政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/52502

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/52502

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51832523 在线人数 : 520

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英國語文學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/52502

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52502

题名:	改變之起始：巴特勒《比喻》系列之希望、烏托邦主義和生存 Seeds of change: hope, utopianism and survival in Butler’s parable series
作者:	禹金韻 Yu, Chin Yun
贡献者:	何艾克 Erick Heroux 禹金韻 Yu, Chin Yun
关键词:	奧塔維亞•巴特勒撒種的比喻才幹的比喻希望烏托邦主義生存辯證關係批評式反烏托邦末日小說 Octavia Butler Parable of the Sower Parable of the Talents hope utopianism survival dialectical critical dystopia postapocalyptic fiction
日期:	2011
上传时间:	2012-04-12 13:47:10 (UTC+8)
摘要:	奧塔維亞•巴特勒《撒種的比喻》與《才幹的比喻》描述一個末日的反烏托邦世界。這兩本小說截取當今社會問題，讓我們對可預期的未來有所警惕。它們不僅提升我們對於現在社會問題的意識，同時不斷地注入並維持希望，為社會改變提供不同的解決方案。做為批評式反烏托邦的現代文類，《比喻》系列小說透過融合末日小說文類，論述希望、烏托邦主義與生存之間的辯證關係。《比喻》系列小說藉由地球之種（Earthseed）的信念及其核心思想「改變即是上帝」（“God is Change”）強調生存的重要性，並將生存進一步分為兩個層次：即時生存（immediate survival）及永續生存（lasting survival），而即時生存與永續生存之間亦存在一種辨證關係。本論文目的為探討《比喻》系列小說中的希望、烏托邦主義與生存在《比喻》系列中的互動，及它們之間獨特的辨證關係如何反映當今社會的處境與現代烏托邦文學的趨勢。本論文分為五個章節：第一章將烏托邦定義為以社會改變為目的的思想及文類；第二章闡述烏托邦文學領域的發展，並將《比喻》系列定位為批判式反烏托邦，以建構希望、烏托邦主義與生存之間的辯證關係；第三章與第四章透過《比喻》系列的文本例證研究希望、烏托邦主義與生存之間的辯證關係如何運作，第三章探討《撒種的比喻》與即時生存，而第四章則探討《才幹的比喻》與永續生存；最後，第五章總結《比喻》系列所反映的當今社會局勢，從文本中發現希望、烏托邦主義與生存之間的辯證關係，並藉由這三者之間關係的理解，避免人類文明社會可能面臨的災難。 Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower and Parable of the Talents depict a postapocalyptic dystopian world, extrapolated from the problems of present day society to provide us with a warning of our conceivable future. They raise awareness of current social problems, while maintaining a locus of hope and providing possible alternatives for social change. In the contemporary genre of “critical dystopias,” the Parable series merges together with the genre of postapocalyptic fiction to demonstrate a dialectical relationship between hope, utopianism and survival. The importance of survival is emphasized in the Parables through the belief system of Earthseed and its core idea of “God is Change,” and can be further distinguished into two levels—immediate survival and lasting survival, which also exist in a dialectical relationship with each other. The aim of this thesis is to discuss how the concepts of hope, utopianism and survival interact in the Parables, and what this unique dialectical relationship reflects about contemporary literary utopias and the present. This thesis is divided into five chapters: Chapter One defines utopia through the function of social change; Chapter Two provides a brief overview of the development of the literary utopian genre and establishes the Parables as critical dystopias, a form that enables and constitutes the dialectical relationship of hope, utopianism and survival; Chapter Three and Four contain the textual analysis of how the dialectical relationship between hope, utopianism and survival functions in the Parables, with Chapter Three focusing on Parable of the Sower and immediate survival, and Chapter Four focusing on Parable of the Talents and lasting survival; finally, Chapter Five concludes with how the Parables relate to our present social conditions, and how understanding the dialectical relationship between hope, utopianism and survival may assist humanity’s effort to avert a major crisis.
參考文獻:	Baccolini, Rafaella. “‘A Useful Knowledge of the Present is Rooted in the Past’: Memory and Historical Reconciliation in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Telling.” Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Ed. Rafaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan. New York: Routledge, 2003. 113-134. ---. “Gender and Genre in the Feminist Critical Dystopias of Katherine Burdekin, Margaret Atwood, and Octavia Butler.” Future Females, The Next Generation: New Voices and Velocities in Feminist Science Fiction Criticism. Ed. Marleen S. Barr. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. 13-34. Baccolini, Rafaella and Tom Moylan, ed. Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. New York: Routledge, 2003. Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope. Vol. 1. Trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1986. Butler, Octavia E. Parable of the Sower. 1993. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2000. ---. Parable of the Talents.1998. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2000. Curtis, Claire P. Postapocalyptic Fiction and the Social Contract: “We`ll Not Go Home Again.” Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010. ---. “Rehabilitating Utopia: Feminist Science Fiction and Finding the Ideal.” Contemporary Justice Review 8.2 (June 2005): 147-162. ---. “Theorizing Fear: Octavia Butler and the Realist Utopia.” Utopian Studies 19.3 (2008): 411-31. Davies, Laurence. “At Play in the Fields of Our Ford: Utopian Dystopianism in Atwood, Huxley, and Zamyatin.” Transformations of Utopia: Changing Views of the Perfect Society. Ed. George Slusser, Paul Alkon, Roger Gaillard and Daniele Chatelain. New York: AMS Press, 1999. 205-214. Davis, Mike. “Who Will Build the Ark?” Telepolis. 11 Dec 2008. 13 Jan 2010. <http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/29/29328/1.html> Donawerth, Jane. “The Feminist Dystopia of the 1990s: Record of Failure, Midwife of Hope.” Future Females, The Next Generation: New Voices and Velocities in Feminist Science Fiction Criticism. Ed. Marleen S. Barr. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. 49-66. Dubey, Madhu. “Folk and Urban Communities in African-American Women’s Fiction: Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Studies in American Fiction 27 (Spring 1999): 103-28. Ferns, Chris. Narrating Utopia: Ideology, Genre, Form in Utopian Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1999. Garforth, Lisa. “No Intentions? Utopian Theory After the Future.” Journal for Cultural Research 13.1 (2009). 5-27. Web. 13 Jan. 2012. Gonzalez, Juan and Amy Goodman. “Science Fiction Writer Octavia Butler on Race, Global Warming, and Religion.” Conversations with Octavia Butler. Ed. Consuela Francis. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. 222-225. Hampton, Gregory J. “Migration and Capital of the Body: Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” CLA Journal 49.1 (Sept. 2005): 56-73. Hudson, Wayne. The Marxist Philosophy of Ernst Bloch. London: Macmillian, 1982. Jackson, H. Jerome. “Sci-Fi Tales from Octavia E. Butler.” Conversations with Octavia Butler. Ed. Consuela Francis. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. 43-48. James, Edward. “Utopias and Anti-utopias.” The Cambridge companion to science fiction. Ed. Edward James and Farah Mendlesohn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 219-229. Jameson, Fredric. Marxism and Form. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971. Johns, Adam. “‘The Time Had Come for Us to Be Born’: Octavia Butler’s Darwinian Apocalypse.” Extrapolation 51 (2010): 395-413. Kearny, Richard and Mark Deeley, ed. “Hospitality, Justice and Responsibility: A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida.” Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999. 65-83. Kumar, Krishan. Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. Lacey, Lauren J. “Octavia Butler on Coping with Power in Parable of the Sower, Parable of the Talents, and Fledgling.” Critique 49.4 (Summer 2008): 379-394. Lear, Jonathan. Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2006. Levitas, Ruth. The Concept of Utopia. New York: Philip Alan, 1990. ---. “The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society: Utopia as Method.” Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming. Ed. Tom Moylan and Rafaella Baccolini. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Levitas, Ruth and Lucy Sargisson, ed. “Utopia in Dark Times: Optimism/Pessimism and Utopia/Dystopia.” Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Ed. Rafaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan. New York: Routledge, 2003. 13-27. McCaffery, Larry and Jim McMenamin. “An Interview with Octavia Butler.” Conversations with Octavia Butler. Ed. Consuela Francis. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. 10-26. McHenry, Susan. “Otherworldly Vision.” Essence 29.10 (Feb. 1989): 80. Melzer, Patricia. “‘All That you Touch You Change’: Utopian Desire and the Concept of Change in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower and Parable of the Talents.” FEMSPEC 3.2 (2002): 31-52. Web. 12 Oct 2009. Miller, Gavin. “Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower: The Third World as Topos for a U.S. Utopia.” Science Fiction, Imperialism and the Third World: Essays on Postcolonial Literature and Film. Ed. Ericka Hoagland and Reema Sarwal. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co., 2010. 203-212. Miller, Jim. “Post-Apocalyptic Hoping: Octavia Butler’s Dystopian Utopian Vision.” Science Fiction Studies 25.2 (1998): 336-360. Moylan, Tom. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. New York: Methuen, 1986. ---. “‘Look into the dark’: on Dystopia and the Novum.” Learning from Other Worlds: Estrangement, Cognition, and the Politics of Science Fiction and Utopia. Ed. Patrick Parrinder. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001. 51-71. ---. Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2000. Moylan, Tom and Rafaella Baccolini, ed. Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Outterson, Sarah. “Diversity, Change, Violence: Octavia Butler’s Pedagogical Philosophy.” Utopian Studies 19.3 (2008): 433-456. Philips, Jerry. “The Institution of the Future: Utopia and Catastrophe in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Novel 35.2/3 (Spring/Summer 2002): 299-311. Potts, Stephen W. “‘We keep playing the same record’: A Conversation with Octavia E. Butler.” Science Fiction Studies 23 (Nov. 1996): 331-338. Sargent, Lyman Tower. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited.” Utopian Studies 5.1 (1994): 1-37. ---. “US Eutopias in the 1980s and the 1990s: Self-Fashioning in a World of Multiple Identities.” Utopianism/Literary Utopias and National Cultural Identities: A Comparative Perspective. Ed. Paola Spinozzi. Bologna: COTEPRA, 2001. 221-232. ---. “Utopia—the Problem of Definition.” Extrapolation 16.2 (1975): 137-148. Sargisson, Lucy. Contemporary Feminist Utopianism. New York: Routledge, 1996. Stillman, Peter G. “Dystopian Critiques, Utopian Possibilities, and Human Purposes in Octavia Butler’s Parables.” Utopian Studies 14.1 (2003): 15-35. Wegner, Phillip E. “Horizons, Figures, and Machines: The Dialectic of Utopia in the Work of Fredric Jameson.” Utopian Studies 9.2(1998): 58-74.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學英國語文學研究所 96551005 100
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096551005
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[英國語文學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	489	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈