事法學》,17(1): 25-32。
    蔡承志譯(2010)。《小心壞科學:醫藥廣告沒有告訴你的事》,台北:繆思。(原書Goldacre, B. [2008]. Bad science. London, UK: HarperCollins.)
    蔡墩銘(編)(2006)。《法律與藥學》。台北:翰蘆。
    衛生署(2006)。《藥你健康(I)(II)(III)》。台北:衛生署。
    蕭富峰、張佩娟、卓峰志(2010)。《廣告學》,台北︰智勝。
    劉孔中、陳新民(主編)(2002)。《憲法解釋之理論與實務第三輯》。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
    劉建宏(2007)。〈吸菸者與非吸菸者之人權保障:「吸菸自由」?兼論「健康權」之內涵〉,《台灣本土法學雜誌》,94: 59-77。
    劉駿州(1994)。〈實證、批判、詮釋-三大方法典範之初探〉,《新聞學研究》,48: 153-167。
    賴文恩、季瑋珠、丁志音、吳中興、林令世(2006)。〈質性研究與證據醫學〉,《光田醫學雜誌》,1(2): 57-64。
    賴志冠(1999)。〈如何改變不健康行為︰以戒菸為例〉,《基層醫學》,14(2): 29-32。
    賴祥蔚(2010)。〈商業言論與憲法言論自由保障〉,《台灣政治學刊》,14(1): 159-199。
    廖梨伶、劉潔心(2002)。〈運用網際網路於青少年戒菸行為之介入研究〉,《衛生教育學報》,17: 109-126。
    魏美珠、林為森(1999)。〈青少年戒菸教育介入成效評估〉,《嘉南學報》,25: 43-55。
    謝國廉(1999)。〈規範菸酒廣告之法令與言論自由權保障之衝突─橫跨健康傳播與人權理論之分析〉,《新聞學研究》,61: 223-245。
    謝文正(2004)。《論香菸廣告規範與商業言論自由》。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
    顏伯勤(1978)。《廣告學》。台北︰三民。
    羅曉南(2009)。〈媒體識讀導論〉,成露茜、羅曉南(主編),《批判的媒體識讀》(二版),頁1-15。台北:正中。
    蘇永欽(1999)。《違憲審查》。台北:學林。
    蘇拾瑩(2006)。《窮鬼翻身:五洲製藥董事長吳先旺的發跡傳奇》。台北:商周。
    二、外文部分
    Arens, W. F. (1999). Contemporary advertising (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Irwin/ McGraw-Hill.
    Babrow, A. S., & Mattson, M. (2011). Building health communication theories in the 21st Century. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), The routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 18-35). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    Bernhardt, J. M., & Cameron, K. A. (2003). Accessing, understanding, and applying health communication: The challenge of health literacy. In T. L. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), (2003). Handbook of health communication. (pp. 583-605). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (N. Richard, Trans.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)
    Buckingham, D. (1991). Teaching about the media. In D. Lusted (Ed.), The media studies book: A guide for teachers (pp. 12-35). London, UK: Routledge.
    Buckingham, D. (2000a). The making of citizens: Young people, news, and politics. London, UK: Routledge.
    Buckingham, D. (2000b). After the death of childhood: growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A. L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., & Tyrer, P. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal,321, 694-696.
    Center for Media Studies, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. (2000, April). Setting research directions for media literacy and health education. Retrieved from http://www.mediastudies.rutgers.edu/mh_conference.
    Cohen, D. (1988). Advertising. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
    Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London, UK: Routledge.
    Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.
    Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Facer, K., Sutherland, R., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2001). What`s the point of using computers? The development of young people`s computer expertise in the home. New Media and Society, 3, 199-219.
    Frechette, J. D. (2002). Developing media literacy in cyberspace: Pedagogy and critical learning for the twenty-first century classroom. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1968)
    Freire, P., & Freire, A. A. (1996). Pedagogy of hope: reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. (R. Barr, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1994)
    Gadamer, H. (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics. (D. E. Linge, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1967)
    Garnham, N. (1979). Contribution to a political economy of mass communication. Media, Culture and Society, 1, 123-146.
    Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic.
    Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Giddens, A. (1990). Sociology: A brief but critical introduction. London, UK: Macmillan.
    Gilpin, A. (1977). Dictionary of economic terms. London, UK: Butterworths.
    Gostin, L., & Mann, J. M. (1994). Towards the development of a human rights impact assessment for the formulation and evaluation of public health policies. Health and Human Rights: An International Quarterly Journal, 1, 58-80.
    Green, J., & Britten, N. (1998). Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal, 316, 1230-1232.
    Griffin, E. (2011). A first look at communication theory (8th Ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
    Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128-138). London, UK: Hutchinson.
    Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968)
    Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1976)
    Habermas, J. (2003). The future of the human nature. (W. Rehg, H. Beister & M. Pensky, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 2001)
    Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York, NY: Pantheon.
    Hofrichter, R. (Ed.). (2003). Health and social justice: Polities, ideology, and inequity in the distribution of disease. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Hofstetter, F. T. (2001). Internet literacy (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
    Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. (D. C. Evanston, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1954)
    Hutzel, K. (2007). Reconstructing a community, reclaiming a playground: a participatory action research study. Studies in Art Education, 48(3), 299-316.
    Jenicek, M. (2003). Fundamentals of evidence-based medicine. New York, NY: Parthenon.
    Kellner, D. (2002). New media and new literacies: reconstructing education for the new millennium. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 90-104). London, UK: Sage.
    Kilbbourne, J. (1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Kremenitzer, J. P., & Myler, T. (2006). Collaboration between teacher educator and kindergarten teacher: a 4-year action research study to improve our own professional practices. Childhood Education, 82(3), 165-171.
    Kreps, G. L., Bonaguro, E. W., & Query, J. L. (1998).The history and development of the field of health communication. In L. D. Jackson & B. K. Duffy (Eds.), Health communication research: A guide to developments and directions (pp.1-6). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.
    Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Ang, S. H., Leong, S.M., & Tan, C. T. (2009). Marketing management: An Asian perspective (5th ed.). Singapore, Singapore: Prentice Hall.
    Kubey, R. W. (Ed.). (1997). Media literacy in the information age: Current perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    Leary, V. A. (1994). The right to health in international human rights law. Health and Human Rights: An International Quarterly Journal, 1, 24-56.
    Lin, C. (2008, July). The imagination of “Media Access” in media literacy education: From some teaching action researches in Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. London, UK: Sage.
    Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7, 3-14.
    Mann, J. M., Gostin, L., Gruskin, S., Brennan, T., Lassarini, Z., & Fineberg, H. (1994). Health and human rights. Health and Human Rights: An International Quarterly Journal, 1, 6-23.
    Marx, K. (1976). Capital: a critique of political economy. (B. Fowkes, Trans.) London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1867)
    Masterman, L. (1985). Teaching the media. London, UK: Routledge.
    McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail`s mass communication theory (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
    Meehan, E. R. (1984). Ratings and the institutional approach: A third answer to the commodity question. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(2), 216-225.
    Menon, A. M., Deshpande, A.D., Zinkhan, G.M., & Perri III, M. (2004). A model assessing the effectiveness of Direct-To-Consumer advertising: integration of concepts and measures from marketing and healthcare. International Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 91-118.
    Miller, K. E., & Waller, D. S. (2004). Attitudes towards DTC advertising in Australia: an exploratory study. International Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 389-404.
    Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B.F. (2005). Clinical research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 605-639). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Moriarty, S., Mitchell, N., & Wells, W. D. (2012). Advertising & IMC principles and practices (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    Mosco, V. (1996). The political economy of communication: rethinking and renewal. London, UK: Sage.
    Murdock, G. (1989). Critical inquiry and audience activity. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O`Keef & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking Communication (Vol. 2, pp. 226-249). London, UK: Sage.
    Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A. M., & Kindig, D. A. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Palmer, R.E. (1969). Hermeneutics: interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Postman, N. (1982). The disappearance of childhood. New York, NY: Delacorte.
    Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York, NY: Penguin.
    Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Knopf.
    Potter, W. J. (1998). Media literacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Prochaska, J.O., & DiClements, C.C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinic Psychology, 51, 390-395.
    Ribak, R. (2001). Like immigrants: negotiating power in the face of the home computer. New Media and Society, 3, 220-238.
    Rice, R. (2002). Primary issues in internet use: access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L. L. Lievrouw (Ed.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 105-129). London, UK: Sage.
    Roth, M. (2003). Media and message effects on DTC prescription drug print advertising awareness. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 180-192.
    Schiller, H. (1984). Information and the crisis economy. Norwood, NI: Ablex.
    Semali, L., &. Pailliotet, A. (Eds.). (1999). Intermediality: The teachers` handbook of critical media literacy. Boulder, CO: Westview/Harper Collins.
    Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London, UK: Routledge.
    Silverblatt, A., Ferry, J., & Finan, B. (1999). Approaches to media literacy: A handbook. New York, NY: Sharpe.
    Share, J., Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2005). Five key questions that can change the world: Classroom activities in media literacy. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Media Literacy.
    Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3), 1-27.
    Smythe, D. W. (1978). Rejoinder to Graham Murdock. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(2), 120-127.
    Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2005). Media literacy education: Lessons from the center for media literacy. In G. Schwartz & P. U. Brown (Eds.), Media literacy: Transforming curriculum and teaching, (Vol. 104, pp. 180-205). Malden, MA: National Society for the Study of Education.
    Vos, P., Ceukelaire, W., Malaise, G., Pérez, D., Lefèvre, P., & Stuyft, P. (2009). Health through people’s empowerment: A rights-based approach to participation. Health and Human Rights: An International Quarterly Journal, 11(1), 23-35.
    Weilbacher, W. M. (1979). Advertising. London, UK: Macmillan.
    Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    93451505
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0934515051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    505101.pdf2790KbAdobe PDF22535View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback