English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51746617      Online Users : 594
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54142


    Title: 華語焦點變調
    Mandarin Focal Tone Sandhi
    Authors: 石書豪
    Shih, Shu-hao
    Contributors: 蕭宇超
    Yuchau E. Hsiao
    石書豪
    Shih, Shu-hao
    Keywords: 焦點
    變調
    優選理論
    韻律制約
    聲調制約
    focus
    tone sandhi
    Optimality Theory
    prosodic constraint
    tonal constraint
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 10:08:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在探討華語焦點變調,並以青年語者為主。本文分別檢驗三種不同的句型,第一類為焦點助動詞和焦點副詞,第二類為平坦結構,第三類則是其它類型的句子。在優選理論的架構下,本文分別提出韻律制約和聲調制約來詮釋華語的焦點變調。筆者透過並存音韻理論(Cophonology Theory)來說明焦點韻律結構的劃分是多個次語法的運作結果。焦點韻律結構的劃分有兩種,主要由(ALIGN-L(F, FP), ALIGN-L(FP, Ft))和(ALIGN-R(F, FP), ALIGN-R(FP, Ft))這兩組可移動的對整制約來決定,當它們在制約排序中移動到不同的位置時會形成不同的韻律結構劃分。本研究發現焦點詞組等同於語調詞組,因此提出另一個對整制約ALIGN-E(FP, IP)來解釋。排序最高的韻律制約則是[FTMIN & NON-FINALITY],目的在於避免單音節音步出現在句末。至於聲調制約,筆者採用IDENT-BOT來處理三音節音步的變調結果。此外,焦點韻律結構的劃分會造成兩個相鄰的上聲出現在不同的音步之中,OCP-L(ft)可以確保此形式的保留。簡言之,本文藉由優選理論的觀點,以及韻律制約和聲調制約的互動,對華語焦點變調提出了一個整體分析。
    This thesis examines Mandarin focal tone sandhi among Taiwan youngsters. Three types of sentences are under investigation: Type A includes the focused auxiliary verbs and adverbs in a simple sentence, Type B the flat structure, and Type C the other types of structures. Under the framework of Optimality Theory, this thesis proposes prosodic constraints and tonal constraints to account for Mandarin focal tone sandhi. This thesis adopts Cophonology Theory to explain the subgrammars of focal phrasings. There are two types of focal phrasing patterns governed by the reranking of two sets of alignment constraints (ALIGN-L(F, FP), ALIGN-L(FP, Ft)) and (ALIGN-R(F, FP), ALIGN-R(FP, Ft)). The focal phrase pertains to a special kind of intonational phrase. This thesis proposes ALIGN-E(FP, IP) to explain this condition. The undominated constraint, [FTMIN & NON-FINALITY], is proposed to ban a monosyllabic foot in sentence-final positions. IDENT-BOT is adopted to deal with the tri-tonal strings such as (σ(σσ)) and ((σσ)σ) in non-focal and focal readings. In addition, focal phrasing may force adjacent L tones to appear in different feet. OCP-L(ft) is proposed to explain this situation. To conclude, based on the constraint-based theory, and the interaction of prosodic constraints and tonal constraints, this thesis has provided a theoretical generalization of Mandarin focal tone sandhi.
    Reference: Anttila, A. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Frans
    Hinskens, Roeland Van Hout & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.),
    Variation, Change, and Phonological Theory, 35-68.
    Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Bauer, L. 1978. The Grammar of Nominal Compounding. With
    Particular Reference to Danish, English and French,
    Odense, Odense University Press.
    Benua, L. 1997. Transderivational Identity: Phonological
    Relations Between Words. Ph. D. Dissertation, University
    of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    Broselow, E. 1982. On the interaction of stress and
    epenthesis. Glossa 16, 115-132.
    Cheng, C.-C. 1973. A quantitive study of Chinese tones.
    Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1: 93-110.
    Chen, Matthew Y. 1984. Abstract symmetry in Chinese verse.
    Linguistic Inquiry 15.1: 167-170.
    Chen, Matthew Y. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi.
    Phonology Yearbook 4:109-149.
    Chen, Matthew Y. 1996. Tone Sandhi. San Diego: University of
    California.
    Cho, Y.-M. Y. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. The
    Phonology-syntax Connection, eds. by Sharon Inkelas and Draga Zec, 47-62. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Chomsky, N. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure, and
    semantic interpretation. In D. D. Steinberg and L. A.
    Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader
    in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, 183-216.
    Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Condoravdi, C. 1990. Sandhi rules of Greek and prosodic
    theory. The Phonology-syntax Connection, eds. by Sharon
    Inkelas and Draga Zec, 63-84. Chicago: The University of
    Chicago Press.
    de Lacy, P. 2002a. The Formal Expression of Markedness. Ph.
    D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    de Lacy, P. 2002b. Markedness conflation in Optimality
    Theory. Phonology 19. 1–32.
    DiSciullo, A.-M. and E. Williams. 1987. On the Definition of
    Word, Cambridge, MIT Press.
    Duanmu, S. 2012. Word-length preferences in Chinese: a
    corpus study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21.1: 89-
    114.
    Green, T. 1993. The conspiracy of completeness. Paper
    presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1.
    Hayes, B. 1985. Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules.
    In M. Niepokuj et. al., eds., Proceedings of the
    Thirteenth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,
    Berkeley, CA.
    Hayes, B. 1987. A revised parametric metrical theory. In J.
    McDonough and B. Plunkett, eds., Proceedings of NELS 17,
    Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of
    Massachusetts, Amherst.
    Hayes, B. 1994. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case
    Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Hsiao, Y.-C. 1991. Syntax, Rhythm and Tone: A Triangular
    Relationship. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.
    Hsiao, Y.-C. 1995. Southern Min Tone Sandhi and Theories of
    Prosodic Phonology. Taipei: Student Book Co.
    Hsiao, Y.-C. 2006. An Optimality Theory approach to tone
    sandhi in Dapu Hakka. NSC Report No. 94-2411-H-004-032.
    Hung, T. 1987. Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Chinese
    Tone Sandhi. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California
    at San Diego.
    Inkelas, S. 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Ph.
    D. Dissertation, Standard University.
    Inkelas, S. and C. Zoll. 2007. Is grammar dependence real? A
    comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint
    approaches to morphonologically conditioned phonology.
    Linguistics 45(1). 133-171.
    Ito, J., Y. Kitagawa, and A. Mester. 1996. Prosodic
    faithfulness and correspondence: evidence from a Japanese
    argot. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5: 217-294.
    Jackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in
    Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Kager, R. 1989. A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing
    in English and Dutch, Foris, Dordrecht.
    Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. New York: Cambridge
    University Press.
    Kaisse, E. M. 1985. Connected Speech: the Interaction of
    Syntax and Phonology. Orlando FL: Academic Press.
    Kanerva, J. M. 1990. Focusing on phonological phrases in
    Chichewa. The Phonology-syntax Connection, eds. by Sharon
    Inkelas and Draga Zec, 145-161. Chicago: The University of
    Chicago Press.
    Li, K.-N. 2009. The Information Structure of Mandarin
    Chinese: Sntax and Posody. Ph. D. Dissertation, Seattle:
    University of Washington.
    Lin, H.-S. 2000. An Optimality Theoretic Approach to Tone
    Sandhi in Mandarin, in Taiwanese, and in Mandarin-
    Taiwanese Code-Mixing. M.A. Thesis. National Chengchi
    University.
    Lin, H.-S. 2005. Prosodic correspondence in tone sandhi. UST
    Working Papers In Linguistics. 1: 229-265.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1986. Prosodic Morphology, ms.,
    Univ. of Massachusetts and Brandeis Univ.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1990. Foot and word in prosodic
    morphology: the Arabic broken plurals, Natural Language
    and Linguistic Theory 8, 209-282.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1991a. Prosodic minimality.
    Lecture presented at University of Illinois Conference
    The Organization of Phonology.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1991b. Linguistics 240: Prosodic
    Morphology, lectures and handouts from 1991 LSA Linguistic
    Institute Course, University of California, Santa Cruz.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In
    G. Booij and J. Van Marle (eds.). Yearbook of Morphology.
    79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and
    reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts
    Occasional Papers in Linguistics UMOP 18, eds. by Jill Bechman et al,. 249-384. Amherst Mass.: Graduate Linguistic
    Student Association.
    McCarthy, J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory
    to Data. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Mchugh. B. D. 1986. Cyclicity in phrasal phonology: evidence
    from Chaga. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on
    Formal Linguistics, Vol. 5, 154-164. Stanford Linguistic
    Association.
    Nagahara, H. 1994. Phonological Phrasing in Japanese
    Prosody. Ph. D. Dissertation, UCLA.
    Nelson, N. 2003. Asymmetric Anchoring. Ph. D. Dissertation,
    Rutgers University,New Brunswick.
    Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1982. Prosodic domains of external
    sandhi rules. In Hulst, H. van der & Smith,N. (eds), The
    Structure of Phonological Representations (Part I).
    Dordrecht: Foris.
    Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology.
    Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
    Odden, D. 1987. Kimatuumbi phrase phonology. Phonology
    Yearbook 4: 13-36.
    Orgun, C. O. 1996. Sign-based Morphology and Phonology: With
    Special Attention to Optimality Theory. Ph. D.
    Dissertation, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    Prince, A. 1980. A metrical theory for Estonian quantity.
    Linguistic Inquiry 11, 511-562.
    Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory:
    Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar.
    Oxford: Blackwell.
    Pulleyblank, D. 1986. Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht:
    Reidel.
    Pulleyblank, D. 2004. A note on tonal markedness in Yoruba.
    Phonology 21:3, 1-20.
    Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between
    Sound and Structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Selkirk, E. 1986. On derived domain in sentence phonology.
    Phonology Yearbook 3: 371-405
    Shih, C.-L. 1986. The Prosodic Domain of Tone Sandhi in
    Chinese, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California,
    San Diego.
    Shih, C.-L. 1990. Mandarin Third Tone Sandhi and Prosodic
    Structure. Ms, Cornell University and Rutgers University.
    Siegel, L. 1974, Topics in English Morphology, Ph. D.
    Dissertation, Cambridge, MIT.
    Smolensky, P. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological
    activity. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop
    1.
    Wee, L.-H. 2010. A percolative account for Tianjin tone
    sandhi. Language and Linguistics. vol. 11.1.21-64.
    Williams, E. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and
    ‘head of a word’, Linguistic Inquiry, 12: 2, 245-274.
    Yin, Y.-M. 1991. Some Major Issues in Mandarin Tonal
    Phonology. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
    Zhang, Z.-S. 1988. Tone and Tone Sandhi in Chinese, Ph. D.
    Dissertation, Ohio State University.
    蕭宇超,2000,〈台灣閩南語之優選變調〉,《漢語研究》,十八卷特輯,頁
    25-40。
    蕭宇超,2010,〈從語料庫觀點探討古詩節律〉,《華語文教學研究》,第七卷
    第一期,頁1-25。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    98555004
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098555004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    500401.pdf1630KbAdobe PDF21185View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback