English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51729556      Online Users : 664
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50984


    Title: 德國統一後高等教育改革之研究
    Higher education reform after reunification in Germany
    Authors: 江世琳
    Chiang, Shih Lin
    Contributors: 張台麟
    Chang, Tai Lin
    江世琳
    Chiang, Shih Lin
    Keywords: 德國統一
    高等教育改革
    大學理念
    波隆那進程
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-09-29 18:21:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 高等教育改革在20世紀後不斷推陳出新且成為國家發展的重要項目之一,世界先進國家無不投入大量的經費和研究在發展高等教育上。從德國高等教育國際化的發展來看,市場的要求成了改變高等教育的主要推動力,而各個高等學校國際化的程度也成了大眾選校和評估職業發展的標準。研究發現,德國在統一以後不但高等學校增加,大學生人數也提高,其改革的真正動機就是國際化,目的是為了維持高等教育在歐洲乃至於全球的競爭力。德國統一以後最大的高教改革特色是引入學士碩士兩階段學制以和國際接軌,同時更積極在各校推行績效責任制度和評鑑以提升教學品質和落實辦學成效,最後更藉由擴大學校的自主管理為發展學校特色的手段,用來達到競爭的目的。德國的做法其實並不異於其他國家,而波隆那進程在促進歐洲高等教育區的發展更適時地給予了德國聯邦政府這麼做的理由。德國聯邦政府為了保障其高等教育在歐洲框架下的「地位」,必須將自己放入歐洲高等教育區的系統中,讓德國高等教育的體制與歐洲其他國家的標準相互連接起來。德國聯邦政府認為歐洲高等教育區在未來會是全球化的一個縮影,而德國各邦高等學校願意妥協也是因為意識到唯有將自己放入一個競爭的系統中學校才會更具吸引力。
    Reform of higher education continued to emerge in the late 20th century and has become one of the most important developments for a country. Advanced countries around the world have invested a lot of their time in funding, researching and developing their higher educational programs. From an international point of view, the requirements of the workplace are driving the changes in higher educational programs. Indeed, the degree of internationalization in colleges and universities can also affect how a school will be judged by students wanting to develop their professional skills. This study indicates that both the number of higher educational institution and also the number of student enrollments in Germany have been increasing since Reunification. The motivation of the reform is to internationalize the higher educational system with the purpose of maintaining the competitive potential of German students. Germany has opened up access to a new bachelor-master-system in order to more readily connect students to international programs. The new evaluation and accreditation processes have been instituted in order to raise the teaching quality and to ensure the effectiveness of schools. Germany`s approach is not different from other countries. The Bologna Process, which is a guideline for the European Higher Education Area, gave the German Federal Government a reason timely to modernize its higher education system. If the German Federal Government had not addressed the accords, Germany would have lost its stature and fall behind European trends and development within the European Higher Education Area. The German Federal Government is aware that the European Higher Education Area will be a small microcosm of globalization in the future, and local German colleges and universities have also realized that they can be attractive only when they put themselves into a competitive international system.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文資料
    一、專書
    大英百科全書Britannica encyclopedia, 2004. 線上繁體中文版。台北市 : 智慧藏學習科技。
    吳清山、林天祐,2003。《教育小辭書》。台北:五南。
    吳清山、林天祐,2005。《教育新辭書》。台北:高等教育文化。
    呂亞力,2002。《政治學方法論》。台北:三民。
    杜意風,1983。《雅斯培論教育》。台北:聯經出版社。
    沈清松,2004。《大學理念與外推精神》。台北:五南。
    林生傳,2003。《教育研究法》。台北:心理出版社。
    邵連鴻,2001。《北大之父蔡元培》,台北:正展。
    EU, 1998/5/25. Sorbonne Joint Declaration, Paris, Sorbonne.
    EU, 1999/6/19. The Bologna Declaration of 19.6.1999.
    EU, 2001/5/19. Praque Communiqué. “Towards the European Higher Education Area”, Praque.
    EU, 2007/5/18. London Communiqué. “Towards the European Higher Education Area: responding to challenges in a globalised world”.
    張明貴,1998。《政策分析》。台北:五南。
    Germany, 1949/5/23. “Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland”.
    Germany, 1999/1/19. Framework Act for Higher Education (Hochschulrahmengesetz), Section 1, Scope, p3.
    HRG, 2002/8/8. in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 19. Januar 1999 (BGBI.I S. 18), zuletzt geändert durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 8. August 2002 (BGBI I S. 3138). Hochschulrahmengesetz
    HRK, 2004/2/10. ECTS als System zur Anrechnung , Übertragung und Akkumulierung von Studienleistungen, Entschließung des 98. Senats vom 10. February 2004. Hochschulrektorenkonferenz.
    HRK, 2008/10. “Statistische Daten zur Einführung von Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen Wintersemester 2008/2009, Statistiken zur Hochschulpolitik 3/2008”, Hochschulrektorkonferenz, p. 5.
    許媛翔、許芷維,2008/3。〈波隆那歷程與德國高教認可系統-德國席根大學校長Dr. Ralf Schnell演講〉,《評建雙月刊》,第12期,台北,頁55-57。
    HRK, 2010/4. “Statistische Daten zur Einführung von Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen Sommersemester 2010, Statistiken zur Hochschulpolitik 1/2010”, Hochschulrektorkonferenz , p. 5.
    KMK, 2010/2/4. ” Ländergemeinsame Strukturvorgaben gemäß § 9 Abs. 2 HRG für die Akkreditierung von Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen vom 10.10.2003 in der Fassung vom 04.02.2010.” Kultusministerkonferenz.
    OECD, Programme International Student Assessment (PISA).
    UNESCO, 1995. Policy Paper for Change and Development in Higher Education, Geneva: UENSCO, pp. 27-28.
    六、報紙
    梁尚勇等,1985。《高等教育研究》。高雄:復文。
    Mayer, Karl Ulrich, 2004/11/12. “Schatten auf der Elite- Amerikas Spitzenunis haben Schwäche, die Deutschland nicht kopieren sollte”. Der Tagesspiegel on line. (每日明鏡)<http://www.tagesspiegel.de/weltspiegel/gesundheit/schatten-auf-der-elite/562066.html>
    七、網路資料
    About OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development),《OECD官方網 》<http://www.oecd.org/pages/0,3417,en_36734052_36761791_1_1_1_1_1,00.html >
    DAAD, Study and Resarch in Germany.《德國學術交流中心官方網》
    湯紹成,1996/2。〈德國統一五年後的得失〉,《美歐月刊》,第11卷第2期,台北,頁58-72。
    <http://www.daad.de/deutschland/index.en.html >
    European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System, ECTS. (European Commission/ Education & Training)《歐委會官方網/教育訓練》
    <http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc48_en.htm >
    Guba, Melanie, 2004. Profilbildung von Hochschulen. Out of Dahlem, Nr. 3.
    <http://www.astafu.de/inhalte/artikel/a_2004/profilbildung/ >
    History of the University Vienna《維也納大學官方網》
    郭為藩,2004。《轉變中的大學-傳統、議題與前景》。台北:高等教育。
    <http://www.univie.ac.at/universitaet/geschichte/>
    History of Homboldt-Universität zu Berlin.《洪堡大學官方網》
    <http://www.international.hu-berlin.de/an_die_hu-en/wegweiser/01>
    湯堯,2008/12。〈世界主要國家高等教育體制改革分析與省思〉,《研習資訊》,第25卷第6期,台北。
    The European Union (EU), Bologna process: setting up the European Higher Education Area.《歐盟官方網》,<http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/education_training_youth/lifelong_learning/c11088_en.htm >
    The official Bologna Process website July 2007- June 2010, Participating countries and organisations,《波隆那進程官方網》
    <http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/pcao/ >
    The official Web Site of the Nobel Prize,《諾貝爾獎官方網》
    <http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/>
    The Center for Higher Education Development, CHE.《德國高等教育發展中心官方網》<http://www.che.de/cms/?getObject=304&getLang=en >
    《台灣駐歐盟及兼駐比利時代表處文教資訊網》
    陳舜芬,1993。《高等教育研究論文集》。台北:師大書苑。
    <http://www.taiwanembassy.org/be/ct.asp?xItem=90629&ctNode=3164&mp=101>
    彭滂沱,1992。《德國問題與歐洲秩序》。台北:三民。
    楊洲松,2002/1。〈教育哲學研究新議題-全球化理論初探〉,《教育研究月刊》,第93期,台北,頁119-120。
    湯堯,2000。《學校經營管理策略-大學經費分配、莫款與行銷》。台北:五南。
    董保誠,1993。《美、法、日、英、德五國大學運作專題研究總結報告》。台北:教育部委託研究報告書。
    鄭燕祥,2003。《教育領導與改革-新範式》。台北:高等教育。
    戴曉霞,2000。《高等教育的大眾化與市場化》。台北:揚智文化。
    戴曉霞,2006。《世界一流大學之卓越與創新》,台北:高等教育。
    二、專書論文
    李曉康,2002。〈管理主義、市場化與大學評鑑-香港的經驗〉戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦主編,《高等教育市場化台、港、中趨勢之比較》。台北:高等教育。
    林孝信、黃俊傑,2003。〈美國現代大學的理念與實踐-以芝加哥大學為例〉,黃俊傑編,《大學理念與校長遴選》。台北:中華民國通識教育學會出版。
    郭為藩,1983。〈高等教育〉,林清江主編,《比較教育》。台北:五南。
    陳維昭,2005,〈當前我國大學教育的困境及其因應〉,黃俊傑編,《二十一世紀大學教育的新挑戰》。台北:台灣大學出版中心。
    楊深坑,2005。〈全球化衝擊下的教育研究〉,《教育研究集刊》,51 (3),台北,頁17-19。
    曾坤生,2002。〈市場化-知識經濟時代大學發展的必然選擇〉,戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦主編,《高等教育市場化台、港、中趨勢之比較》。台北:高等教育。
    楊瑩,2008。〈歐盟高等教育品質保證制度的建構與推動情形〉,楊瑩主編,《歐盟高等教育品質保證制度》。台北:高等教育文化。
    楊瑩、鍾宜興,2002。〈高等教育功能與類型統合之研究〉,潘慧玲主編,《教育改革的未來》。台北:師大教研中心。
    戴曉霞,2002。〈全球化及國家/市場關係之轉變-高等教育市場之脈絡分析〉,戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦主編,《高等教育市場化─台、港、中趨勢之比較》。台北:高等教育。
    三、期刊
    朱啟華,1999/5。〈德國大學改革動向〉,《教育研究資訊》,7(3),台北,頁55-58。
    朱啟華,2006/8。〈論德國高等教育提升競爭力的意義與啟示〉,《初等教育學刊》,第24期,台北,頁42。
    吳秀玲,1996/1/5。〈兩德統一所面臨的結構性問題與調適現況〉,《經濟前瞻》,台北,頁80。
    侯永琪,2007/9。〈突破大學排名困境的新思維-德國高等教育發展中心學門排名〉,《評鑑雙月刊》,第9期,台北,頁44-45。
    梁福鎮,2007/5。〈德國高等教育人才培育國際化的措施〉,《比較教育》,第62期,台北,頁122-132。
    楊深坑,2005/9。〈全球化衝擊下的教育研究〉,《教育研究集刊》,第51輯第3期,台北,頁12-14。
    梁福鎮,2007/9。〈德國高等教育的改革〉,《教育資料集刊》,第35輯,台北,頁1-20。
    蓋浙生,2004/6。〈台灣高等教育市場化政策導向之檢視〉,《教育研究集刊》,第50輯第2期,台北,頁32。
    蔡培村,2001/11。〈全球化趨勢與成人教育之發展〉,《成人教育》,第64期,台北,頁3。
    四、官方資料
    中華明國教育部,2008。〈德國學制圖〉《教育統計指標之國際比較》,附錄:附4-9。〈http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15858〉
    Schriewer, Jürgen, 2009 Summer. “Rationalized Myths in European Higher Education – The construction and Diffusion of the Bologna Model”, European Education, Vol. 41, No.2, pp. 31-51.
    五、研討會論文
    余曉雯,2006。〈從德國高等教育改革趨勢探討其大學角色的變遷〉,發表於「高等教育國際學術研討會」。台南:成功大學教育所。頁322。
    楊國賜,2006/3/24。〈新世紀高等教育的分類、定位與功能〉,「分類、評比與品質保證」學術研討會。台北:淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心。頁I-1-6/7。
    西文資料
    一、 專書
    Brubacher, John, 1982. On the Philosophy of Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p. 2.
    Cohen, Louis & Lawrence Manion, 1980. Research Methods in Education. London: Croom Helm, p. 32.
    Ellwein, Thomas, 1985. Die deutsche Universität- vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Königstein/Ts.: Athenäum.
    Giddens, A., 1990. The consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 22.
    Henderson, Gregory, Richard Ned Lebow, John G. Stoessinger, 1974. Divided Nations in a Divided World. New York: David Mckay, p. 15.
    Spring, Joel, 2008/6. “Research on on Globalization and Education”. Review of Educational Research. Vol.78. No. 2, p. 330.
    Jaspers, Karl. Die Idee der Universität. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1980, pp.38-58.
    Lenhard, Gero t., 2005. Hochschulen in Deutschland und in den USA. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlag GmbH, p. 224.
    Lingens, Hans G., 1998. German Higher Education: Issues and Challenges,(Indiana: Phidelta Kappa Educational Foundation, p. 31.
    Newman, John H., 1996. The Idea of a Univeristy. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 127-128.
    Random House, 2000. Random House Webster’s College Dictionary. New York: Random House.
    Robertson, Roland, 1992. Globalization: Social theory and global culture, London: Sage.
    Rudy, Wllis, 1984. The Universities of Europe, 1100-1914: a history. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, Inc., pp.50-52.
    Rüegg, Walter, 1992. Universities in the middle age. Ed. Hilde de Ridder-Symoens. New York : Cambridge University Press, p. 5.
    Rüegg, Walter, 2004. Universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (1800-1945). Ed. Walter Rüegg. New York : Cambridge University Press, pp. 5-6.
    Salamun, Kurt, 2006. Karl Jaspers. Würzburg: Verlag Koenigshausen & Neumann GmbH, p. 116.
    Teichler, Ulrich, 2003. “Die Master-Stufe an Hochschulen in Europa – Problem und Chance.” Das Hochschulwesen, Vol. 51, Heft 5, pp. 174-182.
    Teichler, Ulrich, 1988. Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 19-37.
    The World Bank and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Higher Education in Developing Countries- Peril and Promise, New York: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank, 2000, p. 44.
    Water, Malcolm, 1995, Globalization, New York: Routledge.
    Welbers, Ulrich, Olaf Gaus, Bianca Wagner (Mitarbeit), 2005., The Shift from Teaching to Learning. Konstruktionsbedungen eines Ideals. Für Johannes Wildt zum 60. Geburtstag. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
    Helga A. Welsh, 2002. Disentangling the Roform Gridlock: Higher Education in Germany, CES Germany & Europe Working Paper, no. 02.7, 2002. Harvard University, Center for European Studies, Program for the Study of Germany and European Working Papers Series, 2002, pp.1-19.
    White, Paul, 2003. Thomas Hexley: making the” man of science”. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, p. 55 & p. 69.
    二、專書論文
    Hamm, Edda M., 2004. “Heft 9: Die Universitätkonzeption Wilhelm von Humboldts. Zur Aktualität eines Bildungsideals für die Berufsvorbereitung von Studierenden,” Hrg. Dr. Harro Honolka, Schriftenreihe des Instituts Student und Arbeitsmarkt an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. München: Institut Student und Arbeitsmarkt an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
    Heine, Christoph, Julia Willich, Heidrun Schneider, Dieter, 2008 Sommer. “Studenanfänger im Wintersemester 2007/2008. Wege zum Studium, Studien- und Hochschulwahl, Situation bei Studienbeginn.” HIS: Forum Hochschule, Hochschul Informations System GmbH, 2008/16.
    Humboldt, W, 2002. “Antrag auf Errichtung der Universität Berlin,” in A. Flitner und Klaus Giel, Hrsg., Wilhelm von Humboldt. Werke in fünf Bänden. Band 4. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    Tomusk, Voldemar, 2008 Summer. “The Bologna Process and the Enlightenment Project”, European Education, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 9-28.
    Krücken, Georg, 2004. “Wettbewerb als Reformpolitik: De- oder Re-Regulierung des deutschen Hochschulsystems?” in: Beyer, Jürgen/ Stykow, Petra (Hg.) Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Hoffnung. Reformfähigkeit und die Möglichkeit rationaler Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 337-356.
    Roland Robertson, 2000. “Social Theory, Cultural Relativity and the Problem of Globality”. Culture, globalization, and the world-system. Ed. By Anthony D. King. Contemporary Conditions for the Representationof Identity. Regents of the University of Minnesota, p. 76.
    Schiedemair, Hartmut, 2002. “Ist die Universitätsidee von Wilhelm von Humboldt tot?”,in Wolfgang Bergsdorf, ed., Erfurter Universitätsreden. München: Iudicium Verlag GmbH.
    Teichler, Ulrich, 2006. “Coordination measures of study in Europe. Between the Scylla of harmonization and the Charybdis of diversification.” In: Löfgren, Kent (Hg.): ECTS and Assessment in Higher Education. Conference Proceedings: pp. 124-128.
    Teichmann, Wieland. “ABC der Hochschulreform: Überblick über wichtige Begriffe und Akteure.” Hrg. Koordinationsbüro Leistungspunkte Wieland Teichmann. BLK-Verbundprojekt Leistungspunkte Universität Mannheim.
    Winter, Martin, 2009. “Das neue Studieren, Chance, Risiken, Nebenwirkungen der Studienstrukturreform: Zwischenbilianz zum Bologna-Prozess in Deutschland”, HOF-Arbeitsbericht 1/2009 Institut für Hochschulforschung Wittenberg an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg, Wittenberg 2009/91 S, pp. 81-82.
    三、期刊
    Altbach, Philip G. & Jane Knight, 2007/9. ”The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities”, Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 11. pp. 290-292.
    Ash, Mitchell G., 2006. “Bachelor of What, Master of Whom, the Humboldt Myth and Historical Transformations of Higher Education in German-Speaking Europe and the US,” European Journal of Education, Vol 41, No.2, pp. 245-267.
    Calder III, William M., 1998/Summer, “How are American universities german?” Internation Journal of the Classical Tradition, Vol.5, Issue 1, pp.97-103.
    “Uniting German Higher Education”, Change, 1990/Nov/Dec, Vol. 22 Issue 6, pp. 39-45.
    El-Khawas, Elaine, 1990/Nov/Dec. “Uniting German Higher Education Issues Old and New”, Change, Vol 22, Issue 6, pp. 39-45.
    Etzioni, Amitai, "The Epigenesis of Political Communities at the International Level”. The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. LXVIII, No. 4, January 1963, pp. 407-421.
    Göztepe-Çelebi, Ece, Freia Stallmann & Annette Zimmer, 2002. “Looking back: Higher Education Reform in German,” German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse, Vol. 2 Issue 3.
    Interviewed by Kai-Alexander Schlevogt. “Supranational visionary and builder of Euroland: Former German Chancellor Dr. Helmt Kohl on the euro’s significance for Germany and its neighbors”. Academy of Management. Vol. 16, No. 1, Theme: Focusing on the Positive and Avoiding the Negative (February 2002), p. 8.
    Keeling, Ruth , 2006. “The Bologna Process and the Lisbon Research Agenda: the European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse.” European Journal of Education, Vol. 41, 2, pp. 203-223.
    Lernhardt, Gero, Manfred, 2009. “Gebildete Stände oder gebildete Bürger. Hochschulbildung und Elitevorstellungen in Deutschland und in den USA.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Vol. 55, Heft 2, pp. 244-257.
    Müller, Anselm Winfried, 2000. “Die gute Universität als Thema der Ethik”, in Anselm Winfried Müller u. Rainer Hettich (Hrsg.), Die gute Universität. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp.31.-36.
    Perkin, Harold, 2006. “History of Universities”. International Handbook of Higher Education. Vol. 18. 1, pp.159-205.
    Pritchard, Rosalind M.O., 2002. “Was East German Education a Victim of West German Colonisation after Unification?”, Compare, Vol. 32, No. 1, p. 47.
    Reichard, Christoph. 2002. Marketization of Public Services in Germany. International Public Magement Review. Vol.3 Issue 2, 2002, p.63.
    Waterkamp, Dietmar, 2009/2010 Winter. “Education in Germany – Twenty Years After the End of the German Democratic Republic”, European Education, Vol.41, No.4, pp. 8-23.
    Rhoades, Gary, Barbara Sporn, 2002. “Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy”. Higher Education, Vol. 43. No.3, pp. 355-390.
    Welsch, Helga, 2006/6. “When discourse trumps policy: Transitional justice in unified Germany”, Gemran Policies, Vol.15, Issue 2. pp. 137-152.
    Welsh, Helga, 2004. “Higher Education in Germany: reform in incremental steps”, European Journal of Education, Vol.39, No.3. pp. 359-375.
    Yang, Rui, 2002. “University internationalization: Its meanings, rationales and implications,” International Education, Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 81-95.
    四、 研討會論文
    孫本治,2001。《全球化與民族國家-挑戰與回應》。台北:巨流。
    Edel, Karl-Otto, 2006/11/28. “Marksteine des Wandels 1810-2010: Zwei Jahrhunderte Hochschulreform,” paper presented at the Conference with Subject ‘Universitäre Monokultur verordnet, Thesen zur Akademischen Bildung in Deutschland.’ Brandenburg: Fachhochschule Brandenburg. pp.7-8.
    五、官方文件
    BMBF, 2005. “Hochschulrahmengesetz (HRG)”, p. 33.
    BMBF, 2008. “Bundesbericht zur Förderung des Wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses (BuWIN)”, Hochschulrahmengesetz , Bonn Berlin, p. 41.
    BMBF, 2010a. Hochschule (高等教育). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    BMBF, 2010b. Exzellenzinitiative(發展卓越). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    BMBF, 2010c. Förderung(頂尖大學的補助). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    BMBF, 2010d. Hochschulpakt(高等學校協定). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung .
    BMBF, 2010e. Hochschulzulassung(大學入學). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    BMBF, 2010f. Bologna-Prozess (波隆那進程). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    馬信行,1986。《教育社會學》。台北:桂冠出版社。
    BMBF, 2010g. Juniorprofessur(初級教授制). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung .
    BMBF, 2010h. Nachwuchsföderung(後進提攜). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
    BMBF, 2010i. Studiende erwarten Qualität fürs Geld(大學生期待徵收學費能帶來品質). Pressmitteilung 187/2008. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).
    BMBF, 2010j. Internationale Austausch- und Kooperationsprogramme. (國際交換與合作計畫)Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    BMBF, 2010k. Internationalisierung der Hochschulen. (高等教育國際化)Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
    Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2002 Teil 1, Nr. 11. Ausgegeben zu Bonn am 22. Februar 2002.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    歐洲語文學程碩士在職專班(MPES)
    95952005
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095952005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[歐洲語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2977View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback