政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51414

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/51414

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51414

Title:	工會與企業勞資關係之研究─夥伴關係建構及發展 Study on the industrial relationship between trade union and enterprise: partnership construction and development
Authors:	楊立裕
Contributors:	顏良恭 Yen, Liang Kung 楊立裕
Keywords:	國營企業勞資關係工會夥伴關係生命共同體 state-owned enterprises industrial relationship trade union partnership the life together
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2011-10-05 14:53:30 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	國營企業政策性因素虧損，造成企業經營、勞工生計、和工會生存遭遇困境。為了解決困境，工會和企業在勞資關係當中必須透過新的互動發展夥伴關係。本研究旨在探討夥伴關係在工會與企業勞資關係當中建構和發展的過程。研究發現，夥伴關係存在的要素是：工作權的保障，自主的工會和勞工參與制度。歸納分析夥伴關係的四種模式是：悲觀，相互收益，相互制約，生命共同體等模式。顧及企業經營、勞工生計、和工會生存，可持續發展的夥伴關係並的是「生命共同體」模式。 Policy-related factors cause the financial loss of state-owned enterprises, and resulting in the business management, the worker livelihoods, and the trade union survival had run into dilemma. In order to solve the predicament, the trade union and the state-owned enterprise in the industrial relationship is needed to develop a new interactive partnership. This study was to explore the partnership in the industrial relationship between the trade union and the state-owned enterprise with the process of construction and development. This study has found that the existence elements of the partnership are: the right to work safeguard, independent trade union, and worker participation. And the four modes of partnership are: the Pessimistic, the Mutual Gains, the Mutual Restraint, and the Life Together. Taking into account the business management, the worker livelihoods, and the trade union survival, the partnership for sustainable development is the " Life Together" mode.
Reference:	一、中文部分王惠玲﹙譯﹚﹙2007﹚。Gustav著。奧地利社會夥伴關係（Social Partnership in Austria）。載於財團法人台灣國際勞雇組織基金會，廿一世紀社會夥伴關係國際展望（頁49-99）。台北市：翰蘆。王振寰、方孝鼎（1992）。國家機器、勞工政策與勞工運動。臺灣社會研究，No.13，1992/11，頁1- 29。石油勞工（2003）。專訪孫勞工董事志偉。第355期，2011年2月1日查詢自http://www.tpwu.org.tw/periodical/355/1301.htm。江大樹（2005）。生命共同體的永續發展：『台灣健康社區六星計畫』政策評析。論文發表於中國政治學會主辦「2005年中國政治學會年會暨學術研討會」，2005年10月1日、2日台北，未出版。成之約、辛炳隆、張玉燕、潘世偉、王方（2003）。勞動政策與勞工行政。台北：空大。成之約（2004）。集體協商與勞資關係。報告發表於行政院勞工委員會主辦「集體協商人才培訓班」，2004年9月6日高雄、2004年9月13日台中、2004年9月20日彰化，未出版。成之約（2005）。「民主化」及其對我國集體勞資關係法制發展的意涵。國政研究報告，2011年2月1日查詢自http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/094/SS-R-094-013.htm 成之約、潘世偉（2005）。勞動法制調整的政策選擇。國政研究報告，2011年2月1日查詢自http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/094/SS-R-094-006.htm。成台生（2000）。工會之研究─以美國、日本與中華民國為例。高雄：復文。林振裕（2010）。勞工參與與勞資關係。臺灣勞工季刊，第22期，頁100- 107。林綺雲（2002）。制度學派的理論反思：台灣教育組織的變革經驗。載於行政院國家科學委員會87-89年度「社會學門專題輔助研究成果發表會論文集」（頁465-482），台北市。周育仁（1993）。政治與經濟之關係：台灣經驗與其理論意涵。台北：五南。侯武勇（2005）。國營公司勞資關係研究—以漢翔公司為例。人文暨社會科學學刊，第1卷，第1期，頁41- 75。姚欣進（2004）。馬克思主義政治經濟學與世界資本主義。台北：巨流。張樹榮（2001）。工時革命。台北：台灣石油工會。郭明政﹙2007﹚。社會安全與社會伙伴。載於財團法人台灣國際勞雇組織基金會，廿一世紀社會夥伴關係國際展望（頁101-116）。台北市：翰蘆。郭承天（2000）。新制度論與政治經濟學。載於何思因、吳玉山，邁入廿一世紀的政治學（頁171-201），台北：中國政治學會。陳正良（2002）。全球化趨勢與勞工政策。國家政策論壇，第2卷第2期，頁105-114。陳永昇（1998）。我國工會聯合組織之研究。國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文，未出版。陳美智、楊開雲（2000）。組織真是「理性」的嗎﹖一個組織社會學的新制度論觀點。東海社會科學學報，第20期，頁27-59。陳嫈郁、楊侃儒（2008）。全球治理與國家機關職能：第二波韋伯國家主義觀點。論文發表於國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系主辦「府際關係與地方治理」學術研討會，2008年10月25-26日，南投，未出版。彭百崇（2007）。社會夥伴參與政策形成之機制建立與運作方式之研究─兼論國外經驗及啟示。行政院勞工委員會委託研究報告（CLA-96-A03）。台北市：中國文化大學勞工關係學系暨研究所。楊世雄﹙譯﹚﹙2007﹚。Birk著。廿一世紀社會夥伴關係國際展望（Perspective of The Social Partnership in The 21th Century in The European Union）。載於財團法人台灣國際勞雇組織基金會，廿一世紀社會夥伴關係國際展望（頁35-47）。台北市：翰蘆。楊志誠（2011）。兩岸關係和平發展的契機─兩岸互信機制的建構。研習論壇，第122期，頁23-40。黃政傑（2004）。質性教育評鑑之探討。國立教育資料館教育資料集刊，第29輯，頁95-118。黃越欽（2006）。勞動法新論，修訂三版。台北市：翰蘆。黃耀滄（2008）。我國推動社會對話機制之現況。石油勞工，第383期。2011年2月1日查詢自http://www.tpwu.org.tw/periodical/383/1502.htm。趙碧華、朱美珍（合譯）（2000）。Research Method for Social Work, Rubin, Allen & Babbie, Earl (Eds), 研究方法─社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用，台北：雙葉書廊。潘世偉、成之約、林佳和（2003）。勞工問題與勞工法。台北：華視。潘若琳、顏良恭、吳德美（2009）。全球治理對台灣基因改造食品管制政策制定的影響。行政暨政策學報，第48期，頁1-62。潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，頁115-143。衛民、許繼峰（2005）。勞資關係與爭議問題，二版。台北：空大。顏良恭、吳德美（2005）。The State, Global Economy and Domestic Politics: Explaining Canada’s Decision to Join Free Trade Agreements。東吳政治學報，第21期，頁115-157 。戴曉惠（2009）。衝突與合作：企業內工會與資方的互動本質。台灣勞動評論，1（1），頁67-88。蕭武桐（2009）。企業倫理：理論與實務。台北：普林斯頓。二、英文部分 Bach, Stephen (2005). Managing Human Resources: Personnel Management in Transition. 4th ed. MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Badigannavar, Vidu (2009). “Does Labor-Management Partnership Deliver Mutual Gains? Evidence from UK Public Services”, in Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations (Vol. 16), Lewin, David & Kaufman, Bruce E.(eds), pp. 75-108. Bingley, UK.: Emerald. Charlwood, Andy & Terry, Mike (2007). 21st-Century Models of Employee Representation: Structures, Processes and Outcomes, Industrial Relations Journal 38(4): 320–337. Creswell, John W.(2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. CA: Sage Publications. Danford, Andy ; Richardson, Mike ; Stewart, Paul ; Tailby, Stephanie ; Upchurch, Martin (2004). High Performance Work Systems and Workplace Partnership: A Case study of Aerospace Workers, New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(1): 14-29. Denzin, N. K.& Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.),.(2nd ed.), pp. 1-33, CA: Sage. Gall G. (2004). Trade Union Recognition in Britain 1995-2002: Turning A Corner? Industrial Relations Journal, 35(3): 249-270. Geary, J. & Trif, A. (2010) Workplace Partnership and The Balance of Advantage: A Critical Case Analysis, British Journal of Industrial Relations, no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2010.00827.x , 2011/2/1 read from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2010.00827.x/pdf Gittell, Jody Hoffer ; Nordenflycht, Andrew von ; and Kochan, Thomas A. (2004). Mutual Gains or Zero Sum? Labor Relations and Firm Performance in the Airline Industry, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 57(2): 163-180. Godard, John (2004). A Critical Assessment of The High-Performance Paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2): 349–378. Golafshani, Nahid (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, The Qualitative Report, 8(4): 597-607. Gollan, Paul J. & Patmore, Glenn (2003). Partnership at Work: The Challenge of Employee Democracy. London, UK: Pluto Press. Guest, David E & Peccei, Riccardo (2001). Partnership at Work: Mutuality and The Balance of Advantage, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2): 207-236. Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca & Hyman, Richard (2006). Embedded Collectivism? Workplace Representation in France and Germany, Industrial Relations Journal, 37(5): 473–491. Horn, Murray J.(1995). The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector: NY: Cambridge University Press. ILO (2003). Governance, Social Partnership and Globalization: A Preliminary Review of Issues, Working Party on the Social Dimension of Globalization, GB286-WP-SDG-3-2003-02-0075-1-EN.Doc. 2011/2/1 read from: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb286/pdf/sdg-3.pdf Jensen, Michael C. (2010). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and The Corporate Objective Function, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1): 32-42. Johnstone, Stewart ; Ackers, Peter ; Wilkinson, Adrian (2010). Better than Nothing? Is Non-union Partnership a Contradiction in Terms? The Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2): 151-168. Johnstone, Stewart ; Ackers, Peter ; Wilkinson, Adrian (2009). The British partnership Phenomenon: A Ten Year Review, Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3): 260–279. Lansbury, Russell D. (2000). Workplace Change and Employment Relations Reform in Australia: Prospects for a New Social Partnership, An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(1): 29-44. Lorenz, Edward H. (1992 ). Trust and the Flexible Firm: International Comparisons, British Journal of Industrial Relations: A Journal of conomy and Society, 3(1): 455–472. Martin, Douglas (2010)The Removal of Workplace Partnership in The UK Civil Service: A Trade Union Perspective, Industrial Relations Journal, 41(3): 218–232. Martinez Lucio, M & Stuart, M (2002). Assessing The Principles of Partnership: Workplace Trade Union Representatives Attitudes and Experiences, Employee Relations, 24(3): 305-320. Martinez Lucio, M., Stuart, M. (2004). Swimming Against The Tide: Social Partnership, Mutual Gains and The Revival of `Tired` HRM, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(2): 410-424. Martinez-Lucio M. & Stuart. M. (2002). Assessing Partnership: The Prospects for, and Challenges of, Modernisation, Employee Relations, 24(3): 252-261. Mason, Chris ; Kirkbride, James ; Bryde, David (2007). From Stakeholders to Institutions: The Changing Face of Social Enterprise Governance Theory, Management Decision, 45(2): 284–301. Mathis, Robert L. & Jackson, John H.( 2007). Human Resource Management (12th ed.). Eagan, MN : Thomson/South-Western. O`Donoghue, T. A., & Punch, K. (2003). Qualitative Educational Research in Action : Doing and Reflecting. London: Routledge Falmer. Oxenbridge, S. & Brown, W.(2005), Achieving A New Equilibrium?The Stability of Cooperative Employer–Union Relationships, Industrial Relations Journal, 35(5): 388–402. Patton, M. Q.(2001). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (3rd ed.). CA: Sage. Ramsay, H.; Scholarios, D.; Harley, B. (2000), Employees and High-performance Work Systems: Testing Inside the Black Box, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4): 501–531. Roche, William K. (2009). Who Gains From Workplace Partnership? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1): 1–33. Shenton, Andrew K. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects, Education for Information, 22 (63): 63–75. Sappington, David E.M. & Sidak, J. Gregory (2003). Competition Law for State-Owned Enterprises, Antitrust Law Journal, 71(2): 479-523. Sinkovics, Rudolf R.; Penz, Elfriede,; Ghauri, Pervez N. (2008). Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business, Management International Review, 48(6): 689-714. Tailby, S & Winchester, D (2000). “Management and Trade Unions: Toward Social Partnership”, in Personnel management: A comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice , Bach, S & Sisson, K (eds.), pp 365-388. Blackwell.: Oxford. Trade Union Congress (TUC) (1999) Partners for Progress: Next Steps for the New Unionism. London, UK: TUC. U.S. Department of State (2011). Labor and Corporate Social Responsibility. 2011/2/1 read from: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/lbr/ Van Buren III, Harry J. & Greenwood, Michelle (2011). Bringing Stakeholder Theory to Industrial Relations, Employee Relations, 33(1): 5-21 Yates, Jacquelyn (2006). Unions and Employee Ownership: A Road to Economic Democracy? Industrial Relations, 45(4): 709-733. Zambarloukou, Stella (2010). Ownership, Corporate Governance and Industrial Relations in The Banking and Telecommunications Sectors: The Case of Greece, Industrial Relations Journal, 41(3): 233–248.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 98921057 99
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098921057
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
105701.pdf	954Kb	Adobe PDF2	1767	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...