政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54114
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51789435      線上人數 : 511
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54114


    題名: 科技創新與韓國公司營運成效間之關聯
    Correlation between technological innovation and performance of Korean firms
    作者: 玉昌訓
    Ok, Chang Hoon
    貢獻者: 吳文傑
    Jack Wu
    玉昌訓
    Ok, Chang Hoon
    關鍵詞: 韓國公司
    科技創新
    Korean Firms
    Technological Innovation
    日期: 2011
    上傳時間: 2012-10-24 16:34:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Globalization provides all business players with equal threats as well as equal opportunities at the same time. Information can be obtained with low cost through wire, wireless technology, learning by themselves and partnership of strategic alliance. High technology and special know-how may take more time to be built than buy. Now the global market is open and flat. Competition which normally erodes profit of firms is taken for granted and can’t be avoided. Joseph A. Schumpeter believed that entrepreneurs would do “creative destruction” to avoid from stationary state of economy and to seek new profit opportunities, and he considered the concept of innovation to be new products, new method of productions, new markets and environment which can change rules of the game of business players. Many Korean firms have jumped into international competitive markets to expand their presences to pursue both profit and growth. Creating competitive advantages by low cost or differentiation of strategy and products in the competitive business environment are very important factors. Innovation is one of the competitive advantages. Innovation may be categorized into three parts; technology, manufacturing process, strategy and marketing. Here in the thesis, I take technology as vehicle of comparison, and use the number of granted patents as the degree of technological innovation. This thesis will make comparison among the firms which have more number of patents and less number of patents to see if technological innovation contributes better financial performances. Patents are used as barrier against new entrants and defending vehicle in the time of patents conflict with market competitors. This thesis will analyze and verify whether the more a firm is innovative in technology, the better financial performance it may enjoy in the severe competitive environment.
    參考文獻: 【 1】Alfred Kleinknecht, Kees Van Montfort, Eric Brouwer. 2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economy, Innovation and New technology. volume 11(2) p109 – p121
    【 2】Arther A.Thompson, A.J.Strickland III, John E. Gamble. 2008. 16th edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition. Crafting & Executing Strategy, Tailoring strategy to fit specific industry and company situations.ppt file
    【 3】Bodie, Zane: Alex Kane, Alan J. Marcus. 2004. 5th edition of McGraw-Hill Irwin. Essential of Investment. p458-460
    【 4】Christian Helmers. 2009. Patents, Spillovers and Firm Performance. Evidence from UK Start-Ups.
    【 5】Economy Research Center of Korea Development Bank. Corporate Finance Analysis
    http://rd.kdb.co.kr/jsp/st/ststa0201.jsp
    【 6】Edward M. Bergman, David Charles, Pim Den Hertog. 2001. Drivers of national innovation systems, Innovative Cluster. OECD report.
    【 7】Financial Supervisory Service of Korea. Electronic Publication system. Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer. www.dart.fss.or.kr.
    【 8】Financial Supervisory Service of Korea. Financial Statistics Information System
    www.fisis.fss.or.kr
    【10】Finn Robert Lewell. 2009. The Role of Intellectual Rights, Innovation and Competition Law in European Software Industry. If there is no promise of monopoly, would there be any incentives to innovate ?
    【11】Hans Loof and Almas Heshmati. 2002. On the relationship between innovation and performance . A sensitive analysis.
    【12】Holger Ernst. 1998. J. Engineering & Technology management vol. 15. Patents portfolios for strategic R&D planning. p279 – p308
    【13】Hwang, Inseong. 2006. 2007. 2008. CEO information. Review of Koran Economy
    【14】John Cantwell. 2000. Innovation, Profit and Growth : Schumpeter and Penrose.
    【15】John Hagedoorn. 1996. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Shumpter Revisited p4-p12
    【16】John Hagedoorn, Myriam Cloodt. 2002. Measuring Innovative Performance. Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators. Research Policy p1365 – p1379
    【17】Korea Industry Statistics and Analysis System. www.istans.or.kr
    【18】Korean Intellectual Property Office. 2009. Statistics of Patents Registrations.
    By year and by comparison of domestic and foreign organization /individuals
    【19】Korea Investor’s Network for Disclosure, 2010.
    【20】Korea National Science and Technology Service. http://sts.ntis.go.kr
    【21】Luuk Klomp and George Van Leeuwen. 1999. The importance of innovation for company performance. Netherlands Official Statictics. Volume 14.
    【22】Matthew A. Zook. 1997. Technological Innovation and Theories of Regional Development. Inside field statement
    【23】Nicholas Bloom and John Van Reenan. 2002. The Economic Journal. Royal Economic Society. Patents, real options and firm performance. p97-p116
    【24】Patent trend of Korea. 2007, 2008 and 2009.
    【25】Peter Neuhausler, Rainer Frietsch, Torben Schubert, Knut Blind. Fraunhofer. 2011. Patents and the financial performance of firms Innovation systems and policy analysis. ICI discussion paper No 28
    【26】Reinier Wintels. 2011. External Acquired Innovation and the Drivers for Firm Performance. An exploratory research into the drivers on firm performance when firm acquire an external innovation in the construction industry.
    【27】R.G.M. Kemp, M.Forkeringa, J.P.J. De Jong, E.F.M. Wubben, Joetemeer. 2003. Innovation and Firm Performance. Scientific Analysis of Enterpreneurship and SMEs.
    【28】Robert A. Burgelman, Modesto A. Maidique, Steven C. Wheelwright. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 2nd edition. p2 – p9, p152 – p159
    【29】Wesley M. Cohen. 2002. FTC/DOJ Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property
    Law in Knowledge-based Economy. Patents, their effectiveness and rols p10-p20
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
    94933027
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094933027
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    302701.pdf1009KbAdobe PDF2811檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋