Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51666
|
| Title: | 公共設施保留地容積移轉市場交易機制之研究
Study on the market transaction mechanism of the transferable development rights of land reservations for public facilities |
| Authors: | 劉厚連 |
| Contributors: | 賴宗裕
劉厚連 |
| Keywords: | 公共設施保留地
容積移轉
市場機制
交易成本
容積銀行
land reservations for public facilities
transferable development rights
market mechanism
transaction costs
TDR bank |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-13 13:57:11 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 公共設施保留地容積移轉在於藉由市場交易機制，使公共設施保留地地主在等待政府徵收之前，得透過容積出售給開發業者獲致價金補償之機會，並免除政府直接辦理徵收之財政壓力。容積移轉制度基本精神是以市場效率解決土地分區使用之公平問題，然現行制度下，不同地區之公共設施保留地移出容積可得價金懸殊缺乏公平性，且容積交易集中於特定地區，造成當地生活環境品質之惡化。故本研究在制度建立之政策層面，尋求達到「受損補償，受益付費」公平原則，使容積購買者付出合理的價金購買公共設施保留地地主持有容積並透過制度設計控管容積移轉對生活環境品質衝擊之問題。在容積交易市場層面，則透過市場機制設計，塑造有助於市場形成與價格維繫之環境及降低容積買賣雙方之交易成本，以促進市場交易之效率並實現前述對地主之公平為目標。
本研究首先從市場供需之角度，分析容積供需失衡，對公共設施保留地容積移轉市場中容積價格之影響，並檢視影響TDR方案成功之市場運作因素與供需條件。其次，就買賣雙方交易盈餘分配進行探討，運用賽局理論中那許均衡之概念，分析討價還價之均衡解，以闡明信息不對稱下，如何解決地主在容積交易中議價資訊不足之問題，提高容積移轉價格，增進該制度在保障公共設施保留地地主財產權之貢獻。第三，引用中間層理論探討TDR銀行在解決交易成本問題之優勢，並闡明非營利性質因減少中介費用支出，增加交易雙方之交易剩餘，較能使TDR方案成功。第四，藉由前述理論之探討，本研究研擬改善現行公共設施保留地容積移轉的市場機制之相關議題，透過學者專家問卷及權利關係人的問卷調查之設計，汲取市場機制改善之建議。
本研究認為我國容積移轉市場存在容積總量超出環境容受力、市場所能提供之交易資訊不足、容積價格落差過大、中介者所提供的服務仍待加強及交易成本偏高等問題，需透過政府介入加以解決。因此，提出以容積銀行為容積移轉政策執行核心之市場交易機制，由各直轄市、縣市政府成立一個非營利性質的容積銀行，作為容積移轉交易平台，並成立專款專用之容積銀行運作基金，作為政策性購買容積取得所需公共設施保留地之用，賦予容積銀行資訊提供、中介媒合、價格引導、確保交易等功能，降低容積移轉交易成本，創造有利之交易環境，確保公共設施保留地地主，能以合理價格出售變現、政府財政可以負荷及都市居住環境品質得到掌控與維護的政策目標。根據研究結果提出建立公共設施保留容積移轉政策之決策與實踐機制及以容積銀行交易平台為主之交易市場機制等制度建議，作為政府未來改善公共設施容積移轉制度之參考。
The transferable development rights (TDR) of land reservations for public facilities are a unique transferring method of development rights in Taiwan. This system allows the owners of land reservations for public facilities to sell the land, through market transaction mechanism and before the acquisition by the government, to developers through TDR in order to earn land transferring compensation. This system can also reduce the financial burden on the government on land acquisition. However, TDR has been questioned for deteriorating the urban living environment due to overdevelopment, and the transaction mechanism may reduce the market function and efficiency due to high transaction costs. Therefore, this study aims to design a market mechanism that can control the impact of TDR on the living environment, create an environment that is conducive to market formulation and price maintenance, and reduce the transaction costs of sellers and buyers, in order to facilitate the efficiency of market transaction and realize the fairness on the land owners.
This paper first analyzes the imbalance between the TDR supply and demand from the market supply and demand perspective, and examines the effect of TDR of land reservations for public facilities on volume price in the market, as well as the market operational factors and supply/demand conditions that affect the success of TDR plans. Then, it discusses the surplus distribution of buyers and sellers, and applies the concept of Nash Equilibrium in the Game Theory to analyze the equilibrium solution of price bargaining. It aims to expound on how land owners could raise the TDR price under insufficient information due to information asymmetry during the bargaining process, and enhance the contribution of this system on the proprietorship of the land owners on land reservations for public facilities. Third, this paper applies the intermediation theory to discuss the advantages of TDR banks in solving the problem of transaction costs, and explains the reason that non-profit characteristics are more likely to guarantee the success of TDR plans. Fourth, based on the above discussions, this paper aims to improve the market mechanism of the TDR of land reservations for public facilities, and conduct questionnaire survey on experts and interest parties in order to collect opinions on the improvement schemes.
Lastly, this paper proposes the market mechanism of using TDR bank as the policy executor of TDR, and establishing a non-profit TDR bank in each city/county by the local government as a transaction platform for TDR transaction. TDR bank operational fund should be established for exclusive use on the policy-oriented purchase of TDR of land reservations for public facilities. Thus, the TDR bank has the functions of providing information, mediating, price guiding, and transaction guaranteeing, in order to reduce the TDR transaction costs, create a favorable transaction environment, ensure the land owners of land reservations for public facilities to sell their lands at reasonable prices, reduce the financial burden of the government, and maintain a fair urban living environment. Suggestions are provided based on the research findings as a reference to the government on improving the TDR system of land reservations for public facilities. |
| Reference: | 一、中文
王明來(1980)，土地發展權移轉制度在農地保護上之應用芻議，「土地改革月刊」，31（7）：19-22。
王春木（2007），「我國公共設施保留地容積移轉市場建立之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
王昱智（2001），「容積移轉制度中關於轉換率之研究—以台北市為例」，中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
王塑峰(2004)，「拍卖理论的基本原理和最新研究成果述评」，吉林大学經濟碩士論文。
王鴻楷(1998)，「修訂台北市綜合發展計畫—三軍總醫院及周邊地區整體規畫」，台北市政府都市發展局。
立法院財經立法促進社（1997），容積移轉空間「以建築容積移轉辦法取得公共設施保留地方案」公聽會，空間雜誌，94：31-42。
成學真、宋妍（2002）,農業中介組織節約交易成本的經濟學分析，「合作經濟（農業經濟2002年7月號）」，頁32-33。
何坪華、沈建中（2000），中介組織節約市場交易成本的理論與案例分析，「農業經濟」，6：16-18。
吳卓夫、韓道昀（2003），「台北縣私有公共設施保留地容積移轉實施之調查研究，海峽兩岸工程管理研討會」，新竹。
呂偉白譯 (1978)，發展移轉制度之評介，「土地改革月刊」，28（7）：16-22。
陳顯測（2001），「容積移轉制度下樓層效應對住宅建築投資報酬率影響之研究—以高雄市個案為例」，高雄第一科技大學營建工程系碩士論文。
彭耀華（1998），發展權移轉機制何故不能取代道路地之征收，「空間雜誌」，108：50-52。
黃舜銘（2004），「大稻埕歷史風貌特定區容積移轉機制之研究」，國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
楊小凱（1998），「經濟學原理」，北京：中國社會科學出版社。
楊重信（1992），以發展權移轉與聯合開發方式取得公共建設用地之探討，，「研考報導」，18：28-43。
楊重信、林瑞益（1994），可轉讓土地發展權市場之效率與公平性，「人文及社會科學集刊」，83（6）：21-62。
廖佳展（2005），現行容積移轉制度下容積移轉估價方法之初探，「土地問題研究季刊」，4（2）：110-119。
劉厚連(1998)，「建築容積移轉制度運用於解決既成道路問題之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
劉厚連(2004)，我國實施古蹟容積移轉制度之問題檢討，「土地問題研究季刊，3（2）：65-74。
劉厚連(2008)，「引進美國發展權移轉銀行交易制度改善我國容積移轉市場之法方向研析」，立法院法制局專題研究報告，編號550。
Friedman, L. (1956), “A Competitive-Bidding Strategy,” Operations Research, 4: 104-112.
劉厚連(2008)，非營利中間層組織在改善我國容積移轉市場之作用--交易成本的觀點，「土地經濟年刊」，19：97-134。
劉厚連(2009)，「都市計畫有關土地限制使用與損失補償問題之探討與修法方向研析」，立法院法制局專題研究報告，編號626。
劉憲祥（2002），「公共設施用地運用容積移轉之財務分析-以都市計畫農業區變更住宅用地為例」，中華大學建築與都市計畫系碩士論文。
蔡佳明(1999)，「以財產權及社群衝擊法分析土地使用管制及其變更」，台灣大學都市與城鄉所碩士論文。
蔡碧雲(1997)，「容積移轉接收區劃設之研究-以公共設施用地為例」，成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
鄭明安（1991）從容積率與發展權理念看不動產物權管理，「人與地」，96：11-19。
賴宗裕、李家儂（2000），現行容積移轉制度與容積可移轉量評估之探討，「土地經濟年刊」，11：1-22。
賴宗裕、胡宏昌（1999），建構容積移轉機制之研究-對都市容積移轉辦法草案之評論，「經社法制論叢」，23：311-327。
薛立言、黃共揚(2000)，公債標售制度探討，「大華債券期刊」，3：3-1。
韓道昀（2004），「就投資觀點探討台北縣私有公共設施保留地容積移轉之研究」，中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文。
Fudenberg, D. & Tirole, J. (1991), “ Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium,” Journal of Economics Theory, 53(2): 236-260.
簡豐源(1979)，運用發展權移轉制度解決公共設施保留地問題之研究，「土地改革月刊」，20（10）：23-24。
藍兆杰、徐偉傑、陳怡君譯，Dixit, A. & Skeath, S.著（2002），「策略的賽局」，台北，弘智文化。
顏愛靜（1979），美國地方政府實施發展權移轉制度所採量化方法之研討，「土地改革月刊」，29（9）：11-15。
邊泰明( 2000)，容積移轉經濟分析，「土地經濟年刊」，11：27-37。
蘇志超（1979），平均地權之理想與發展權移轉觀念之比較，「土地改革月刊」，29（10）：4-6。
蘇志超（1999），建築容積移轉辦法理想與實際之討論，「人與地」，187：18-22。
林毅夫著,劉守英等譯(2000)，關於制度變遷的經濟學理論:誘致性變遷與強制性變遷，財產權利與制度變遷-「產權學派與新制度學派譯文集」，上海人民出版社，第371-418頁。
青木昌彥著(2001)，周黎安譯，「比較制度分析」，上海，遠東出版社。
Alchian, A.A.著，劉守英等譯(2000)，產權:一個經典注釋，財產權利與制度變遷，「產權學派與新制度學派譯文集」，上海人民出版社，第166-178頁。
Cooter, R.,& Ulen, T.(2000)著，施少華等譯(2002)，「法和經濟學」，上海財經大學出版社。
Fudenberg, D. & Tirole, J. (1991), Game Theory, Cambridge MA. Press.
Costonis, J.J.著，張復明譯（1979），「發展權移轉制度」之評介，「土地改革」，27(3):36-43。
Davis,L.E., & North,D.C.著,劉守英等譯(2000)， 制度創新的理論:描述、類推與說明，選自財產權利與制度變遷，「產權學派與新制度學派譯文集」，上海人民出版社，頁295-326。
Dixit, A .& Skeath, S., 藍兆杰、徐偉傑、陳怡君合譯(2002)，「Game of Strategy(策略的賽局)」，弘智文化。
Hennig-Schmidt, H.（2002）李竹渝, 魯萬波，「議價行為博弈中的不確定性：有關最後通牒分散式談判的實驗研究」，商業經濟與管理，4:23-27。
Milgrom , P.著， 杜黎、胡奇英譯(2006)，「拍賣理論與實務」， 清華大学出版社。
North, D.C（1981）著，陳郁等譯（2002），資產市場中的價格、數量與交易成本，「經濟史中的結構與變遷」，上海，上海人民出版社。
Stevens, J,B.著，楊曉維等譯（2003），「集體選擇經濟學」，上海人民出版社。
Tanzi, W.著，孫寬平主編（2004），「體制轉換與政府角色的轉變，轉軌、規則與制度選擇」，北京，社會科學出版社，第326-332頁。
二、英文
Abreu, D. & Gul, F. (2000), “ Bargaining and reputation,” Econometrica , 68: 85-118.
Fulton, W., Mazurek, J., Pruetz, R.& Williamson, C. (2004）, “TDR and Other Market-Based Land Mechanism: How They Work and Their Role in Shaping Metropolitan Growth,” The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
Arrow, K.J. (1969）, “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issue pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocations,” Analysis and Evalution of Public Expenditures .
Barrese, J.T. (1983), “Efficiency and Equity Consideration in the Operation of Transfer of Development Rights Plans,” Landeconomics, 59(2): 235-241.
Benham,A. & Benham, L.（2001）, “The Costs of Exchange, Ronald Coase Institue,” Working Paper Series1: 1-14.
Berry, D. & Steiker, G. (1975), “An Economic Analysis of Transfer of Development Rights,” Regional Science Research Institute.
Bolton, P. & Dewatripont, M.（2005）, Contract Theory, MA: MIT Press.
Bratton.N, Eckert, J. & Fox, N. (2008), “Alternative Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Transaction Mechanisms, Cascade Land Conservancy,” http://www.commerce.wa.gov/DesktopModules/CTEDPublications/CTEDPublicationsView.aspx?tabID=0&ItemID=6223&MId=944&wversion=Staging
Bulow, J. & Roberts, J. (1989), “The Simple Economics of Optimal Auctions,” Journal of Political Economy, 97(5): 1060-90.
Callies, L. D., Freilich, H. R., Roberts , E.T. (1999), Cases and Materials on Land Use, West Group Press.
Carpenter, B.E. & Dennis, R.（1982）, “Spatial-Equilibrium Analysis of Transfer of Development Rights,” Journal of Urban Economics , 12: 238-261
Coase, R.H. (1988), “The Nature of the Firm, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,” Oxford University Press, 4(1): 3-47.
Furubotn, E.G. (1974), The Economic of Property Rights, Ballinger Publishing Company.
Coase, R.H. (1960), “ The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economic, 3: 1-44.
Cohen, R.J. (2002), An Analysis of Social Equity Issues in the Montgomery County (MD) Transfer of Development Rights Program.
Cremer, J. & McLean, R. (1985), “Optimal Selling Strategies under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist when Demands are Interdependent,” Econometric , 53: 345-361.
Crone, T.M. (1983), “Elements of an Economic Justification for Municipal Zoning, ” Journal of Urban Economics, 14: 168-83.
Dahlman, C. (1979), “The Problem of Externality, ” Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (April): 141-162.
Dallessio, and others. (2006) , The Economics of Transferring Development in the New Jersey Highlands, Regional Plan Association and Environmental Defense.
Danner, J.C. (1997), “TDRs－Great Idea but Questionable Value,” The Appraisal Journal, 65(2): 133-142.
Demsetz, H. (1967), “Towords a Theory of Property Rights,” Amercian Economic Review, 57: 347-359.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F.& Shleifer, A. (2002), “The Regulation of Entry Quarterly,” Journal of Economics, 117: 1-37.
Dorfman, J.H., et al. (2005), The Feasibility of a Transferable Development Rights Program for Athens-Clarke County, Georgia.
Furubotn, E.G. & Richter, J. (1997), Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, University of Michigan Press.
Eggertsson, T. (1990), Economic Behavior and Institutions, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Field, B.C. & Conrad, J.M. (1975), “ Economic Issues in Programs of Transferable Development Rights,” Land Economics L1, 4: 331-340.
Fingleton, J.（1997）, “Competition between Intermediated and Dieect Trade and the Timing of Disintermeditation,” Oxford Economic Papers, 49: 543-556.
Fischel, W.A. (1979), “Equity and Efficiency Aspects of Zoning Reform,” Public Policy, 3: 1-31.
Fulton, B., Greve, D. & Weaver, S. (2006), “TDR Study, Santa Barbara Ranch Project,” http://www.sbcountyplanning.org/projects/03DVP-00041/index.cfm
Gehrig, T.（1993）, “Intermediation in Search Markets,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2（1）：97-120.
Hahn, R. (1984), “Market Power and Transfer of Rights,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99:753-765.
Hanly-Forde, Jason et al. (2005), Transfer of Development Rights Programs: Using the Market for Compensation and Preservation, Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell Cooperative Extension, Cornell University.
呂衛青(1980)，「發展權觀念在土地使用計畫可行性之研究」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
Hart, O. (1995), Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford University Press.
Hanly-Forde, J. , Homsy, G., Lieberknecht, & Stont,R. (2002), Transfer of Development Rights Programs-Using the Market for Compensation and Preservation, http://government.cce.cornell.edu.
Henig, J. (1989), “Privatization in the United States: Theory and practice, ” Political Science Quarterly, 104(4): 649-670.
Hurwicz, L. (1993), “Toward a Framework for Analyzing Institutions and Institutional Change,” in Bowles et al.(1993): 51-67.
Johnston, R. A. & Madison, M.E. (1997), “From landmarks to landscapes,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3): 365-379
Karkainen, B. (1994), “Zoning: A Reply to Critics,” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 10(1): 2-46.
Keogh, G. & D’Arcy, E. (1999), “Property Market Efficiency: An Institutional Economics Perspective,” Urban Studies, 36( 13): 2401-2414.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1999), Foundations of behavioral research (4rd.ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Klemperer, P. ( 2004), Auctions: Theory and Practice, Economics Papers 2004-W09, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
Lindblom, C.E. (2001), The Market System--What It Is, How It Works, and What To Make of It, Yale University Press.
宋東鉉(1996)，「容積移轉接收區之實施範圍及移轉量之研究」，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
Machemer, P.L. (1998), Transferable development rights as a growth management technique in landscape management: A case study approach, Michigan University PhD.
Machemer, P.L., Kaplowitz.M & Edens,T.C. (1999), Managing Growth and Addressing Urban Sprawl:The Transfer of Development Rights, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Michigan Station University Research Report.
McConnell, V., Walls, M. & Kelly, N. ( 2007), Markets for Preserving Farmland in Maryland: Making TDR Programs Work Better. Final Report Queenstown, Md.: Maryland Center for Agro-Ecology.
McConnell, V., Kopits, E. & Walls, M. (2003), How Well Can Markets for Development Rights Work? Evaluating a Farmland Preservation Program, Washington: Resources for the Future.
McMillan, J. (2003), “ Market Design: The Policy Uses of Theory, ” American Economic Review, 93(2): 139–144.
Messer, D.K. (2007), “Transferable Development Rights Peograms: An Ecomonic Framework For Success,” Journal of Conservation Planning, (2): 47-56.
Mills, D.E. (1980), “Transfer of Development Rights Markets,” Journal of Urban Economics, 7: 63-74.
Morrow, J.D. (1994), Game Theory for Political Scientists, Princeton University Press.
Mooya, M.M. & Cloete, C. E.（2007）, “Informal Urban Property Markets and. Poverty Alleviation：A Conceptual Framework,” Urban Studies, 44（1）：14 7-165.
Myerson, B.R. (1981), “Optimal Auction Design,” Mathematics of Operations Research, l(6) : 58-73.
李恒光(2002),市場仲介及其功能與作用，「吉林財稅高等專科學校學報」，2：49-54。
Nash, F.J. (1950), ”The Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica , 18: 155–162.
Newburn, D.A. (2002), Spatial Economic Models of Land Use Change and Conservation Targeting Strategies, ProQuest information and Information and Learning Company.
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D.C. (1984), “Government and the Cost of Exchange,” Journal of Law and Economics, 14: 255-264.
North, D.C. (1987), “Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic Growth,” Economic Inquiry, 25: 419-428.
Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Methods, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
O’Hara, M. (1997), Market Microstructure Theory, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
OECD (2001), Implementing Domestic Tradeable Permits: Recent Developments and Future Challenges, OECD Proceedings, PP. 29-66.
Offe, C. (1996), “Designing institutions in East European transitions,” in Robert E. Goodin, ed, The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge University Press.
Pindyck, R S. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998), Microeconomics (Fourth Edition), Prentice Hall press.
李軍林、李天有（2005），討價還價理論及其最近的發展，「經濟理論與經濟管理」，第63-67頁。
Pollakowski, H. O. and Wachter S. M. (1990), “The Effects of Land—Use Constraints on Housing Prices,” Land Economics 66(3): 315-324.
Pruetz, R.AICP, (2003), Beyond Takings and Givings: Saving Natural Areas, Farmland and Historic Landmarks with Transfer of Development Rights and Density Transfer Charges, California: Arje Press.
Roddewing, R.J. & Inghram, A. (1987), “Transferable Development Rights: TDRs and the Real Estate Marketplace,” Planning Advisory Service Report 401, Chicago: American Planning Association.
Rose, J.G. （1975）, The Transfer of Development Rights: A New Technique of Land Use Regulation, Center For Urban Policy Research Rutgers-The State University New Brunswick.
Roth, A.E. (1987), Laboratory experimentation in economics: six points of view, Cambridge University Press.
Rubinstein, A. (1985), “ A bargaining model with incomplete information on time preferences,” Econometrica, 53: 1151-1172.
Rubinstein, A. & Wolinsky, A. (1987）, “Middlemen,” The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 8：581-593.
Samuelson ,W. (1984), “Bargaining under asymmetric information,” Econometrica , 52: 995-1005.
Shaked, A. & Sutton, J. (1984), “Unvoluntary Unemployment as a Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model,” Economic, 52: 1351-64.
Shevchenko, A. (2002）, “Middlemen,” International Economic Review, 45(1): 1-24.
李家儂（2007），容受力應用於都市地區建築容積總量管制之探討，「土地問題研究季刊」，6（3）：82-97。
Small, L.E. & Derr, D.A. (1980), “ Transfer of Development Rights: A Markets Analysis,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1): 130-135
Sobel, J. & Takahashi, I. (1983), “A Multistage Model of Bargaining,” Review of Economic Studies, 50(3): 411-426.
Spulber, D.F.（1999）, Market Microstructure : Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm., Grambidge University Press.
Stevenson (1998), “Banking on TDRs: The Government’s Role As Banker of Transferable Development Rights,” N.Y.U. Law Review, 73: 1329-1376.
Strange, D. & Meyer, J.W. (1993), “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion,” Theory and Society, 22: 487-511.
Taintor, R. (2001), “Transfer of Development Rights,” South County Watersheds Technical Planning Assistance Project, 8-10.
Tavares, A. (2003), Can the Market Be Used to Preserve Land? The Case for Transfer of Development Rights, European Regional Science Association 2003 Congress.
Wallis, J. J. & North, C. D. (1986), “Measuring the transaction sector in the American economy,” 1870-1970, with a Comment by Lance Davis. In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, edited by Stanley L. Engerman and Robert E. Gallman. University of Chicago Press.
Walls, M., McConnell, V. ( 2007) , Transfer of development rights in US communities Evaluating program design implementation and Outcomes, RFF Report.
Watanabe, W.（2004）, “Middlemen: The Visible Market Markers,” Job Market Paper November: 1-30.
李時敏（2002）,交易過程與交易成本，「財經問題研究」，229：22-26。
Williamson, O.E.(1971）, “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations,” The American Economic Review, 61(2): 112-123..
Williamson, O.E.（1985）, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firm, Markets, Relational Contracting., New York Free Press.
Yavas, A. (1994）, “Middlemen in Bilateral Search Markets,” Joural of Labconomics, 12（3）: 406-429.
Young, H. P. (2001), Individual strategy and social structure: an evolutionary theory of institutions, NJ: Princeton University Press.
李鎮光（2000），「以公平補償探討發展權移轉取得公共設施保留地之研究」，政治大學碩士論文。
汪海、張節東、王晶晶（2007），最優拍賣理論及其實踐述評，「經濟問題探索」，10：172-176。
汪濤，張巍（2002），資產市場中的價格、數量與交易成本，「商業研究」，244：132-134。
周一夔（1976），美國發展權移轉體制簡介，「都市與計劃」，2：1-11。
林元興，(1988)，以容積移轉免費解決公共設施保留地的問題，「人與地」，58：50-51。
林莉婷(2001)，「建構容積移轉接收基地選址之研究」，台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文。
林智偉（1996），「以建築容積移轉方式取得公共設施用地之研究」，中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
洪維廷，2001，「台灣地區公共設施保留地制度立法過程及執行之研究: 賽局理論的觀點」，國立政治大學地政學系博士論文。
涂平子（1999），容積移轉與都市品質：紐約市古蹟保存與擴大使用發展權移轉辦法爭議，「城市與設計學報」，7：239-265。
張五常（2003）,定義與度量的困難-交易費用的爭議之三，「IT經理世界」，102：專欄。
張瑞雲（2006），「我國容積移轉法制之研究－兼與日本容積移轉制度之比較」，政治大學地政系碩士論文。
張維迎 (1999)，「賽局理論與信息經濟學」，臺北：茂昌出版。
張聰明(2000)，美加容積移轉制度之探討，「立法院院聞」，28（3）：38-47。
章一華(2000)，市場經濟條件下產權制度的創新過程，「集美大學學報（哲學社會科學版）」，3（4）：11-15。
連淑芬（2001），「新都市計畫地區以容積移轉方式規劃取得公共設施用地之研究」，中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士論文。
陳文申(2000),試論國家在制度創新過程中的基本功能-諾斯悖論的理論邏輯解析，「北京大學學報(哲學社會科學學報)」，197：35-44。
陳立夫(2004)，我國之容積移轉制度，「月旦法學教室」，第17期，頁42-43。
陳明燦（1999），論土地之使用限制與損失補償：兼論我國既成道路與公共設施保留地相關問題，中興法學。45：313-377。
陳敏文（2004），都市計畫土地容積率移轉問題之研究，「現代地政、人與地」，277：53-57。 |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
902575021
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902575021 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| http___thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw_cgi-bin_gs32_gsweb9.pdf | | 3838Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1905 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
