English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51768849      Online Users : 498
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54114


    Title: 科技創新與韓國公司營運成效間之關聯
    Correlation between technological innovation and performance of Korean firms
    Authors: 玉昌訓
    Ok, Chang Hoon
    Contributors: 吳文傑
    Jack Wu
    玉昌訓
    Ok, Chang Hoon
    Keywords: 韓國公司
    科技創新
    Korean Firms
    Technological Innovation
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-24 16:34:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Globalization provides all business players with equal threats as well as equal opportunities at the same time. Information can be obtained with low cost through wire, wireless technology, learning by themselves and partnership of strategic alliance. High technology and special know-how may take more time to be built than buy. Now the global market is open and flat. Competition which normally erodes profit of firms is taken for granted and can’t be avoided. Joseph A. Schumpeter believed that entrepreneurs would do “creative destruction” to avoid from stationary state of economy and to seek new profit opportunities, and he considered the concept of innovation to be new products, new method of productions, new markets and environment which can change rules of the game of business players. Many Korean firms have jumped into international competitive markets to expand their presences to pursue both profit and growth. Creating competitive advantages by low cost or differentiation of strategy and products in the competitive business environment are very important factors. Innovation is one of the competitive advantages. Innovation may be categorized into three parts; technology, manufacturing process, strategy and marketing. Here in the thesis, I take technology as vehicle of comparison, and use the number of granted patents as the degree of technological innovation. This thesis will make comparison among the firms which have more number of patents and less number of patents to see if technological innovation contributes better financial performances. Patents are used as barrier against new entrants and defending vehicle in the time of patents conflict with market competitors. This thesis will analyze and verify whether the more a firm is innovative in technology, the better financial performance it may enjoy in the severe competitive environment.
    Reference: 【 1】Alfred Kleinknecht, Kees Van Montfort, Eric Brouwer. 2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economy, Innovation and New technology. volume 11(2) p109 – p121
    【 2】Arther A.Thompson, A.J.Strickland III, John E. Gamble. 2008. 16th edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition. Crafting & Executing Strategy, Tailoring strategy to fit specific industry and company situations.ppt file
    【 3】Bodie, Zane: Alex Kane, Alan J. Marcus. 2004. 5th edition of McGraw-Hill Irwin. Essential of Investment. p458-460
    【 4】Christian Helmers. 2009. Patents, Spillovers and Firm Performance. Evidence from UK Start-Ups.
    【 5】Economy Research Center of Korea Development Bank. Corporate Finance Analysis
    http://rd.kdb.co.kr/jsp/st/ststa0201.jsp
    【 6】Edward M. Bergman, David Charles, Pim Den Hertog. 2001. Drivers of national innovation systems, Innovative Cluster. OECD report.
    【 7】Financial Supervisory Service of Korea. Electronic Publication system. Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer. www.dart.fss.or.kr.
    【 8】Financial Supervisory Service of Korea. Financial Statistics Information System
    www.fisis.fss.or.kr
    【10】Finn Robert Lewell. 2009. The Role of Intellectual Rights, Innovation and Competition Law in European Software Industry. If there is no promise of monopoly, would there be any incentives to innovate ?
    【11】Hans Loof and Almas Heshmati. 2002. On the relationship between innovation and performance . A sensitive analysis.
    【12】Holger Ernst. 1998. J. Engineering & Technology management vol. 15. Patents portfolios for strategic R&D planning. p279 – p308
    【13】Hwang, Inseong. 2006. 2007. 2008. CEO information. Review of Koran Economy
    【14】John Cantwell. 2000. Innovation, Profit and Growth : Schumpeter and Penrose.
    【15】John Hagedoorn. 1996. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Shumpter Revisited p4-p12
    【16】John Hagedoorn, Myriam Cloodt. 2002. Measuring Innovative Performance. Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators. Research Policy p1365 – p1379
    【17】Korea Industry Statistics and Analysis System. www.istans.or.kr
    【18】Korean Intellectual Property Office. 2009. Statistics of Patents Registrations.
    By year and by comparison of domestic and foreign organization /individuals
    【19】Korea Investor’s Network for Disclosure, 2010.
    【20】Korea National Science and Technology Service. http://sts.ntis.go.kr
    【21】Luuk Klomp and George Van Leeuwen. 1999. The importance of innovation for company performance. Netherlands Official Statictics. Volume 14.
    【22】Matthew A. Zook. 1997. Technological Innovation and Theories of Regional Development. Inside field statement
    【23】Nicholas Bloom and John Van Reenan. 2002. The Economic Journal. Royal Economic Society. Patents, real options and firm performance. p97-p116
    【24】Patent trend of Korea. 2007, 2008 and 2009.
    【25】Peter Neuhausler, Rainer Frietsch, Torben Schubert, Knut Blind. Fraunhofer. 2011. Patents and the financial performance of firms Innovation systems and policy analysis. ICI discussion paper No 28
    【26】Reinier Wintels. 2011. External Acquired Innovation and the Drivers for Firm Performance. An exploratory research into the drivers on firm performance when firm acquire an external innovation in the construction industry.
    【27】R.G.M. Kemp, M.Forkeringa, J.P.J. De Jong, E.F.M. Wubben, Joetemeer. 2003. Innovation and Firm Performance. Scientific Analysis of Enterpreneurship and SMEs.
    【28】Robert A. Burgelman, Modesto A. Maidique, Steven C. Wheelwright. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 2nd edition. p2 – p9, p152 – p159
    【29】Wesley M. Cohen. 2002. FTC/DOJ Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property
    Law in Knowledge-based Economy. Patents, their effectiveness and rols p10-p20
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
    94933027
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094933027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    302701.pdf1009KbAdobe PDF2811View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback