政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51534
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114105/145137 (79%)
Visitors : 52145862      Online Users : 658
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51534


    Title: 漢語言談中的兒童拒絕策略
    Children`s refusal strategy in mandarin discourse: a case study
    Authors: 吳妃容
    Wu, Fei Rong
    Contributors: 黃瓊之
    Huang, Chiung Chih
    吳妃容
    Wu, Fei Rong
    Keywords: 拒絕
    語言習得
    兒童
    refusal
    language acquisition
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2011-10-11 16:46:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇論文目的在探討兒童在親子對話中行使拒絕行為的表現,研究問題如下: 1. 兒童採用哪些拒絕策略來達到拒絕的目的?2.從這些拒絕策略中,可以反映出哪些語用發展?研究的語料來自於一名以漢語為母語的小男生與他母親之間的日常對話,共擷取三個時間點的語料作為分析語用發展所用。分析結果顯示,隨著年紀越大,受試兒童在拒絕策略的數量上以及委婉度上都有明顯增加。此外,我們也發現到,隨著年紀增長,受試兒童漸漸的能跳脫自己觀點,而從別人角度出發來做拒絕回應。此外,母親行使請求的方式也影響了受試兒童的拒絕表現,當母親的請求較強勢時,受試孩童會傾向用較有技巧的方式來回應。此外,母親行使請求行為的方式也會根據受試兒童的年紀不同而有所差異。
    This study aims to investigate the children’s refusal performance from a developmental perspective and how the mother’s requests affect children’s refusal strategies. We analyzed a Mandarin-speaking child’s natural conversation with his mother. The data were collected from three time points, that is 2; 7, 3; 1 and 3; 7. The refusal strategies adopted in the present study are mainly based on Wang (2001)’s categorization. After the careful examination, it is observed that the refusal strategies increased with the age. The child decreased his reliance on the most direct way to refuse. In addition, the data also showed the child’s growing ability to take his interlocutor’s perspective into account, which is consistent with previous studies about children’s pragmatic development. The child also applied his knowledge of a sincere request when making refusals.
    As for the effect of the mother’s request, it is observed that the force of the mother’s request could be perceived by the child and influenced the way the child refused. When the mother’s requests were imposed, the child would apply more skill strategies to respond. Also, the child would combine refusal strategies to respond when facing more complicated request.
    Reference: Atkinson, M. (1979) Prerequisites for reference. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developemental pragmatics (pp. 229-249). Academic Press, New York.
    Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    Bates, E (1976). Language and Context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    Bates, E. & Silvern, L. (1977). Social adjustment and politeness in preschoolers. Journal of communication 37 (2) pp. 104-111.
    Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., &Uliss, W. R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Anderson & D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative in a second language. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper. Eds. 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Boggs, Stephen T. 1978. The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society 7, 325-344.
    Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Chen, X., Ye, L., & Zhang, Y. (1995). Refusing in Chinese. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (Technical Report #5, pp. 119-163). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    Dunn, Judy. 1996. Arguing with siblings, friends and mothers: developments in relationships and understanding. Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, ed. by D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, and J. Guo, 191-204. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Eisenberg, Ann R., and Catherine Garvey. 1981. Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4, 149-70.
    Emihovich, C. 1986, Argument as status assertion: Contextual variation in children’s disputes. Language in Society, 15, 485-500.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25-66.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1982). Ask and it should be given you: Children’s request. In H. Byrnes (Ed), Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics. (pp. 235-245). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
    Foster, Susan H. (1999). The communicative competence of young children. Pearson Education: New York
    Garvey, C. (1974). Requests and responses in children’s speech. Journal of child language, 2, 41-63.
    Genishi, C. & Di Paolo, M. (1982). Learning through argument in a preschool. In L. Cherry Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 49-68). New york: Academic Press.
    Guidetti, Michele (2000). Pragmatic study of agreement and refusal messages in young French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 569-582.
    Guo, Yu-Feng. 2001. A Case Study on South-Min Pragmatic Characteristics and Development of a 2-year-old Child. M.A. Thesis, National Hsin-Chu Teachers College.
    Hymes, D. (1971). On communicative competence. Unervisity of Pennsylvania Press: Pennsyvania.
    Kasper, Gabriele and Dahl, M. 1990. Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics: Politeness. Pp. 193-218.
    Keenan, E. O. (1974). Conversational competence in children. Journal of child language 1 (2): 163-185.
    Kucxynski, L., Kochanska, G.., Radke-Yarrow, M., & Girnius-Brown, O. (1987). A developemental interpretation of young children’s non-compliance. Developmental Psychology, 23, 799-806.
    Kuczynski, L. & Kochanska, G. (1990). Development of children’s non-comliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology.
    Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness: or, minding your p’s and q’s. In C. Corum et al. Eds. Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the ChicagoLinguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society. Pp. 292-305.
    Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.
    Liao, C. C. 1994. A Study on the Sstrategies, Maxims, and Development of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Crane.
    Liao C. C. & Bresnahan M. I. 1996. A contrastive pragmatic study on American English and Mandarin refusal strategies. Language Science (18). 703-727.
    MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd Edition. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Reeder, Susan C. 1989. How Children of Different Ages Refuse to Comply with Requests. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida.
    Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press
    Searle, John R. 1975. Indirect speech acts In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. Eds. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 59-82.
    Wang, Ai-Hua (2001). The investigation of verbal refusal behaviors in English and Mandarin. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly) 3: 178-185.
    Wood, L. A. & Kroger, R. O., (1994). The analysis of face work in discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13. 248-277.
    Yang, Li-Chin. 2003. A Study of Young Children’s Production and Perception of
    Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. M.A. Thesis, Providence University.
    Yang, Tsun-Ching. 2004. A Study of Refusals to Requests of Taiwanese Elementary
    School Children. M.A. Thesis, Providence University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    95555010
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    501002.pdf263KbAdobe PDF2914View/Open
    501003.pdf228KbAdobe PDF2765View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback